Twinfinite Writes: With a new Mass Effect game just around the corner, we take a look at how previous games in the series have stacked up against each other.
While two was more engaging and somewhat more challenging than 1 but 1 felt like an actual rpg to me. I got into the series because it was an Rpg. ME2 was too diluted with fps element for me.
I'll save you a couple clicks. From higher to lower score: 2, 3, 1, Infiltrator
They still do that slideshow bs?
3 is better than 1 lol.. I think 1 is better than 2 as well. Metacritic hath spoken though.
1 was rpg with shooter elements. 2 was shooter with rpg elems 3 brought back some the rpg elements from 1but drop the ball with that weak ending.
2 was still good. It was confusing why they got rid of some of the best parts of ME1 but the combat felt better and such. 3 was boring imo. I rarely find part 3 of any series interesting. The general rule I see is: 1 - great 2 - better 3 - fail 4 - revision There are exceptions where the first is better like dead space and the 3rd is the best like far cry but it's not often in my purchases.
Twinfinite I have some ideas for your future articles! Batman Arkham games ranked according to metacritic. Uncharted games ranked according to metacritic Call of duty games ranked according to metacritic Mario games ranked according to metacritic Hell, Pokemon games ranked according to metacritic Just don't forget to use your wonderful slide show format ( you'll get so many add clicks with that Pokemon article, you're welcome!)
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.