40°
Submitted by WutangClam 363d ago | opinion piece

Does Every Game Really Need to Have Multiplayer Content?

Ray Porreca of Entertainment Buddha writes: "Lately, it feels as though there has been a large shift in the way that video games are developed. This change is to be expected, of course, as the games industry proves year after year that when it comes to the entertainment world, video games are currently the reining king. As the video game industry has grown, so too have the titles and projects that developers work on, with massive budgets granted for AAA titles that rival, if not surpass, major film budgets." (Dragon Age 3: Inquisition, PC, PS3, PS4, The Last Of Us, Xbox 360, Xbox One)

HAMM3RofBUDDHA  +   363d ago
This is definitely an issue in AAA development.
cfc78  +   363d ago
Definitely no I hate it when sp games get cut short of what they could of been just to have some half assed multiplayer added.
HanzoHattori  +   363d ago
Tomb Raider:The Definitive Edition is the perfect example that supports ^^^this^^^ comment.
toddybad  +   363d ago
And you have to play it forever if you want a platinum. Hate it!
#2.1.1 (Edited 363d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report
HanzoHattori  +   363d ago
Sports games, run & cover shooters, FPS, and hack & slash games may benefit from a multiplayer mode. Games with cinematic cut-scenes, like survival adventure, horror, rpgs suffer when content is taken away to add in a multiplayer. Just image if TLOU was open world, but there would be no multiplayer mode. TLOU has the potential to be so much more than it is. Without multiplayer, the game could be filled with more places to explore, an expanded story, and more infected instead of being completely linear. Don't misunderstand my comments about TLOU because I do consider it to be one of the greatest games of all time and for anyone who has played the game, I think most of us can agree that TLOU's status as one of the greatest games has nothing to do with the multiplayer mode. I think multiplayer mode in certain games should be offered as DLC instead of being added to a game and taking away from content in the main story.

Great topic. Good article.
spacedelete  +   363d ago
why can't we have both ? to me if its just single player only then it has no replay value and i'd trate it as soon as i could. this is same as if a game is only multiplayer i won't buy that as well. gaming is about being more social so get deal with it. get more friends to play and you won't question games with multiplayer.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
40°

Indie Game ‘MoBu’ Coming to iOS, Android

39m ago - Indie developer Panteon has announced MoBu will release for iOS on August 27, and Android on Sept... | iPhone
40°

Bungie Weekly Update - 08/27/2015

39m ago - DeeJ: This week at Bungie we led a mission against the Cabal inside the Dreadnaught. That l... | Xbox 360
Ad

The Xbox One Games You Need to Play in August

Now - A new month has rolled up which means new releases are on the horizon. Microsoft has a fairly good line-up on the way for August, so let’s take a l... | Promoted post
30°

Reine des Fleurs Soundtrack CD Released Today in Japan

42m ago - Today, Idea Factory released the Soundtrack CD of the Reine des Fleurs ADV game in Japan. | Culture
40°

Adventure Video Games Are Steadily Delivering Better Stories Than Movies

45m ago - Charles Cecil of Revolution Software talks about 'Broken Sword 5' and adventure gaming's return... | PC
40°

Let's Talk: Batman Games

1h ago - Take Max's personal trip down memory lane and revisits some of the best Batman games ever. | Retro