Can you see a difference?
I can't see any difference at all.
im confused though which needs addressing,i have a question- have developers nearly reached the limit with 360 like they have been saying because ps3 games should not be on par with 360 at such an early stage on the ps3 (especially as its a difficult system to program for)as developers should know every trick possible on the 360 with regards to getting maximum performance. you never saw any ps2 game look on par or better that the xbox and developers knew ps2 inside out noone really realises this fact and its confusing
wow, very close. there is some slight screen tearing on the x360 at the part where they are all in the back of the truck. both look almost identical regarding the actual graphics and effects. good job DICE! looking forward to MIRROR'S EDGE from you next!
"i have a question- have developers nearly reached the limit with 360 like they have been saying because ps3 games should not be on par with 360 at such an early stage on the ps3 (especially as its a difficult system to program for)as developers should know every trick possible on the 360 with regards to getting maximum performance." They PS3 isn't like the second coming of jesus. When it comes to multi-plat games, there's no reason for a developer to put extra time into the PS3/360 version when it already looks and performs as good as the other. The technology will be pushed more on exclusives, which look incredible on both systems. Just because it's hard to program for doesn't make it better either.
let me clear up some confusion for you. The "generation" gap between consoles doesn't exist. originally the PS3 was supposed to be launched along side the Xbox 360. And as a requirement, sony shipped out many of it's original dev kits already. This means that games have been in production for as long as 360 games. Meaning they've had the same amount to learn everything on both systems. Second problem is neither system is as strong as we think, and neither is stronger then one another (flame me later guys, this is the truth). You won't see one console regularly out preforming the other this gen, both will be suited to different tasks most games will look equally as good on both systems.
please take into account first the only system I own is a PS3, (mainly because I don't have the moeny for both and hardware reliability.) as much as there was probably screen tearing on the 360 version ( I haven't seen the video ) I know that there is Screen tearing on The playstation 3 version. Atleast in the Demo. just want to make sure that everyone knows this game is pretty much, one in the same.
that doesnt make sense eitHer because nearly every developer has stated the recieved their ps3 dev kits way after the 360s some by a year or more,so can you post proof of your claims because i can of mine especially from epic, EA and capcom.its just a question which as a gamer has confused me,im like what is the truth wiith these consoles power instead of all this PR bullcrap
good post. the delay was for blu-ray! the specs of the ps3 were finalised around the same time as the 360s. and the first and second party devs have had their kits since sometime 05. killzone, gran tourismo and mgs have been indevelopment since 05. as you correctly stated, there is no generation gap. jamie foxx: no console has been maxed in two years ever!! the longer the devs have with the hardware, the more they will squeeze out of it. killzone and gran tourismo look so damn good because they are running on superior game engines! not superior hardware! plus they've had losts of money and man-hours lavished on them. and when they are released, will be the culmination of nearly four years woork each! just look at far-cry2. the game engine isn't that far off of killzones, yet runs super on both consoles. the killzone engine could well be the best engine for this gen of consoles! and you can guarantee that although killzone3 will look better, it wont be a leap above no2. now whether microsoft craft an engine for the 360 as good as any of those three is another question?! the truth is, both consoles are equally good.
you deserve plenty of bubbles for that post. Very nicely put, and you wrote in english. I'm impressed. Seriously, this place can be very hard to read occasionaly.
Xbox 360 has more jaggies and PS3 is a lil bit blurrier.
They look exactly the same. Except for the last few scenes, where it's night time. X360's colors looks a bit washed out. Though they only look washed out on those scenes. Otherwise I think it looks identical.
In my all honest opinion, both versions looked exactly the same. Except at some spot PS3 version looked a touch, just a touch brighter, but that has more to do with the TV settings i guess. Good thing both versions are same.
There the same. I played the demo on the PS3 and XBox.I think it all comes down to the controls.I feel more comfortable with the ps3 controller personally.
After reading some of your past comments, and taking a look at your name. I find your comment to be questionable, your past comments give you away. How can you play demos, when it shows your gamertag as having the arcade version? or does that gamertag belong to someone else? Any real gamer know the 360 controller is a FPS controller.
and your name?
I don't hide anything, and never have, not ashamed of it ether.
You find his comment about liking the PS3 controller better questionable because of his user name? Wow, and this coming from a guy with the number 360 in his user name... What, a fanboy calling another fanboy to the carpet here? lol I like the PS3 controller better than the 360 as well, but do you find my comment more questionable? I have no PS3 related terms in my user name...
hypocrisy at it's best. back on topic. There is no visible difference between the 2 versions. I have played both demos at length. I am still undecided which to get. The past several games I picked up for both but that is startin to get hard on my wallet. I will probaly wait and see which version my friends pick up.
"Any real gamer know the 360 controller is a FPS controller. " So apparently ~3.27 million people that bought the PS3 version of COD4 aren't gamers?
Actually any real "FPS" gamer knows the mouse and keyboard is best for FPS games but a "real" gamer can adapt with a standard controller. I am just as accurate with a Sony Dualshock 3 in Battlefield and COD4 as I am with a 360 controller. You don't strike me as someone that doesn't own a PS3 so why would you give an opinion on which controller is better?
Good to see both appear so close to each other on a game i think has quite a lot of potential to be a belter! If the full game is as intense and as fun as the demo then i think we are all in for a post MGS/NG2 treat.
I liked this game more than i thought i would. Well, the online at least.
98.9% usually go to the 360, but this is spot on. Anyone else here tried the demo? I find the tanks to be a bit overpowering and to hard to take down. Thats the only thing that pisses me off about the game though.
The power/defense of the tanks should be toned down just a bit. otherwise, the game is pretty good. Im actually surprised how much fun it is. I mean it is EA! on topic: it looks the same. Nice to see Gametrailers actually turning on the RGB option on the PS3. Atleast the games don't look superwhite like earlier in the comparision vids.
the tanks do have a good amount of power but both sides get tanks. Some fire quickly and do less damage and the others fire once every few seconds but do a lot of damage. I like using the shotgun (demolition) because of the rocket launcher. That comes in handy with the tanks. The only thing that pisses me off is the Helicopter. That'll take some time for me to master it.
Especially against people. You have to hit them almost dead on for anyone to get hurt. There is no splash damage in this game. It's almost easier to run over people running around than it is to try to shoot at them. I really wish they made it so the marker over you disappears when they can't see you anymore. There's so many bullshit kills where I'll hide behind a wall or use a smoke screen only to be shot through the wall/smoke because I have a big red arrow pointing at my head.
There is a difference in color in some scenes. Example: 0:53 the cannon scene.
It all comes down to console preference (i.e. Controller preference, reliability and online price).
I'm all for open debate, but don't pretend to be impartial with comments like "online price"
let's wait and see ...
looks the same 2 me
agreed like in DMC4, there is ZERO graphical difference well done DICE
Hi, They both look identical, you can pick up on small points in either comparisons, though I though the fact they keep switching the windows around which is both annoying and confusing. It's time these pointless comparisons videos where laid to rest
i believe these comparisons are useful. for me i have both consoles and ill get the one that runs better for whichever console
ARE YOU SLOW ANY REAL GAMER KNOWS WHAT HE LIKES BETTER AND I LIKE THE DS3 AND I HAVE A 360 and still like the DS3 SO IM NOT A REAL GAMER WTF
All down to personal preference, I don't like the Xbox360 controller it's not comfortable for me, but I know friends who prefer it over the PS3 one. All down to taste and what fits your hand and feels comfortable to use.
Ya...apparently I'm not a gamer because of my controller preference...
right under the original comment being replied to. It makes it a lot easier for people to read.
360 looks a little bit blurry thats all...
They look the same to me. PS3 games always look brighter on SDTV's because they're usually native in HD outputs. 360 games look better on SDTV's.
And good for dice on getting both versions the same. That always results in better sales for the devs. It's always good to earn a good reputation for this sorta thing.
360 will have hundreds of thousands of people online with nearly all of them with mics. Ps3 with have about TEN people online with one mic between them.
360 will have immature bots like you babbling about how their version of the game is always better, and probably 12 year olds at that.
hundreds of thousands of people or hundreds of thousands of screaming 8 year olds making racist remarks ?
While it was interesting at 1st to see the graphical differences between the 2 platform but now most of their comparisons are the same, you'll need eagle eye to spot the difference.
Only do them if there's a REALLY notable difference.
What if they're trying to make a point of showing how similar games look now? or maybe they just decided to do it for every major multi-plat release. It doesn't hurt anything when they do it, so they might as well.
Actually if there isn't a difference it's better to talk about those games.
That should be first. But like i said, there should only be comparison videos if there's a great difference in how they look. If not then don't even bother.
No real difference the PS3 version seems to be slightly faded. The 360 version is slightly more sharper its so close its hardly worth mentioning. The close ups of the charactor(1:40) you can see the detail in his coat clearer on the 360 version seems to be more detailed you can also look at the rocket launcher the text on the launcher in the 360 version is clearer and not faded. 98% the same meaning no one will see a difference.
is that a man in your avatar ?
Is what I said offensive? lol. You're offended because you know the pixelation in this video is so bad(fuced up)the quality of this vid is hiding most of the flaws in either version(most likely the PS3 version and why the post was chosen with a seemingly forced story description?). #5 thats after the devs dumb down the 360 versions to achieve that goal
His hat is off the screen and PS3 version look clearer. On PS3 version you can see all of his hat. http://i25.tinypic.com/28qz... I think your just saying this to make yourself feel better about your purchase. Oh well. I think that is a man in his avatar. Either way it looks creepy.
are you lenhearts/nasim in another guise?? i think you are you little wierdo
actually, if anything, I would say the x360 one is more faded and the ps3 one slightly sharper.
here we go, there's always something, the graphics/sound are the same but hey the retard patrol is coming! ps3 controller best! x360 controller best! jesus...
power of green the 360 version looks slightly faded if you look without your xbox glasses on but the without this video we could never tell the difference, in that lil thing. Great job ea dice
still great to know the ps3 is NOT producing superior multi-plat games. (you know, the same way there was always a huge difference last gen between xbox and ps2) I really felt early on that the ps3 would sh*t on the 360 with all their hype and "cell power" talk..... i guess at best the ps3 can hope for is to be on par with the 360.
that is a very good point
Kudos to DICE for their great game that runs smoothly on both platforms. Can't wait.
you know why they dont because are not givin the time to do it, i think your mad cause you dont have a ps3 for what reason dont know cant afford one maybe. I used to be just like you talk about the ps3 cell power overrated but when i got one i realized how much its better than the xbox, all it took was my first rrod and then i got my ps3 and never looked back even though i like the xbox still ninja gaiden 2 is decent, when i played mgs4 i realized what all this cell and blu-ray talk was all about, man uncharted are you crazy when you get one trust me youll be singin a differnt song
your talking about exclusives, while I was talking about multi-plat games. and as far as exclusives go, the 360 has SIX rated over 90% on metacritic while the ps3 finally has ONE. and while I agree that uncharted and mgs4 are great looking games, i still believe they can easiy be ported to the 360 if needed. the only people that believe they can't are fanboys. so i'm still very happy with my purchase for a 360 for games. while I might be considering a ps3 in the future because i want a blu-ray player.
Minor brightness differences, thats really all. I'm impressed.
its a multiplatform title for crying out loud...they have to be equal and if one is a little different then it will be only slightly...the game is available for both systems they're not gonna make one version purposely look superior to the other...its only in ps3's exclusive titles that you will see developers try and take advantage of the tech in the ps3
the character models are amazing, one of the first games I played where peoples eyes look real.
does the strip at the bottom of the video on the opening cutscene black for ps3 and grey for 360? To me that hints they have turned up the contrast to make the 360 version look brighter. Exact time on video where it is noticable is 0:05 - 0:18. Why is it like that?
by july 2006 there were already 10,000 finalized dev kits in developers hands. by january 2006 4000 dev kits were released. http://theconsolewars.blogs... and the first reports of ps3 dev kits http://ps3.ign.com/articles... dated 2005 the first demo for mgs4 using the ps3. http://youtube.com/watch?v=... dev kits were released at around the same time as the 360's.
I think some of you think the ps3 is suppose to be way stronger than the 360 graphically. I think they are both almost equal but the ps3 can just do more things on the technical side. Like textures should be equal and etc. but then the ps3 should be able to hold more textures then the 360. Like hair for example instead of having it 1 big model ps3 could have like 1000 strands of hair flowing in a any direction in a realistic flow. Or a bunch of flowers moving randomly to the wind or leaves on a tree. Thats the ps3 real advantage over the 360. To be able to hold much much more things. If games are made to look the same they should look the same its not like they are developing ps2 and xbox and there is an obvious difference in such a way they look like 2 different games. Also ps3 can obtain games at full HD and 60fps 360 cant pass 720 w.o upscaling.
i lol'd. No offense but you obviously have no clue how things works. for example. you talk about the number of textures mattering, well, it doesn't, resolution of textures matter, and thats limted by the space in the ram, or by texture streaming. what the ps3 does better is number crunching so, better physics and procedual code. Better poly counts. what the 360 does better is ram and condition code. So better ai and better textures. and finally, top spin on the 360 is full HD.
The 360 definetly cant achive better AI it processor sux or lets say has nothing on the cell. All 360 can do is push polygons nothing big on a technological stand point. It cant do motion capture like in heavenly sword, mgs4 and tons of other games. Also how doesnt the number of textures matter your saying you rather everything look the same then look natural and realistic? Take a look at MGS4 all of its cutscenes are done with the engine meaning everything you see in a cutscene is what it looks like in gameplay and vice versa. Then if you look at the enviroments and everything you just be amazed on how good the game looks and natural things are and its all through the engine. Definitely better than UC and UT3.