Submitted by WutangClam 404d ago | opinion piece

Does Every Game Really Need to Have Multiplayer Content?

Ray Porreca of Entertainment Buddha writes: "Lately, it feels as though there has been a large shift in the way that video games are developed. This change is to be expected, of course, as the games industry proves year after year that when it comes to the entertainment world, video games are currently the reining king. As the video game industry has grown, so too have the titles and projects that developers work on, with massive budgets granted for AAA titles that rival, if not surpass, major film budgets." (Dragon Age 3: Inquisition, PC, PS3, PS4, The Last Of Us, Xbox 360, Xbox One)

HAMM3RofBUDDHA  +   405d ago
This is definitely an issue in AAA development.
cfc78  +   405d ago
Definitely no I hate it when sp games get cut short of what they could of been just to have some half assed multiplayer added.
HanzoHattori  +   404d ago
Tomb Raider:The Definitive Edition is the perfect example that supports ^^^this^^^ comment.
toddybad  +   404d ago
And you have to play it forever if you want a platinum. Hate it!
#2.1.1 (Edited 404d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report
HanzoHattori  +   404d ago
Sports games, run & cover shooters, FPS, and hack & slash games may benefit from a multiplayer mode. Games with cinematic cut-scenes, like survival adventure, horror, rpgs suffer when content is taken away to add in a multiplayer. Just image if TLOU was open world, but there would be no multiplayer mode. TLOU has the potential to be so much more than it is. Without multiplayer, the game could be filled with more places to explore, an expanded story, and more infected instead of being completely linear. Don't misunderstand my comments about TLOU because I do consider it to be one of the greatest games of all time and for anyone who has played the game, I think most of us can agree that TLOU's status as one of the greatest games has nothing to do with the multiplayer mode. I think multiplayer mode in certain games should be offered as DLC instead of being added to a game and taking away from content in the main story.

Great topic. Good article.
spacedelete  +   404d ago
why can't we have both ? to me if its just single player only then it has no replay value and i'd trate it as soon as i could. this is same as if a game is only multiplayer i won't buy that as well. gaming is about being more social so get deal with it. get more friends to play and you won't question games with multiplayer.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
New stories

ClusterPuck 99 Xbox One Review | GameEnthus

25m ago - Given the name of this game, I'm glad things worked out. Recommendation: Worth a Buy - if you... | Xbox One

Dusting off the Nintendo e-Reader - An inconvenient way to play subpar games

25m ago - A.J. says: "Nintendo has a long history of taking chances when it comes to hardware; from the emb... | GameCube

Top 5 Movies To See This Month

Now - The month of September has Johnny Depp portraying an enraged criminal, a group of climbers trying to make it home safely, and the return of the sur... | Promoted post

SAG AFTRA Interactive Members Approve Strike

25m ago - The votes are in and SAG AFTRA Interactive Members have approved a strike. This does not mean the... | Industry

EGX 2015 Interview – James Parker of Ground Shatter, SkyScrappers

26m ago - Gamer Attitude caught up with James Parker of Ground Shatter to talk about SkyScrappers. | PC

Toto Temple Deluxe Xbox One Review | GameEnthus

36m ago - Apparently goats are good for points and controlled explosions, who knew? Recommendation: Wort... | PC