Top
110°
7.0

Halo: The Master Chief Collection Review - Gaming Nexus

From the review: "If it weren’t for the multiplayer options, The Master Chief Collection would have garnered a much lower score. The multiplayer suite is truly the saving grace of this package and worth the price of admission alone."

Read Full Story >>
gamingnexus.com
The story is too old to be commented.
OOMagnum1342d ago

"If it werent for the multiplayer options, The Master Chief Collection would have garnered a much lower score". Hey at least after the first sentence, I know not to read the rest.

BX811342d ago

At school now. Are the servers up?

True_Samurai1342d ago

Idk about others but it takes me 1min to find a game now before the update was 5min

XBLSkull1342d ago (Edited 1342d ago )

Halo: Combat Evolved alone is still worth $60 and still worthy of its 97 metacritic. And you get 3 more games for free on top of that. This guy is intentionally a hater.

In addition:

"If it weren’t for the multiplayer options, The Master Chief Collection would have garnered a much lower score. The multiplayer suite is truly the saving grace of this package and worth the price of admission alone."

Funny for two reasons - A statement like that doesn't sound like a 7/10 experience, and multiplayer also is still not working very well and if points were to be knocked off I would do it and cite that it's matchmaking component is broken.

BX811342d ago

@true
thanks. Just got home tried a game and it populated then just put me in the match by myself. Lol. Its a start, going to try again after dinner.

hankmoody1342d ago

LMAO Seriously, if this isn't click bait, I don't know what is.

WeAreLegion1342d ago (Edited 1342d ago )

Agreed. We have here four of the best campaigns ever made and they're going to trash those? Are you serious?

Utalkin2me1342d ago

"Four of the best campaigns ever made", Really? Even if you're a major Xbox fanboy, that is just a silly comment.

Angeljuice1342d ago (Edited 1342d ago )

@Legion
Best campaigns ever made......on Xbox.

I'm not trolling, I played Halo when it released on PC and it was nothing I hadn't seen a hundred times before. Its a solid enough game, but nothing close to the best PC shooters at the time.

I played Halo 3 a little on my friends Xbox and felt similarly uninspired.

WeAreLegion1342d ago

Haha. I usually get called a Sony fanboy. This is a change of pace.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1342d ago
spicelicka1342d ago

LOLLL hey if all games were only half of what they are, they would all get lower review scores! Wow fact!

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1342d ago
TXIDarkAvenger1342d ago

I think its safe to say that this reviewer is more of a fan of the newer Halo games. "Sure, Halo 2 looks and sounds better than it ever has, but it feels incredibly dated when you play it. The game’s pacing is slow and the default control schemes don’t feel comfortable any more. That same thing can be said for Halo C.E. and Halo 3". And why does he expect the gameplay experience to evolve, its suppose to be the same as it was back then because that's what made it so great.

"Since the experience is exactly the same as it was with the original releases of C.E., 3, and 4, there really isn’t any reason for players to play through the 360 ports in this package." I don't even...

spicelicka1342d ago

This has to be a joke, it's cool for the reviewer to give his opinion, but if he expects a remake to be a completely different game than the original I can only laugh...

Omran1342d ago

polygon change there review score
from 9.5 to 8 due to servers issues

lunatic00011342d ago (Edited 1342d ago )

So just because this idiot feels that halo 1 and 2 are old and not quite to tadays standards of shooters...it gets a bad score...is this review for reals????

Show all comments (18)