Many gamers have been clamoring for more "objective" reviews, but Splatoon handily demonstrates why such requests are troublesome.
No one is asking for only objective reviews, just not skewing the review based and subjectivity. There's room for both. Point out everything the game has to offer, and then give your opinion on whether, for you, it's more than the sum of its parts. To this author, splat on is, and Destiny isnt. And that's fair.
"No one is asking for only objective reviews" You would be surprised at the Twitter conversations I've had. I've spoken to people who think that if person A likes a game, and person B doesn't, one of them is wrong. I wish I was exaggerating.
A good review is both objective and subjective. Someone can tell you how a game is objectively and then tell you how they personally feel about it. This isn't rocket science, guys.
You can't have a review without a healthy dose of subjectivity... At the end of the day, it's an opinion on whether or not a game delivers... An objective review isn't a review at all... It's a list of features... Without the author giving his opinion on whether or not those features were implemented well and amounted to a good game, there's no point in reading...
i'd rather have a list of features. skill sets used while playing. strategies. bosses, maps, stages.
You most certainly can have a review without a healthy dose of subjectivity. What's more, you can have a review with subjectivity, but that doesn't pass off opinion as fact. The two things CAN exist. It's just become unpopular to allow for objectivity, and defending poor reviews with "it's just an opinion" has become the thing.
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.