A game that's been waiting for almost ten years is bound to produce something good, surely. The guys at IncGamers have had a crack at the game and outline their thoughts and feelings on what it is that make and break the game.
Jeez. That's harsh. I'm not buying that game!
I'm a PS3 fan more so than 360, just becaues I've had it longer (oh and I love my quiet bluray player!) but ultimately I like games. So I would be the first to say, eff this game. But Give it a try if you can, it isn't that bad. Perfect? No. Great? No. But it is a love hate thing. Camera can piss you off at times.
4.5.. damn that's low :S
I have to agree with this, it really is poo.
OUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU UCH. Major burn. :/
that review must have hurt the bots!! take it easy on them!!
I sense the beginnings of a cardiac arrest. o-o
HOW low can you go!!?!?!!?!??!?! Only on the Crapbox360. Thanks, I'll be here all week.
it isn't at all. play it first, unterstand it... if it had been from EA, ubisoft or even bioware the reviews would habe been totally different. masseffect is in no way a better game than toohuman and masseffect is great! it has flaws, but any review under 7/10 is just a bunch of haters that have no clue about games. its just a joke lately - someone gives 92%, another review 4/10 - impossible, its showing once more that the press and the whole review system is total crap.
Yes the review system sucks. But lately I've been seeing a lot of reviews submitted without a review score. I think that is the only fair way to judge. For instance, GTA4 is one of the highest-rated games in history, and I have no idea why - I think most people agree it was a let down and a step backward from San Andreas. Too Human is a "love it or hate it" kind of game, from what I have read in the reviews, and unfortunately that reflects as either a high-ish score, a mediocre score or a piss-poor score like this one. If you take the metacritic average, of course it will be low, but that doesn't mean there won't be people that will enjoy it.
I agree - text based reviews are the best. anyone can judge for themselfes what points are good or bad. but incgamers - sorry that is not even press or something. who is giving crap sites like this a stage on N4G? I'm just kind of shocked - a crap game like siren gets decent reviews even if nothing is right with it. toohuman, a very deep game that is just galaxies above that siren crap gets so horrible reviews. how on earth can anybody dislike toohuman that much. great gameplay, lots of action, great graphics, decent story telling, coop and so on... one major site starts an anti-hype (not enough marketing money spent?) - lots of others just follow. I'm tired of this... that crap above sounds like a BRAID (how on earth is this game good? I am no puzzler... so who am I to judge?) guy or some gears fan reviewed too human - where are the reviews of specific genres, where the reviewer is knowing what he is talking about!? most reviews are not dispassionate enough - and the one in the inc review is even admitting it in the text.
Geez - I know everyone has different tastes, but to state that such a classy game as Mass Effect is not any better than this game clearly shows you don't have any ability to judge at all. You can say you have a great time with this title, or even that its better to you, thats simply your tastes. But Mass Effect took interactive story telling to anew level that this definitely doesn't. Despite the glitches, Mass Effect was a beautiful game and this is not. I'm no hater. I'm been playing this game for over 8 hours and despite the fact its seriously flawed, I'm getting a lot of enjoyment from it. But it's not a classic game at all, and to mention it in the same breath as Mass Effect is to discredit one of the best 360 games yet. You're failure to see whats so horribly broken about this title does not mean that everyone else on the planet who doesn't like it is riding a hype train. It's broken and people are saying so. If you are one of the many who will look beyond its obvious flaws and forgive its frustrations to enjoy what it DOES have, then good for you. I'm right their playing it too. But I have to acknowledge that a lot of people will not be able to enjoy it. Theres no conspiracy theory. No bribes. It shows that people are different, and what you might like, ain't for many people. This is especially true if you can mention Mass Effect in the same sentence as this merely 'OK game.
@ titntin Thank you . bubble to you sir. what i tried to say in to pages of post you have summed up in a few short words. wish i could be more diplomatic with my words. again, well said. i am a 360 fan, i am buying this game, i have played the demo twice, and i totally agree with you.
Xbox 360 - The only console you can get a full "AAA" Experience in every exclusive! I might be off on my quote, but I have seen a few say this! Where, oh where are they?
I can't wait to get home tonight and play Too Human. Loved the demo, it was miles better than Star Wars FU. If the full game is just as good as the demo I'll love it. If people bash new types of game because its different to what they are used to, all that the devs will produce are yearly remakes of the same generic crap.
first part of the game is the demo (after the intro) and I tell you it's going better and better... the demo is just nothing compared to the full. everybody is moaning about 08/15 crap games - then one dev comes and makes some good new and fresh approaches. bammm, no one buys the game thanks to stupid reviews. that leads us to wii casual family games dudes! still bad reviews but enough moms that buy the crap... horrible!
Damn thats one of the lowest scores i've ever seen..
You obviously didn't see the reviews for Lair and Haze!
Stop being an insecure little b*tch. Those games didn't live up to their hype and neither did this game. Get over it and shut the hell up.
No really, the game is that bad and glad to see a site give it the score it deserves. I have been playing through it since early this week and really, this game is dull, terrible controls and everything that has been listed time and time again. I have no idea why people can not accept that this is simply a crap game :) What people can't grasp is that reviews are a 'personal opinion' based on experience.
you missed that I have the game and I say it's at least on par with masseffect ;-) its love or hate. I love it you hate it. there are reviews that are in the 90% so its not crap for anyone. but anyone that loved diablo simply can't say toohuman is bad because toohuman is diablo on steroids.
Yeowch! That has got to hurt Denis where it counts.
This is one reviewers point of view, and why shouldn't they have a stage like anyone else? If you don't like this review, then that's fine, but is it not fine to not allow people to give a score they think is suited to the game? There is room for comment and feedback, but the way you guys go on about it means that reviewers don't feel like they can give real scores without being berated. Commentators are no better than the media when they want to stir up hype and I'm glad that some sites have the guts to put their personal opinion on the game.
its one for the bargain bin,10 years for this is sad
boy oh boy did this flop...
REVIEWS DONT MATTER! LOL
I am going to have to agree, this is the worst review I have seen period! I have to ask did he even play the game?
too flopping 3fixme king of flop
welp incgamers suck....
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.