Obviously you haven't played it cuz, this game is FREAKIN AWESOME!!! Molyneux is a little over emotional, but gotta give him credit for being compassionate about his work. I mean would you rather someone like him or guys over at EA who put out generic garbage.
So is he punching through dry wall because there are some 8's, is he crying because there are 8's, or is he having tears of joy because he made his mommy proud?
I'm sorry if I'm trying to put a little comical relief in my comments. I think you're being as babyish as Mr. Molyneux right now. Don't take stuff so seriously. Besides, you really think Peter Molyneux will take a stroll to the N4G comments? I don't think so. Like he has the time to come to come on here or even care about what people not as successful as him have to say. He wouldn't care either way.
You think my comment was disrespectful? You should see the utter trash that comments in the open zone.
Yeah but none of the reviews have been considered with co-op in mind, however their score has been based on the fact that co-op is coming. If the co-op was seriously broken, that could affect the review score. But we now don't know anything about the co-op from the reviews.
I'm not saying the Fable 2 reviews are incorrect, rather that the reviews of games without a Single Player/Multiplayer component are unjustified in using that as a criticism. It's like rating a movie down because it doesn't have any interactive elements.
That game should have been ready at launch though, so I could understand it's score. I'm sure the game will be fine, and as long as reviewers state that Socom will improve over time thats good. However Socom definitely deserved it's score being that it didn't deliver on day. Especially when the game is only multiplayer, the reviewers had nothing else to comb through
I take the criticism that "it doesn't have a multiplayer/singleplayer" to be more of a criticism of the mode the game DOES have. Like no one complained about BioShock having no multiplayer because the single player was awesome. I agree that if the online coop ends up being broken on Fable 2, I'd be annoyed at the review. However, if there's no technical problems, the coop and single-player are sort of the same content, aren't they? Ultimately magazines/websites want their review to be up as soon as possible and they didn't want to lose traffic by waiting a week to try out the coop.
I donno.. so what if he's a bit emotional over it. It's gotta be massive presure to deliver a game that is well receieved. (huge money/hopes on the line)
And then there's all you 15 year old "pro testastrone" guys who would fear to cry if your leg got cut off. :)
i donno guys, who the f cares. Hope it's a good game.
I think as long as he noticed the reviewers playing it in many different ways he was overwhelmed. I don't think the average score affected him as much.
Not a big surprise there. Peter is prone to emotional outbursts. He's probably a PR nightmare for MS when he gets in front of the microphone. Honesty and emotion are bad for press and politics.
Fable 1 got the same reviews. (I think a bit better actually) We all know what happens in two months. Molyneux goes on a message board, says he failed gamers and Fable 2 was terrible trash, and then he promises (again) that his next game will live up to his other promises.
Also, I'm going to destroy this site. How dare you put me in the open zone?!!!?
Well as the bugs and faults slip out it makes you wonder what else accompanied his letter begging for good reviews.
i cant stand this idiot.
LOL
i wonder if Molyneux and Dyack go to support groups together or have the same therapist
Atleast hes not a stuck up doucheface.
lol emotional.
Skittles!