430°

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 - First official benchmark shows AMD's GPU beating NVIDIA's GTX1080 FE in DOOM

AMD has revealed the first official benchmark for its new graphics card, the AMD RX Vega 64.

Read Full Story >>
dsogaming.com
ARESWARLORD2453d ago

I had a feeling they were going to be beastly and competition is definitely good. I'll be sticking with my GTX 980 TI for the foreseeable future though it's still more than overkill for me.

oasdada2452d ago

Same here sticking with my 1070 for now

MegamanXXX2452d ago

How about in other games lol

freshslicepizza2452d ago

This is true, DOOM does well on AMD cards.

bluefox7552452d ago (Edited 2452d ago )

Yeah, it's pretty much just Doom. Doom uses the Vulkan API, and AMD cards do incredibly well in Vulkan, considerably better than Nvidia. But the reason you only see AMD talking about Doom is because it's really the only game it can beat Nvidia on with their high end cards.

Avery2453d ago

Very underwhelming and disappointed.
A $600/700, power hungry, water cooled/air cooled Vega has about = performance to a $514 aftermarket GTX 1080.

Anandtech - "what we’ve been told is to expect the Vega 64 to “trade blows” with NVIDIA’s GeForce GTX 1080."
Techpowerup - AMD provided some internal performance numbers from their own testing, so as always take these with a grain of salt. These tests were done on an Intel Core i7-7700K at 4.2 GHz, 16 GB of DDR4-3000 MHz RAM and with the latest available drivers for the AMD and NVIDIA GPUs at the time. Refer to the complete slide deck at the end for full testing information, but there was nothing that caught our eye otherwise. The chosen games were all running on DX12 or Vulkan APIs, and the order of the four GPUs being presented is certainly on purpose but looking purely at the numbers and no more it appears that RX Vega 64 trades blows with the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 at stock settings under WQHD (21:9, 1440p)
Hardwarecanucks - There is certainly something you can infer about this situation though; somewhere NVIDIA’s designs skipped a full generation (or more) ahead of AMD. Like the Fiji architecture was obviously meant to compete against Maxwell GPUs only to be released a year later, Vega’s target was Pascal. The only problem is that Pascal has been gracing the GeForce lineup for a long while whereas Radeon users are only getting their first taste of that performance level now. Regardless of how you look at things, AMD is playing catch up and their launch cadence is dropping further behind.

ARESWARLORD2453d ago

Wow man take a breath it'll be okay.

UltraNova2453d ago (Edited 2453d ago )

If you can take your nvidia goggles off for just a minute you will realise that AMD doesnt have to outright beat them out of the gate, they just need to be price/perfo competitive in order to gain some marketshare back. They do not need to be 20% faster in everything against a 1080 they just need to be fast enough to make GPU and CPU buyers choice between them and Nvidia a real challenge, not a one way street thing, like it has been for the past 5 years; thats what matters to AMD at the time being and thats what's important for both market competition and us the consumers in the end.

With that said, I m fairly certain that AMD is slowly but surely back in the game and I bet anyone nVidia is already feeling the heat.

kevnb2453d ago (Edited 2453d ago )

You say that as if they aren't losing market share, although luckily for amd crypto miners are buying their cards now.

Weeblordbad2452d ago

Not to mention the market for the low to mid end cards dwarfing the high end market. Who knows how well Vega will stack up against Volta, all they have shown are the workstation cards which as always is a premature inaccurate way to look at a architectures performance.

Avery2452d ago

Quote - http://www.hardwarecanucks....
"I’m going to end this article with a story since I think it is appropriate right now. Back at CES I had the chance to sit down over supper with a long-time ex employee of AMD and RTG. When asked about the long, drawn out release of Vega his simple answer was: There’s two ways to break bad news to someone - either all at once or prepare the person little by little so acceptance comes easier. " - Vega is a bad news story for gamers

TankCrossing2453d ago

$499 card. The baseline Vega 64 was used for the benches, not the liquid cooled or limited edition ones.

Trading blows with the 1080 at a slightly better price (or much better price if you go for one of the bundles and/or freesync monitor) isn't actually a bad place for AMD to be at all. The cut down Vega 56 looks to be in a good place as well.

Angeljuice2452d ago

Check this out:
http://wccftech.com/amd-rad...

Radeon RX Vega beats GTX 1080ti in blind test.

Angeljuice2452d ago

Think again Avery;

The RX Vega beats the GTX 1080ti in a blind test. The setup including
monitor is $300 cheaper, without monitor it's $200 cheaper.

httpwccftech.com/amd-radeon-r x-vega-vs-gtx-1080-ti-blind-tes t/

Avery2452d ago

Wrong - you can take your "Feels per second" and I'll look at Frames Per Second - look up AMD tests - it shows 1080 beats it in more games AMD tested themselves period. Here you go buddy take a close look at factual numbers and not "feels" - https://forums.anandtech.co...

Avery2452d ago

These aren't my quotes - I've listed where they came from - the Tech Press!
It is power hungry and it can't beat a 1080, it trades blows with it and that is right from AMD themselves.
I suggest reading up on it and waiting for reviews, cheers!

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 2452d ago
deadfrag2453d ago

Nvidia must be having a celebration after this benches!Then Volta will kill AMD for good at the end of this year.

Asuka2453d ago (Edited 2453d ago )

i am kinda hoping they put off Volta for a little while to let the yields for HBM2 stabilize so we can see potentially lower prices. Honestly Pascal is still outperforms anything AMD has including Vega. A Pascal refresh with even better efficiency and better OCing would be more than enough to take on anything AMD comes up with for at least another year.

This way Nvidia can release Volta against AMD Navi the following year as both are going to be scalable MCM architecture.

narsaku2452d ago

There is no, "potential", lower prices.

Nvidia charges a premium price because they know their fans will allow them to. And that's it.

Those 1000 dollar graphic cards could be sold for 500 dollars and they'd make a profit. But why not double that over again, right?

babadivad2452d ago

I don't believe they will launch Volta gaming cards this year. The rumored Pascal refresh seems far more likely.

0Day2453d ago

Clap, Clap, Clap.... They always showcase DOOM since its the only better optimized game on AMD hardware.

Show all comments (47)
80°

Review: GameScent - Now you can smell your games | KnowTechie

KnowTechie writes: "The GameScent is a unique way to add immersion to your games. Thanks to its HDMI and 3.5mm jack, the device is versatile, so you can use it across your consoles and PC. However, it would be great to see a new range of scents since there are only six, and many smell similar to each other."

Read Full Story >>
knowtechie.com
TheLigX1d 1h ago

Ah yes… whenever I play a game I always think that it would be so much better if my home could smell more like gasoline and burnt gunpowder.

staticall1d 1h ago

Boogerman, Binding Of Isaac, Fallout, Postal and Scorn, here i come, smell away!

Skate-AK23h ago

Can't forget Octodad and Harlod Halibut.

80°

Nintendo's Massacre Of The 3DS And Wii U Is Finally Complete, Regrettably

Hanzala from eXputer: "The cruel hammer of Nintendo has fallen. Farewell, 3DS and Wii U, you surely brightened my life and many others; you won't be forgotten."

100°

Review: GameScent AI Aroma Diffuser | Hardcore Gamer

GameScent is aiming to push gaming forward with the ability to fill the room with an aroma that matches the game being played.

Read Full Story >>
hardcoregamer.com