Submitted by clintos59 2595d ago | review

Herald & Review, Reviews Metal Gear Solid 4

'Metal Gear Solid 4' gives Snake his final, best mission


Say what you will about lengthy cutscenes in games: Hideo Kojima has them down.

The "Metal Gear" series - masterminded by Kojima and now in its 20th year - is well known for its cinematic sequences and deep (and often convoluted) storytelling.

The final entry in the series, "Metal Gear Solid 4: Guns of the Patriots" for the PlayStation 3, takes the storytelling to lofty heights. Cutscene time rivals gameplay time - and it's amazing. (Industry, Metal Gear Solid 4: Guns of the Patriots, PS3) 10/10

Credit url: herald-review.com
Silogon  +   2595d ago
Who are all these morons reviewing the game? Why are all these no name sites being allowed to review the game? Do N4g reviews count too?
butterfinger  +   2595d ago
So you called these people morons and a no-name site. They are actually well-respected in Illinois. It can't be helped that people are going out of their way to dig up every review possible. Aimee Green actually does a good job of reporting gaming news and doesn't deserve to be slammed by people like you. Complain on, Silogon!
clintos59  +   2595d ago
Its the first time ive seen so many others outside of gaming wanting to review a game...
from MSN, to Fox News, AOL to Imageshack, lol. I guess the impact of this masterpiece has caught many people by suprise of just how amazing it is and others want to share there reviews aswell about the game. :)
Silogon  +   2595d ago
sounds to me like you're the only one who knows who she or this site even is. Let alone cares. Just because a 10 is slapped onto this review doesn't mean it's worth anymore time than Tom's Review or any of the others who gave it a bad review.

They need a quality control regulation in order for the game's final score to be noted. This is why Meta and Gamerankings is off and not reliable.

They allowed 87 reviews for Gears of war and only 77 for Uncharted. Is that fair? no. MGS4 will garner 200 reviews at this rate. Don't even try to justify this to me or anyone. We should have a 20 review limit and that's it. Quality over quantity.
butterfinger  +   2595d ago
Ok, so a 20 review limit? And who's reviews will make up those 20 exactly? 20 10's or 20 of what you agree with? Or 20 sites that you agree with? Your idea is a joke and totally unjustifiable and practically impossible. If you don't like the review system that much then you shouldn't pay attention to it. It's not going to change anytime soon. Complain on, Silogon!
Silogon  +   2595d ago
no, you take the most notable sites. The sites with the most hits and most users and most traffic.


etc. etc. etc. etc.

Those are what will make up your scores. You take the top 20 sites and that's it. the top sites with the most hits and user base. the most known and familiar. That way every game has a fair shot of meeting the demands of the meta when they allow 87 reviews to 77 reviews be acceptable is when I stopped taking them serious.

You can't honestly sit here and tell me that 10% wouldn't have made a different on Uncharteds reviews. Sorry. It's unacceptable to tout these meta scores when there is no quality control stopping how many reviews count and don't count.
butterfinger  +   2595d ago
You and I...
have no idea if 10% would have made a difference. You could do the research yourself and look up Uncharted reviews on every other site (not blogs or user reviews) that wasn't on Metacritic and find out for yourself. However, the only reason you would do that is if you are an Uncharted or PS3 fanboy. I don't waste a much time worrying about whether my console has x number of AAA titles according to Metacritic. If I like a game, I will enjoy that game without someone telling me I should or shouldn't. BTW, your idea of using sites that get the most hits still fails. That still doesn't solve any of the reviewing bias problems or anything. Let it go. You will never change the review system, and I doubt enough people care enough to help you try.
Baba1906  +   2595d ago
what are you fighting about 0o. i think its clear that the game is a masterpiece. at least for me. so who cares about the reviews.
butterfinger  +   2595d ago
I totally agree...
I was just defending a respectable person and their site. All of these reviews are meaningless to me, and the game was amazing.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
New stories

Review - Submerged | Use A Potion!

9m ago - Check out Use A Potion's review of Submerged, the latest release from Uppercut Games! "There wer... | PC

(WGB) The Swindle Review – Ocean’s Thirteen

9m ago - Baden of WGB: "The Swindle can be a brutal game, sometimes I’d say to the point of feeling unfair... | PC

Warhammer Fans! Win a Pro-Painted Ghorgon!

Now - Turbo Tape Games is pleased to announce a contest for an exclusive Ghorgon miniature hand-painted by Dave Taylor! | Promoted post

Rare Replay Review | Hardcore Gamer

19m ago - Writing a review for Rare Replay is among the most bizarre tasks imaginable in video game journal... | Xbox One

How Assassin's Creed keeps it fresh: part one

31m ago - Tony Nguyen over at G4@Syfygames thinks the Assassin's Creed games still manages to keep things f... | Xbox 360

Masochisia Gets a Disturbingly Creepy New Trailer

1h ago - Hardcore Gamer: "Masochisia looks to be a frightening game where players control a character who... | PC