Call of Duty: World at War Reviewed @ Gameplayer

Gameplayer has gone live with a positive review of Call of Duty: World at War, although it is not all praises. In particular they have concerns about the multiplayer side of the game.

"Now, when we say 'personal touches', you might think we're referring to its visual fidelity and meticulous attention to detail. Sure that's a factor, but we could just be talking about the way the combat requires a more personal touch from you (like shish kabobbing up a storm with your trusty bayonet). You may even think that the term 'personal touches' relates to the way Treyarch has included not only online four player co-op, but some old school split-screen multiplayer action too."

Read Full Story >>
The story is too old to be commented.
solsub3682d ago

Nice score. I really didn't think WaW would've been this generally well-received. Props to Treyarch.

3682d ago
celldomceen13682d ago

its good the multiplayer is nice too not cod4 nice, but good nonetheless its gonna consume alot of my time i think.

FanBoyismShouldDie3682d ago

i bought COD:WAW today thought it was the beezkneez, i've been playing through the singleplayer mode which is super intense and really fun, now i'll tell you why i'm super pissed off right now, because of continuously re spawning enemies... its effing ridiculous, enemies just keep coming at most parts of the game until you move further ahead, which can be troublesome on veteran, also the grenades, enemies throw so many gosh darn grenades its stupid, i've gotten stuck for a half hour at the same part because i keep dying from grenades, they throw sooooo many. but it is a good game.

tehReaper3682d ago

I definitely know what you're talking about. I had to turn the difficulty to hardened because of all of those grenades. In fact, it still didn't really help.

Show all comments (7)