Top
230°

Bungie Myths Debunked!

That Gaming Site writes: "Theres been plenty of talk recently about Bungie branching off, being bought out, etc. We here at That Gaming Site were rather embarrassed such facts were spread around the Internet with little to no research to back them up, let's clear things up, shall we?"

Read Full Story >>
thatgamingsite.com
The story is too old to be commented.
Stryfeno22760d ago

There you go...This article explains things perfectly. Gears 2 here I come.

*Logs out*

Zerodin2760d ago

Sorry Droids.
No I'm not.

Ps3Fanboy7772760d ago

The fact that we even hear talk about Halo and what not on Ps3 is VERY interesting.

This whole story has been rathering interesting. Truthfully id take gears over halo if i had a choice. Halo sucks.

Ichiryoka2760d ago

Why does sony need a game like halo when they have killzone 2, R2, Bioshock series which has recently been added, the COD Series which is multi platform as well, SOOO Who needs Bungie??? Ohhh right my fault, microsoft does.

Xelai2760d ago

The sad thing about this is that the original sentences are completely taken out of context from the original interview, when in the interview it talks about who it is possible for Bungie to separate more and more along the road from Halo, the article approved in this site turns it into Bungie and Microsoft.

Pathetic.

Sitdown2760d ago

The games you named are good and all.......but if Sony could get a game that has the same selling power of Halo.....would you want them to turn it down?

Forbidden_Darkness2760d ago

@ article:

1. But for how long will Microsoft keep publishing them and if they keep publishing them forever and drop out of the console war they could still be multiplatform?

2. Yeah, im sure sony was never even thinking of buying them, they have enough first party developers anyways.

3. Of course, Microsoft owns the rights to Halo, no way it would ever let that go.

4. obviously Microsofts not going to state how long the deal is for.

"So their you have it, of course this doesn’t necessarily mean Bungie won’t go multiplatform, their could be something we missed completely. All we can say is until that day, get your facts straight!"

Exactly, they gave no solid proof that Bungie wont go multiplatform at some point and just because Microsoft has a share in them doesnt mean they couldnt mean they wont make a game on another platform, just look at Rare for example, their a first party and still made a DS game.

Odion2760d ago

Rare makes DS games with MS IP's because MS allows them to, it gets the IP out there more, and brings in extra money.

Elven62760d ago

Sadly, their are people out their (even on N4G) who think all of that is plausible.

thebudgetgamer2760d ago (Edited 2760d ago )

isnt this article speculating just as much as the other.
all im saying is i have much respect for the work bungie does and would love to see one of their games at the very least go multi and if not i plan on buying a 360 anyways

:)

Elven62759d ago

Its not speculation, its fact :) They took their sources straight "from the horses mouth" in a sense (aka their press releases)

Sitdown2757d ago

"Sadly, their are people out their (even on N4G) who think all of that is plausible."

I am not trying to be the grammar police, but both usages of "their" you were wrong...you need to use "there"

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2757d ago
Foliage2760d ago

I agree Halo will not be on the PS3, but what is this crappy site?

The guy can't even spell "there". He got it wrong twice.

Here is a quote:
"So their you have it, of course this doesn’t necessarily mean Bungie won’t go multiplatform, their could be something we missed completely. All we can say is until that day, get your facts straight!"

Is this "writer" 14? Get your spelling straight!

steveg25642760d ago

Those were the only ones you found? :-)

Show all comments...
The story is too old to be commented.