Submitted by BUM 2708d ago | image

First scans of Crysis Warhead

6 pages of PC Gamer Magazine scans full of Crysis Warhead. New unseen images and details. (Crysis - Warhead, PC)

TABSF  +   2707d ago
could probably make system cheaper than that but this is looking amazing
okcomputer  +   2707d ago
True, but still I love that they had a section of the article devoted to how even an average pc can run the game well. It gives a nice "stfu" to all the console fanboys who usually go on about needing $2000 rigs and $500 video cards everytime a good game comes out for the pc.
Gorgon  +   2707d ago
"True, but still I love that they had a section of the article devoted to how even an average pc can run the game well"

They said the same about the first one.
Winter47th  +   2707d ago
Them making Warhead run better than the first one is a slap to everyone who bought Crysis, that means:

1- They admit Crysis' not optimized, but since Warhead runs on the same engine, with everything cut and pasted, they just don't give a damn about finishing what they started with patch 1.3.
2- They could release a patch to make it work just as good as Warhead, but they wont.
3- They don't give a $h!t about their fans, if you want your patches, performance then buy it again with refurbished campaign.
#1.3 (Edited 2707d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
Charlie2688  +   2707d ago
@Winter47th: I think at this point its pretty much confirmed that the CryEngine 2 used for Crysis was horrendously unoptimized also pretty much confirmed that they gave up trying to optimizing the engine thru patches so they gave up on the first Crysis -_-
juuken  +   2707d ago
Looks awesome.
Dark_Vendetta  +   2707d ago
With a 8600 you can run it silky smooth but with how much details turned on? I tried to run Crysis on Very High on my 2900XT but it suffers way too much. Too many slowdowns (because of the 2900 ...) and even the parts that were playable weren't that much fun. I really expected more :(
TheIneffableBob  +   2707d ago
High settings, apparently.

I'm guessing Crysis was terribly optimized.
okcomputer  +   2707d ago
I've read articles that say the devs were basically big nvidia supports and optimized the game for those cards. So its pretty much established that nvidia cards are better suited for crysis. Thats probably the difference I guess.
Gorgon  +   2707d ago
Give me STALKER any day over this.
DaddyDC650  +   2707d ago
Must buy for me!
TABSF  +   2707d ago
well did not have many problems with my 3870 and not getting any with my 9800 GTX

i think that the game is ace (crysis) and i think that developing warhead is a good idea

plus if you go to Crymods you can download tweaks so that crysis can play very high setting on XP also you can get one that play high setting on low specs pcs

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
New stories

Review: Project Zero: Maiden of Black Water | Stevivor

4m ago - Project Zero isn’t a bad game, but it is a disappointing one. | Wii U

Fallout 4 Review (Invision Community)

4m ago - Fallout 4, developed by Bethesda, is another game in the long lasting series of Fallout, set in a... | PC

PS4 Games To Look Out For In November 2015

Now - With all the amazing titles still to come this year, Releases.com thought it would do you a favor and make it a little bit easier to keep track of... | Promoted post

Darksiders II Deathinitive Edition Review | TXH

5m ago - Neil writes "Death, the most feared of the Four Horsemen is back and ready to take our lives once... | PS4

Top 5 Craziest Summons in Final Fantasy VIII

23m ago - 2mooglesgaming: Final Fantasy VIII is unique in the series for a lot of reasons: It’s got a moder... | PC

Spiral Cats Amazing Wizard Cosplay for Cabal Online

43m ago - The famous cosplayer Doremi today shared her hot transcendence Wizard cosplay artworks for Cabal... | Culture