There's no telling when we might see Darksiders III (or what it'll be like), so here's hoping Bloodborne is close in terms of gameplay style.
Not me I liked Darksiders, but I didn't love it, I hope we get a Darksiders 3, if we do it should be its own game, why do games have to be like each other? if they all copied each other it'll get boring, look at fps games, they're virtually all the same, they all copy the same mechanics (regen health for example) and games like Battlefield (in my opinion) have suffered because of it
we'd probably be getting a darksiders 3 anyways, and id rather not gimp the superior series just coz.. also i cant see a single thing that might have prompted the author to even come up with that thought, bloorborne is a full fledged rpg with challenging difficulty ,interconnected world with a dreaded atmosphere. darksiders is a action-puzzle platformer with beefy dudes whose apocalypse is more colorful than the most happy looking thing in the entire souls series.
Hmmm. No one. Let it be Blood borne
A God of War clone....no thanks ¬¬
Dude i think darksiders was good on its own right , not just a god of war clone , anyway i dont want bloodborne to be darksiders , i want darksiders to be darksiders and i hope we get a third installment soon .
Explain to me how Darksiders was a God of War Clone? Darksiders was a Hack & Slash RPG, I want you to look at Darksiders 1 & 2 and then tell me it was a "God of War clone". Foxtrot, you could atleast try to hide your fanboy.
god of war games sucks ass anyways,the combat is rubbish.
I respect your opinion, but since it's very different from mine I'll make a note to ignore it in the future. Peace and good gaming. :D OT - I want Bloodborne to be like the Souls games and not much at all like Darksiders.
"As much as I respect the Demon's Souls and Dark Souls games, they're not quite my thing. They're just a little too brutal for me in terms of difficulty." The difficulty in Dark Souls is a little exaggerated...its just a game that doesn't hold your hand throughout everything...there are harder games out there. To me it seems that you barely had a taste of the soul series or just played it for a short while a deemed it wasn't for you. "Call me names if you like but I play games to relax. If I consider them a chore, I'm not really interested.One of the games I really loved was Darksiders II. It had the structure and bones of a role-playing game, but the more simplified action approach. The combination was absolutely fantastic; I just couldn't stop playing. There were some challenges, the game was a great length, and the depth and streamlined action/RPG-type gameplay just worked." Too bad Dark Souls isn't your type of game but asking to change the formulae just to make it more accessible for certain people isn't the right thing to do. The director had a vision for this game and if he were to alter his vision for it to suit other peoples play styles, it would absolutely ruin what makes this game special. Beating an area boss is one of the most satisfying experience you can have in gaming.
Very well said! For me, and a lot of others, Demons/Dark Souls was a breathe of fresh air. It gave us a great sense of adventure similar to the older games we played growing up. It was anything but a chore, it was completely adsorbing and one of the most re-playable games I've ever played. I expect Bloodborne to offer a similar experience, not a Darksiders experience, which is a different game that appeals to different taste.
I know I don't.
Lol no Bloodborne needs to be like Bloodborne. Its own unique spin on the genre.
isn't BloodBorne already a spiritual successor to Demon Souls on the PS3?
Not me. Darksiders 1 was ok, nothing more, nothing less, but Darksiders 2 was utter crap I didn't even have enough will to finish
Bloodborne is an action RPG, so the question doesnt make sense.
Not I, Darksiders was fun and enjoyable but I want Bloodborne to be it's own thing and the Director has made it clear that it will be, have somethings inspired or improved from Demon's Souls but it will be it's own game. I don't want games that are like other games, I want games that are their own games. Comparing 2 games to give people a sense of what it's kind of like is one thing, making a game almost identical to another game is just lazy.
No, just no! There are plenty easy/casual game out there. You can play those if you want.
The action is already faster than the Souls series.
I honestly dont want bloodborne to be DS,and heres why. Bloodborne combat is really slow in comparison with DS combat which have H&S elements and RPG elements.You also need different combos like spin combos,crowd control,air combos and stinger like move. DS3 better be good when it comes,and I hope it wont take after DS2 because the story and the loot system was really really bad and frustrating. And the DLC was horrible,I couldnt even play the DLC because it frooze every time I tried it. I liked DS1 the best out of the two. it has annoying good combat/decent,good story and plenty of badass moments,I just like War melee combat better then Deaths combat and its annoyingly lvl system. and from 1 of the gameplay videos ive seen from bloodborne it seems the combat is really slow in comparison of DS combat.
hell nah!! are you crazy wth why would i buy a new game and want it to be like an old clone of gow! smdh
Darksiders isn't good. Lol, I want Bloodborne to be what it is. It gives satisfying combat.
NONE darksiderswas lame..
Are you kidding me? HELL F*KIN NO! If you want Darksiders than just replay Darksiders 1 & 2 again or pick other games that have the same style! SMH :(
Nobody wants it to be like Darksiders, we all want it to be like Demon's Souls
dear god no! we get the first real new Miyazaki offering in a decade and you want it to be a clone of darksiders? (which was a stylized clone of Zelda with a little extra hack'n'slash) wow what is wrong with you? we finally get a new Miyazaki game praise the sun I don't even want it to be too much like a souls game really. something new from the man who came up with demon's and dark souls will suit me perfectly thank you! darksiders!? really? wow pipe down please lest the game gods hear you! jesus
Darksiders 1 was okay, pretty boring, but okay. Darksiders 2 was a struggle to get through, so, damn, BORING! So, my answer is no.
No thanks, i want to be like the first two Souls game with Miyazaki twists and changes to fit his vision, you want something similar to Darksiders try Lords of the Fallen.
I honestly can't think of anything in video games I don't want to happen more than the propose proposition.
Wtf? Why would you want one the of best current game series to emulate one that is a notch below? Leave this game the way it is, progressing the Souls games route. Darksiders is alright. I enjoyed both, but lets be completely honest about it. It is clearly not as awesome as any of the Souls games. Just say you prefer hack/slash games. You prefer "press X repeatedly to win", over critical thinking equaling high reward.
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.