“Gender neutral bathrooms in our new game, @PatMcCroryNC. It takes place in the future, unlike the past you envision.”
Cliff Bleszinksi, aka Cliffy B, opened Boss Key Productions in April 2014 and released the first-person shooter LawBreakers in 2017 for the PlayStation 4 and PC. The studio would close in May 2018 and the servers for the game would shut down in September 2018.
Bleszinksi shown interest in resurrecting LawBreakers. Publisher Nexon also owns the rights to the IP and Bleszinksi is open to talking with Nexon CEO Owen Mahoney.
Lawbreakers was never successful, and therefore not worth reviving. It was hero-shooter [incorrectly labeled as an arena] that failed cash in off the popularity of Overwatch.
LMAO I guess he really thought it was going to be competition.
This wasn't the only game that failed and claiming to be something entirely different.
Battleborn anyone?.
Battleborn flopped but had more going for it than Lawbreakers. Oh how i had wanted to like BB. It had solid art and characters and a campaign but the gameplay nor story were there.
I'm still amazed this guy opened a new studio, and then shut it down after their first game flopped. Your excuses didn't matter cause all that people got was their money taken, and a product they could no longer play.
Sit down, Cliffy B. Nobody wants that shit 🤣 Mostly because you're the one who made it. 🤡🤡🤡
LawBreakers, the Overwatch-style FPS game that closed in 2018, may be getting some news, says director and Gears of War creator Cliff ‘CliffyB’ Bleszinski.
re-release it as f2p ...
then it'll be the closest modern thing to the glory days of arena shooter perhaps?
the other being the new game: The Finals
Game pass isn't the answer to everything. Ark Survival Evolved is a game that has sold 35 million copies and is free on GP but on Xbox, both official and unofficial servers are dead yet on PC and PS, it's thriving (I love the game and it done have cross play so play it on any system)
Kyro
Maybe on pc but it might as well be dead on playstation with a handful of people per server if that.
Most servers have 0 on them.
JackB, You must be talking PvE because PvP, especially unofficial is thriving. This isn't a dig at your beloved Xbox but facts are facts. There's not many people playing ARK on Xbox which surprised me when I bought an Xbox that there were so few people playing it there. I know Xbox player base is tiny in comparison to PC and PS but the servers were dead dead
@kyro
I still play official pvp on Xbox, definitely isn't dead. There's still a decent amount of players for a game that's shutting down in 4 months.
I am cautiously hopiumistic. This game was actually dope and deserved better. I also wish people would stop comparing this game to Overwatch, they're nothing alike.
The biggest mistake he made was to make it a PS exclusive.
His whole fanbase was on Xbox.
I'm glad he admitted that himself later on though.
'The biggest mistake he made was to make it a PS exclusive. ' It was on pc as well so not a ps exclusive also i doubt the game would of done better on Xbox as it wasn't a good game.
Cliff actually explained that the console exclusivity was a mistake. It's not an issue with PS as a platform or anything. He just didn't have a fanbase on PS. His fanbase was primarily on Xbox due to Gears of War's success, and those players felt alienated.
Again his fanbase was on Xbox.
Not PC or Playstation.
And the metacritic is at 76.
So it was a pretty good game to most.
It would have done better.
Biggest mistake was that the game sucked and screamed "me too me too"
Second mistake was exclusivity
Oh look, someone who clearly never played the game. The game came out just a year after Overwatch and had been in development since Boss Key opened in 2014. They first teased the game as BlueStreak in 2015. But yeah, sure, it was just a "me too" game.
Wouldn’t buy this again.
Really enjoyed the gameplay but they were far too quick to pull the plug and I felt utterly ripped off paying for it.
Only way is F2P.
How could there be tons of support when it initially didn't even make a dent in the shooter genre?
I think even UT would get a bigger audience at this point.
Seems like he's trying to make Lawbreakers much bigger than it was.
Remember this guy has a large ego.
Cliff gets too butt hurt to continue making games. He is salty about the gamers for Lawbreakers, as said in his tweets. He then blamed people at 4Chan for “ruining” Radical Heights.
He was too busy stuffing Microtransactions into Radical Heights instead of finishing up the unfinished assets throughout the map then blames gamers for the hacking of Radical Heights and ruining the game instead of investing into trying to fix the situation and a better anti-cheat system.
Lawbreaks can come back as a F2P but Cliff will run it into the ground like majority of his games. Best of luck, Cliff.
Forget about that game. He should make another arena shooter, like Unreal/Quake. Would be awesome if he could team up with John Romero that man is a legend.
If its an X Box game, I expect it to be a flop. That's how ALL X Box games have been unless its a casual game like COD or a racing game.
Even PS5 owners admit Forspoken is a letdown. We do so because we actually have a ton of other games that are highly rated AAA exclusives many of which run at 60fps. If Forspoken was released on XBOX it would have probably been the best thing since sliced bread.
Dreams? You’re kidding right. Have you seen the content people have created from that.
The only issue with Dreams is the missed opportunity for not releasing it on PC and PS5. The one PS game where a PC version would have made sense.
That's why a game like HiFi Rush (a game with no promotion) has been enjoying great success on Xbox and PC. Also, if you're to assume that because its on GP is the only reason it's successful on the platform (Xbox) , the GP version has a fraction of the reviews that the Deluxe (paid version) has by a large margin.
I wanted to get into it but didn't wanna pay money to buy a game with guaranteed-to-be-dead servers. I bet most people were in the same boat
Hopefully it comes back as cross play and free to play. As much as I hate free to play microtransactions, it does keep servers for games like this alive
The game definitely deserves a second chance. Swallow your pride and make it a (non predatory) F2P experience.
The game was actually really solid. It just didn't find its player base.
Us:
“Hey Cliff, think you want to release a brand new game like Gears of War in the glory days after your silly Overwatch clone failed”
Cliffy B:
“Nah. I WILL NOT LET THIS GO…ITS A FUN GREAT GAME”
CliffyB Tweeted: "Oh and while I have your attention - yes, it WAS a mistake putting LawBreakers on Playstation over Xbox. :)
(when people follow your career from a beloved series such as Gears on Xbox uhhh mighta made sense to put the new game on said console)"
Thinking you had a hit and lightning striking twice was a mistake. Good games transcend platforms. Me too games with low player bases don't last.
I would hope one would learn from one's mistakes but when Cliffy says that kind of BS it makes him sound like he still has no clue what makes a great game.
Exactly, as if a mediocre, bare bones, clone of a game would fair better if it was released on another platform, oh wait it was...on PC.
Cliffy B. is overthinking it. Quite simply, Lawbreakers was generic and forgettable.
The game received barely average scores across multiple publications and websites. Does he really think that Xbox media and the public would regard it as better just because of their fond memories of Gears of War?
Unfortunately in this business your often only as good as your last game, which in Cliffy’s case is Radical Heights.
Cliffy B never learns. He loves himself so much. In his eyes, he is amazkng and cannot do wrong. Everyone is at fault but him. So full of himself and that is why he fails over and over again.
Maybe the game could have fared better if it was on both consoles and cross play enabled. But we will never know now. It is what it is so no need to dwell on it there Cliffy.
"No clue what makes a great game"
Are you serious? he's been responsible for many games that people would class as great. Some of which he was a creative director on. Don't allow his incredible ability to be annoying to alter your perception of history.
So why are some games that only appear on a single platform still a hit. Logic and reality just gut punch Cliffy every time he opens his mouth to make an excuse for his own choices. Maybe the issue this time was he picked the wrong game to copy.
"makes him sound like he still has no clue what makes a great game."
Doubt he ever did. Given that all his games are arena shooters, he was just in the right place at the right time in the shooter era of gaming.
considering that his last two games, lawbreakers and then radical heights are the ONLY two failures he ever actually had, and that's because he was independent and self-financed,
I'd say he has one hell of a clue what makes a good game :
(DON'T SUPPOSE YOU EVER HEARD OF UNREAL TOURNAMENT, RIGHT?)
that was essentially the franchise that built epic games, which he was the creative mind 100%.
I love the revisionist history,
but you get a lot of that along with slanted facts with the PlayStation crowd.
he just didn't take into consideration all of the basic business circumstances.
you can't launch self-financed anymore unless you're making a tiny independent game, even then there's a huge chance you won't get an audience but if you lose the consequences are far less.
and @anubisG.
you might want to take a look at his development history and see some of the things he's done before you make an idiotic claim like you did "fails over and over again"
you DON'T know what you're talking about,
at all.
I’m assuming they mean making a game similar to other popular ones in the genre.
Like everyone these days jumping on the battle royal bandwagon with knock offs. Or people trying to follow Overwatch's success and put out imitations of it. Instead of trying to make a good game, they try to pop out a new game to get in on the latest fad.
Exactly mediocre cloned of a popular game and he blame PlayStation players for expecting higher quality and be treated like clients not a homeless at the bank door opening it.
During his gear years he was part of the I hate PlayStation ban wagon and he expected the PlayStation players to receive him with open arms 😂
Pc version was fine its just the match making sucked and should have had a server browser on Pc but they ignored the pc community.
Well, when you make a clone of a game that already isn't fun then I guess the result is going to be bad.
Cliffs B is such a sad adult. He has so much talent but his ego gets in the way too much. I still remember when he showed up on a live G4 panel taping to try to call out the hosts for giving his game “BulletStorm” a lower than what he thought he deserved score. It was one of the cringiest things to happen in the gaming world.
Edit for vid link:
https://cors.archive.org/de...
He’s seriously like the Kim Kardashian (from a few years ago)of the video game world: he’s always trying so hard to stay relevant by being overly vocal when in fact most people just know him for that one thing he did years ago. But unlike Kim who’s actually trying to better herself (by becoming a lawyer/ advocate for people who were unjustly given unfair treatment in the court system), he still try’s to use the tactics he used to to get attention without realizing he needs to improve himself to improve his presence.
I remember when I was going for lunch and Cliff walked out with his girl. By the time we got a table outdoors Cliffy was still sitting in the parking lot over revving the engine on his sports car. Everyone was sitting there trying to enjoy themselves and turning around not in the awe that he wanted but saying what a jerk. He tried to tear out of the parking lot onto Seaboard and almost wrecked his car.
Here he complains about the platform choice as if that is the issue but this is the same guy that said Sony was playing everyone.
https://v1.escapistmagazine...
Cliffy , nobody cares about your stupid game , don't blame the platforms blame yourself.
Lawbreakers and radical heighst where both mediocre games to say the least.and that doesn't change where you put them .
Lawbreakers was fun at least you had to aim and not just spam bs like overwatch with huge hitboxes . Playing overwatch is like playing a pc game with a controller.
Yeah. Keeping it exclusive was the least of the issues with this game. His fan base on Xbox would have made a marginal difference to the overall sales.
He made a cookie cutter game, in an over-saturated genre. The only reason he got as much attention as he did was because of his work on Gears, otherwise, there wasn't much to write home about with the game, and he didn't have the resources to make more than a mid-tier game, nor have a decent marketing budget which is what you need for these kinds of games.
Yeah cause putting it in a platform with less than half as many units out there would've made so much more sense. Your game just didn't stand out and you couldn't help but keep comparing yourself to overwatch. Your marketing sucked and the game wasn't good enough to make up for that mishap. Take the hit and move on Cliff
He starts the tweet with "oh and while I have your attention...". What a turd. How long was he sitting on that seething and waiting for a brief opportunity where people happen to be listening to him so that he can drop another excuse for failing
There were better options for PS players at the time . His game could of been a Big fish in a small pond type of thing on xbox, Or it just sucked like you said. IDK cause i never had a chance to play it .
It was on PC also, so the install base of the consoles wasn't the issue. A lot of his fans migrated to PS4 regardless this gen due to MS at the start of this gen, and realistically, the number of people that even know who he was, or what this game was, is pretty insignificant in the overall picture of what's considered a good game. His status as a game developer is just a way to open the door to more exposure. He lacked the funds, and I guess the ability to walk through that door. Almost all the marketing of this game focused around the contention of his comments from the past, his general hostility towards the gaming community(even on the Xbox side when they liked him), and his general douchery at the time. I personally never had much issue with him, but that is just the general feeling I got that people saw him as during the time of marketing this game. Just pissing off some die hard Xbox fans was irrelevant to the success of his game.
LOL. Yes because the console choice was the problem...not the fact it looked generic as hell and was releasing in a sea of other like clones trying to "steal" that "Overwatch magic".
Please, this guy has come out with every excuse in the book for this game failing, just admit it was a shitty generic game.
Why did he even say it like that. He should've said not putting it on every platform as a Free to play game was a mistake. I didn't even know this was on PS4 till just now, that's how little exposure it got.
Lawbreakers wouldn't have sold any better if it was on the Xbox One instead. That being said I would like to see Cliffy B make video games again and I'm curious if he could make a game like Gears of War again or not.
With Rod Fergusson now at Blizzard, I could see Microsoft bring in Cliffy B to help with Gears.
I said that when you announced it.
“ However, as Bleszinksi alludes to, there might have been a loyal audience that was left behind on Xbox One that may have helped keep Lawbreakers above water and gave it a chance to build a foundation to grow upon.”
Yeah, i reckon that would have helped
Even if it did, it wouldn’t be by much.
The game was generic and honestly the marketing sucked. During the time I barely saw any gameplay of coverage of this game and when it released I didn’t even know lol...
He needs to take and L and move on.
The only way it would of done good on Xbox, if it released now and was on game pass. I guess timing was bad also, but don’t act like if it was release during that time on Xbox it would of done extremely better.
"I said that when you announced it."
I mean, it isn't like you'd have said any different, Krib. Let's get real here.
OT: Sorry Cliff, your game didn't resonate. Plenty (and I do mean PLENTY) of other developers saw success exclusively on PS4, so there must have been some other factor at play for Lawbreakers
You're right, xbox owners don't care about quality, and this pile was way better than anything Microsoft was putting out....
The point that I was trying to get across to you is that no one really likes Lawbreakers
Listen, I have to block people because a certain person who thought he was too >cool< wouldn't stop harassing me after he couldn't comment on an article anymore.
I honestly doubt that "loyal audience" would have helped. People were loyal to his prior work more than him, and he is the kind of personality that even if you respect his work, it's often hard to respect him and the way he treated people.
He had fans, but all that does is make it so you have a foot in the door when it comes to marketing your game. He failed to use that opportunity as a benefit, and he never really was able to show off the game in a way that got people excited. Most of the talk I saw centered around the game was more about his attitudes of the past, and present at the time, and how generic the game looked. He didn't have the resources for a better marketing campaign, and relied too heavily on what he felt was his own popularity. To really bank off being a celebrity, it requires fans in the tens, if not hundreds of millions. Not tens or hundreds(being generous as I doubt that many recognize his name), of thousands.
Cliff must be feeling some kind of way since Epic has been getting so much attention lately. He wants some of that attention too, and of course there are websites that are happy to oblige.
His past ego guarantees I never buy a game from him. There's a couple tools that I never buy games from.
He is also implying that Xbox fans would enjoy a mediocre game over PS owners. He implies they would buy anything blindly because it's cliff B.
Cliffy b what can i say hes a jackass and a fanboy. If he would he had a choice he would be Microsoft first party studio
The guy is a loser and a fanboy and i bet he would love to be Microsofts first party studio
Cliffy B decided to go woke with a copy cat game that had no marketing.
A good game ruined by shit-tier marketing. Putting it on the Xbox-One wouldn't have made a difference.
Like people have said already, having it on the Xbox wouldn't have changed anything.
The game was pretty much a faster paced overwatch.
Also the fact that the game was suppose to be a free to play game, but then they changed it.
I don’t think it would’ve faired any better on Xbone. There’s a reason not many were interested in the game...
honestly he should have made a gears clone for ps4. everyone who owns a playstation would have spent the time to see what the fuss was about with it because we don't really have a game quite like gears. An adrenaline filled cover shooter would have sold well.
Instead cliffy wanted to copy the current fad which isn't the way to go about business in the video gaming world. Not to mention the game was just bad because he focused on fast paced skill which most people don't have, making the game unenjoyable and again the marketing was terrible. the only thing i remember about lawbreakers was that he said inflammatory things about xbox that he didnt need to. Basically fanboyism is ok for the average gamer but for the average developer it doesn't look good on you.
EDIT: also the game must have been terrible if so few people went out and didn't even try it on pc. second,online multiplayer people are a fickle crowd to be trying to appease. if you had put in the work on a good single player instead of chasing a quick cash grab you would have reaped dividends.
I would expect he had some kind of NDA with Epic not allowing for creation of 'gears clone'. Most people were associating him directly with Gears brand.
He was no longer working for them. I don't think they get to control whether or not you make similar unique games
Depends on what kind of papers you sign and your position in the company. I've seen clauses that forbid working on similiar projects for half a year or even a year after you leave the company. They have to reimburse you somehow for it, though.
Cliffy, nobody cares about Lawbreakers no matter what systems you put it on. They didn't then and they certainly don't now. Go have your fit somewhere else instead.
He needs to just stop and get over it. Keep in mind he laughed at and completely dismissed Fortnite...A multi BILLION dollar revenue generator. 1 year of Fortnite revenue eclipses the collective earnings of all titles he has ever been a part of releasing. Gears 1 earned 100m (no small potatoes, but not even close to 1B).
Don't get me wrong, I HATE Fortnite, but you can also understand the market appeal. He (as an industry insider) clearly does not.
While not a great game if it was on Xbox and gamespass it would have done at least a little better.
thats one way to ignore the fact that your game looks generic as fuck, lets just blame the platform haha. idiot.
No, that wasn't the mistake. Lawbreakers was in itself a mistake. But blame everyone but yourself. Typial CliffyB.
No just a crap game, Gears was obviously a flash in the pan for Cliffy B. He ran out of ideas after that😂😂
Basically overhyped loudmouth of a dev makes new ip that's nothing special and looks fairly generic. Sells badly. Blames hardware it released on and rhe player base rather than just accept it was clearly not great. I follow gaming news closely and either hadn't heard of this title or forgot all about it so the marketing nust have been crap aswell...
Also considering it's review scores I just looked up that woukd suggest that he is insinuating xbox players are mugs surely: he's basically saying they'd have bought it despite it being meh where a greater number of playstation gamers didn't.... or maybe he's suggesting xbox had so few exclusives they'll take what they can get- somehow I doubt that they would have bought it tbh.
This guy has literally blamed every external factor on the planet well before Lawbreakers.
It is a hall mark of a loser.
Was this not the guy who had his team jump in the battle royal bandwagon because fortnite and pubg was doing well?
How long did that game last? About 2 weeks until the servers was shut off.
This guy Cliff seems to make an awful lot of "mistakes"...... I mean, it couldn't possibly be that the game just wasn't that good to begin with. No, that would actually require some ownership responsibility. Some folks just don't have it in them. That's when the excuses start.
Lawbreakers wasnt a good game so it failed, cliff needs to stop making excuses.
Why was it bad tho? I never played it so I'm curious. The gameplay I saw looked fun and much more appealing than fortnite and some other popular games I've tried.
Aside from it being boring and unbalanced I only found 2 classes that were decent. The game probably needed more polish and then maybe it would have been ok but it just wasnt a good game imo. I dont like fortnite at all but it's better than this garbage.
Cliffy B just cant admit the game was bad and regardless of system it would have gotten the same result.
Please, for the love of God, stop giving this guy attention. He is a troll, one of the biggest video game Dev trolls there is. He moans at gamers for not getting his games when they buy them while equally moaning at other gamers when they dont buy them.
He's announced his retirement from the industry ages ago but he keeps coming back. Just let his gaming career die, he clearly does not deserve it.
Yea Cliffy, because GamePass alone was gonna save that game!? Lol. Should have gone f2p and had purchasable updates like war frame. That was LawBreakers only chance releasing so closely after Overwatch...
Cliffy has made every excuse possible why his game failed. Maybe just admit it was a bad idea altogether.
How many copies did you sell on PC?
This guy is a fool all he does it make excuses and blame everything but himself.
Cliffy B is coming home to the Xbox brand. I don’t know if he will get his own studio or will just be a consultant but he’s to talented not to be creating games
If he had gone the Xbox route, then it could have been included in the game pass, available for everyone who subscribed for free, thereby creating traction for this dead game. Did I guess right?
After reading.... wasn’t it on PC for a bit prior to Playstation? And it still had never gained the audience needed.
I think what he meant to say was 'this bare bones, bang average game is a perfect fit for gamepass'.......... I kid, I kid 🙄🙄
Yeah, I don't think different platforms would have changed the outcome.
there were like 1 or 2 classes that were slightly fun, balanced. game needed polish.
I think he should have gone with Xbox too. He helped define what Xbox 360 was, and built up an audience. Law Breakers was a better fit for Xbox imo and would have seen more success.
What he really means is: "Oh the PS4 has so many amazing games that no one gave a crap about our bad game, but if we had launched our game on xbox people would have bought it because the xbox barely has any decent games."
He’s trying to sell a book. So he’s saying stuff like this to drive interest. I don’t think releasing on Xbox over PlayStation would’ve saved the game, unless it released on gamepass.
It was a mistake for such a game to release only on one console. It has nothing to do with the PS4. You needed audience and this comes if you release on multiple consoles and PC.
Another part of the issue besides the game being a less than mediocre clone is that he is a bit of a dick. Because of that some people will not give his games a chance.
Or how about all platforms lol? I doubt it would have done much better. Everybody screams they want a skill based arena shooter but it’s a niche genre in reality. Who was it aimed at? The people who still play quake everyday? It’s not a mass market game.
So that's the reason is it? Yeah sure.. if your game is trash then it will be trash no matter the platform. Saying it would do well on Xbox? So are you saying Xbox owners are stupid and can't tell a trash game From a good one? Get the F lost!
Don't go uaing the ps4 as a scapegoat for your shitty game. A little game called Fortnite would have been a better excuse.
Can anyone be more clueless than this guy or is this supposed to be an insult for Xbox gamers saying they have poor taste and would like his crappy game. I think the biggest mistake he made was letting people play the beta so they could truly see how bad it was. That lost them more sales and traffic than anything.
Who takes this guy seriously nowadays? The game failed cause it was a wannabe clone of Overwatch and was coming in an already saturated market. Maybe for once, accept your own failures so you can mature.
So many people are saying this game is bad but I want to hear a reasonable explanation why. I never played the game so I'm genuinely curious. The game has a 76 on Meta for ps4/PC with generally good reviews and not any bad scores.
There might be something to this; putting it on the platform where there wasn't as much competition--and a platform that needed exclusive experiences--might've been beneficial.
he turned his back on the fans that made him who he is (was). does he think releasing that shitty game on xbox was going to make them love him again in retrospect? after all of the shit talking and betrayal? law breakers would have failed no matter what and Cliffs reputation is toast as far as im concerned as a gamer. he jumped the shark and flipped us the bird while he did it.
The game was just okay. It was a cool concept on paper, but the slow motion zones just got annoying after a while.
I'm just gonna be real here. I've never developed a game or anything even close. In fact, I've achieved so little in my life compared to Cliff that I'd label it 'tremendously embarrassing'. With that being said though... I think this guy has some poor perspective on gaming. Firstly, I'm sure this is the guy who moaned about people wall-bouncing in Gears of War 1 multiplayer. Just because it wasn't designed to be played that way doesn't mean that it wasn't fun as hell and a legitimate gameplay hook. Why even fight it? that's where I lost it with this guy (GoW 1 is in my top 5) why he didn't steer into the skid and realise he had something I'll never know. Secondly, I'd argue that only 25% of gamers could tell you which developer made Gears of War (most people really don't care that much). I'd also argue that of that 25% only 2% actually know who "Cliffy B" is. Of that 2% some don't even see eye to eye with his views on gaming (e.g. me). For him to presume that he has some sort of cult following like Kojima that could potentially sell games just based on reputation is just a bit odd.
OMG, I swear every time Cliffy opens his mouth I hear trains load with bullscheisse. :(
What the headline is: "Cliffy B Explains Why Putting Lawbreakers on PS4, Instead of Xbox One, Was a Mistake"
What it should be : "Lawbreakers Was a Mistake"
Cliff should have kept his leftist propaganda to himself. That’s the main reason people wanted nothing to do with Lawbreakers.
He's always had this toxic immature behaviour, against pc players when he was an xbox fan and against xbox when he switched sides to pc and ps4 and together with his delusion of grandeur cost him his company and two cancelled games.
I think the problem was the game itself. What an incredibly awful game. Guy is clueless.
Bad timing was the mistake. Marketting. etc, etc.
Great games go nowhere all the time. It just happens. Then a super hit like Fortnight or Minecraft comes around.
Instead of failing on one console it could have failed on the other.
Cliffy is a genius!
Goes to show you, it doesn't take much to luck out and be a one hit wonder. This guy might by be the closest thing to being the Milli Vanilli of gaming.
Making a clone of another popular game and then wondering why it didn't sell I thought he would of recognised that doesn't work from all the gears clones that came and went.
It does seem like more of an Xbox game than PS but the difference in sales wouldn't have been significant. Wrong game at the wrong time simple as that.
I love the fact that Lawbreakers-related topics get more attention than the game itself.
No, the mistake was trying to release a game in an over saturated genre that didn't really offer anything new
That was not the biggest issue with your game...dude is in serious denial.
Because we need more stories where women are being prayed upon by men in the bathroom...
No idea what this game is, but this is cool.
What a joke, I can't believe they're actually putting that in the game let alone GNB's even being a topic, that should never happen.
Anything to make more SJWs play your games, I guess...
Seriously wish developers would keep this crap away from games, maybe they think it's a neat touch or an artistic statement but really, there is enough ridiculous SJW stuff in RL to contend with, can't I escape that rubbish in my games now?