The superheroes charge onto the three next-gen consoles, but which one looks best.
are they including Wii in an HD comparison?? Wii can't do HD.
Given that the video isn't synced up between the three systems, it is very difficult to make a fair comparison, especially between the PS3 and the 360. I guess the conclusion of their video is that the 2 big boy systems are the same, and the fun system looks comparitively worse.
Which we all knew anyway.
I thought it was supposed to blow the 360 out of the water! I guess it missed.
Hit the wrong Ship.
You system bashers are so dang stupid! Both the 360 and the PS3 are nice. Grow up and suport the one you perfer and stop bashing the other one. Your not going to change any PS3 fans mind about the system just like they will not change your mind about the 360.
It is tru that you are not going to sway most of the fanboys with any opinions, but it is also true that Sony toutes itself as the only true "next-gen" sysytem. With that said, Sony has so far fell well short of the mark.
and it's also true that when dev's learn to bring out the ps3's potential.. we are going to see amazing games.
but its also going to take a lot longer for developers to bring out the "potential" of the PS3 because Sony had to make the system hard to develop for. Where as the 360 is a lot easier and will see changes being made quicker and more drastic.
for the record, tho hard to compare with this vid, ign rates ps3's marvel 6.5 and the 360's 7.5 as far as graphics.
which means nothing cause it's a ported launch title.
The Wii shouldn't even be in these comparisons. It's just embarassing.
Between the ps3 and 360 I would say that the 360 looks better. The reason I say this is because I observe better black levels/shadow detail/lighting effects on the 360 and it has been consistent across all video comparisons I have seen so far. In every other way they seem to be identical.
Here is the HD version of the CoD3 comparison from gametrailers also. It is most obvious in this game, especially when comparing the night sequences where the ps3 version looks like day time.
We are not trying to change a Sony fans mind. We are just pointing out how for so long Sony has said this and that about the "Mighty" PS3. (And they did the same thing with the PS2) Well now that it is out, we all see what BS we were feed once again. We are not saying the 360 is better. We are pointing out how equal they are, and that right there shows what a great system the 360 is. For $200 less and a years worth of less technolgy time for the 360 to be on par with the PS# should be a disgrace to Sony. And for all of you's that say wait for the developers...... hey stupid, that is what Sony always says to make you keep waiting for a dream that will never come true. As almost all 360 fans were once PS or Nintendo fans, we are the gamers that got tired of there bullshit. We no longer will stand to be made stupid by Sony. We hate Sony!!! So that is why we bash!!
wow what happened
Oh sorry.. Thought this was a game console contest..
Not Miss Console of America 2006 beauty contest.
Nevermind... I guess i'll have to PLAY them myself.
I can't help but wonder whether the Wii's video footage was captured via the lowly nominal composite output...there's just waaaay too much of a fuzziness factor which indicates so.
Nonetheless, I'd still need to give the Wii version a fair shake for myself. I've been playing the Wii's version of Call of Duty, and I absolutely LOVE it, primarily due to the incredibly immersive controls (I've always absolutely DETESTED playing FPS's using a gamepad/analog stick.) So as far as I'm concerned, the Wii system has thus far proven to be an absolute joy - despite the relatively sub-par graphics.
multiplatform game with a near-simultaneous release so far looks better on the 360. At least this one is closer than COD3 where the 360 looks significantly better. I feel bad for those who are still staunchly defending Sony. While I do agree that the PS3 will eventually have some strong visuals and smoother framerates, it's blatantly obvious that the PS3 can only equal the 360 as, currently, it's significantly behind.
PS3 owners shouldn't give up all hope that the PS3 will have its share of top notch stuff, but the arguments that the PS3 is worth the higher price tag and will blow the 360 out of the water should cease. At this point, PS3 fanboys are just making themselves look bad. If you want to spend $200 more on a product that is, at present, significantly inferior to its competition and hope that in the long run it gets better, so be it. It's your choice. I've gambled on things myself. Enough with trying to tout that the PS3 is better than the 360 though.
At least before the PS3 was released there was no proof of anything. It has now been released and the PS3 is behind the 360 in nearly every facet. I'm sure the PS3 will improve, as did the 360, but the 360 will continue to improve as well. If fanboys can't see through Sony's transparent hype at this point (with the 360's superior games and services and the PS3's lacking of certain features) then there is no hope. At present, Sony fans should be more concerned that hopefully the PS3 can at least match the 360 eventually. If this does happen, then maybe the fan club can revitalize the hope that the PS3 moves forward, but as it stands, the dream of the PS3 entering the market and smashing the competition is over.
No Deathnote1 it is not a port. Microsoft just provides better development tools than Sony.
im gettin a wii on friday i just bought a 360 there and im glad boy it looks smoother than ps3 allot surley a better system
Truth is sony pretty much lies and makes up BS and tries to pass it off as truth. Main reason I wont buy a playstation.
XBOX360 has already been out for a year and prices have dropped and games have gotten alot better. PS3 has just come out so its more expensive and has alot of bugs. I really dont see the point in buying a PS3 right now. If you feel you have to have one you should probabbly wait a year till the games are better and the price is cheaper.
Sony cant even get their "True HD" right. After overhyping their system they fell flat on their face and delivered 720p (which isnt that bad anyways). Buts whats worse is that older tvs dont support 720p and instead of upscaling a game to 1080i the ps3 downscales it to 480p.
What I predict happening this console cycle is the PS3 taking the role of the xbox and the xbox360 taking the place of the PS2.
Just how last cycle the PS2 was easiest and most developed for because it was the least powerfull of the three systems, the 360 and wii will recieve more content than the PS3. So of course there may be some great titles for the PS3 just like there were for the xbox and the gcube, but overall it wont have the selection the other systems have.
Ontop of that graphics arent everything, if a game is good graphics only add to it, if a game is bad graphics only make a bad game look better.
It will be the Wii that becomes multi console gamers first or second system alongside the 360 and not the PS3. One of the Wii's strengths is going to be the multi-console gamers. They will be looking at the prices and saying, I can get a 360 and a Wii for the same price as a PS3 and add to the sales of both consoles. 360 and Wii are going to be the big battlers. As powerful as PS3 is, I can't see it gaining enough traction at it's current price point to take on either one of them. I mean, the day before the Japanese Wii launch, Nintendo had merely 2x the numbers of Sony. After the Japanese launch, they were more than 3x. The Australia and Europe launches will be here in a few days, and that figure will likely jump again to 5-6x PS3 sales. If Nintendo can keep their momentum going, it is not even inconceivable that they could overtake 360 in the race to 10 million.
technologically "advanced" sytem at the highest price should be the winner, we'd all have Neo-Geo's and 3DO's. Granted they both had great games, but I think Sony really shot themselves in the foot with this ugly heap. Maybe they should stick with CG to show the consumer, that always worked for them in the past.
So why are people buying a Wii???? The zelda game is almost identical to the gamecube version...except for the controls of course. So I guess thats all the Wii offers???
Wii is all about the controller. The hardware is just a souped up Gamecube, but still it's outselling the PS3 by a wide margin. Sony should be ashamed that they are being beaten by Nintendo this time around after they hyped all the hardware and their "True HD" 1080p visuals and the Blu Ray. Apparently 1080p visuals and watching HD movies aren't what people want if Wii sales figures mean anything. The G4 commercial with the fat smart girl and the cute dumb blonde is true. People are going for the blonde. "I like go carts. Vrooom Vrooom!!"
its called "baby-steps" first they need to see how good this new controller will do, i know for sure if nintendo comes with a next nintendo console, we will have good looking GFX and ofcourse the return of the Wii-mote.
o and if Zelda was a Wii project i bet we would have seen a better looking game then it already kinda looks good.
who cares about graphics? Nintendo shows gameplay and innovation are WAY more valuable than graphics. anyone who has played a wii game knows how awesome and MORE FUN the wii is. Nintendo is soley for gaming which is logical considering its a GAMING system. i think its retarded that xbox and ps3 focus more on entertainment features rather than on gaming.
Nintendo system is relying on one thing... a controller. While I want it, It could be disastorous as we are already seeing. Third party games are not using it the way it should and even first party games aren't spectacular. I agree that graphics aren't everything but if Nintendo wanted to win, they should have put some more power behind it.
Nintendo is a gaming system... your right.
But the 360 and the PS3 are also... they are just A gaming media system. Thats why they are focusing on both games and media. If you say that they are not focused on games, You are mistaken.
Games consoles SHOULD be about good games, not about harddrives, MP3 and attachable waffle irons.
They are about games. The others just make the experiance better. Harddrives is for memory which you need. MP3 so you can listen to music WHILE plaing just like in the 360.
learned anything from the last generation, having owned all three systems, memory cards suck. I was spoiled by the XBOX hard drive for my saves. No more fumbling around for the right memory card. And the featue for the 360 such as linking with a PC or streaming MP3's in game are just software to comliment the fantastic hardware. They didn't slap in old system chips to drive up costs or add proprietary media formats such as poo-ray. Microsoft is mostly a software company and produced some added benefits to expliot the superior hardware.
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.