310°

What AMD and Intel's partnership means for PC gaming

AMD and Intel just announced early today a major partnership to join forces, combining Intel's CPU technology with AMD's graphics. The move is no doubt a shock for the gaming industry and has far reaching ramifications. Here's what we think are the most important bits, and how the partnership will affect PC gaming.

ocelot072359d ago

PS5: Intel processing power and AMD's GPU power - yes please

2358d ago Replies(2)
Tsar4ever012358d ago (Edited 2358d ago )

"PS5: Intel processing power and AMD's GPU power".

INTEL CPU cores? HAH!! While your going that far off the deep end, why don't you just request for Nvidia's GPU power for PS5 too? Guess you haven't read that old Forbes article about why Sony & Microsoft choose AMD & X86-64 for PS4 & XB1. https://www.forbes.com/site...

bluefox7552358d ago

Agreed. People might say that Nvidia is better, but AMD does great and is very comparable in the low-mid range GPU market. Intel CPUs would be a godsend though, hopefully addressing some of the CPU limitations this gen.

Tsar4ever012358d ago

Yeah, Intel cpus would've made a big difference in frame-rates performance on current-gen consoles, Can you even imagine how well even the BASE consoles would've done running Ryzen apu's? Richard at Digital Foundry gave us sort off a Hypothesis video on this, you might of already looked at it, https://www.youtube.com/wat... and the result showed gives me hope for next-gen consoles.

2359d ago
Bigpappy2359d ago

No more CPU competition? Not sure this is all that great. But life is about changes.

ocelot072359d ago

Both are still going to be competing in the CPU I imagine. This only help's both parties. Intel's graphics where ok but does not have a patch on AMD's so this will help them. This will help AMD also and will make netbook's a decent buy for portable gaming.

darthv722359d ago

It's not about the cpu side at all. Intel is wanting to use AMD gpu technology combined with their cpu to create an APU that takes on nvidia.

Bigpappy2359d ago

okay. thanks for the clarification guys.

zivtheawesome2358d ago

well it is not really no cpu competition this is only one build they are doing together, they still have seperate builds using only AMD/ intel + nvidia.

UltraNova2358d ago

Its only for small factor applications not desktop, laptop and enterprise CPUs.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2358d ago
Rimeskeem2359d ago

As long as the prices don’t sky rocket I’m ok with it.

MegamanXXX2358d ago

Can you imagine the prices it would be if it was Nvidia and intel

xX-oldboy-Xx2358d ago

My hope is the prices come down. One can hope.

FyBy2358d ago

That would be great "APU" for consoles! Cant wait! But in the end AMD-only solution can deliver similar for better price, so I dont think we will see these CPUs in consoles in the future.

Show all comments (21)
50°

Razer Iskur V2 Gaming Chair Review - Lumbar Support Done Right

The Razer Iskur V2 is a high quality, premium gaming chair that your back will thank you for.

Read Full Story >>
playstationlifestyle.net
100°

Make your next GPU upgrade AMD as these latest-gen Radeon cards receive a special promotion

AMD has long been the best value option if you're looking for a new GPU. Now even their latest Radeon RX 7000 series is getting cheaper.

Father__Merrin18h ago

Best for the money is the Arc cards

just_looken17h ago

In the past yes but last gen amd has gotten cheaper and there new cards are on the horizon making 6k even cheaper.

The arc cards are no longer made by intel but asus/asrock has some the next line battlemage is coming out prices tbd.

Do to the longer software development its always best to go amd over intel if its not to much more money even though intel is a strong gpu i own 2/4 card versions.

140°

PlayStation Doesn't Need a Dedicated PC Store Launcher

With all the PlayStation games that are now coming to PC, is it time for Sony to release a dedicated PC launcher?

thorstein2d ago

No, and they already solved any need with the overlay that's coming.

Vits2d ago

Unless they are trying to kill their recently created PC business, I would advise against opening a dedicated PC store. It's an extremely hard endeavor, and people, in general, are very comfortable with Steam. Even Epic, with their billions of dollars invested, is still struggling to find a foothold, and they have Fortnite.

just_looken1d 5h ago (Edited 1d 5h ago )

Money is one thing security is another but again millions have 0 knowledge past 2020.

Epic store for years struggled with a shopping cart/account theft/credit card theft

Rockstar launcher/store to this day over 5 years later still has horrific user interface security flaws lost account's and stolen CC

Then you got that activision need phone number oh we lost it launcher

The crown jewel is the ea launcher/store ea app 3 yrs old still has hundreds of threads were people lost games/accounts/game access or just straight up crashes.

Edit" Oh ubi launcher were you buy a game that may or may not be there again or work and the launcher 5yrs old still has no 4K support if you launch it on a 4k screen there is a high chance it will just crash.

ocelot071d 21h ago

Can tell who ever put this together is not all that clued up on pc gaming.

It's just a known fact. The PC gaming community prefer Steam and Steam alone. They don't like different launchers. I personally don't mind them. But majority just stick with steam. Hence why EA and Ubisoft went back to on releasing on steam and why Microsoft release games on steam as people hated buying from the windows store.

The only other launchers that I imagine are doing ok is GOG due to being drm free and epic games due to the free games every week. Sony shouldn't release any sort of pc launcher n

Nitrowolf21d 19h ago (Edited 1d 19h ago )

It literally says in the OP that PC gamers don't like multiple launchers lol. It even mentions Steam being the go to for gamers

Tacoboto1d 16h ago

Title: "PlayStation Doesn't Need a Dedicated PC Store Launcher"

N4G: "Can tell who ever put this together is not all that clued up on pc gaming"

When you don't even read the headline...

ocelot071d 14h ago

I read it and had a brain fart. As read the title then this "With all the PlayStation games that are now coming to PC, is it time for Sony to release a dedicated PC launcher?"

So I hold my hands up on that mistake. Rest of my comment still stands.

Giblet_Head1d 5h ago (Edited 1d 5h ago )

Steam and GOG are highly preferred because of the rich feature set. Ubisoft, Rockstar, EA, Epic etc have all set a precedent over the years for customers to instinctively expect individual publisher launchers to be so extremely half-assed that the majority simply don't want to bother dealing with what is almost an inevitable disappointment by comparison to Steam or GOG. Those publishers and their inaction or general disinterest to improve have effectively ruined any future adoption to be taken seriously.

Einhander19721d 19h ago (Edited 1d 19h ago )

This is just another ridiculous double standard article.

It's like how Microsoft can spend 20 years of making nothing but gaas and live service style games to sell microtransactions, dlc and subscriptions and get praise for doing it, but if Sony wants to make a single game like that every website under the sun is writing articles saying how Sony is anti-consumer or whatever.

derek1d 12h ago

Yep, huge double standard look at the tortured reaction to the ps5pro, websites hyperventilating like Sony is forcing people to buy it.

just_looken1d 5h ago

Wait my xbox from 2004 has avengers gaas on it? wow your so smart

m$ Gaas started with the other companies like sony

Gamepass yes they are deep into that but its still a huge money saver sense you do not own your games then get a service like that.

Now there pc xbox launcher that is trash for years now

Show all comments (15)