A Shorter, But Cheaper Software Future for Gamers?

After the recent announcement of Ratchet and Clank: Quest for Booty's cheap price and short play time, two of the writers at GamePlasma were left arguing over whether there is "A Shorter, But Cheaper Software Future for Gamers?"

Read Full Story >>
The story is too old to be commented.
dxmnecro3776d ago

Pfft. Why should I pay $15 for a game that they can say is shorter and make me feel like I'm getting a deal, when I'm already used to the old system of $50 and 40-60 hours of game time(hopefully)

Old Snake3776d ago

I rather pay 15 bucks for a game that is 10 hours long than full price for a game that is 10 hours long

beavis4play3776d ago

it ended on a cliff-hanger. i wasn't happy i'd probably have to wait at least 1.5 yrs. to find out more of the story.
now, with this short psn game, i'll have my answers and hopefully a set-up for the next game. it can work in situations like this. and i'm sure there are other examples. but, to just say all games are going this route i don't think makes a lot of sense right now.(at least until much larger storage options become much cheaper)

Wildarmsjecht3776d ago

It's one game. Not the standarad point in which all games will be. They decided to give fans something to hold them over until thy can work on the next full fledged title. It involves the story, but also brings in something fresh.

sometimes I wonder if people will always take one game and use it as an example for all other titles.

Vojkan3776d ago

quest for booty is only 3 or 4 hours long, chech gamespot e3 live coverage from day one. Its an experiment.

Show all comments (16)
The story is too old to be commented.