40°
Submitted by WutangClam 19d ago | opinion piece

Does Every Game Really Need to Have Multiplayer Content?

Ray Porreca of Entertainment Buddha writes: "Lately, it feels as though there has been a large shift in the way that video games are developed. This change is to be expected, of course, as the games industry proves year after year that when it comes to the entertainment world, video games are currently the reining king. As the video game industry has grown, so too have the titles and projects that developers work on, with massive budgets granted for AAA titles that rival, if not surpass, major film budgets." (Dragon Age 3: Inquisition, PC, PS3, PS4, The Last Of Us, Xbox 360, Xbox One)

HAMM3RofBUDDHA  +   19d ago
This is definitely an issue in AAA development.
cfc78  +   19d ago
Definitely no I hate it when sp games get cut short of what they could of been just to have some half assed multiplayer added.
HanzoHattori  +   19d ago
Tomb Raider:The Definitive Edition is the perfect example that supports ^^^this^^^ comment.
toddybad  +   19d ago
And you have to play it forever if you want a platinum. Hate it!
#2.1.1 (Edited 19d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report
HanzoHattori  +   19d ago
Sports games, run & cover shooters, FPS, and hack & slash games may benefit from a multiplayer mode. Games with cinematic cut-scenes, like survival adventure, horror, rpgs suffer when content is taken away to add in a multiplayer. Just image if TLOU was open world, but there would be no multiplayer mode. TLOU has the potential to be so much more than it is. Without multiplayer, the game could be filled with more places to explore, an expanded story, and more infected instead of being completely linear. Don't misunderstand my comments about TLOU because I do consider it to be one of the greatest games of all time and for anyone who has played the game, I think most of us can agree that TLOU's status as one of the greatest games has nothing to do with the multiplayer mode. I think multiplayer mode in certain games should be offered as DLC instead of being added to a game and taking away from content in the main story.

Great topic. Good article.
spacedelete  +   19d ago
why can't we have both ? to me if its just single player only then it has no replay value and i'd trate it as soon as i could. this is same as if a game is only multiplayer i won't buy that as well. gaming is about being more social so get deal with it. get more friends to play and you won't question games with multiplayer.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
20°

Is iOS 8 Too Big For Your Device? Try This Trick So You Don't Have To Delete Your Games

14m ago - When Apple declared iOS 8 as “the biggest release since the launch of the App Store,” they weren'... | iPhone
10°

Destiny Inspector Achievement Guide

15m ago - Here is how to get the Inspector achievement in Destiny. To inspect another player, you walk up t... | Xbox 360
30°

Digimon All-Star Rumble - Shoutmon Vs. Gabumon Gameplay - TGS 2014

53m ago - Video of Digimon All Star Rumble for PS3 and Xbox 360 at TGS 2014. | Xbox 360
40°

Final Fantasy Type-0 HD TGS: Showfloor Gameplay

54m ago - Running on PS4 but Xbox One is also available on the Showfloor 8 minutes of footage. | PS4
Ad

Destiny The Game

Now - Explore Mars, Rediscover Venus, Reclaim the moon, Protect Earth. Become Legend. The wait is over! Destiny is now available to play, Pick up your... | Promoted post
40°

Xbox One Exclusive D4 TGS Hands-On - I Can't Put My Arms Down | GR

55m ago - "This game is entirely controlled via Kinect, which is a double-edged sword. Most actions are per... | Xbox One
Related content from friends