Despite Battleborn costing $60, a little digging reveals a game that almost certainly was designed to be a multiplayer-focused free-to-play experience. Should the game have stuck to that strategy?
Sony has launched a BAFTA Game Awards 2024 section on the PlayStation Store that lists the different games nominated this year.
Hanzla from eXputer inquires: "If Xbox can care about preserving its games and legacy, what exactly is wrong with Nintendo, trying to kill game preservation single-handedly?"
Ahh yes the good old game preservation of saving all your games to a removable hhd on the Xbox 360, taking it round your mates house, setting up multiple tvs to
Be met with “save data corrupted, please re download”
Or how about removing 360 games
From the store
, download them now or else, and, better hope to god that save data doesn’t corrupt, or it’s lost for ever
Nice one ☝️
This is just a scammy PR move to distract from the fact they are going digital only and trying to push streaming and subscriptions only.
No gaming company has pushed harder to remove ownership than Microsoft.
Without discs there is no preservation, preservation can't be done by the rights holders it can only be done by the consumers, anything else is a lie.
Nobody wants this. Sales or the lack of it in the case of XBOX is very telling. I wonder how the adorably all digital series X will fare. Adorably dismal perhaps?
Only time will tell, but for from someone like me suspecting that Xbox is trying to gracefully exit the console market, that "forward compatibility" team is trying to get Xbox games playing on Windows PCs. I mean, it's nice that they're not planning on exiting with a "enjoy your games while the hardware still works" message, so that's nice. They still have a brand to protect via Microsoft so probably feel obligated to have a better exit strategy.
The Epic Games Store has another freebie ready for your library and it is a free runner.
I played the beta, and was surprised to find out that they were going to be charging for the full release. I play Smite on my PS4... completely different gameplay mechanic, but still a MOBA. I've had more fun with it (completely free to play) than with my time in the Battleborn beta. That's not to say I didn't enjoy Battleborn. I may pick it up for dirt cheap some day. But $60 seems ridiculous.
It really does look like a free-to-play.game.
Being honest, Overwatch provides even less content and I'd still prefer paying full price for that over Battleborn. If I'm not mistaken, DLC maps for Battleborn are not even free either.