If you remove Far Cry 4’s fictional Himalayan setting called Kyrat, the rocket launcher selling sherpas and all the Buddha statues, Ubisoft latest entry in its open-world first-person shooter franchise is basically the same game as Far Cry 3.
A brand new engine for FAR CRY 5 would be amazing I cant wait to see how amazing the graphics are. Hopefully it will be shown at the game awards or we will have to wait for E3.
If that is the case I would never pay $60 for it, FC3 was adrenaline filled fun that got boring fast and had little to no good content. IMO it is a big gimmick that people like if they actually belief gameplay is the only important element in a video game. I would spend no more than $20 for another FC3. It was overrated IMO, I think it's good gameplay and visuals gave it good presentation which could be considered key to getting a great review from some. Of course just my opinion, I think a 9 above is ridiculous for such an empty game then again I like depth and open world RPGs like Fallout and TES so maybe I have been a little spoiled by what they offer in their big worlds.
I'm looking forward to Far Cry 5. This game really needs a new engine though.
Far Cry.. more like far bad lol ubisoft can't make a game that workz
i enjoyed it but nowhere near as much as FC3
and really deadly Honey Badgers
If that is the case I would never pay $60 for it, FC3 was adrenaline filled fun that got boring fast and had little to no good content. IMO it is a big gimmick that people like if they actually belief gameplay is the only important element in a video game. I would spend no more than $20 for another FC3. It was overrated IMO, I think it's good gameplay and visuals gave it good presentation which could be considered key to getting a great review from some. Of course just my opinion, I think a 9 above is ridiculous for such an empty game then again I like depth and open world RPGs like Fallout and TES so maybe I have been a little spoiled by what they offer in their big worlds.