40°
Submitted by WutangClam 210d ago | opinion piece

Does Every Game Really Need to Have Multiplayer Content?

Ray Porreca of Entertainment Buddha writes: "Lately, it feels as though there has been a large shift in the way that video games are developed. This change is to be expected, of course, as the games industry proves year after year that when it comes to the entertainment world, video games are currently the reining king. As the video game industry has grown, so too have the titles and projects that developers work on, with massive budgets granted for AAA titles that rival, if not surpass, major film budgets." (Dragon Age 3: Inquisition, PC, PS3, PS4, The Last Of Us, Xbox 360, Xbox One)

HAMM3RofBUDDHA  +   211d ago
This is definitely an issue in AAA development.
cfc78  +   211d ago
Definitely no I hate it when sp games get cut short of what they could of been just to have some half assed multiplayer added.
HanzoHattori  +   210d ago
Tomb Raider:The Definitive Edition is the perfect example that supports ^^^this^^^ comment.
toddybad  +   210d ago
And you have to play it forever if you want a platinum. Hate it!
#2.1.1 (Edited 210d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report
HanzoHattori  +   210d ago
Sports games, run & cover shooters, FPS, and hack & slash games may benefit from a multiplayer mode. Games with cinematic cut-scenes, like survival adventure, horror, rpgs suffer when content is taken away to add in a multiplayer. Just image if TLOU was open world, but there would be no multiplayer mode. TLOU has the potential to be so much more than it is. Without multiplayer, the game could be filled with more places to explore, an expanded story, and more infected instead of being completely linear. Don't misunderstand my comments about TLOU because I do consider it to be one of the greatest games of all time and for anyone who has played the game, I think most of us can agree that TLOU's status as one of the greatest games has nothing to do with the multiplayer mode. I think multiplayer mode in certain games should be offered as DLC instead of being added to a game and taking away from content in the main story.

Great topic. Good article.
spacedelete  +   210d ago
why can't we have both ? to me if its just single player only then it has no replay value and i'd trate it as soon as i could. this is same as if a game is only multiplayer i won't buy that as well. gaming is about being more social so get deal with it. get more friends to play and you won't question games with multiplayer.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
20°

Code Name: S.T.E.A.M. Review | BioGameGirl

47m ago - BGG: Code Name: S.T.E.A.M. is a new third-person shooter and strategy game that features a uniqu... | 3DS
30°

RIDE Review (PS3) | CarGamingBlog

47m ago - CarGamingBlog says "Ride can be a fun and challenging game if you are willing to look past a few... | PC
Ad

Visit CGMagazine: The Culture of Games

Now - CGM is for the mature audience of comics and games that wants more out of their media than just a review score. | Promoted post
20°

Final Fantasy Type-0 HD (PS4) review | Impulse Gamer

47m ago - IG: Within the first half hour, Final Fantasy Type-0 HD establishes what game it wants to be. Th... | PS4
30°

5 Star Wrestling Review (Invision Game Community)

47m ago - 5 Star Wrestling is a brand new wrestling title from Dundee based studio Serious Parody releasing... | PS3
20°

Pocket Gamer: Tiny Dangerous Dungeons Review

47m ago - Pocket Gamer: It's been a pretty good week if you're a fan of retro platformers. There was the im... | iPad