Microsoft to have new exclusive IP's at E3
Very interesting its going to be more about first party than third. Looking forward to it.
Interesting indeed. Time to pump more cash into 1st party studios&new ips. Definitely gonna be looking forward to all they have planned.Currently all the major MS studios including the new ones i.e decisive games,lxp, mohjang etc all have new/ unannounced ip in the works and we aint even talking about exclusives from 2nd party studios. I also hope we get to see the rumored project from lift&lionhead.
it is likely the new game from rare. microsoft knows they are not winning the third party battle against sony so they pretty much have to up their game.
@moldy I always believed ms being behind would force their hands and push them to create more. No time for the complacency that can sometimes spore from being ahead. They cannot afford to act as they did near the latter end of last last gen . The chances are sony will continue to pump exclusives so ms, with all their wealth, ms shouldn't have a problem improving their output. I reckon phill will do a better job than his predecessors. I think he knows it wasn't just the bodged reveal that hurt the brand.
I will be looking forward to seeing what they have.
I heard somwhere that Epic has something to show based on the Samaritan/Infiltrator tech demos. Maybe it will be 1st party IP like Gears?
"Microsoft to have new exclusive ip's at E3" NO s***! Did it ever happen that a manufacturer went to e3 without a single new IP? It's strange, first time ever i am not hyped for an e3. Started last year, but this year is even worse.
" We should have new exclusive IP at E3. I'm trying to make this E3 more about 1st party than past E3s." That's very good to know. Third party announcements usually disappoint me in these keynotes. I expect to see stronger first party showings from the guys. No 10 minute long COD walkthroughs.
In other news, water is wet! Seriously, does anyone not think they won't have new first party ips to announce at E3? Bring it.
E3 exclusive ip's are a given. The main concern is how about exclusives right now.
It's not by choice. But I agree, it's better for them to focus on First party titles right now. Third parties aren't as willing to work with them as they once were.
MS losing COD marketing rights is still just a rumour. Will find out at E3 if true.
Third parties aren't as willing to work with them as they once were? Yeah, keep telling yourself that. Either way FINALLY they are putting more into their first party. I mean they stated this since launch that that's what they're going to do different. Since everything is going service based it only makes sense you have very strong content. Given the success EA had with EA Access it only makes sense to make your own first party games.
I'm not just talking about Black Ops 3. Which they did lose. They attempted to get timed exclusive rights for Mass Effect and were denied. Microsoft can offer a lot of money for rights or advertising to try to sway publishers. But consumers money is also relevant when making these decisions and the 2:1 install base in favor of PS4 is hard for publishers to pass up. When you look at consumer base for things like DLC, it only makes sense from a publishers perspective.
Got any links to backup those claims?
Microsoft and EA have a pretty good relationship and Microsofts AC: Unity deal paid off for both Ubisoft/MS. IDK what drugs you're on, yes third party support in Japan is going to be closed to nothing due to the low install base. But Worldwide the X1 is outpacing the 360 and the 360 had crazy support. Seriously how naive are you?
E3 is going to be fun.
We won't get any links from him. It's another rumor just like the same rumor that was going around last year that turned out to be false http://charlieintel.com/201... I tried googling it and couldn't even find any recent rumors of it. The only ones I could find were from early last year.
@Transister Please stop the nonsense. MS working deals with Third parties developers is just as important to Xbox as working up there portfolio of fantastic first party games. This year alone third parties have been important on MS with Evolve, COD, Dragon Age, Witcher 3 and I am sure The Division is next, plus a few surprises that they have not mentioned and will probably speak of at E3.
Wow people are bragging over marketing deals now? This industry needs to become one standard and one console like movies have nearly always been. Then we can actually talk about games and not whatever this nonsense is we're currently talking about
Doesn't really state anything about them owning the IPs. MS many times have called first party, IPs that are not owned by them.... Well see this E3.
Real gamers care most about the quality of the game. People looking for something to complain about care more about IP ownership and business details.
?? Yes..because we can't care about both? Bioshock, Lost Planet, Dead Rising, Dead Rising 3, Ryse, Ninja Gaiden II, Titan Fall,Mass Effect and the list goes on... This wouldn't really be the first time MS has had an exclusive that went else where either because it was timed, they didn't won the IP, team etc. Quality games...I agree, exclusive? Now...I would like to spend $400 on a XONE for a title that won't just end up on PC or PS4 which I already own 6 months to a year later. MS is sorta know for that. Example. They don't own the Sunset Overdrive IP, thus...could end up on PC, PS4 etc. They DO own the Scalebound IP...thus, I'll be a bit more excited about Scalebound in terms of buying an XONE as its owned by MS and my purchase can actually be legitimized vs finding out its just coming to PC later on... Sorry but they have a history of this sort of thing and I'm not made of money, when Sony publishes a title.....it stays on its platforms..... I have no issue buying a PS4 for Sony's Ips as Sony's games stay on its system, MS publishes titles that many times end up else where lol. I need to know bud. I care about the quality, but that doesn't mean I'll just buy a XONE for any damn game knowing this companies shady history with timed games. I own Titan Fall, Ryse and Dead Rising 3 too bud....guess what? I don't own an XONE, saved me LOTS of money waiting as it was wise to not believe in MS BS and just wait for the truth to surface regarding those supposed exclusivity deals. Might have to wait for those other deals to happen too lol.
"I need to know bud. I care about the quality, but that doesn't mean I'll just buy a XONE for any damn game knowing this companies shady history with timed games." Like I said in my other comment, you seem to think it's perfectly OK when Sony does it, but not when MS does it. You use the word "shady" to describe MS's third party exclusive deals. Where's your equally strong language regarding Sony's? Talk about a fanboy cheerleader.
"Like I said in my other comment, you seem to think it's perfectly OK when Sony does it" Nope, this is what I said bud. ""I don't really believe in that BS, not from Tomb Raider and not from SFV" Soooo I'm not in support of timed games from either and don't buy that they some how really needed to be funded or wouldn't exist." and "As a gamer, this is best for us, not Tomb Raider or SFV. I'm sorry but that money could have been used else where. SFV will be on XONE, Tomb Raider will be on PS4" Only thing I actually stated regarding Sony was that they at least own enough teams to do such a thing.... MS currently has the least and I don't think its wise to delay games as some sort of advantage when XB fans would rather have real exclusives vs delays, again...what do delays get you? I again don't support the practice on either side, I don't' even get why you keep making it seem as if I'm fine with timed games from Sony.....I'm pretty sure I made it clear I'm not ok with SFV nor Tomb Raider as I feel they are waste and only benefit Sony and MS as companies in terms of sales, they don't aid the gamer. Again....PS4 owners will get Tomb Raider anyway, XONE owners will get SFV anyway. Thus....would you as a gamer rather just have a new owned ip as you would be getting those games regardless? Sony isn't give us PS4 gamers SFV just like MS isn't giving its gamers Tomb Raider...they are merely delaying a game to make it seem as if they have a stable library, at the end of the day...waiting a few months will show those games to be timed and it won't really matter. Sooo would you rather have them spend the money on a new IP or Tomb Raider? Let me remind you you'll STILL GET TOMB RAIDER! lol, soooo your happy to lose some IPs merely to get another version delayed? Is the delay some how helping you or MS? I once again don't think some delay on another version is to some how be praised... Sony isn't GIVING me SFV, they are just delaying it on XONE ,same with MS with Tomb Raider... I'm not sure why you would see MS as giving you anything.... I'm happy to hear them focusing in house as they should be, any gamer in general should be happy to hear such news. I really don't get why a delay of a timed game would aid anyone....other then the publisher and company paying for the timed game. That doesn't help gamers. If MS money hatted Evolve and delayed would they be giving you anything? Sooo would you take away one of the exclusives IPs coming from MS to have a PS4 delay? LOL! As if thats some how helping you in any way. No reason to support timed games bud...not even slightly.
Well Phil stated they have more first party to show off this time around. But what if it is 3rd party along side 1st Oh your probably gonna complain go figure.
So, what Sony IP's are you losing by getting SFV early? Apparently you know EXACTLY how MS spends their money. You seem to be 100% sure that MS must have cancelled a new IP to get the Tomb Raider deal. Both sides do the same thing. It all balances out. If you feel MS is cancelling new IP's, then you must also feel Sony is cancelling new IP's. Of course, you don't because of your bias. Also, you can't deny that you call MS's deals "shady", while using no such language to describe Sony's deals. You're a hypocrite, plain and simple.
Hopefully it's not just timed exclusives like Tomb Raider but actual first party games
Every console manufacturer will show exclusives and New ip at e3. Why is this news?
Microsoft my wallet is ready. Take all my money.
I would settle for a ton of both new first party IP'S and a few 3rd party turned exclusive. ........... One thing they need to do is stop with these lame short term timed Exclusive deals . Not saying they need to buy all IP'S ,but funding and long publishing contracts are a good start.
More about 1st party? Meaning its a first party exclusive. Probably gears as we have no actual confirmation of that yet. Maybe something else, Sony will have an exclusive too no doubt as no way have they already released all there announcements of IPs in star ocean/street fighter etc.. and left none for e3. meaning E3 this year is gonna be amazing!!
People doubted this? Xbox has had games since the beginning. You think dead rising, over drive, quantum break, scalebound, killer instinct, fable, forza 5,6,h2,ori, halo mcc & halo 5, gears(gears coming and you know it), phantom dust, went into development after first year sales dipped? These games take years to make. Ps4 is weak right without bloodbourne. Ps4 sales mean little in terms of games right now. Or if so cod sales means cod is the best game ever made every year over and over. As a gamer I think sony needs to step it up this year. Insert ps4 game list below guys I won't read all the indie games and japanese take turns attacking/rpg games I don't care about. Mk looks better than sf5(same ol same ol) so xbox gamers seem set. Ps4 will be more worth it imo in 2016. Sonys marketing team is fantastic and the fanboys are excited for and filling up the "star wars exclusive ps4 marketing" articles. Oh and spotify. It will make the gameplay better somehow. Glad I didn't get ps4 yet. I have a pc so no man's sky, sf5(meh), eve valkorie, hell blade 60fps 1440p I hope for me. 1080 is ok though. Only 2 games I want that are on xbox I can get on pc so.. Wake me up when uncharted comes and I'll pick and copy of the amazing looking bloodborn. May your disagrees block out the sun. E3 will be huge for all platforms. Hope pc will have a bigger presence. Didn't phil say they may have to push back games because of the amount coming? Between halo 5, tomb raider, forza 6 then multi plats like star wars I am glad quantum break is pushed back to not over lap with tomb raider. To much for xbox to do. More exclusives incoming. Seems MS is more focused on AAA than Sony this gen starting out. Most of the exclusives they talk up are big budget. Off topic: Also dx12 won't do much lol
If you look into the archives of history, you'll see that Sony has never had a stellar first year for any of their legendary consoles and it takes then a good couple of years to get the ball rolling on first-party exclusives. After which point, they are on fire and a force to be reckoned with. It's great that you have a PC, but that doesn't invalidate the fact that these games are also on PS4, and provide more reason for the millions of people out there who game exclusively on consoles to choose the PS4 because XB1 or Wii U doesn't have said games. PS4 - regardless of indies, console exclusives, "niche" games and Japanese games that seem to be easy for you to disregard like they're not actual games - has better rated games overall than Xbox One. It has more games, more diversity and more sales. So it has it all basically. You can be short-sighted or only look at a few pieces of the puzzle, but it won't change any of that. ----- More relevant to note, is that whilst you're praising Microsoft for their lineup (fair enough), there is a reason they have more AAA exclusives currently. Compare the output of Sony and their PS3 from 2011-2013, to Microsoft's support of the 360 in terms of exclusive games during those years. Not so great for MS. Sony were doing TONS more in terms of bringing large quantities of diverse and well-rounded games to their console. These companies have limited in-house developers. Sony's were all making PS3 games, whilst Microsoft left the 360 with major exclusive game droughts, and focused on getting an early start with the XB1, but still came up short due to a wild Cerny. ;) I mention all of this because people like to conveniently forget all of it when they mock Sony and their PS4 lineup. Things have become more aggressive when arguing about the "AAA exclusives" situation because of the state of fanboyism, not because Sony is doing anything different than the norm.
More about first party, that's what i wanted to hear.
Definitely great to hear. Getting super hyped for E3 now :o
Great and this was a given but also nice to have it confirmed E3 is going to spectacular
If you think MS focusing on new IPs, especially when they're investing into their own studios instead of just throwing money at 3rd party devs, is a given you haven't been paying any attention whatsoever. I hope E3 is great this year, but I always keep my expectations in check.
this is what i like to hear, a bit more fight from Microsoft, now officially stoked for Microsoft E32015, i just want Xbox One to make that comeback man, i know the machine can, cheers Phil
I hope we see a game changing IP for the xbox. Halo was that game changing IP for og Xbox, gears was the game changing IP for the 360, and I hope they show off their next big thing at E3. Hopefully they find a studio soon to get started on it. Another thing I want this year is an action adventure third person shooter IP or a serious open world shooter IP. Lastly I need some Crackdown gameplay as well as new Quantum Break gameplay. A new IP from Mojang would be interesting as well.
It might be Scalebound.
nicee scalebound gameplay quantum break more gameplay and release date crackdown gameplay gears teaser trailer Phantom dust gameplay or beta fall 2015 Rare new game halo wars 2 Halo 5 gameplay singleplayer tomb raider gameplay forza 6 gameplay 1 or 2 new ip and i have made my E3
how is that wishful thinking?Phil just said the show will be a 1st party affair and he also said there would be new ips.so most likely we will see most of those games and some new ips at the show .
Continue you with the petty lists, I mean seriously what else is n4g used for aside from spamming lists of either x1 exclusives or ps4 exclusives. Seriously this is getting old fast, I think people who just spam lists of exclusives should get restricted to posting as much if they're just shamelessly spamming.
BASED PHIL SPENCER BRINGING THE GAMES
Deleted comment, Ic3fir3 said basically the same thing above
see the time lol im first dude
Yeah you had me by a minute lol I didn't want to fill up the comments with the same list
Awesome. I'm expecting a lot of Scalebound & Quantum Break gameplay as well as some new Gears of War gameplay. Looking forward to see what Sony has planned as well. I'm so inundated with amazing games right now between BloodBorne and Dark Souls Scholar of the First Sin. Still have Witcher 3, Rise of Tomb Raider & MGS5 Phantom Pain coming up too. It's almost too much but I'm not complaining. The only problem is coming up with the funds to play all these amazing games while juggling bills.
Scalebound Crackdown Fable Star Control Gears Halo 5 Tomb Raider 2 new Rare games Showing us the power of DX12 and Cloud! E3 looking great.
Halo 5 and gears, is all i need
Keep spamming dem fanboy lists.
"I'm trying to make this E3 more about 1st party than past E3s." I'm sure they saw Nintendo's E3 presentation and took notes on how to do a presentation right. All exclusives and show gameplay. This is what every company should do.
Don't think that has anything to do with it. Consider they are getting beat by Sony....again for the 3rd time and those timed games are not helping them as everyone sees through them pretty quickly. Remember how fast everyone was talking about a PS4 version of Tomb Raider before MS even stated the specifics? Its because no one cares, we've been through this BS before by them, its see you in 6 months to a year and we'll see those versions of the game you claimed didn't exist... They've abused it sooooo many times, to the point where it doesn't work, I'm not sure who is buying a XONE for Tomb Raider instead of a PS4, if you were alive last gen...you'll know that MS sorta had a habit of doing this. Now it seems its just not working anymore. Its costing them lots of money, they are still getting outsold and its clear that fans don't care for delays, they care about REAL first party games. What is MS doing for its fans by delaying the PS4 version? Sooooooo MS fans are getting a game they would have already been getting? Sooooo MS isn't really giving anything they are merely delaying other versions? So would you rather have a delay of another version or have a new ip? I mean...what is delaying another version doing for you? Look at all the comments, gamers are happy to hear this! THIS is what they should have been doing for years now, Sony has purchased a wave of teams to invest in just that, where as MS has spent lots money to delay versions just to make the appearance of having a stable first party....their first party is not only weak, they don't seem to be doing much about it. I'm sorry but Sunset Overdrive, Titan Fall, Ryse, Dead Rising 3, Tomb Raider etc are all bandaids...they don't fix MS situation, in fact they make it much worse. Had MS had just let those games go to any systems and focused on actually using that money on new studios and new ips THEY OWN, they would have been in a better position. Think about this....Assassins Creed was once going to be a PS3 exclusive..., so was FFXIII, now consider both those games appeared on PC, X360 etc, what would it really do for Sony fans to have those games timed? Soooooooo take money from Uncharted? The Last Of Us? Money that could have been used to buy Evolution studios? Is it helping fans or helping MS as a company? Because a timed games is nothing more then a delay on another system, its not some game that you would have NEVER played unless it was money hatted, I don't really believe in that BS, not from Tomb Raider and not from SFV. At least Sony owns the most first party studios to do such a thing, MS shouldn't be doing that as much as they need a stable foundation and need more teams, not money hats.
Pretty ridiculous, incredibly biased comment. A quality game is a quality game, regardless of who owns the studio. If such a game appears on your console but not on your competitors' console, it's a win for all involved with that console. You seem more concerned with who's name is on the lease to the studio than about the actual quality of the game. Saying that a high quality game like Sunset Overdrive is a band-aid and hurts MS is just a ridiculous fanboy comment. I hope there's dozens more games like Sunset Overdrive in the years to come. When I play a quality game, I couldn't care less who owns the studio that made it. That information doesn't affect my enjoyment one iota. Apparently, it affects yours though. Owning a studio does not guarantee quality. Sony fans have been portraying MS as some sort of evil company for years because securing third party exclusivity is something MS has done better than Sony in recent years. If you knew your gaming history, you'd know that third party exclusives and delaying releases on opposing consoles is what helped Sony during the years you like to brag about. Grand Theft Auto III, GTA Vice City, Ultimate Mortal Kombat 3, the original Tomb Raider - these were some of the biggest reasons to choose the Playstation brand over other consoles. Now that MS does it better, you can't stand it. Fortunately, Xbox owners realize that quality games come from talented developers, regardless of who signs their paycheck.
So what you are saying is that you hate MS and have no clue what you are talking about. As both MS and Sony have done this sort of thing repeatedly, bandaids to people that don't own the games and are butt hurt about any game that doesn't get announced for PS4. Every major exclusive MS has come out Sony fans have posted a petition to bring it to PS4, think about that.
Such a great comment. It's amazing how anyone can disagree with you. Just goes to show the mindset of a certain group.
"Owning a studio does not guarantee quality" Never said that bud. Merely that the practice makes no sense as its just delaying games, not providing them. MS doesn't own those IPs. Thus...they are again merely paying to delay. Yes...many are quality games...yes....many of those games are good..... They would have always been good and of quality regardless of a PS4 or PC delay, once again. "What is MS doing for its fans by delaying the PS4 version?" or really any other version for that matter? My point is not about the quality of the title, merely that the title isn't owned my MS, MS isn't giving you anything...they are again just delaying another version. I would rather see that money put to them buying a studio as you still get Titan Fall, Dead Rising 3, Tomb Raider etc with that option, it means MORE games for gamers. I'm sorry but the only people that agree to timed games are fanboy cheerleaders. What is a delay of a game doing for you? "I don't really believe in that BS, not from Tomb Raider and not from SFV" Soooo I'm not in support of timed games from either and don't buy that they some how really needed to be funded or wouldn't exist...I really don't buy that as the price for paying for that funding might as well be used to just buy the IP if they really can't afford to make it, they likely can't afford to even hold the IP...anyone thinks its strange they are poor enough to not make it, yet just enough money to keep the ip? Sounds more like Sony is paying for a delay JUST like MS was paying for a delay...no different. But again...at least Sony owns more studios to be able to do this, MS already has the least and paying for timed games doesn't really make sense. They should be using the at money in house for REAL exclusives vs paying to delay. As a gamer, this is best for us, not Tomb Raider or SFV. I'm sorry but that money could have been used else where. SFV will be on XONE, Tomb Raider will be on PS4....but at least Sony isn't running dry on teams, MS already has very little teams and doing timed games doesn't really help and actually shows they have very little interest in really making owned exclusives... Mind you....last I checked, the entire GTA series is on many systems and at the time, XB had so little units, how do you know Sony paid for them to NOT bring it to XB when XB sold the least? is Sony and MS paying all of 3rd parties to not make Wii U games? You sure it wasn't based on LOW SALES? As the GTA series is on both day and date now. Rockstar was even trying to make a Gamecube version but Nintendo wouldn't allow it... "Xbox owners realize that quality games come from talented developers" irrelevant. Those games would be coming to you either way bud, thats sorta of the point. I again am not ok with timed games. MS has clearly confirmed those titles where timed as they go else were a year to 6 months later, Rockstar, Square etc haven't just turned up talking about deals with Sony if they even existed. Consider XB was brand new at the time and not even known if MS would stick around in gaming. Some titles didn't go on XB JUST like some still don't today, based purely off of bad sales. Not every title that comes later on is some sort of deal. No reason to be mad, be glad! This is a good thing and means more REAL exclusives and not timed games, read what the fans are saying. I'd rather see that money put to real exclusives vs delays, wouldn't you?
Don't know how my comment turned into a MS vs Sony or anything about Tomb Raider or SFV. I am not even sure if your reply was even meant for me.
@Ed how does this tie in with Nintendos E3 presentation last E3?
By your standards, timed exclusivity doesn't work. Tell me then, how is paying just to advertise a game that is on both consoles better? Sony does that all the time! Wouldn't it make more sense to have their 1st party studios release something meaningful this holiday instead of advertising a game that is available on XB1 as well? Edit: Oh, and Rockstar sued Sony for "breech of contract", a contract Sony paid for, to get their GTA games out on XBOX early. If you wanted to know, the internet is useful for more than just making fanboy comments in threads they don't belong in. Try looking things up before you post.
"I am not even sure if your reply was even meant for me." "Don't think that has anything to do with it. Consider they are getting beat by Sony....again for the 3rd time and those timed games are not helping them as everyone sees through them pretty quickly." Basically, Sony is more influential with third parties now, so Microsoft has no choice but to focus on first party titles. Honestly, that's a more reasonable- more likely, anyway- conclusion than that they learned from Nintendo's last E3 conference.
OooooooR maybe MS is tired of hearing Sony fanboy bitching and moaning " bu bu bu MS should make their own IP instead of buying them" so now when they do so it's " bu bu bu Sony is selling better so they have no choice" so now Sony is doing what MS did last gen so now it's acceptable. You prove that sonyfanboys are so hypocritical. You bash a company you hate for anything they do until your favorite company does it then its ok.
@Vega275 "Sony is doing what MS did last gen so now it's acceptable." Yea, pretty funny right? MS has more focus on 1st party titles so the excuse from a lot of the Sony crowd of MS not having any 1st party games has been ripped from underneath them. Now their focus is on third party multiplat games and how Sony is more "influential" (whatever that means since THEY ARE MOSTLY MULTIPLATS) with other devs. "You bash a company you hate for anything they do until your favorite company does it then its ok." truth.
Water is wet.......talk about pointless article.