GearNuke: "Assassin's Creed Unity PS4 version is out in the wild and judging from these screenshots taken directly from the PS4, the game does indeed run at a sub-1080p resolution."
They just wanted "Unity" for both versions ;)
Keep telling yourself that, 2 generations of promises of 1080p gaming and still unable to deliver lol. Console gamers paid 600usd for PS3 with a promise of 1080p gaming. It failed badly with hardly any AAA games in 1080p. 8 years later, up comes the PS4 another 400usd spent. Same promises, yet still no guaranteed 1080p. Next gen games are about starting to role out now. Once games true next gen games are out, ones which dont release on last gen consoles. You will see both the PS4 and xb1 fall back to 720p gaming. Its funny i made a PC back in 2008. With a I5 CPU, it played games in 1080p back then. Today 6 years later all it needed was a CPU overclock to 4ghz and a GPU upgrade (both cheaper than getting a console) and it again manages to play games in 1080p better than consoles while maintaining BC for just about every game bought in the last 25 years lol.
Ubisoft are completely missing it this gen so far. Unity for both consoles wouldn't lead them anywhere. next stop: The Division.
I still have an I5, anything else is overkill tbh, even now. Once you reach GPU'S overall throughput. You become limited anyway. As for PS3, Was never touted that way. Blu-ray was @ 1080p. Most games were 720p. People tend to forget, PS3 was pushing graphics that were newer then the console could handle at times. Limiting factor with these consoles is CPU. But Sony has an ace up their sleeve. They have much more Compute power then people realize. But i'm guessing Ubishit hasn't used it yet. There is no reason for this to be parity on x1 and PS4. PS4 has twice the throughput. FACT
Shame there hasn't been anything worthwhile on PC for a long time.
@alexg587 Yeah you keep telling yourself the new consoles will get better, whatever. A year in to a 5-or-so year lifecycle, and we're still sub 1080p and laughably, ***KING PATHETICALLY, still, STILL, at 30 FPS. All because of idiots like you that believe 30 FPS is fine and great because you don't want to face the truth - the new consoles suck. You're not shouting at the devs. Worse, you're agreeing with crap like The Order. LESS than 30 FPS is fine? You agree it's cinematic and adds to the game? That's just insultingly moronic.
Oh shut up with your im a pc gamer its the best , no one cares not even devs thats why they only talk about console versions get over it they dont care about pc gamers very few devs do anymore
You are just typical low end pc owner.For examble test metro redux with pc and ps4.2x760 sli i5 cant hold stable 60fps Ps4 can or try Tombraider with 500 euros pc like i5 750ti you get under 30 fps .Pc:s main problem against ps4 is lag of vram.We tested many games with 3 different pc:s got to say overall winner was Ps4.
Decrypt, how the fuck did you even get 25 agrees? Dev even said it was kept at same res on purpose to avoid "debates and stuff"/ 99.9 of PS4 games are 1080P.
while i agree that unity is pulling some bullshit most ps4 games are in 1080p as far as i've seen.
large majority of ps4 games are 1080p.the only reason this one isnt is because the devs already admitted to parity
Half my PS3 collection is native 1080p (Call of Juarez: Bound in blood, The Saboteur, etc..) you might wanna do some research before you start talking out your ass. BTW, Assassins Creed Black Flag was patched to 1080p Day 1 on PS4, it's likely Assassins Creed Unity will be the same. If your main focus is 1080p you're doing it wrong anyways.. FPS > RESOLUTION Of course 1080p/60fps should be the main target on current-gen consoles.
They don't have the GPU power yet. Forget about 4k next generation, unless your playing Zuma.
There were never any promises. You made them up for yourself.
@windblowsagain "Limiting factor with these consoles is CPU. But Sony has an ace up their sleeve. They have much more Compute power then people realize. But i'm guessing Ubishit hasn't used it yet. There is no reason for this to be parity on x1 and PS4. PS4 has twice the throughput. FACT " Ahahahahahahahahaha... seriously man, stop. You are going to make me piss myself from laughter. You must be the Sony version of Mister X.
This is just what happens when you port from XB1 to PS4. Ubisoft can claim Parity as a reason all they want, but in reality its just them not trying to change it from its ported state. Lazyness. Ubisoft isn't exactly known for great performance optimization on the PC. They like shortcuts.
Sure doesn't seem like many agree with you. Maybe it's the fact that with this current gen there have been a substantial amount of 1080p games. As a pc gamer I find that consoles have lots to offer that make them stand their ground to pc's. Maybe that's why they are still trending better in the industry in gaming than pc's. Not to mention mobile platforms are killing it over pc's. Pcs will always be dominant over consoles in graphics but that doesn't mean that's why people buy consoles. Tell me how much you enjoy super smash Bros or the other titles you won't ever be able to play. Take advantage of all the platforms. That is if you are a real gamer. Which is a person who just enjoys games. Not just the amount of lines vertical and horizonal your hardware can do.
PC gamers have had 1080p 60fps gaming now for over 10 years and console gamers are still a step behind its a joke really and this generation they have been given the tools to do it. The reason why there not is the quality they are trying to put out is too much for the consoles its as simple as that. Stick to the consoles level rather than overshooting. That's why you can get last gens games for xbox and ps4 looking amazing on new consoles. They actually look better than most if not all 3rd party games and run at 1080p 60fps.
@decrypt You do realize i5 didnt come out til near the end of 2009?
Wow the vaseline is strong on this one, http://i.kinja-img.com/gawk... No buy sorry Ubishit Edit: btw i saw the pics on lukas link way better than the ones on the crappy site of the article to judge.
this game looks absolutely terrible.
Stop being a dram queen and overly dramatic. It doesn't look like what they showed us, but it isn't terrible. I am so disappointed with Ubisoft right now because of this bullsh*t bait and switch crap, but I wont say it's terrible. I think I might have to pull my pre-order and pick this up used instead. GTA 5 comes out the same day, so AC:U gets a big F-U. Make them pay with your wallets. Don't support this BS
@Syntax-Error: Actually, it does look horrible. It looks worse than their last title on the same console. It looks, graphically, on par with what we had on the PS3. That, though, is my opinion. Yours may vary. But, I agree with ThatOneGuyThere.
Assassin's Creed: Parity
Watch Dogs anyone ? trllolololo. Anyone trusting Ubisoft after that incident to be truthful in their graphics displays and their screen-bullshots is seriously a dumbass
@TheOpenWorlder This is much worse than Watchdogs. At least WD ran at 900p on PS4 vs 792p on xbone, had better lighting, shadows and AO than xbone not to mention it didn't screen tear all over like the xbone, AKA it took advantage of the extra PS4 GPU power. This game looks terrible, Black Flag looked better AND was 1080p. After seeing this it is more obvious that xbone parity was the goal. N o buy for me.
Did you even see the minimum requirements for the game on PC? People like you who think ps4 is some super computer from future are making me laugh. As for the screens look like they're not even 900p
Because it's not like a lot of Ubisoft games have inflated requirements to make their games seem more demanding and optimized while they're lazy ports...
Yeah. The requirements aren't because it's a beast of a game that pushes things beyond all other games (Hint: Skyrim mods run with lower specs and look so much better than this game). The problem is Ubisoft rushes things out every year and they don't optimize. It's also more beneficial for them to encourage people to buy games on consoles rather than on PC, so it's a win-win for them.
Ubisoft is wrong http://www.escapistmagazine...
lol that avatar +bub just for that. @johnny5
The site this article was posted on sucks. Pops up constantly asking me to "like" your site just makes me hate it and avoid it in the future. Get a clue.
Adblock is your friend
Chrome on mobile user. It has Adblock. Still has a page that covers half the site, and half the time was unable to even exit out of the ad.
Ahh i see, yeah i never view the site in question on my mobile becuase of that
Viewing on a phone/tablet causes that shit website to nuke your screen with ignorance. Haven't clicked on their crap in months because of it.
use the n4g app on andriod its unoffical but you can view and comment smoothly with no ads
I will pass this comment to the site admin.
That looks so blurry
It's the picture itself, it's probably compressed down on purpose to try and exacerbate the situation.
Ok, what the hell is up with the graphics? Those textures look like from an old Xbox 360 game, everything seems blurry. This doesn't look like a next-gen game to me.
I agree. The textures is somewhat lackluster and on top of that, it looks washed out.
It does seem very blurry, especially the main character.
This isn't how it looks like at all. I played the game on an Xbox One connected to one of the most crappy screens ever and it still looked better. Ps4 has to look at least the same as the build I played, if not better.
what if this pics are from PC on low-medium settings
just like the Evil Within, I thought it was a ps2 game in my ps4.
Failed attempt at a joke. Evil Within looked nothing like a PS2 game. So you're saying Evil Within looked like God Of War graphically considering that was one of the best looking games on PS2. It looked like an HD RE4, but not like PS2 graphics on it's best day. Troll much?
Some people just have a problem of understanding a little sarcasm...
Heard about compressed pictures? Well that is the case here. Hope gamers don't fall for this shit.
For Consoles players is other news, the PC version has not been leaked as of yet!
watch as ubisoft intentionally gimps the PC version, and modders have to fix their mess.
This seems to be the industry standard now. Modders seemingly far more talented than the developers themselves.
It doesnt even look that good, the textures are all muuddy and blurry Arno doesn't look too good either either and the NPC's number isn't that high Probably not even a hungred at once on screen
wtf is this shit!!!!!!!!!!!!!! f**k you ubi this looks horrible compared to that next gen trailer start of the year never giving u another penny
31 New PS4 screenshots that can be added to the article http://imgur.com/a/Kfagt
Ahhh I didnt see that bit
Sub-1080p! Kill it with fire!
What a let down in terms of graphics those pictures are. It'll look better on PC but most probably it'll run like sh*t, given the minimum requirements they officially announced. Oh, Ubi...
Call of Assassins: Modern Duty ;) Assassins Punity: Modern Unity ;) Assassins Bleed: Modern Milking ;) Assassins Unity: Jury Duty ;) Assassins Parity: Modern Hilarity :)
Johny5 - power down.
Lmao i liked the last one best
LMAO at Call of assassins.
Ubisoft can suck a fat sausage! Let them milk, make comments bout parity bs and the drones will still eat this up. Guess what though? You won't get my money, #uck u!
What makes someone a drone to you? Is the fact that I think this game looks fun, enough to condemn me? Quite silly.
Can we at least wait till the game comes out to burn it? It is possible that it could be great. Resolution is only part of the issue. I will still be getting this game to play with friends.
People enjoy bandwagoning and blindly following other peoples opinions before actually playing it for themselves.
and that goes for more than video games, generally everything in life.
Looks a bit before last gen in places.