Seeing the difference between the original and the reboot will blow your minds.
2 generations make a HUGE difference. WOW.
Well considering its also not a remaster or a remake...Its a re-imagining of the first game taking a new engine and some of the ideas from other games in the series...Its not just some straight up remake, thank god since the first didn't have lock on strafing
the difference is so much. cant wait to play this beauty
I hope they do a reboot of Up Your Arsenal
well u nerver know with 2&3 Re-Imagining
It obviously looks the same. Right?(sarcasm)
And by "true next gen" they mean a re-master,...cant belive i waited so long for a £300 remaster machine..lol
except its not a remaster. its a reboot
But it is a remaster... Just like Kanye West discovered that no name Paul McCartney /s Hey Dreamed, ignorant troll comments only work on the uninformed, and it seems you're the most uninformed one here.
Phantom Dust. Windwaker HD. Resident Evil. Bye, troll.
It is not even a remaster. They built the game from the group up for PS4.
it's a re-imagined remake, not a remaster
Except this is not a remaster and you should look better for new games...lol
It's current gen... Disagrees? lol Wow
The power of PS4 is truly amazing.
Ratchet and Clank sure has come a long way. Love the look of this game.
They comparing the ps4 to the ps2 really how about the ps3.
From the article, "the difference between the original and the reboot will blow your minds". Also, this is a reimagining of the FIRST GAME - on PS2...hence the comparison to show how it's changed. Where does the Ps3 come into this? :/ It looks astonishing and this comparison demonstrates how far they've brought the art style of the franchise.
Really how about read the article.
Oh my god... THE worst comparison ever. 1. PS2 footage is not 60fps as it is during gameplay 2. Did they use a phone from 2004 to film this? That looks: - blurred - washed out - EVEN MORE blurred. It's probably upscaled, and noone forced gamers in PS2 era to use crappy LCDs. CRT = no scaling needed (plus great image clarity in motion, of course) PS2 games on this engine, often supported progressive scan. The dumb idiot who made this comparison propably used a cable popular 20 years before PS2: http://amigakit.leamancompu... I return to PS2 and my CRT from time to time, and the game doesn't look like that at all. It even looks slightly better (than this in the "comparison") on a very crappy TV-card, when I connected the PS2 to it just from curiosity (bluuuurgh... never again). To sum it up: - let's cheer for a game that looks better than 13 year old version. - let's forget the older version had 40-50% of possible detail because of 60fps instead of crappy 30. - let's use some ancient cable, let's use interlaced mode, then let's add scaling and some cheap grabber or phone instead of taking the footage from PS2 emulator, if obtaining a true VGA-box was difficult. This is so dumb.
The PS2 footage came from a R&C video on YouTube. The PS4 footage came from IGN's recent preview.
You really hate your life don't you?
Are you serious???
its gonna be good i reckon.
I cannot wait for this, I love the series
good looking game.they put some efforts.
This game looks amazing. I thought it was the best looking game at e3.
Oh it looks way better than the Ps2 Game, well you don't say
It's pretty funny they compare graphics of PS2 to PS4 when they could've used PS3. Maybe it's because there isnt much difference in the graphical gameplay. 😂 Oh and this is coming from a PS4 owner.
I still see a big difference between [email protected] games on the PS3 and PS4. Problem here is that YouTube's horrible compression would probably ruin the IQ and make the comparisons alot more difficult. This is coming from someone who owns a PS4.
Get real. There isn't a big difference, dude. You can barely even tell with the PS2 footage. Also, they decide to run the PS4 version at 30 fps instead of 60. 😂 So imagine how much of a better comparison it would have been to the PS2/PS3 version. Oh and this is coming from a PS3 owner also.
The whole point was the compare the original version and the re-imagining, the PS3 has nothing to do with it.
Wait, so a PS4 remaster, sorry "reimagining" which apparently is a thing now because Sony says so, is running at half the framerate of it's PS2 predecessor? And this is ok? If MS did this they'd be rolling in the aisles. But hey as long as it runs at 1080p right?
It's a re-imaging because it features new story elements, planets, weapons, bosses. It's a re-imagining in the complete sense, not just because "Sony says so". It's not okay but it has nothing to do with Sony, the developers have stated they're no longer doing 60fps games and there's not much anybody can do about that.
Ok so it's a new Ratchet and Clank game. Why don't they just say that? That is too bad and kind of odd that a dev publicly says they are no longer doing 60fps. Why I wonder? I mean they're a Sony exclusive dev so why abandon 60fps?Is it a hardware thing?
Shouldn't it be compared to Ratchet and Clank on PS3 instead? Hmmm... anyway, looking forward to this one!
@ron bit fresh comin from someone with 2 bubbles....unless your more of a troll than i am?????
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.