40°
Submitted by WutangClam 187d ago | opinion piece

Does Every Game Really Need to Have Multiplayer Content?

Ray Porreca of Entertainment Buddha writes: "Lately, it feels as though there has been a large shift in the way that video games are developed. This change is to be expected, of course, as the games industry proves year after year that when it comes to the entertainment world, video games are currently the reining king. As the video game industry has grown, so too have the titles and projects that developers work on, with massive budgets granted for AAA titles that rival, if not surpass, major film budgets." (Dragon Age 3: Inquisition, PC, PS3, PS4, The Last Of Us, Xbox 360, Xbox One)

HAMM3RofBUDDHA  +   187d ago
This is definitely an issue in AAA development.
cfc78  +   187d ago
Definitely no I hate it when sp games get cut short of what they could of been just to have some half assed multiplayer added.
HanzoHattori  +   186d ago
Tomb Raider:The Definitive Edition is the perfect example that supports ^^^this^^^ comment.
toddybad  +   186d ago
And you have to play it forever if you want a platinum. Hate it!
#2.1.1 (Edited 186d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report
HanzoHattori  +   186d ago
Sports games, run & cover shooters, FPS, and hack & slash games may benefit from a multiplayer mode. Games with cinematic cut-scenes, like survival adventure, horror, rpgs suffer when content is taken away to add in a multiplayer. Just image if TLOU was open world, but there would be no multiplayer mode. TLOU has the potential to be so much more than it is. Without multiplayer, the game could be filled with more places to explore, an expanded story, and more infected instead of being completely linear. Don't misunderstand my comments about TLOU because I do consider it to be one of the greatest games of all time and for anyone who has played the game, I think most of us can agree that TLOU's status as one of the greatest games has nothing to do with the multiplayer mode. I think multiplayer mode in certain games should be offered as DLC instead of being added to a game and taking away from content in the main story.

Great topic. Good article.
spacedelete  +   186d ago
why can't we have both ? to me if its just single player only then it has no replay value and i'd trate it as soon as i could. this is same as if a game is only multiplayer i won't buy that as well. gaming is about being more social so get deal with it. get more friends to play and you won't question games with multiplayer.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
30°

Resident Evil: Revelations 2 Review | Gamespresso

18m ago - Gamespresso says the best word to describe the first episode of Resident Evil: Revelations 2 is u... | PC
10°

BagoGames | Friends With The Monster: Evolve Review

22m ago - BagoGames Slowly, but surely, there seems to be a new trend of primarily multiplayer based vid... | PC
20°

Hyperdimension Neptunia Victory II gameplay trailer, screenshots

23m ago - Compile Heart has released the first gameplay trailer and new screenshots for Hyperdimension Nept... | PS4
20°

One Piece: Pirate Warriors 3 gameplay clips: Ivankov, Hancock, Jinbe, and Franky

23m ago - This week’s selection of One Piece: Pirate Warriors 3 character clips introduce Emporio Ivankov,... | PS3
Ad

Valve Partners With HTC To Create The Vive Virtual Reality Headset

Now - Valve has formed a relationship with Taiwanese smartphone and tablet maker HTC to help create a virtual reality headset called The Vive, which is p... | Promoted post
20°

Makai Shin Trillion opening movie

23m ago - Compile Heart has released the opening movie for Makai Shin Trillion, its upcoming PS Vita from D... | PS Vita