40°
Submitted by WutangClam 234d ago | opinion piece

Does Every Game Really Need to Have Multiplayer Content?

Ray Porreca of Entertainment Buddha writes: "Lately, it feels as though there has been a large shift in the way that video games are developed. This change is to be expected, of course, as the games industry proves year after year that when it comes to the entertainment world, video games are currently the reining king. As the video game industry has grown, so too have the titles and projects that developers work on, with massive budgets granted for AAA titles that rival, if not surpass, major film budgets." (Dragon Age 3: Inquisition, PC, PS3, PS4, The Last Of Us, Xbox 360, Xbox One)

HAMM3RofBUDDHA  +   234d ago
This is definitely an issue in AAA development.
cfc78  +   234d ago
Definitely no I hate it when sp games get cut short of what they could of been just to have some half assed multiplayer added.
HanzoHattori  +   234d ago
Tomb Raider:The Definitive Edition is the perfect example that supports ^^^this^^^ comment.
toddybad  +   234d ago
And you have to play it forever if you want a platinum. Hate it!
#2.1.1 (Edited 234d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report
HanzoHattori  +   234d ago
Sports games, run & cover shooters, FPS, and hack & slash games may benefit from a multiplayer mode. Games with cinematic cut-scenes, like survival adventure, horror, rpgs suffer when content is taken away to add in a multiplayer. Just image if TLOU was open world, but there would be no multiplayer mode. TLOU has the potential to be so much more than it is. Without multiplayer, the game could be filled with more places to explore, an expanded story, and more infected instead of being completely linear. Don't misunderstand my comments about TLOU because I do consider it to be one of the greatest games of all time and for anyone who has played the game, I think most of us can agree that TLOU's status as one of the greatest games has nothing to do with the multiplayer mode. I think multiplayer mode in certain games should be offered as DLC instead of being added to a game and taking away from content in the main story.

Great topic. Good article.
spacedelete  +   234d ago
why can't we have both ? to me if its just single player only then it has no replay value and i'd trate it as soon as i could. this is same as if a game is only multiplayer i won't buy that as well. gaming is about being more social so get deal with it. get more friends to play and you won't question games with multiplayer.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
40°

PlayStation Survey shows possible incentives for future pre-orders

11m ago - STN: Sony is sending around a survey which shows possible incentives which may be given when p... | PS4

Only 2.4% of gaming views on YouTube come from official channels

12m ago - Updated March figures on the views of gaming videos on YouTube have revealed that Minecraft is st... | Industry
Ad

Make the World / Break the World

Now - Myriad is a twin-stick shooter that grows more beautiful the better you play. Give us your vote on Steam Greenlight! | Promoted post
30°

Star Wars: Battlefront – Everything you Need to Know

25m ago - "The entire madness started in 2013 at E3, where EA showcased the first teaser trailer for Star W... | PC
10°

Review: The Legend of Zelda Majora's Mask 3D | Gamercafe

25m ago - In short, if you did not play Majora's Mask at the time, this is an excellent alternative, and in... | 3DS
40°

Mortal Kombat X Review | OnlySP

51m ago - Boasting a deep storyline that no other fighting game can match with infamous gameplay, Mortal Ko... | PC