Interview is in a foreign language & the google translator isn't doing a pretty good job of translating it, but you can see couple of new screenshots.
looks ok... i guess
Yawn...after playing Metal Gear Solid 4 everything else just looks dull.
<Infinity Ward....?.... INFINITY WAAAAAARD!!!)
meh Need motion for better judgement.
this game is so dumb looking (so far)...........why does treyarch make games that r so dumb and pathetic looking and i thought infinty bought the rights to cod? anyone know?
Activision does. Activision just lets each developer work on the new game. Unfortunately, with the bar set by CoD4 and Infinity Ward, Treyarch doesn't stand a chance to try making a better CoD5.
after the incredibly high bar that was set by COD4, theres no way in hell that COD5 can top (or even match) COD4
I'm officially OFF DUTY!
...I had a kill/death ratio of 4.09 and without sniping or being a camper. Basically the game stopped being fun for me a for a couple of reasons: 1. Martyrdom. Worst perk in the game. Takes away the need for any skill and its in dire need of a makeover in terms of being able to use it. As a start I would make it so you could only use this perk if you have not thrown all your grenades during combat! 2. Sniping. Maps are far too small to support snipers. Basically just a line of fire point and shoot. You don't have to worry about wind, gravity, etc. Still far too easy to snipe. 3. No team play. Most of the time is a free-for-all no matter what the game type being played. Teamwork nearly always takes a backseat to good teamplay. This is especially relevant for the PS3 version as there seem to be so few PS3 players who actually have a headset. 4. The lobby. COD4 is all about on-line play and yet it comes complete with one of the most inept lobby systems of any next gen game. Even COD3 had a better lobby than COD4. Mind you, at least it is not as bad as the lobby used for GTAIV. 5. Crossairs. What the hell is the deal with being able to tell where an enemy is hiding by looking at your crossairs. 6. Weapons pick up. I am fed up with games that don't require you to do much at all to pick up weapons or ammo. Simply walk over them and thats it. Why have none of these next-gen games introduced some sort of mini-game (ala Gears of War reloading system) for searching bodies or picking up ammo. Also be nice to be able to set booby traps on your fallen comrades so if anyone did do a search... 7. Spawn points/killing. COD4 still has a nasty spawn system that seems to place you back in the middle of combat which makes you nothing but a target for being spawn killed. I wreckon if you spawn kill (I know sometimes is accidental) that your gun(s) should jam for 15 seconds. Anyway, COD4 is by no means perfect and its the little things that start to bug me about the game. I for one am looking forward to COD5 as it seems to me to be COD4 but set in WWII and that to me is quite appealing.
cod5 uses the same engine what cod4, they will also meke it better
i don't understand why everone puts down treyarch? i mean the difference is graphics between cod2 and cod3 was big, thanks to treyarch, and the gameplay was just more of the same. now treyarch is using infinity wards game engine, and with co-op and vehicles.... how can anyone not be looking forward to this game? i know cod4 was the shiz, especially with the modern weapons, but it's gonna take them at least 2 years to make another cod game.
If they can build on the foundation Infinity Ward laid with COD4 then i can't wait to get my hands on it.
I think IW made a house not just the foundations. And these screenshots look absolute sh*t.
...lets judge a game based on screen shots that don't even look like they were taken from in-game. I am thinking that COD5 is going to look pretty much like COD4 but with environments, textures and weapons that place it in WWII. I would love to know why so many try to bag COD5 before they even have enough information about the game to make an opinion. I for one am going to wait and see. I mean, COD3 was better than COD2 but it did not offer anything over and above COD2 to warrant the purchase. Finally, what would be the point of bringing out COD5:MW2 so soon after COD4:MW? I am glad they are taking things back to WWII as I think it will be a timely change.
You seriously like them going back to WW2??? As quite a young gamer (16 years old), I have already seen enough of WW2 from COD2, the market wants modern, they should be smart and give the market what it wants if they ever expect to out do COD4.
WWII is fine, and those of us who have jobs know this, and the developers know that we who actually have money like any setting as long as it's interesting, and that's why they're making COD5 in WWII. Basically because 16-year-olds don't matter, we do. Check out the average age of gamers. Sorry dude.
Okay, not gunna disagree with you, i still stick to my arguement, lets just wait and see if COD5 surpasses the quality and sales of COD4.
I would of rather had the modern warfare setting, but I guess this is okay.
COD5 is gonna suck balls! Listen I love COD4 Modern Warfare. I just don't like the fact they went back to WWII. After COD4 I'm done cuz unless COD goes back to Modern Warfare I'm not getting this game. The original COD was really innovative and unique but after seeing the 2nd and 3rd I realized it all looked the same just newer battles. Until COD4 came out I was like yes something different beyond WWII Games now I look at COD5 and I'm like f*** this game. I'll be busy playing Resistance 2, Killzone 2, Crysis, Bioshock, and Project Offset for my FPS Games now. Isn't anyone getting tired of this WWII crap other than me? What's better Modern Warfare or this? Modern Warfare is better why change it?
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.