170°

Ep469: The Order: 1886 A Flop? Peter Molyneux Interview Sparks Outrage (GTR)

This week on Gamertag Radio:

Happy Birthday Gamertag Radio! The Order: 1886 A Flop? Peter Molyneux Interview Sparks Outrage, Double Fine’s Tim Schafer defends Peter Molyneux over ‘unfair’ criticism, Evolve review by Peterocc & Fan Mail

Moldiver3342d ago

Godfree. Holla at me...Let me make you some good intro music for your show!

Venomousfatman3342d ago

I havent played the Order yet, but I think that it may be a thing when a ton of people are really not happy with how the game has turned out.

fallacious3342d ago

Or the people who are happy don't talk shit about it online because they're fine with it. Often the vocal ones are the minority.

NegativeCreep4273342d ago (Edited 3342d ago )

Very true, fallacious. And as anyone who has even a moderate amount of first-hand knowledge of the Internet knows, the detractors (i.e. fanboys) on the other side of the fence usually make up the greatest amount (or at least a significant amount) of that minority; The ones that are so inherently critical of a video game are typically not even within the buying public or consumer base for said video game.

3342d ago
mep693342d ago

Thats why uber-feminists get away with it. Noisy minority ruins alot of things.

Silly gameAr3342d ago

How about when there are a lot of people that are?

ger23963342d ago

Unhappy? The game play was posted on YouTube prior to release. People had enough time to cancel their pre orders or not buy it at all. In this day and age there is no excuse to not do some research before making a purchase of any kind.

Transporter473342d ago

I bought the game, and I am extremely happy for the way it turned out. Can it have improvements? Yes, but that doesn't make me unhappy. I am pretty satisfied :D

Letthewookiewin3342d ago

Same here. They have the engine now they can focus on expanding the world and gameplay. The ending was great, including the post credit one.....

VforVideogames3342d ago (Edited 3342d ago )

No hate here but you can return it now , 5 hours later.

James Vanderbeek3342d ago (Edited 3342d ago )

the only people mad at the game is the media because its not like call of duty. haha. ps4 gamers are enjoying it.

I really enjoyed it.

aPerson3342d ago

"PS4 gamers are enjoying it"

I certainly didn't and I was one of the ones looking forward to "playing" it.

3342d ago
OUROSMAG3342d ago (Edited 3342d ago )

A ton of people not happy? Trying reading posts on facebook, the people who comment on how much they love the game, far outnumbers those who are not happy... and half of those unhappy people are seemingly trolls.

Sorry but People are loving this game.

OrangePowerz3342d ago

I like it a lot. Would I rate it with a 10/10 or 9/10? No it has some faults and flaws (the length isn't one of them), but the gunplay is solid, I played games with a higher cutscene to gameplay ratio (looking at you MGS series and particularly MGS4), and there aren't as many QTEs as reviews make it look (it does contain some that I think are not necessary). I can see why it wouldn't be a game for certain people, but really a scire like 5/10 or 6/10 doesn't do the game justice. In a time where we get one unpolished and buggy game after another they deliver a highly polished product that's free of major bugs and rarely has any small ones.

I think they delivered on what they wanted to deliver.

nucky643342d ago

the question is venom: have the people not happy witht game even played it?....I would say no. those who are not happy just spew general negative comments without giving specifics about the game. and I've only been able to get one of the haters to reply and then, he hasn't given me anything particular to the game that supports his opinion that the game is a let-down.

Battlefieldlover3342d ago

Don't know if you really care but I just finished it and aside from the ending (clearly setting up For a second) I absolutely loved this game. The only real problem with The Order is its price.

Ps. Didn't hate the ending, I just like closure from games and movies, but it is effective in leaving me wanting more.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 3342d ago
fallacious3342d ago

This game is better than anything molyneux has made. He should seriously just quit making games.

OrangePowerz3342d ago (Edited 3342d ago )

For my view on The Order you can look a bit further up, but in a short summary I like it a lot.

I still don't agree with your comment. Molyneux did work on several excellent and amazing games that shapped some genres or in the case of the god game genre created it. He worked on Populous, Syndicate, Theme Park, Dungeon Keeper, Black and White, Fable and some others. That is quite an achievement when you look at an industry that has a high amount of people going into other industries after a short time because you earn a lot more doing similar stuff in other fields and a high likelihood for people getting burned out. I don't think he is bad as a game developer in itself, just that he isn't that good at containing his enthusiasm towards certain ideas or features he wants to have in the game. I fully think he should know better what can and can't be done in games and should present a more realistic view on his projects.

The thing is most developers would talk like that about their games. You are excited about what you do, if you wouldn't you wouldn't get through all the ridiculous hours and extensive crunch times and still do a decent job.

The difference is most of the people that are allowed to talk about their games have extensive training in how to do so and have to follow a strict script provided by the PR guys. For whatever reason he doesn't follow that.

kratoz12093342d ago

I enjoyed it

Short but sweet and hopefully the sequel fixes those problems

DevilOgreFish3342d ago

I'm sure 1886 has a fanbase, Ryse Has one as well.

Show all comments (35)
230°

Peter Molyneux's new game is set in Fable's Albion

Project currently codenamed MOAT.

JusttJD0099187d ago

M.O.A.T

Misleader of all time?

jznrpg187d ago (Edited 187d ago )

It’s between him and Phil. I’d vote Phil

Obscure_Observer186d ago

"It’s between him and Phil. I’d vote Phil"

If Phil were the man that made my life miserable, I would vote for him as well.

Regarding the topic, it could be both Peter and Phil working together.

M.O.A.T takes place in Albion, so it´s possible that Pete is working on new partnership with Xbox, which imo, is nothing but great news!

GhostScholar186d ago

What exactly has Phil mislead about? I can’t wait to hear the verbal diarrhea you come with.

Cacabunga186d ago

Still waiting for Milo and Kate.. most lmao game OAT

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 186d ago
Becuzisaid187d ago

Wait.

His name is still used as a selling point for new games? Seriously?

jznrpg187d ago

If anyone knows his name you have to be extremely skeptical that what he delivers will be anything like what he says it would be and that’s best case scenario.

RaiderNation187d ago

He's like the "Tom Clancy" of video games.

InUrFoxHole187d ago

Lol what the hell man?!?!?

Number1TailzFan187d ago

I remember Black & White (PC) but other than that I can only think of Fable, B&W was a pretty cool game tho at the time.

sagapo187d ago

Populous was another one designed by Peter, released before B&W, godlike game as well, pretty good too.

Giblet_Head187d ago

I quite liked Magic Carpet growing up.

Obscure_Observer186d ago (Edited 186d ago )

"His name is still used as a selling point for new games? Seriously?"

The guy is a gaming legend for gamers who actually knows and played his games, like Dungeon Keeper, Populous, Black & White and Fable for example.

Becuzisaid186d ago

I'm certain that most who actually know who he is would contest your use of legend. He's the living, human embodiment of false advertising.

Obscure_Observer186d ago

@Becuzisaid

There´s an abyss between false advertisement and bad games.

Most gamers will get excited for games from great gaming creators rather than focus on their exaggerated promises.

Kojima described his Xbox exclusive game as "very unusual like no one has ever experienced before, leveraging the cloud." He said all publishers he presented the project, called him mad and rejected his game but Microsoft, because it´s too crazy.

Is Kojima exaggerating? Obviously. It´s gonna be a bad game? Hardly.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 186d ago
TheColbertinator187d ago

Imagine a game where Peter Molyneux presents an extraordinary set of ideas that players will enjoy for years to come. Now imagine that this particular game will come out because it will never exist.

Profchaos187d ago

Does Milo live under a bridge there

shinoff2183187d ago

Captain overseller is returning. Ain't heard his name in years.

shinoff2183186d ago

Peter was overselling games way way before cdprojectred, and bethesada

Show all comments (24)
80°

Evolve or Die: The final days of the follow-up to Left 4 Dead

Back in 2016, Turtle Rock announced that support for its 4v1 monster-hunting shooter Evolve would end but fans wouldn't let it die.

350°

The Order: 1886 pushed visuals hard in 2015 - And still looks stunning today

Digital Foundry : Released in February 2015, The Order: 1886 was a stunning PlayStation 4 game at the cutting-edge of rendering technology, with visuals that still hold up today. The game's release pre-dated in-depth Digital Foundry coverage, something we're looking to address with this new video! Ready at Dawn's game never received a sequel and never received a PS4 Pro upgrade, but thanks to developments with exploited, older firmware PS5 consoles, we can now show you the game running locked at 60 frames per second.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
VenomUK252d ago

The gameplay was bland and extremely frustrating at times with unnecessary QTE combat at points. But the world and the lore and the characters and the story were fantastic. I’ve always wanted a sequel. I still hope Sony will surprise us one day.

shadowT253d ago

Sony missed the opportunity to acquire Ready at Dawn Studios.

Tacoboto253d ago

But... Sony didn't want Ready at Dawn. Clearly

mkis007252d ago

I'm guessing had 1886 turned out more positively they would have.

RaidenBlack253d ago

And let's not forget,
Ready At Dawn showcased The Order 1886 running on PC at 60fps at SIGGRAPH 2015
https://www.dsogaming.com/n...

isarai253d ago

I still stand by my theory that this game just released at the wrong time. Almost every outlet spent a lot of time in their reviews ragging on the game for not being an online experience, everyone was in the Destiny hype train and at the time they wanted EVERY game to follow suit, bashing any game that didn't. If this were released after everyone realized how much that wasn't future, people would've appreciated it more. I loved it, and I'm always disappointed that we'll never get a sequel

Tacoboto253d ago

That doesn't seem to be true about outlets complaining on the lack of online. The review summaries on Metacritic are very consistent: Amazing graphics, but shallow gameplay and a very short length with little reason to return.

Here's an example of how *little* time IGN spent talking about multiplayer:

"With no multiplayer, and no reason to revisit the short and stunted single-player campaign once it’s been completed, there just isn’t a lot to it."

It's the final sentence. They don't even take the time to say "online multiplayer"

MrChow666253d ago (Edited 253d ago )

"Amazing graphics, but shallow gameplay and a very short length with little reason to return."
You are right, that's what everbody was saying at the time, never heard anything about it not being online.
I've been thinking about trying this game for years, I may get it now that it's dirt cheap, no big loss if it sucks

MrChow666253d ago

Oh, add to that bad enemy AI, I remember that from the reviews, I saw a video of a wherewolf boss fight with a very weak AI

thorstein253d ago

And there we glowing reviews for shorter games. It was one of the times where hating this game was "cool."

CrimsonWing69253d ago

Can you show me the reviews that rag on it for not having an online experience?

I’m not doubting you or anything. I’m just being lazy.

isarai253d ago

Sorry, not multiplayer, open world is what I meant.

Tacoboto253d ago

That's also fake news, isarai. Again, the game was consistently criticized for what it was (Pretty but extremely short, extremely linear, hand-holding, no replayability), not for what it wasn't (multiplayer/open-world)

isarai253d ago

Nope, every review uses the term "linear" several times as if it's some inherently bad attribute. Not fake news at all. Since then there's veen plenty of short and sweet single player linear games that get lots of praise, again after the reality of everything being open world set it and it wasn't as great as everyone thought. But at the launch of the last gen everyone had open world fever, and especially the first couple years "linear" was a con in many games reviewed

Tacoboto253d ago

That's your own contortion assuming criticism of its extremely linear design is suddenly a call for it to have been open world.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 253d ago
zumlauf14253d ago

You totally made up a claim regarding an overall review consensus that isn't true. And, instead of just ignoring being called out for it, you respond with "oh actually i ment to say OPEN WORLD". Which literally isn't true either. You can't show us one review that bashed the game for "not being open world". And, somehow the other guy is getting downvoted. Over a bullshit liar.

isarai253d ago

Games were being criticized at that time for any game that wasn't open world or online. So yeah I got one mixed for the other, doesn't change my argument one bit that it would've been received better if it released later. People are agreeing because if you were not riding the "online and open world" hype train at that time, it was blatantly obvious there were biases in play for how games were criticized. Now after all that has happened since people want to say "oh wait these games were actually pretty good" cause they know better now

Rude-ro253d ago

The gameplay was very shallow and when one says repetitive, it is by the very definition for some fights. As in, completely identical but different setting.

The game has amazing potential.
The graphics, the lore, characters…
This could most definitely have been all corrected with a sequel and became a franchise hit…
Still would love to see an attempt.

Ie fantastic premise and moments that shine…
But it had its downfalls that deserved the negative marks.

thorstein253d ago

It was the "game to hate" when it launched. And right here, on this site, we saw people posting stories that were outright fabrications about the game. It was weird. The game launched, it was fun, a really cool game but the hate was too much. And so were the lies.

Minute Man 721253d ago

It was just too short....but I loved every minute of it....double dipped and grabbed the ultimate CE

babadivad253d ago

That isn't true. I remember people talking about how incredibly short it was and the somewhat janky gunplay.

KwietStorm_BLM253d ago

First I'm hearing of this. I don't know what multiplayer has to do with anything. The game was just dull. Amazing graphics, great narrative, great lore, boring gameplay sprinkled in pieces between cutscenes, and lackluster AI and controls.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 253d ago
anast253d ago

People cried this game was too short. No people are crying because games are too long.

isarai253d ago

Pretty sure everyone is complaining about bloated games lately but ok

anast253d ago

Thank you for the ok. I needed that.

RaidenBlack253d ago

Games like Ubisoft open worlds not enjoyable lengthy games like Elden Ring or Baldur's Gate III

anast253d ago

I get it, but people also complain about the main stories being too long or just games being too long in general because they are "adults".

Show all comments (50)