From the review: "If it weren’t for the multiplayer options, The Master Chief Collection would have garnered a much lower score. The multiplayer suite is truly the saving grace of this package and worth the price of admission alone."
"If it werent for the multiplayer options, The Master Chief Collection would have garnered a much lower score". Hey at least after the first sentence, I know not to read the rest.
At school now. Are the servers up?
Idk about others but it takes me 1min to find a game now before the update was 5min
Halo: Combat Evolved alone is still worth $60 and still worthy of its 97 metacritic. And you get 3 more games for free on top of that. This guy is intentionally a hater. In addition: "If it weren’t for the multiplayer options, The Master Chief Collection would have garnered a much lower score. The multiplayer suite is truly the saving grace of this package and worth the price of admission alone." Funny for two reasons - A statement like that doesn't sound like a 7/10 experience, and multiplayer also is still not working very well and if points were to be knocked off I would do it and cite that it's matchmaking component is broken.
@true thanks. Just got home tried a game and it populated then just put me in the match by myself. Lol. Its a start, going to try again after dinner.
LMAO Seriously, if this isn't click bait, I don't know what is.
Agreed. We have here four of the best campaigns ever made and they're going to trash those? Are you serious?
"Four of the best campaigns ever made", Really? Even if you're a major Xbox fanboy, that is just a silly comment.
@Legion Best campaigns ever made......on Xbox. I'm not trolling, I played Halo when it released on PC and it was nothing I hadn't seen a hundred times before. Its a solid enough game, but nothing close to the best PC shooters at the time. I played Halo 3 a little on my friends Xbox and felt similarly uninspired.
Haha. I usually get called a Sony fanboy. This is a change of pace.
LOLLL hey if all games were only half of what they are, they would all get lower review scores! Wow fact!
I think its safe to say that this reviewer is more of a fan of the newer Halo games. "Sure, Halo 2 looks and sounds better than it ever has, but it feels incredibly dated when you play it. The game’s pacing is slow and the default control schemes don’t feel comfortable any more. That same thing can be said for Halo C.E. and Halo 3". And why does he expect the gameplay experience to evolve, its suppose to be the same as it was back then because that's what made it so great. "Since the experience is exactly the same as it was with the original releases of C.E., 3, and 4, there really isn’t any reason for players to play through the 360 ports in this package." I don't even...
This has to be a joke, it's cool for the reviewer to give his opinion, but if he expects a remake to be a completely different game than the original I can only laugh...
polygon change there review score from 9.5 to 8 due to servers issues
So just because this idiot feels that halo 1 and 2 are old and not quite to tadays standards of shooters...it gets a bad score...is this review for reals????
The game is a great value for any Halo fan it also showed me how bad Destiny really was
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.