Some gamers are passing up what could be the next spectacular Call of Duty experience simply because of prejudice against Treyarch. Is that prejudice justified, or should gamers give Treyarch and World at War a fair chance?
Huzaifa from eXputer: "2008 was home to the likes of Call of Duty: World at War, Dead Space, GTA 4, Far Cry 2, Left 4 Dead, and many other hits, which is outright remarkable."
A very devoted fan of Call of Duty: World at War racks up incredible in-game stats while playing regularly for the past 15 years.
Of course you will hit a ridiculous stat after 15 of anything.
My main character for Everquest had over 500 days played in the first 6 years of the game. I was young then and had a lot of time on my hands. I don’t think I could duplicate that again until I retire and not sure I could match it if I tried.
Gamespot : Call of Duty: Vanguard launches with 20 multiplayer maps, three of which are actually remakes from 2008's Call of Duty: World at War. Let's take a look at how the maps have changed with this side-by-side comparison.
COD5: WaW is bad. Very bad. Its downgrade from COD2.
Stick to your Gears of Wars 2 and Resistance 2 people!
Before you disagree and spawn crap and flaming like you did. Here is proof I have game: http://i12.photobucket.com/...
lol nr 1 get lost man!
I just now got the game. Hopefully it's fun...
Wow, already arguing and stuff in the comments. =/
Anyway, I've been wanting to try this for a while. Hopefully I can get a copy soon.
I have read 3 reviews so far that all say that World at War is great, so I don't know what the haters are smoking.