Top
200°

Should RAGE 2 Have Been Developed In-House at Bethesda?

"RAGE 2 is almost certain to be a winner, however, to play devil’s advocate, its publisher may have benefited immensely from keeping development in-house at Bethesda Game Studios."

The story is too old to be commented.
Reaprr32d ago (Edited 32d ago )

id Software are probably occupied with developing Doom 2.
Offloading Rage to an experienced studio who specializes in open-world games isn't such a bad idea.
Rage's original vision may not have been realized. This way, games can remain in the pipeline with the help of additional devs instead of keeping us fans waiting forever for the next iteration of a particular IP.

isarai32d ago

No, i don't think bethesda can pull off an open world game with good combat, let alone one that looks nice or is stable/polished

r3f1cul31d ago

and what avalanche games has??? most of their games run like an utter dumpster fires ... in fact just cause 3 is probably one of the single worst running games ive ever played in my whole 30 years of gaming lol mad max was semi ok but lets not act like they are even close to pumping out game of the year contenders here ... the less ID the worse IMO i dont care what people riding the hype train are saying ...

isarai31d ago

"Most of there games"? JC3 is the only one theyve had with real performance issues. Previous JC games ran fine and mad max was locked 30fps

Parasyte32d ago

Nope. If Bethesda had made it, it would be released as a buggy mess.

EDKICK32d ago

Yea Just Caus 3 launched in real good shape /s

_LarZen_32d ago

On PC it was and still is GLORIOUS. On consoles...not so much.

thedr90432d ago

Probably would be better but I'd rather Bethesda focus on the new TES or Fallout.

Eidolon32d ago

And a new engine for Christ sake

OpenGL32d ago Show
Show all comments (25)
The story is too old to be commented.