Sea of Thieves is an Online Multiplayer for Everybody

Kim at GameSpew: "I hate playing online multiplayer games; I much prefer the solace of a single-player adventure. That’s why, when Sea of Thieves was first announced over a year ago, I had next to no interest in it. [...]

But at a recent Xbox event, I got to sit down and have some serious hands-on time with the game, and that interest meter has drastically piqued once again. Sea of Thieves is incredibly good fun. Enough to make me ditch my anti-social ways and jump into a game with other people. Shock, horror."

Read Full Story >>
The story is too old to be commented.
297d ago Replies(4)
297d ago Replies(3)
submarinna297d ago

SoT doesn't look like a game for me. I love my quality single player games thank you very much.

343_Guilty_Spark297d ago

Then play them and stop trolling.

Duke19296d ago

Seriously. "I only enjoy SP games so Im not getting this one!" /Posted on a MP game article


Cobra951296d ago

It's a Sea of Thieves article, a game which isn't out, and which many of us were hoping would have a good offline SP component.

Black0ut297d ago

Ok cool so now you can move on and play said SP games I guess?

Very odd seeing the comments littered with totally off topic opinions...

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 296d ago
chaos-emeralds297d ago

sorry, just no. I don't want it. But apparently Rare have stated I don't want a new conker or banjo game. I'm sure a lot of people will like this though.

297d ago
ElementX297d ago (Edited 297d ago )

People complain that MS only releases Forza, Halo, and Gears but when they work on something new, people say it's not for them or they want single player games.

Lighter9297d ago

Rate is making SoT, not MS.

chuckyj1297d ago (Edited 297d ago )

Rate is making SoT? You mean Rare? Yes, but they are a first party developer under the (Microsoft game divisions)... So yes, it would be a Microsoft developed game, because MS is footing the bill for their own studio they own 100% to make the game.

jagermaster619297d ago

Microsoft owns Rare so what are you trying to say?

Lighter9297d ago (Edited 297d ago )

I hate word predictions. I also hate that I can't edit my post. I meant Rare obviously. It still says Rare is the developer. Microsoft just owns them.

There's no reasoning with you people. You all also claim that getting old bc games is better than getting new games.

Makes as much sense as a football bat.

Theknightofnights297d ago (Edited 297d ago )


I guess Sony doesn't do anything with Uncharted, Infamous, Killzone, or Horizon then because Sony "just owns" the companies that do, at least according to your logic. There is no reasoning with these guys because your post didn't contain reason.

Kingthrash360297d ago

Rare left long ago....that's just the name ms owns. The devs left when MS cancelled 3 games behind closed doors and told them to make kinect games.

Goldby297d ago

Naughty Dog is owned by Sony. Does that not mean sony developed Last of us and uncharted.

Here's a tip. Yes it does.
Sea of theives is developed by MS as MS owns Rare

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 297d ago
Brazz297d ago

It's not just about "something new", it's more about "something new that picks my interest and looks fun"... i don't like SoT, to me the game looks boring considering what i saw, the gameplay is bad, mechanics are lackluster, and the game is repetitive as \□●■■♤>.
This game is about preferences. Do you like what you see in SoT? Yes? Good for you, have fun.

297d ago
-Foxtrot297d ago

I think it's mostly because a lot of people see Rare as a single player company...and if they weren't going to get something new at least you'd have a real Banjo Threeie game, Perfect Dark or Conker sequel to get excited about.

If there was a company Microsoft has to make something single player focused it would be Rare.

Jinger297d ago

Nothing wrong with trying something new though... Look at Horizon

297d ago
Cobra951296d ago

Jinger, what about Forza Horizon? (I assume you meant FH.) Those games are playable offline, by a single player, and are quite enjoyable in that mode.

297d ago Replies(4)
297d ago Replies(1)
OMGitzThatGuy297d ago (Edited 297d ago )

They mean they want Sony games, but from MS.

297d ago Replies(1)
psyxon297d ago

Just that ignorant, immature gamer bias. It's surpassed fanboyism now. It's pure delusional hatred now.

Cobra951296d ago

People also complain that MS is only focusing on MP "social" games lately. That criticism is very much at home in this thread.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 296d ago
Show all comments (93)
The story is too old to be commented.