Bland, boring, and badly made – returning to the bad old days of low rent mascot platformers is not a good way to demonstrate the power of the Xbox One X.
I'm sure this game isn't that good, but for a game to be a 3/10 it has to be worse then bad.. it has to be broken.
Guess knack aint so bad eh.
Nope, still is
still better than this kak
Words Spoken from a person who has never played it are irrelevant.
My nephew's LOVE Knack 2 in co-op. Not really my taste, but I do love me some Ratchet and Clank!
Knack is actually pretty fun especially if you play it co-op.
Who dafuq said it would be?
Nobody. I disapprove the quality of a games review when it begins with a comparison headline like this... A comparison nobody was making to begin with.
i own super lucky's and its really solid game, no way its a 3. 6-7 would be more realistic.
I swear the VR was where the charm came from. It's what made it fresh. It was an okay game with wow factor. Taking that away from the franchise killed it stone dead for me and made it bland. Hopefully they make another in VR. Not hating, if you played both, you'd probably agree.
VR can make average games into really cool ones. There're games I would never play on the TV but in VR I love them. Bound is a good example of it.
Why does everything have to be an answer to Mario?
because in this day and age everything needs to be compared to everything
Ok, I will compare it to A Hat in Time... I say it still sucks.
Did you play it
10 disagrees and still not one of the 10 answered on why doesn’t everything have to be compared to Mario with these platformers. Literally, that is the problem. I could say a game sucks but to ever suggest a game sucks because it’s not another game defeats the whole point of what it means to objectively view a game. If you are looking for a Mario game on any platform you aren’t going to find it. Give up the ghost let it go, platformers should be allowed to be a game and not be held to another games achievements.
you missed the answer 3 comments ago.
I’m talking about the 10 now 13 disagrees. I can understand a game sucking I can understand people want to compare things. Yet, the only thing that mattered was if the game sucked or not. Not if it’s Mario on Xbox or not. It’s a completely ignorant comparison all in the vein of the games being platformers
It was never meant to be an answer to Mario. It is a game to attract families for Xbox by a charming playable pet.
And its not going to do that it was an EPIC FAIL.
How do you know that? Have you any insight in future sales numbers or how families react to it?
It will be bought but it won't hit 1 million sales I don't care how charming you think it is.
Not so lucky. Unlucky
I hope sites purposely tank this game after Microsoft tried to make accusations and attacked IGN for giving the game a low rating. Not that it needs tanking considering it was already poorly reviewed before the controversy. And the fact that they used the Xbox live stores rating as an example with full knowledge that no one needed to buy/play the game to rate it on top of the fact that they control the store and can easily manipulate the rating.
Wait, who did what now?
Shannon Loftis got a mob of xbox fanatics to attack ryan on twitter
"Super Lucky’s Tale is not the Xbox’s answer to Mario", yes it is and that's the best they can do
I didn't like it on the Rift so I had no plans of even looking at this one.
Lucky's Tale... I'll see you in Hell!!!!! (aka Bargain Bin!)
I've heard so many varying opinions on this game, some either really like it, or they hate it, seems there is no in between, I'll wait for a demo or something probably
i really like the game i would give it 7.5, a 3 is taking the piss
For what it is it’s not a bad game. It’s just simple and easy, but it’s a good time. Nobody is trying to compare it to mario, it doesn’t even play like a mario game
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.