IGN: "Not only does he value single-player modes, but he thinks they can motivate players to try multiplayer modes."
LOL...what a cheek If you love it so much why the hell did you abandon the single player DLC for GTAV? You know after the epic GTAIV ones and the Undead Nightmare for Red Dead Redemption? OH YEAH...GTA Online and the money it brought in while you milked Shark Cards.
I spent more money in GTA IV dlc then I did with all GTA V "free updates" Ya, shark cards are absolutely not necessary and I personally have never needed to buy them ever.
@Foxtrot 😂..was gonna say the same thing. I agree. Can u believe these people? smh Your "defending " Single Player" after abandoning Single Player with GTA V? Not even "1" Single Player DLC for GTA V, but your "defending" single player? The thinking is dead wrong, I'm a gaming hobbyist, & never once have I EVER been inspired to try a multiplayer game because I played a single player game. Not once, ..& especially nowadays, when I know @ every turn The Interactive Entertainment Industry is "constantly" looking for opportunities to push Multiplayer, GAAS, DLC, Microtransactions, Loot Boxes, Always-Online, & Episodic Gaming @ the game consumer as the defacto, default, core aspect of gaming instead of single player games. I don't even care much for mulitplayer, never have in all these years, I like single Player games. Red Dead Redemption 2 is going to face obstacle's that GTA V didn't. Gamers are aware, expect this game to be like GTA V, with an online/mulitplayer focus, no matter what is said to the contrary by the Media or Rockstar/Take2. I expect to see more Media spin articles, quotes, interviews from Rockstar/Take2 as damage control, attempts to ensure gamers they will have a complete single player experience with RD2. Problem is this: GTA V had a "complete" single player experience, but content produced for GTA V after release was ALL GEARED TOWARDS multiplayer/Online....& u made alot of $$$ due to your greed. Even if you say your going to produce single player content(DLC) for RD2 after release, why should I believe u? or that it's going to be any good or worth what your going to charge for it? Why should i trust that Rockstar is going to produce " high quality " single player DLC? moreso than the mulitplayer experience your inevitably going to produce for RD2? You completely IGNORED your core single player fans with GTA V, completely. Why should I trust you now? I'm not going to, you ruined your reputation, & it's your fault Rockstar/Take2.
Despite the fact that Grand Theft Auto Online discouraged them from making their promised single player DLC for the game, or any other new games since 2013 for that matter.
I love the dude who basically gave only multiplayer DLC like SP Is a necessities
I think this guy is full of it.
Another question, why does R* refuse to support the PC market? Even though GTA V was on PC, the PC gamers had to wait a long time for it and with RDR we got nothing at all. Just a strange attitude considering that large volume of gamers on PC and the fact the games are developed on a PC in the first place.
Why do single player games need defending?
There's this stigma going around that SP games are dying just because MP games are making more money in the long run.
@gangsta_red Stigma suggest it's not true, is that what your saying? If you can't see with your own eyes The Interactive Entertainment Industry has marketed & produced more multiplayer/online games this Gen vs Single Player AAA games , ...then is it a wonder when your name pops up "eyes roll" , smh's, ? ...as its a given your going to "parrot" in favor of, what the Industry is trying to shove to the forefront @the expense of single player AAA games. There have been less single player AAA games of " quality " produced , in favor of more Multiplayer focused games this Gen. Fact. You know, typically i don't need to read your comment B4 I realize I'm going to disagree with it. I could put a disagree button on "auto" regarding your name, & be right 99.9% percent of the time.
@morpheus You're hilarious and I've gotten to the point to just dismiss anything and everything you say as soon as I see a notification from you because I know it's going to be some over exaggerated mess of paranoid delusion. But I'll entertain your craziness for now.... MP games are more popular and a lot more companies are trying their hand to make it work because they do make more money in the long run. This in no way means that there's a dimise or a danger in SP games becomong extinct. Almost all the major companies these past few weeks have shown off or debuted games that either are SP or have a SP and MP option. There's no need to rush into every article or devs to constantly try and justify single player games still exist. "There have been less single player AAA games of " quality " produced.." Compared to what? You make no sense as this is just your opinion based on absolutely nothing. Funny to see you say Fact aftwards as you haven't backed it up with any of the sort. If you think these triple A games quality has diminished then that's your opinion and not a fact. You should learn the difference. "I could put a disagree button on "auto" regarding your name, & be right 99.9% percent of the time." I would rather you put a personal ignore on my name since every thing you spout is complete garbage.
Single player games are an integral part of gaming.
What is said & what is done is entirely different things.
Good lord the irony
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.