Approvals 10/3 ▼
SactoGamer (3) - 3316d ago Cancel
bacrec1 (3) - 3316d ago Cancel
chrish1990 (2) - 3316d ago Cancel
DarkOcelet (1) - 3316d ago Cancel
Stiffler (1) - 3316d ago Cancel
190°
9.0

Bloodborne review: scarlet letter | Polygon

Polygon:
"From Software's games have been lauded for how they buck modern game design trends. They don't rely on cinematic storytelling through lengthy cutscenes. They don't present pivotal action moments as button-matching "quick time events." They don't offer helpful breadcrumb trails to guide a player to the next story-driving checkpoint. They're just not particularly warm and friendly.

I expected Bloodborne would be challenging — it is — but primarily I assumed Bloodborne would simply transmute a long list of medieval fantasy tropes and established gameplay mechanics to a new, slightly more modern setting. Developer From Software upended those expectations, and the result is remarkable."

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community3316d ago
DarkOcelet3316d ago

Well who would have thought that Polygon would actually give it a 9. I know i didnt.

robtion3316d ago

Great to see another high score but Polygon is a joke. Any site that would rate TLOU so low is not worth my time.

kraenk123316d ago

Polygon is the prototype of hipster scum infiltrating gaming media these days. Despicable site.

Kos-Mos3316d ago

Have you ever thought that they might be right in that review?
If you can`t proof otherwise I stand by those who write the review, and not the ones that say it`s wrong.
You are welcomre to give me a review of their review.

methegreatone3316d ago (Edited 3316d ago )

You know, there is a slight chance that if they rated TLOU low, they just... didn't really like it ?
One of their reviewers didn't like it that much ?

Their site doesn't become a joke because of that. Totalbiscuit tried TLOU and didn't really like it because of control issues or something. Is he a joke ? Not quite.

I've only watched a lot of TLOU in action (walkthroughs), and to me it was incredible. Simply the best game out there in so many aspects. That intro sequence... I'd probably give it 9 or 10 if the second half of the game keeps up the same quality (I can only assume it does ? I've watched halfway)

That's not the point though. Judging sites like this is kind of stupid

Ezz20133316d ago

I imagine the guy who give Bloodborne 9/10 was grinding so much that he broke all his teeth out of anger for giving a playstation game the score it deserve

Ladies and gentlemen
i give you the reviewer :
http://s479.photobucket.com...

chrismichaels043316d ago (Edited 3316d ago )

You know a game like Bloodborne is something really special when even an anti-Sony site like Polygon gives it a 9.0.

morganfell3316d ago

"Have you ever thought that they might be right in that review?"

Considering their past actions and the sheer mountain of indiscretions? No, not for a second, not for a moment, a blink in time, a fleeting moment, and angel's gasp.

No, just no.

And chrismichaels above is correct. The staff at Polygon must have screamed like they were having their lungs ripped out.

Gazondaily3316d ago

Polygon give the game a good score. Fanboys on N4G continue to make themselves look even more petty. Can someone show these guys the low scores they gave exclusives on other platforms please? Maybe that will stop them or will they form a new conspiracy theory?

miyamoto3316d ago

LoL @ Polygon! You jokesters! Jajajajajajajaj!

guyman3315d ago

Kos-Mos

O lord, what you said is just incredibly sad.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 3315d ago
MRMagoo1233316d ago

Doesn't this score mean it's really a 12/10 ?

generic-user-name3316d ago

They couldn't review it badly because it's a From Software game, imagine if From's next game is Dark Souls 3 and it was multiplat, it'd look bad for them to crap on bloodborne and then go back to worshiping DS3 because it's not sony exclusive.

-Foxtrot3316d ago

Funny how there review comes out just after IGN's...you know with their delay in all

DragonKnight3316d ago

I'm just surprised they didn't knock it down to 6 out of 10 for the mild sexual innuendo when Gerhmann (sic?) talks about the doll.

"Game promotes prostitution by alluding that a female doll can be 'used' to suit the players 'needs' 6/10."

CaptainObvious8783316d ago

I was going to say the same thing.

The reviewer mustn't of being paying attention during that part.

DragonKnight3316d ago

More likely he hasn't been told what to think about it yet. Wouldn't be surprised if Kotaku makes an article about it soon considering the connections between the two sites.

insomnium23316d ago

@dk

I'm sure that Anita Sarkeesian will have a field day with that one though. Time for a new donation people.

TheVoid3316d ago

Will this put to rest the whole notion that Polygon hates everything Sony.

-Foxtrot3316d ago

Not really.

They aren't stupid, if they do it to every Sony game they would make it too obvious.

I will never forget the Last of Us review...and I mean the written review not just the number. Something they marked down for "bad weapon sway" when it's something you upgrade.

TheVoid3316d ago

So this is a conspiracy? Maybe I'm just not buying it.

huckle3316d ago

Yeah, that was a horrible review, regardless if you liked TLoU or not...

Maybe Polygon turned over some staff.

huckle3316d ago

Not trusting a Microsoft funded site to give unbiased PlayStation game reviews = pathetic.

methegreatone3316d ago (Edited 3316d ago )

You're kidding right ?

Wow.

The thing is, it's not just polygon.

What really shows how stupid this mentality is :-
The moment any site scores any exclusive low, eg The Order 1886, remember all the outcry all over n4g comments ? You can like the game and disagree with reviews, but no. It's the exact same thing as this. All review sites suddenly become XBOX fanboys. Whether it's Polygon, or IGN, or all reviewers as a whole. It's the exact same hypocritical crap that gets spewed out by fanboys.
The top voted comments were always about how the reviewer sucks, or just wants to bash the game, or how XBOX exclusives will never be badly reviewed for being linear.
All of a sudden reviewers all want only open world games.
All of a sudden it's because they have a grudge against that console's exclusives.
Funnily enough, once Bloodbourne gets 9 and 10 from everyone, all of that is gone.

To all the people who do this : You're just fanboys. Yes, there are haters, and they are idiots. For example, with The Order, haters went out saying "Boring, linear QTE fest, black Bars haha shit"
Needless to say, that's stupid. That misses the point. That doesn't discuss anything useful at all. It's also hypocritical, given that none of the things they listed are actually bad things.
You're just as bad though. You do the exact same thing. You don't discuss the specifics, you just apply sweeping, vague and mostly retarded labels. You make comparisons with COD's review scores to make your point of all reviewers are bad. It's all stupid, hypocritical and non sensical.

Reviews are reviews. Some like certain games, others don't.
Some people are taking the recent serious journalist ethics issues and mannipulating them for more fanboy oriented purposes. It's sad, really.

I guess this is like, the only one downside to console exclusives, is fanboys on both sides acting this way.

DOMination-3316d ago

Sony also gave Polygon funding in its early days.

Big_Game_Hunters3316d ago (Edited 3316d ago )

This is getting pathetic, you conspiracy babies need to stop, or at least keep it your yourselves. Maybe go meet up once a week so you can cry and moan about it together where the rest of us don't have to see it.

"Reviewers gave (knack, driveclub, The order, Killzone SF) low scores because bias against Sony, OH WAIT BLOODBORNE 93 METACRITIC!!?!? THOSE REVIEWS ARE ACTUALLY TRUSTWORTHY, AT LEAST UNTILL SONY'S NEXT GAME GETS LOW SCORES"

Cupid_Viper_33316d ago

@ methegreatone

Irrationalities can be found on/in either fringes of the divide between the two camps, so I can't completely refute your calls of "hypocrisy". But to pretend that reviewers weren't out to get The Order is just that, "irrational".

contrary to popular beliefs, it's the reviewers who have to agree with the gamers, and not the other way around. We often make the mistake of letting reviewers dictate what types of games get made and such, when the vast majority of these reviewers are "casual gamers". These are guys reviewing games they are barely competent at, and then proceed to provide their "expert opinions" onto with a score slapped onto it.

As a matter of fact, the less "personal emotions" found in a review, the more accurate its description of the game becomes. Stick to the facts and let the gamers decide if they've played too much of the same type of games before, and how tired or not tired they are of the gameplay mechanics being offered. Because the minute you don't, you're making way too many assumptions about who's going to buy the game, and how they're going to feel about it.

If you're 29 years old and reviewing a certain game, chances are that you're already familiar with the gameplay mechanics and other nuances of the game because you've probably been gaming for years. For someone who's 14 years old, that very same game may be the first time he's ever seen such mechanics in a game. To ignore these nuances and many other ones and slap a 4/10 on a game like The Order 1986, which is not broken, which is not asking for DLC money, IS to show a complete inability to comprehend the purpose of a review.

So this leaves us with 2 options, either these guys are complete fools who should be out of a job because they lack the proper skills and understanding of their jobs. Or, there were underlying forces out there who saw that The Order 1986 as being a threat. Maybe that's why they bullied it like the new pretty girl in school who all the popular girls instantly hate because they fear loosing all the attention and being relegated to a back seat.

2 great critically acclaimed games for the PS4 at a time when the Xbox One doesn't really have any for the next few months didn't bode well for quite a few folks. And they simply picked on the one which was more vulnerable one in The Order 1986. It would be hard to go against Bloodborne when so many have already played the Demons and Dark Souls series. It would expose them way too much.

Gazondaily3316d ago

The double standard from fanboys is even more astonishing than whatever perceived bias Polygon has.

It extends beyond them. With The Order fiasco, I witnessed some of the most downright pathetic excuses, accusations, conspiracies and defences lodged against almost the entire industry. So many on here couldnt handle the fact that maybe, just maybe, that game was terrible.

Selective amnesi. Having your cake and eating it and the perpetual changing goal posts.. FuN times.

I dont agree with many of Polygons reviews and their constant sjw pandering but I don't adopt such an unbearable ans childish attitude that many on here do.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 3316d ago
Malice-Flare3316d ago (Edited 3316d ago )

no, it won't. as long as their policy remains, that after a review is written a group will read it and decide the score (doesn't matter if people in the group played the game or not), Polygon will always remain questionable. especially with a known person like Gies as Reviews Editor...

@TheVoid
you're getting disagrees because people don't like the question you asked...

TheVoid3316d ago

Okay simply asking. I'm new here why am I getting so many disagrees?

TFJWM3316d ago

Your getting disagrees because one review does not an unbiased site make

OT: I figured they wouldn't go over 8, I applaud them

Neo_Zeed3316d ago

If this were on Xbox... Polygon would have found a way to give it an 11.

mixelon3316d ago

Sorry to see all the disagrees, you quickly learn what people like here are like though. :/

Polygon also loved Resogun, and numerous other things. Sites just post incredibly wonky reviews sometimes.. All of them!

IGN's Alien Isolation review is my personal least favourite, but oh well!

Gazondaily3316d ago

Not at all. TLOU's score haunts many who can't comprehend how someone couldn't possibly like the game. Acknowledging Polygon would take away the fanboy fuel in the future.

Spotie3316d ago

If only it were someone, and not a group of someones who didn't even review the game.

If only they hadn't already given questionable scores to good PlayStation games.

If only they didn't have an avowed Killzone hater review Killzone.

If only Microsoft hadn't funded them.

If only they weren't willing to overlook- read: completely IGNORE- things like downgrades for Xbox exclusives while finding whatever possible to dock points for (certain) PlayStation exclusives.

Yeah, there are no reasons to question Polygon, even if they're not stupid enough to slam EVERY Sony exclusive.

Arkardo3316d ago

You people are too naive, there's no stupid conspiracy theories, is as simple as covering their asses once in a while, it's common knowledge if you've been following news sites for at least a couple of years and even more obvious if you have more time reading gaming news.

They are biased, they were funded by Microsoft in those days.

It should be pretty stupid If they give every PlayStation game bad reviews they Will lose the majority of Gamers whose doesn't follow gaming news because they will notice it.

Ign became a joke Of a website too, they wait for majority of websites with more honest reviews to go out so they don't F*** it up so badly.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 3316d ago
Rimeskeem3316d ago

I'll be honest, did not see 9 coming.

Show all comments (65)
140°

The 7 Best Souls-Like Games - Mastering the Challenge

The Souls-like genre remains popular, along with FromSoftware's classics there are many contenders. But which are the best Souls-like games?

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

✔ Fixed
Bad Editing
site name in title is only for reviews and previews, please remove
Emilio_Estevez24d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(1)
+ Updates (2)- Updates (2)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community24d ago
Changed: title
kevco3324d ago
toxic-inferno24d ago

Hmm... In my opinion, the 7 best are the 6 made by FromSoftware (DeS, DS1, DS2, DS3, BB and ER), then Lies of P. But each to their own.

kevco3324d ago

Still DS1? You don't feel it's been surpassed yet?

Demon's Souls has the remake of course, but DS1 has surely been outdated?

Smellsforfree23d ago

I think that the DS1 remake is better looking than DS2. The interior lighting matched with the low resolution textures in DS2 is very garish, IMO.

Besides graphics, what do you mean by DS1 being "outdated"? I'm someone who played through Elden Ring and just recently played through the DS series, and as far as gameplay went, there were all very similar.

Cacabunga23d ago

I haven’t played many but Bloodborne and NIOH1 are on top of my list.. had a blast with these 2

toxic-inferno23d ago

For world design and interconnectedness (that's a word, right?) DS1 is yet to be beaten.

290°

9 Years Later, Does Bloodborne Deserve All The Praise It Gets?

Saad from eXputer: "Almost a decade later, it's time to take the nostalgia goggles off and accept that Bloodborne has long been surpassed by its successors."

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (2)- Updates (2)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community25d ago
Changed: title
exputers26d ago
jznrpg25d ago (Edited 25d ago )

Yes, yes it does. It’s still a great game. Elden Ring isn’t better just different and a bit easier . I like that you have to be aggressive but smart in Bloodborne

thorstein25d ago

I literally replayed it recently and it's better than I remember. I think it's like going back to a beloved book and noticing things I hadn't before.

raWfodog25d ago (Edited 25d ago )

Yo! I was getting ready to reply with the exact same four words you started with lol. Yes, I think Bloodborne has withstood the test of time and remains a great game. That’s why all the fans are hoping for a sequel someday. Hoping that we can catch that magic again with a new storyline.

Leeroyw25d ago

Yes. Just replayed it a few days ago. My first Platinum. And yes. I rage quitted so many times and called it BS too when I started. It's tight. The combat is amazing and the lore is rich.

GamingSinceForever25d ago

Elden Ring was easier? I don’t know about that at all. I remember leveling up in Bloodborne and breezing through it. In Elden Ring no matter how powerful I got I was still catching a beat down from every boss.

thorstein25d ago

That's due to scaling enemies. I remember not doing Haligtree untill near the end and having enemies withstand almost a full blast from Azur's Glintstone Staff Comet Azure. My level was quite high.

Melee characters are not fun in that game, especially for the Elden Beast.

MeteorPanda25d ago

Considering l did a run 2 months ago? Yes.

Show all comments (54)
160°

Bloodborne's Potential Remaster Continues To Be Sony's Biggest Missed Opportunity

"Sony is missing out on a hugely profitable opportunity by ignoring fan demands for a Bloodborne remaster and PC port," says Ahmed from eXputer.

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community52d ago
thorstein54d ago (Edited 54d ago )

Bloodborne came out on the PS4. It is owned by From Software. What missed opportunity? I am sure the people at From Software know what they are doing. Especially since they are hiring devs instead of laying them off.

Maybe do an article about that instead of writing a hit piece on them acting like they don't know how to run their business.

54d ago
-Foxtrot53d ago (Edited 53d ago )

To be fair Hidetaka Miyazaki said in an interview

“Unfortunately, and I’ve said this in other interviews, it’s not in my place to talk about Bloodborne specifically. We simply don’t own the IP at FromSoftware.”

So the ball kind of is in Sonys court, it feels like a missed opportunity because it’s something people really want and Sony just hasn’t really been bothered to get it off the ground. There was rumours it was at one point but it all went silent.

Cacabunga52d ago (Edited 52d ago )

Sony has been missing nothing but opportunities for a few years now.. since GOW release, it’s worrying silence we’ve been getting..

As for Bloodborne, imo it would be too soon to release it because PS4 game still looks phenomenal..

Bloodborne REMAKE I think will be PS6 launch title by Bluepoint. I truly hope so! 2 gens later we can get the same wow effect as Demons Souls.

Eonjay52d ago

He is right because it is Sonys IP but a little further back he also explained that they only work on one game at a time. This means that From must also be available. In other words it could already be in the pipeline. Ecen if that is the case, it's still up to Sony to reveal it when they are ready. As ever, I prefer not to hear about it until it's about 3 to 6 months from releasing.

CrashMania53d ago (Edited 53d ago )

'Bloodborne came out on the PS4. It is owned by From Software'

Actually Sony owns the IP, same with Demon's Souls. I think they'd prefer if From did the work on any future of both of those though, but if Sony wanted to they could have those off to anyone else to work on them, like the DS remake.

thorstein53d ago (Edited 53d ago )

Yeah. Thanks for the info.

But I still think that remasters should wait a generation. And Blue Point did Demon's Souls which was superb.

It can be a huge risk. And I think Hidetaka Miyazaki hinted that it would be a PS6 title. I don't he has no say in what happens, it's a partnership.

--Onilink--52d ago

To be honest, if there is a remake/remaster (not that it needs one) I would prefer someone else to handle it, like they did with Demon Souls

From many perspectives From Soft is an amazing developer, BUT, on a technical level they are far from impressive, both in terms of dated visuals (again, on a technical level, not art/design) and usually poor performance.

And what is the point of a remake/remaster if not to provide a visual and performance enhancement to a game that already nailed the rest?

Michiel198952d ago

@thorstein what huge risk? Part of one of the most well known ip's in gaming nowadays, there's not much risk there when it comes to a remake.

thorstein51d ago

@Michiel

I meant remasters in general are a huge risk, not Bloodborne.

Bloodborne isn't, but I think it's going to be on PS6, like how Demon's Souls went from PS3 to PS5.

Sorry for the confusion.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 51d ago
thesoftware73052d ago (Edited 52d ago )

Thorstein,

Wow, your post seems angry..relax it's an opinion.

And btw, it is on Sony, they have the exclusive right to the game, on top of that, they could have easily, at bare minimum, offered an official 60fps patch, with a few extras and charged people $10 to upgrade or $30-40 for new buyers.

I believe I saw an interview where , FromSoft said it was all up to Sony on a sequel and other dealing with the game.

A "hit peice", that serious huh?..relax lol.

thorstein52d ago (Edited 52d ago )

Wow you seem angry. I responded to crash 2 days ago about the remaster and who did it.

Why do you care what other people think in a moment about some journalism. Calm down, buddy, it's just my opinion. From 3 days ago.

Edit: I just went back through my comments and found 2 where I call out the author in the past month. Wow, I'm a rageaholic.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 51d ago
potatoseal53d ago (Edited 53d ago )

It will be a launch title on PS6 just like the remake of Demon's Souls for PS5 launch

OhReginald52d ago

Sony realizes people will flock to buy ps6s for a bloodborne remake. Easy money.

jznrpg52d ago (Edited 52d ago )

Rumored it’s slated for PS6 launch. Some say PS5 Pro. Who knows ?

P_Bomb52d ago

Highly requested, unfortunately neglected.

jznrpg25d ago

Some say we didn’t need TLOU2 remake but that was a PS4 game and now we need a BB remake but that was a PS4 game. We send mixed signals

Show all comments (23)