40°
Submitted by WutangClam 269d ago | opinion piece

Does Every Game Really Need to Have Multiplayer Content?

Ray Porreca of Entertainment Buddha writes: "Lately, it feels as though there has been a large shift in the way that video games are developed. This change is to be expected, of course, as the games industry proves year after year that when it comes to the entertainment world, video games are currently the reining king. As the video game industry has grown, so too have the titles and projects that developers work on, with massive budgets granted for AAA titles that rival, if not surpass, major film budgets." (Dragon Age 3: Inquisition, PC, PS3, PS4, The Last Of Us, Xbox 360, Xbox One)

HAMM3RofBUDDHA  +   269d ago
This is definitely an issue in AAA development.
cfc78  +   269d ago
Definitely no I hate it when sp games get cut short of what they could of been just to have some half assed multiplayer added.
HanzoHattori  +   269d ago
Tomb Raider:The Definitive Edition is the perfect example that supports ^^^this^^^ comment.
toddybad  +   268d ago
And you have to play it forever if you want a platinum. Hate it!
#2.1.1 (Edited 268d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report
HanzoHattori  +   269d ago
Sports games, run & cover shooters, FPS, and hack & slash games may benefit from a multiplayer mode. Games with cinematic cut-scenes, like survival adventure, horror, rpgs suffer when content is taken away to add in a multiplayer. Just image if TLOU was open world, but there would be no multiplayer mode. TLOU has the potential to be so much more than it is. Without multiplayer, the game could be filled with more places to explore, an expanded story, and more infected instead of being completely linear. Don't misunderstand my comments about TLOU because I do consider it to be one of the greatest games of all time and for anyone who has played the game, I think most of us can agree that TLOU's status as one of the greatest games has nothing to do with the multiplayer mode. I think multiplayer mode in certain games should be offered as DLC instead of being added to a game and taking away from content in the main story.

Great topic. Good article.
spacedelete  +   269d ago
why can't we have both ? to me if its just single player only then it has no replay value and i'd trate it as soon as i could. this is same as if a game is only multiplayer i won't buy that as well. gaming is about being more social so get deal with it. get more friends to play and you won't question games with multiplayer.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
10°

Bandai Namco selling Star Wars Battle Pods for $98,000

14m ago - It’s official, you can now purchase your very own Star Wars Battle Pod arcade machine, but be war... | Arcade
30°

Resident Evil 0 HD Remaster Message from Producers

24m ago - Capcom released a message video from the producers working on the just announced Resident Evil 0... | PC
Ad

The Witcher 3

Now - All the lore you need to know. | Promoted post
30°

Dying Light Gets Patch 1.06 On PS4 And Xbox One, Adds Free DLC; Full Changelog Revealed

27m ago - Dying Light has received a brand new update on the PS4 and Xbox One bumping the game's version to... | PS4
20°

Next Final Fantasy XV Active Time Report set for June 4

31m ago - Square Enx will host it’s next Final Fantasy XV Active Time Report broadcast on June 4 at 22:00 J... | PS4
40°

Destiny, Prison of the Elders Objectives and Rewards 05-26, 06-2

55m ago - Take a look at what's in store in Destiny's Prison of the Elders for this week. | Xbox 360