1160°

Sony Has Shown How Fast The PS5 Loads Games VS The PS4 Pro

Sony has today shown off a video showcasing how fast the next gen Sony console (expected to be PlayStation 5) loads games versus the PlayStation 4 Pro. When the first PS5 details were released last month, one of the main selling points for the console was how fast it loads games.

affrogamer1801d ago

WOWZERS!! The Beast is on the way!!!

pwnmaster30001801d ago (Edited 1801d ago )

This should be the type of performance all consoles next gen should atleast be at. That was insanely quick loading.

1800d ago
Rude-ro1800d ago

&cigi
I get your point, but it is the pro version vs the next gen.
Not the base console.

Abnor_Mal1800d ago

Can we stop with all this "beast" talk, it was annoying af with the XBox One X fanclub, call it a monster instead.

meep3161800d ago (Edited 1800d ago )

@cigi you say it like you have a clue about the quality of the assets in this game. Even if the render resolution is 1080p the assets could be of very high quality, which most sony games are. I could go on, but I think its better for people to just study how graphics are rendered before they start making comments like this.

fr0sty1800d ago (Edited 1800d ago )

They don't change assets other than textures for 4k in most cases, and the Pro version of Spiderman is running at 2560×1440 upscaled to 3840x2160.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1800d ago
itsmebryan1800d ago

Load times make it a"Beast"? I never heard anyone say they load times are more important than frame rates and resolution. But, I guess things change.

sampsonon1800d ago

@itsmebryan no pop in makes it a beast.

nitus101800d ago (Edited 1800d ago )

@itsmebryan

I will agree that load times do not make a PC/console a beast although they do help significantly.

Yes, framerate and resolution are important especially in games that can make significant use of them, however, most TV's and especially 4K and 8K ones have a refresh rate of 60Hz unless you are willing to pay significantly more for ones with a higher refresh rate. For instance, my Sony 55" HD (ie. up to 1080p) TV has a refresh rate of 200Hz and that makes fast action games comfortable on the eyes even though the frame rate of the game may be 30fps although I will admit that slowdown can be annoying.

It must be noted that it does not matter if your PC/console outputs a game at say 120fps or better if your display has a refresh rate of 60Hz. Sure you may see a marginal difference although that is debatable, however, you can see a significant difference if your displays refresh rate is equal or higher than the framerate of the game. As an example say your game outputs at 120fps and if you wish to have a display that will support that framerate then its refresh rate should be 120Hz or better.

Why do you think many PC gamers choose a 1440p 144Hz or higher monitor?

Mr Logic1800d ago

@nitus10

Virtually everything you just spewed is ignorant and wrong.

meep3161800d ago (Edited 1800d ago )

@Mr Logic he's actually right, where some people get confused is that many tvs have 120hz output but only 60hz input. They take a 60 hz signal and add frames, which gives us the god awful soap opera effect. Some tvs can accept a higher refresh rate signal at 1080p, this all should be common knowledge in the information age.

the last two paragraphs he wrote are a little off, but not that far. Blurbusters has a lot of material you can read up on, including freesync and gsync. The next consoles should have freesync (and tvs are starting to get it too), and im surprised we arent hearing more about it yet. Im pretty sure the xbox one x has some sort of freesync built in already as well.

Mr Logic1800d ago

@meep316

No...You seem to be attributing things to nitus that he never explicitly says and I was never responding to. Let's take things one at a time.

"my Sony 55" HD (ie. up to 1080p) TV has a refresh rate of 200Hz and that makes fast action games comfortable on the eyes even though the frame rate of the game may be 30fps although I will admit that slowdown can be annoying."

Sheer garbage. Your screen can be 60hz, 120hz, or 240hz, but it will never make 30fps content smoother and if it does, then it is doing so at the expense of latency. In addition I am aware that very few TVs do actual 120hz, but a number of Sony TVs actually do.

"It must be noted that it does not matter if your PC/console outputs a game at say 120fps or better if your display has a refresh rate of 60Hz. Sure you may see a marginal difference although that is debatable,"

This is not debatable. Sure exceeding your screen's refresh rate does not make the game more "smooth", but it does serve up the most recent frame at all times resulting in lower latency.

"however, you can see a significant difference if your displays refresh rate is equal or higher than the framerate of the game. As an example say your game outputs at 120fps and if you wish to have a display that will support that framerate then its refresh rate should be 120Hz or better.

Why do you think many PC gamers choose a 1440p 144Hz or higher monitor?"

Several things here. Let's set aside adaptive sync/gsync/freesync for a second, because he never mentioned frame syncing. Under those circumstances you generally don't want your Hz to exceed the game fps because it will result in permanent tearing.

PC gamers choose 144hz only if you plan to at least get close to if not exceed those fps. Nobody is buying a 144hz display with a cheap gpu that only reaches 80fps.

As to everything you said, it is mostly correct. Xbox already supports Freesync on all their models (except maybe the original X1?), but the issue is that most freesync displays up until this point have been monitors, and only accept AS over DP and not HDMI.

Also worth mentioning is that Xbox actually supports 120hz over HDMI via recent firmware upgrade.

meep3161800d ago (Edited 1800d ago )

"PC gamers choose 144hz only if you plan to at least get close to if not exceed those fps. Nobody is buying a 144hz display with a cheap gpu that only reaches 80fps. "

actually many do, especially if its a freesync or gsync monitor. I have an aging 1070 and some new games only run between 50-70 fps at 1440p, but it looks great. Other games run above 100 fps, and at that point its very diminishing returns. Anyway, blurbusters.com is probably the best resource for this sort of thing.

Mr Logic1800d ago

@meep

Which part of "Let's set aside adaptive sync/gsync/freesync for a second, because he never mentioned frame syncing." doesn't make sense to you?

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 1800d ago
1800d ago Replies(10)
dumahim1800d ago

There's no question it's a big improvement on loading speeds, but keep in mind, this a current gen game being loaded on next gen hardware. A next gen game will be loading more information, so it'll slow down a bit.

Suave_Langosta1800d ago

One, it’s next gen so it better be miles better than what we have seen this gen.

Two, Xbox x was already named the “the beast”and that was already annoying then so you can kindly stop.

Lastly, you guys act like this is some kind of unbelievable entity that deserves upmost praise, but back to my first point, it’s next gen, so applaud it for what it is, but two to three years after it’s release, (micro and Sony) will again try to screw us with another round of midgen “upgrades.” So idk I’ve been an avid console gamer on all three big companies but this current gen is pushing me towards a PC. Just sayin

-volt-1799d ago

These consoles are nothing but wanna-be PC's anyways. It's pretty obvious... I enjoy the Switch but because of its portability... Beyond that it is a silly cycle.

-volt-1800d ago (Edited 1800d ago )

Beast? Nothing new about SSD/ M.2/ etc.......

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 1799d ago
Thundercat771801d ago (Edited 1801d ago )

I already pre-ordered the PS5... In my soul.

SyntheticForm1801d ago

Mine's pre-ordered in my heart.

bouzebbal1801d ago

I have mine... In my dreams

kasu1800d ago

Start your home business right now. Spend more time with your family and earn. Start bringing <80$> per hr just on a computer. Very easy way to make your life happy and earning continuously.
Start here…....
https://bit.ly/2H4RzBH

UnSelf1800d ago

Mine is already pre-loading Horizon: ZD 2.

Oh nvm it’s done loading ✅

Gaming4Life19811800d ago

🤣🤣🤣 too funny.

As soon as pre orders go up for both systems I'm going to pre order at least 3 each and sell 4 pre orders and keep 2. I been doing this for a while now and I always make alot of money just for selling my pre orders.

Gaming4Life19811800d ago

@Spartacus

Lol what's wrong with making extra money. I remember standing in lines back in the day and selling my spot and I wasnt the only one nor did I start it. The people that buy pre orders from me are always happy that I did this cause they wouldn't have got a system.

Love that show by the way.

PhoenixUp1801d ago

Say goodbye to games with loading screen minigames

Jin_Sakai1801d ago

Open world games will greatly benefit from this. Can’t wait!

sushimama1801d ago

I am so sick of long loading screens

KyRo1801d ago

Loading screens have pretty much become a thing of the past these days anyway? Outside of the inital load and when you die, games very rarely give you load screens anymore.

Neonridr1800d ago

@KyRo - RDR2 is full of loading

rainslacker1800d ago

The loading is still there, it's just masked with other things. Like in Uncharted and TLOU, they use cinematics with the loading in the background. If you skip the cinematics, you'll see the loading screen.

It's a common practice for a lot of games nowadays, because it can take some time to load that much memory and get the scene set up within the program itself.

UltraNova1801d ago

Soulsborne games will greatly benefit from this, alleviating some of the frustrating waiting time from getting killed and waiting on a loading screen so you can go at it again, and again and again...

nitus101800d ago

With Souls/Borne games you do need to "git gud" 😉 so you don't get killed as often. Of course when you do teleport between bonfires/lanterns then loading can be annoying but then again you should not do this very often.

Bathyj1800d ago

I like the loading screens in bloodborne. It gave you time to have a good hard think about yourself.

blackblades1801d ago

I was thinking some certain games will still have the issues.

totalgaminglegend1800d ago

I see Bethesda using this hardware for the next Elder Scrolls considering they said themselves, their goals cannot currently be met on current hardware.

Larrysweet1800d ago

Hahahah skyrim looking crap can be met on ps3 since said using same tired engine

rainslacker1800d ago

There is more to it than just loading the data into memory. It really doesn't take a huge amount of time to load in the amount of data being used for current gen games from disc to memory. Most of the time is actually from setting up the assets in memory to be displayed on the screen, as well as initializing parts of the program to run the game the way it's supposed to be.

Some developers are good about not having to do everything every time, others....not so much. Some games tend to reload the entire game scene every time it's needed, and they use heavy compression for the assets which have to be decompressed when loaded into memory. Other games, only load in the new stuff they need, and update the memory paths better, but don't initialize everything every time.

I'd imagine their "goals cannot be currently met" statement was more about the graphics, which is silly considering their games aren't usually graphical powerhouses, or the memory requirements not being high enough, because their game engine tends to be a memory hogs. Maybe they're getting better though....but they really need to revamp their game engine. While they can still keep the work flow in place, there are many antiquated processes within it, and while you can adapt it with new tools, it can be held back if core designs aren't brought up to date. Luckily, they have updated the rendering pipeline to at least this gens availability, but next gen there are some new practices which are pretty damn impressive from both DX and Vulcan.

darthv721800d ago

Load times never bothered me. Hell... I own a neo geo cd. you want to talk about "loading"... haha

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 1800d ago
Show all comments (160)
60°

Eiyuden Chronicle: Hundred Heroes Launch Date Arrives

The official launch of Eiyuden Chronicle: Hundred Heroes is finally upon us! The game is now available for PlayStation, Xbox, Switch and PC.

110°

6 Fun Games Where You Actually Play As The Bad Guy

While the mainstream media always sees things turning in favor of the hero, here are 6 games that own being a bad guy.

Profchaos7h ago

Pretty much all of these games listed are based around a morality system you don't have to be bad and you don't have to be good.

It seems to have left out some real amazing games like red dead redemption 1/2,ass effect and true crime la/ny

Tacoboto6h ago

Armored Core VI?

Ok, I'm really missing something here. Just beat chapter 3 earlier this evening, unlocked A-rank Arena fights. I'm not seeing or sensing any branching paths or morality system and I've done every side mission and arena fight available to me up to that fight.

Is something big coming soon to branch the story?

banger886h ago

No mention of Grand Theft Auto? Saints Row (original trilogy), Manhunt? Also The Suffering (depending on the ending you get).

90°

Dead By Daylight Announce TOME 19: SPLENDOR Alongside Updates

Behavior Interactive Inc. revealed a new content update for Dead By Daylight, with a Chatoic Modifier, Store Update, and TOME 19: SPLENDOR.

Read Full Story >>
cgmagonline.com