160°

Can One Game Sell A System?

"Others will wait for a system library to pile up, and console pricing to plummet. KJ is unsure if he can last years without playing the hottest titles." -Play Legit

Read Full Story >>
playlegit.net
Crazyglues3315d ago

Of course, and especially when that game is something like Uncharted 4 / The Last of Us...

Rimeskeem3315d ago (Edited 3315d ago )

Or Halo/Gears of War

I firmly believe that there are systems sellers

FinalFantasyFanatic3315d ago

Yes, If I remember right, the original Xbox didn't get popular until Halo came out, in turn that probably attracted more console purchases and Dev interest in the system. Pretty much every console has their system sellers that push those sales.

Kingthrash3603315d ago

I rEmber when mario kart came out for wiiu ...had wiiu selling like hot cakes...After it died down so did wiiu sales....proof is right there.
New ip are great but not system sellers..even the good ones.. Imo it's the mario/uncharted/halos of the world that sell consoles (to name a few...zelda, gow, gears, metroid, and infamous, also) all first party games btw...All system sellers.

sonarus3315d ago

Its hard for most people to justify purchasing a system for one game. But there is that rear game we all hold dear that most of us would do almost anything to play. For some its Halo/gears of war. Though in my opinion the gears series was already stale as fu** by gears 3.

For me its MGS. If that game was only out on a virtual boy i would find one and buy it. A new god of war might do it as well.

TheRedButterfly3315d ago

Halo (and Gears, but mostly Halo) has been the main reason for people to buy an Xbox since November 2001.

It's the reason I got one, the reason I keep getting them, and the reason I will continue to get them. I can get (almost) everything else on other platforms, but I can only get Halo on Xbox. Would I get them elsewhere? Probably not - I enjoy having everything in one single spot (and I've grown attached to my Gamerscore), but I know I have options when it comes to where to get Batman Arkham Knight and The Witcher 3.

MrSec843315d ago (Edited 3315d ago )

I can't agree, in order to be a system seller that one game would have to be enough to entice people into buying that platform, but with Halo the system already had the install base and Halo just caused a reasonable spike, but then a week later the hardware sales fell back down.

Usually you'll find that other games increased their numbers when a supposed system seller releases too, probably because Halo or whatever was the last game they were waiting for before they would get into that platform, but they didn't just want Halo, they wanted a bunch of games.

A library of content has way more weight than a single supposedly big game.
Halo definitely sells very well, but it's usually because the audience for that game already owns an Xbox.

Me personally I waited to get a 360 until a decent deal was available, I wanted to play Halo, but it wasn't the only game I wanted, Gears, Forza, Fable, Project Gotham and the bundle and pricing factors were important to selling me on the system as well.
Multiplats running the best and friends having that system were important things too me as well.

PS3 had a bunch of games I wanted like Resistance, Motorstorm, eventually GT, Ratchet & Clank, Uncharted and others.

This has been the case with me and I think most gamers look at buying a games system as an investment, they don't just shell out hundreds of pounds or whatever currency to buy one game.

Razuel3315d ago

it is unfortunate that sony does not have a competitive multiplayer exclusive system seller. "still"

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3315d ago
Crazyglues3315d ago (Edited 3315d ago )

@ rimeskeem

Yes indeed, on both systems there are games that indeed sell the system..

Didn't mean to imply that it's just on PS4..

Rimeskeem3315d ago

It's ok, didn't mean to attack you or anything. Sorry if it came off like that

Highlife3315d ago

What is this respectful talk? This is the internet right. If only this was common. Bubs for both.

Letthewookiewin3315d ago

What! Kindness, unacceptable fight to the death holding your system of choice!

Aloy-Boyfriend3315d ago (Edited 3315d ago )

Naughty Dog themselves are a system seller. Anything they do sells. Notice how each game gains more sales than the previos ones. U3 sold over 5 milli and TLOU sold 7 milli the last time I've heard of it. U4 will definitely reach a milestone and sell some more PS4s with the right marketing.

Naughty Dog has the spotlight now in the gaming world thanks to the overwhelming success of TLOU.

Drake as of now is the PlayStation mascot just like Zelda is for Nintendo and Masterchief for Xbox. Mascots are the true system sellers. Others can also be sellers. I'm eager to know how Bloodborne has impacted PS4's sales

PsBoxGamer3315d ago

MARIO is Nintendos Mascot bro.

Aloy-Boyfriend3315d ago

Yeah but I think zelda sells more. Mario didn't sell much Wii us. Zelda on the other hand would do much better

InTheLab3315d ago

Dude Zelda on its best day can't touch Mario's sales. We're talking 3 to 5 million versus 5 to 10 on any of their consoles...

themonado3315d ago

Wait, what...? As far as I know, Zelda has never outsold Mario.

otherZinc3315d ago (Edited 3315d ago )

@XiKurapikaKurta,

No, Naughty Dog isn't "the spotlight of the gaming world", please.

If Naughty Dog were the "spotlight", Amy Henning, top programmers, directors, and employees wouldn't have been laid-off. That's why Uncharted 4 is being delayed to 2016, they're understaffed.

344 Industries, on the other hand, is bolstering it's studio. 5 Halo Novels, Halo Movies, Halo Comics, Halo Encyclopedia, New Halo Action Figures, AND: *Halo 5 complete with Campaign,
Campaign Co-op, Forge, Multiplayer, Etc...
In 1080p 60fps with Windows 10 &
DirectX 12; All releasing 2015!

That's what happens when you're considered the "center of the gaming universe".

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3315d ago
jonboi243315d ago

I bought a Gamecube for Smash and a PS for FF7.

Ninver3315d ago

I got a PS for Speed Freaks. Ah silly memories.

Macdaddy713315d ago

And here goes asking dumb stuff again, if one game would not sell systems they would not make first party games!!!! Why even ask that.....find some Real gaming news and write a good thread,.. Dang enough with this,..

bacrec13315d ago

I don't know about that. Is there a definitive PC game out there?

ZombieKiller3315d ago

Gears of War sold an xbox 360 to me.

God of War
Uncharted

When it was exclusive to PS, Devil May Cry and Metal Gear Solid for the Playstation. Now it's a whole bunch of "system sellers" for me.

Hell, the reason I KEEP buying the consoles is the exclusives. Not to mention the PC guys only getting GTA V now. I don't know where I would be without GTA in my life lol!

joab7773315d ago

The beauty is that it doesn't have to.

tmh35933315d ago

yes and if DS 2 wasnt coming out in a week id go buy a ps4 for bloodbourne right now, im so petroleum jelly ps4 has it exclusively

jcnba283315d ago

Didn't you mean Mario kart Wii?

Over 35 million copies sold.

I don't think any Sony or Microsoft game has even come close to that number.

3314d ago
+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 3314d ago
HammadTheBeast3315d ago

Bloodborne. Halo 5. Legend of Zelda. Overwatch.

All of these are games which can sell systems. So, the answer to that question is yes.

JsonHenry3315d ago

Yes. I had bought a launch day PS4, but it broke. So I've been without a PS4 for about 6 months now. Watched one Twitch stream of Bloodbourne and went out and bought a new finally after putting it off for too long.

Rimeskeem3315d ago

you didn't have a year warranty?

JsonHenry3315d ago

I DID have a warranty. But I opened mine up the first day I bought it to look inside of it and voided the warranty long before it broke.

I'm a PC "elitist". And one of our quirks is checking out the hardware under the hood. Warranty be damned.

OUROSMAG3315d ago

Bloodborne is already moving units, a few of my friends bought one because of Bloodborne, and look at sales in japan.

RAM0N 3315d ago

Of course i bought a ps4 because of bloodborne

Show all comments (63)
120°

6 Games That Genuinely Deserve A Current-Gen Upgrade

Games such as Mad Max, Red Dead Redemption 2, and Batman: Arkham Knight desperately deserve a modern-day revisit.

thorstein7d ago

Mad Max is underrated. Such a fun game.

Cacabunga7d ago (Edited 7d ago )

RDR2 still looks astounding on PS4 Pro. i cannot imagine how it could look with a next gen upgrade.

JonTheGod6d ago (Edited 6d ago )

Probably not very different.

No idea why this article is highlighting recent beautiful graphically-advanced games and saying they need current gen makeovers. They already look better than most new releases; just compare Arkham Knight and Suicide Squad!

Yi-Long6d ago

It's obviously never gonna happen since Sony killed the game and studio, but Driveclub. Even in its current state, 10 years after release, it still puts many competitors to shame ...

Demetrius6d ago

I'm not into racing games but yeah I even looked at gameplay of that sometimes

Demetrius6d ago

Mad max ikr! Far cry primal, it amuses me how ubisoft just left ac unity hanging, sadly most of the good staff left from rocksteady while being forced to make that abomination smh

160°

15 Single Player Games That Divided Fans

One way or another, these games provoked strong reactions.

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
banger8813d ago

I don't think Days Gone divided fans. For the most part, gamers loved it. It was the reviewers who were divided. Self-loathing racist pieces of shit that took exception to the main character being white. This was a fantastic game, one of the best open-world games I ever played, and I've played them all.

Cacabunga13d ago (Edited 13d ago )

Second you on this.. I had absolute blast playing this game!! Memorable!

TLOU 2 I thought was utter s***.. I still haven’t finished it and stopped about halfway (apparently).

It wasn’t fans divided around The Order, it was a period where xbox fanboys were thinking Rise was a more engaging game so they were spreading a lot of hate..
Today they are hibernating with nothing to play
The Order was short, no denying, but a great game with huge potential

shinoff218312d ago

I enjoyed days gone and last of us 2. PeoPke trippin.

I always thought the order was kinda whack seeming so I never tried it. Id like to now though.

Jon6158612d ago

No thr order was a short, clunky mediocre yet visually stunning game. I thoughts so and pretty much every other reviewer did too.

thorstein12d ago

The Order, where length was a criterion for rating a game, but only this particular game and no others.

Demetrius13d ago

I agree on my 2nd playthrough, ps5 this time

RavenWolfx13d ago

While I enjoy what is there in Days Gone, I mourn what was lost. The first trailers for Days Gone showed a morality system that looked interesting. For example, in the beginning when you are chasing down Leon and after you caught him, you could choose to shoot him or leave him for the freaks. You can see hints of it in other places, like if you catch a bandit unaware sometimes they will disarm and it seems like Deacon had the option to shoot them or let them go (he automatically lets them go).

Crows9012d ago

Whatever...those systems unless revolutionary don't add much...they rarely do in games that do have them.

anast13d ago

For the most part, when it comes to Last of Us 2, incels, homophobes, and closet national socialist types didn't like it. I repeat not all, but most.

Days Gone is a great game and it was attacked by the leftist socialist people that are actually closet fascists. As a great poet once said: "Socialism is the mother of fascism."

The Order got hit from anti-Sony Xbox fans.

Out of these 3, Last of Us 2 stands above as being a work of art. It's still generating a ton conversation to this day.

coolbeans12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

-"Last of Us 2, incels, homophobes, and closet national socialist types didn't like it. I repeat not all, but most."

It's so weird & cringe to see other gamers paint this broad brush of *who* didn't like Part II. Why take the "most who disagree with me are Hitler" type of mentality over game tastes?

-"The Order got hit from anti-Sony Xbox fans."

No other community I've dabbled in - be it social media or gaming forums - has built up such a dedicated defense for The Order like N4G. This attitude fundamentally blows my mind, especially in the face of similar older titles (hello Uncharted 1) that already did a marginally better job at storytelling and gameplay. It almost feels like some N4G group chat made this reflexive defense as a meme and a bunch of posters are still playing along with it. No offense to genuine Order fans, but I simply can't shake that feeling.

Yui_Suzumiya12d ago

Well to be fair, I remember being only one of a few people on this site that actually praised The Order when it for came out and got alot of flack for it. Over time it seems opinions have changed about it.

anast12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

saying something is "cringe" doesn't prove me wrong. You just throw words out and hope they stick. Bring some evidence to prove me otherwise.

I got:

Letizi, R., & Norman, C. (2023). “You Took That From Me”: Conspiracism and Online Harassment in the Alt-Fandom of The Last of Us Part II. Games and Culture, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/155...

You're up. Maybe you can change my mind.

Because NG4 defended it doesn't mean NG4 is the gospel of gaming.

thorstein12d ago

Yeah Yui, it was "the game to hate" at the time. What was bizarre was the, as usual, journalists that were lying about the game and their stories were approved.

It was all clickhate all the time for the Order. I defended it too.

coolbeans11d ago

@Yui

-"I remember being only one of a few people on this site that actually praised The Order when it for came out and got alot of flack for it."

That could've been the case right at release, but you should see more recent opinion articles on here. There's a pretty substantial cadre who defend it on here as being "unfairly tarnished" that I simply don't see elsewhere.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 11d ago
Skuletor12d ago

Most of the backlash against The Last Of Us 2 was people upset that Joel was killed off, simple as that.

anast12d ago

There is that too, but the other groups pilled on too, which increased the numbers. I really don't see why we have to ignore everything but Joel being killed.

Inverno12d ago

I didn't like Part 2 and I'm not any of. The game sold like crazy, it's just hard for people to understand that most found the story to be arse.

anast12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

Prove what I say is wrong. I will need evidence. I didn't not say all. Your exception rule doesn't work. Find evidence that counters mine. So, we can have a real discussion.

Inverno12d ago

There are plenty of legitimate criticism in hours long analysis videos and reddit posts actually critiquing Part 2. The people you're talking about are such a minority, and they attack just about everything because they see the "wokeness" in the most subliminal ways. They're insignificant because the game still sold pretty well, and reviewed well regardless. Keep in mind the game released world wide, and western politics and views can't be applied to every corner of the world. I can agree that Days Gone was attacked, and unlike Part 2, due to these sites being so heavily political biased it did do some damage.

anast12d ago

I am at least showing the group was large enough of a concern for a journal to publish an article.

Where's your evidence?

Crows9011d ago

He's not looking for evidence. Don't bother with him.

Crows9012d ago

The last of us part 2 was bad story wise. Not some nonsense that you speak of...most of the negative people were random...lots of the critical reception from anything other than mainstream journalism thought that the game had huge problems.

Angry Joe and skill up being prime examples of that...unless of course like most socialists out there you wanna just lable people.

anast12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

Where's your evidence?

Crows9011d ago

@anast

Oh geez...Twitter is full of trolls...common sense.
The YouTube critics I mentioned are innocent till proven guilty. And proven with facts not opinions. I gave you evidence of 2 prominent youtubers and yet you ask for more...either you can't read or you aren't looking for evidence.

As far as groups being "large" for journos to get their panties all tied up...well then again you must be extremely gullible. As if we haven't seen thousands of articles claiming players are offended, angry or backlashing based solely on 1 or 2 posts. They love grabbing very specific individuals and using them to represent a much larger base....whatever is convenient to them making the case that gamers bad and journos good.

coolbeans11d ago (Edited 11d ago )

-"saying something is "cringe" doesn't prove me wrong. You just throw words out and hope they stick. Bring some evidence to prove me otherwise."

It doesn't "prove" it, but I have a solid success rate with the term - which seems to be the case here too. With regards to your article, I should break this down into parts:

1.) For starters, bleating for countering "evidence" after brandishing a media analysis paper (or papers) shouldn't be treated as some kind of trump card. That's not to say these researchers did nothing, mind you. Only that expecting counter-ideologies within this field who'll make this specific kind of work for TLOU Pt. II is absurdly demanding on its face. Nevermind the probability of non-progressive types getting the administrative approval being next to nil, but that's another can of worms.

2.) While I have critiques about x or y (some anecdotes being more flimsy than others, GG speculation, etc.), let's say for this argument that it's a solid piece overall. Having read the whole thing, there is literally *NOTHING* that validates the broad brush with which you painted TLOU2 critics in your first comment (speaking as someone who thinks it's a good game). The discussion about alt-fans, anti-fans, etc. does paint an ugly picture about the TLOU subreddit, Twitter users, certain YouTubers, and more; however, there's no positive declaration about TLOU2's critics ending at these particular clusters either. Even if you say "most, not all" in your first comment, that still seems overly broad compared to the text I read. (EDIT: That's not to disregard the nastiness or modest size in its own right.)

It's also worth noting how much of that paper's material is inspecting a pre-/at-release sort of backlash. But the game's been out for several years now. More and more people who AREN'T incels, homophobes, closet Nazis have played it past 2020 and you don't really see this new broad consensus about its accomplishments; in fact, you see more of a continued split over whether or not it deserves such monumental praise. Here's just a few other sub-communities near its release that don't fit your description:

- https://www.youtube.com/wat...
- https://www.youtube.com/wat...
- https://www.youtube.com/wat...

-"Because NG4 defended it doesn't mean NG4 is the gospel of gaming."

Correct, but you're just solidifying my point. Even PS fans elsewhere (social media or gaming forums) don't go to bat for The Order with the enthusiasm and consistency they do here in my experience. That's what makes your assessment of "anti-Sony Xbox fans" so fascinating to me.

anast11d ago

1) Speculation and emotion

2) Speculation and emotion

2a) Might be an argument if you gave me something other than your own opinion and emotions over the subject, but it's left as an anecdote without any real research. By the way, we can't negate the at release behavior, because it fits your narrative. It existed and those groups were involved.

The article is not a trump card and the fact that you seem to think so is more troubling on your end than mine. The article was to see if you could find other people that researched this phenomenon and we can have a conversation, but you still refuse to do this. Instead you wrote a sermon, which is a shame because maybe you had something with point "2a: It's also worth..." But this point still tries to side step actual events.

The final point doesn't solidify anything unless you are trying to solidify your own opinion. Albeit, it is passive aggressive, which is strange.

coolbeans11d ago

-"Speculation and emotion"

I mean... okay? Where am I wrong on 2.) though? Asking for a conflicting media studies research paper on this specific topic is already a random ask, given the environment with which these are made.

-"Might be an argument if you gave me something other than your own opinion and emotions over the subject, but it's left as an anecdote without any real research."

Wait. Just so we're clear: a research paper that focuses most of its attention towards a subreddit and social media comments to Neil Druckmann means you get to sustain your overly broad claims while contrary social media sources that don't exhibit the same kind of "alt-fan/anti-fan" rhetoric can't be counted? Now I feel even more confident in my initial assessment b/c all you're after is just whatever can be found with some accreditation behind it - regardless of quality.

-"By the way, we can't negate the at release behavior, because it fits your narrative. It existed and those groups were involved."

That's the thing: I never said they wasn't a sizable contingent of that either. From the start, my response was just how wild it was to paint *MOST* detractors with such a broad brush. I still don't think I'm off-base in saying it's cringe to just say "most people who shit on x game are closet Nazis or bigots of some sort," especially when your research doesn't really validate that.

-"The article is not a trump card and the fact that you seem to think so is more troubling on your end than mine."

Bro, you literally responded with "Bring some evidence to prove me otherwise.... You're up. Maybe you can change my mind." I don't really see how I'm speaking out of turn there given this and your original comment.

-"The article was to see if you could find other people that researched this phenomenon and we can have a conversation, but you still refuse to do this."

If no other people *HAVE* researched this phenomenon, then I don't see how the next best option is highly-popular sources which counter your original claim. Given that all you're promoting is a media studies paper hyper-focusing on a specific cluster of media, why wouldn't other forms of media work as some kind of substitute? That's not side-stepping events in the slightest.

-"The final point doesn't solidify anything unless you are trying to solidify your own opinion. Albeit, it is passive aggressive, which is strange."

I don't know what that first sentence means, honestly.

Look, I'll just put it like this: try to have a frank conversation about The Order on some other non-N4G gaming forum. There isn't going to be this clean split between 'Sony fans' and 'Xbox fans' that love it or hate it. Ask Sony fans how they'd feel about paying full-price for it and you're not going to get the ardent defenses compared to some of its most popular comment sections here.

anast10d ago

Still no evidence. I ask for you to bring contrary evidence, so maybe I might change my mind, all research can be falsifiable. This is what you are missing. We are thinking in two different universes.

You are writing sermons, which is a waste of everyone's time including yours. Bring some research and we will discuss it. As of now you have only brought superstitions.

coolbeans10d ago

-"I ask for you to bring contrary evidence, so maybe I might change my mind, all research can be falsifiable."

But I literally read YOUR evidence and it doesn't support the broader claims you made at the start. I'm not sure where else to go with that.

-"Bring some research and we will discuss it. As of now you have only brought superstitions."

Bro, leveraging this kind of language is so wild in the face of what you've provided. It's like unless those different communities I linked where fused together in a random media studies paper, you'd magically consider it valid. I don't understand how you're leveraging that, especially when it doesn't fortify your initial claim. You're basically retorting to me writing too much, regardless of the content itself. Just the oddest conversation with you thus far and I don't quite get it.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 10d ago
D0nkeyBoi12d ago

Amazing gameplay, but TLOU2 had one of the worst, most convoluted and uneccessary plots I ever seen in a sequel. Terrible story and the characters were forgettable. I didn't give an F about anyone in the story.

Inverno12d ago

I don't think any of these divided fans, other than LoU2. The rest were either victims of biased reviews or just generally agreed that they weren't as good as they could've been or just overall disappointing.

210°

Uncharted Unreal Engine 5 Imagining From MachineGames-Indiana Jones Designer is a Sight to Behold

A stunning Uncharted Unreal Engine 5 imagining has been released, featuring cutscenes, platforming, combat, stealth, and vehicles.

Created by Daniel Arriaga, a level designer at MachineGames on the upcoming Indiana Jones game, this fan concept is a solo developer project.

Read Full Story >>
wccftech.com
RaidenBlack57d ago

to reiterate, this is just a hobby project by a single developer

isarai56d ago

As a one man project this is awesome as hell!

56d ago
lellkay56d ago

Impressive considering its a one man effort!

Nacho_Z56d ago

Nate looks like he's been charting the lost city of Marijuana.

Show all comments (15)