According to report, PlayStation 4 exclusive announcement at PlayStation Experience event might be coming from "Third Party Developer".
Exclusive is an exclusive - 3rd party or 1st party - doesn't matter. Not sure why everyone hates on Microsoft for doing it - they all do it. It's to make your system stand out and offer a game you can't play anywhere else (or at least any other competitors console).
Don't worry, this site will adopt your point of view once Sony does it. p.s. I agree with you
it's going to be The Last Red dead Guardian Mark my words.
This PlayStation event is gearing up to be a great way to end an incredible first year for the PS4.
Shenmue 3 on PS4 excluisvely will make fans rage no doubt. I am almost sure it will be that game.
You mean exclusive that gets ported in 6 months to a year? Lololol that's not exclusive. Especially MS don't own the ip
Please be Agent !!!!!!!!!!!
It seems like it won't be Agent. Could it be Metal Gear Solid: Phantom Pain?
^uhhh no That game was shown at a Microsoft press event. No way in hell would it suddenly be a PS4 exclusive. Give me new announcements.
'Please be Agent !!!!!!!!!!! ' You'll still be saying that in 2025.
id rather there be no exclusives to anyone at all.
LOL thats something a PC fanboy would say.
@Clunkyd no that's something someone who doesn't give a f*** console wars would say.
Only if they dont take away a multiplat from Xbox fans. :I
agree exclusives are the substance of owning a console ..pls let it be Dragons Dogma 2
Dragon's Dogma 2 would be nice. A Next Generation Tenchu Stealth Assassins would be explosive.
Just by reading this I was already out of breath! Loved the first one so much!
TR is an established franchise already thats why people went ape shizznit over the announcement.For all we know this could be a brand new IP.
And it had already been announced for other platforms and retailers were even taking pre-orders.
Everyone hates on MS for doing it for a very good reason here's why. When you do like Sony and Nintendo have done by fostering game development from first party studios it sends a message and that message is you're in it for the long haul. Having a good stable of first party studios shows that you genuinely have an interest in the gaming space and that you're not just one foot in one foot out. Both Sony and Nintendo are and have been in the game longer and have shown this isn't just a project or an experiment. MS had all of last generation to acquire first party studios and build up their stable of developers and they didn't do it. MS has always been one foot in one foot out and have shown people that they aren't genuinely invested long term in gaming. They have established a pattern they go heavy with games and paid for exclusives the first part of a new generation and then they slack off and don't continually support their platform throughout an entire generation which is probably why they've never won a generation ever. Buying up games and playing keep away from other platforms which is what they do in a false attempt to bolster their gaming portfolio is not only frowned upon it's a sleazy move and this generation it also hurts developers who get paid to go exclusive to the xbox one because it limits the sales and exposure their games get because the xbox is being outsold 2 to 1 worldwide sure the developers get paid but it's debatable if in the end it's worth it for them Titanfall and Sunset Overdrive are a good example. Microsoft doesn't support their consoles throughout an entire generation because they don't have the first party studios to do it and unlike Sony and Nintendo they don't take risks with new games and because of that they play it safe with sequel after sequel. Forza is a good example of them doing this as well as Halo and Gears and Fable. MS doesn't care about gaming or gamers the xbox one is a fine example of this. They ignored their core customers and chased the casual players Nintendo has and it backfired on them and damaged the brand which is why they're where they are today.
@yarbie: "Not sure why everyone hates on Microsoft for doing it" the issue isn't so much MS getting 3rd party exclusives - the issue is dumping money to turn what were multiplatform titles when they were announced into exclusive/timed exclusive titles. for example, i don't think anyone had a problem with scalebound being MS exclusive because it was *announced* as an exclusive.
Exactly. Sony isn't buying up games like Tomb Raider and Minecraft which are already on multiplatform. Sony is more respected by the gamers cause they invest in more new ip's whether it's 1st or 3rd party.
A theory. Could it be the next Deus Ex?. Here's my reasoning. Four days before E3 the logo leaked for the next Deus ex game yet the game was a no show. Around the same time there was a rumor going round that a major third party game was pulled from Sony's show last minute. We know it is in development. Second someone saw the game and made a post about how fanboy's would rage. This means that it is probably significant but not super huge like mass effect etc. Then Microsoft was given Tomb raider exclusivity by Square enix. In return could they have given Deus ex to Sony?
"Then Microsoft was given Tomb raider exclusivity by Square enix." timed. it's timed exclusivity.
Interesting idea. I thought the last Deus Ex was incredible (except the strange ending).
Very true Yarbie. People keep saying it's different when MS does it but it's not. Just because it's a new IP from a third party doesn't make it any different. Just because No Man's Sky is a new IP, does it make it any less desirable for a Xbox player to want to play the game as a PS user would want to play the new Tomb Raider game? No! I saw No Man's Sky and I personally would love to play it when first comes out more so than the new Tomb Raider, but Sony made sure to keep it out of the hands of all gamers. (I actually read someone post that about Tomb Raider, too funny) Hilarious when people say it's ok when a new IP is involved but I seem to remember the same folks going ham when Titanfall was a third party exclusive and how a lot of these same people were saying MS is killing the game industry with these practices. But as soon as Sony does it with No Man's Sky, Hellblade and potentially this new announced 3rd party game...it's ok...because it's a new IP or Sony nurtures their 1st parties so they can do it. It's the scramble city defense as most here have to back peddle after raging hard on MS. It's always some lame pass given to Sony when they do the same, while MS gets the top heat with over 200 comments of people condemning them.
You are not getting it dude, people got mad when Microsoft got the tomb raider timed exclusive because that what was previously stated to be on all platforms in 2013 e3 its trailer included all platforms last gen and this gen but then Microsoft just flat out spent money to prevent it from coming to other platforms that's the problem it shows that Microsoft isn't a risk taker and rather than invest in a new IP from a third party it just gobbled up an established franchise from one, are you seeing the picture I'm glad your all getting scalebound and what not
I think No Mans Sky couldnt be developed on 2 platforms at the same time.. probably coming to Pc and then Xbone eventually
@monster "Microsoft just flat out spent money to prevent it from coming to other platforms..." Yea and Sony spent money to keep No Man's Sky off other platforms. There is no difference! Just because one was established and the other isn't doesn't make the first one any less desirable. It's just more spin and manufactured hatred towards MS but when Sony does it you guys come with the best excuses ever to justify it. "..that Microsoft isn't a risk taker and rather than invest in a new IP from a third party.." Sunset Overdrive Scalebound Ryse Quantum Break Just what in the hell are you talking about? Those are FOUR third party exclusive titles that MS is backing and heavy! The fact you can post that and not put a /s is beyond amazing.
It's only a problem when you release a sequel exclusive to a console after the previous installment was on both. People have a problem with that because it's like giving your fans a middle finger.
Hmm this could mean a lot. Most likely: It could be a 3rd party exclusive that was multipatfrom which would make people "Rage" just like the Tomb Raider announcement depending on the game. Somewhat Likely: It could be a game build on the "Rage" Engine by Rockstar. GTA San Andreas Stories or a new exclusive. Least Likely: It could be a sequel to id Games "Rage 2".
Name a game on PS4 that had already released on all platforms and then the sequel was bought out to be exclusive to one platform. Microsoft has done this several times since they don't know how to make games. I would be fine with a 3rd party game going exclusive as long as it wasn't a sequel to a game already released to everyone.
You don't pay a developer to turn a multiplat form exclusive into a timed or a permanent exclusive, which is a common practice from Microsoft.
Is the PS Experience event live streamed somewhere, video presentation?
I think its from a japanese publisher, some reboot of an older series.
Funny. No chance of Bethesda doing a exclusive deal for fallout or elder scrolls.
I'm pretty sure Microsoft could change anyones mind.
Doubtful. More likely that will be revealed at the video game awards this year.
Man, been waiting since 2009 to hear more about Agent. Same boat as the Last Guardian for me.
"If it’s going to make people rage, it’s for a good reason." http://i0.kym-cdn.com/photo...
Its not Agent = I'm not Hype (False I'm still hyped up, but damn i wish it was Agent)
Lol, your picture goes perfectly with that. Here's hoping it's something amazing though... I really want some hype from this one.
I'm super stoked about Playstation Experience conference. Hope they have some nice surprises for us.
Could be 2nd-Party like Heavy Rain is for example.
I'm laughing at that first sentence so hard that I'm not even going to read the article. It was already "confirmed" like a month ago that there was a 3rd party exclusive coming. There's no "might" about it... Wow, great journalism!!
I got disagrees lol. It's all good. Funny though it was from the same website... http://www.gamepur.com/news...
TLG is all i need
Final Fantasy VII remake. This seems to celebrate the 20th anniversary of PlayStation and Final Fantasy VII defined the PlayStation 1.
Probably Rage 2. Hence the "rage"
Why not a Streets of Rage reboot? Hey, a guy can dream!
The Last Guardian or an early release for a game that was originally scheduled for 2015.
Doesn't matter what it is, I can play it because I have all the consoles. I do think a high possibility it might be a new Techmo game. We haven't heard much from them but I am secretly hoping for a Ninja Gaiden 4.
Tenchu! Bless you* lol
Shenmue 3?!?!?.... Wishful thinking
The only game that will make gamers rage if it will be exclusive!
My exclusives wish list... Syphon Filter Crash Bandicoot Mod Nation Racers 2 Spyro The Dragon Legacy of Kane G Police Bloody Roar
Mannnn....legacy of kane or ZOE 3 would be nice!
So I just know you sony fans are going to bitch about this just like you did about the Tomb Raider deal with Microsoft.
Yea, if it's an exclusive Mass Effect then it wouldn't be fair on Xbox fans. Can't think of too many more that have started on Xbox though?
People raged over TR because it was already advertised as a multiplatform title. Hell, you could preorder it for PS4 already at the time of the announcement. Also it would be shitty if Mass Effect went Sony exclusive since the game started on 360.
Kingdom Hearts 3?
could it possibly be dishonored 2???? they already said they was working on a sequel way back!
It will indie game or f2p game it won't be AAA game
My guess is Ryse 2. :P
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.