Approvals 10/3 ▼
Mr Pumblechook (1) - 3537d ago Cancel
iamnsuperman (3) - 3537d ago Cancel
Nyxus (3) - 3537d ago Cancel
finite (3) - 3537d ago Cancel
110°

Exclusives When is it okay? When isn’t it?

Microsoft at their Gamescom conference announced that Square Enix’s title Rise of the Tomb Raider would be exclusive to Xbox. Whilst there has been the predictable upset from PC & PlayStation owners disgruntled now the game won’t be launching on their preferred console, this deal actually has some very serious ramifications for the entire gaming industry. We take a look at the different types of exclusives deals and discuss the positives and negatives of each.

Read Full Story >>
handytips.info
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

✔ Fixed
Bad Editing
"Exclusives: When are they okay? When aren't they?"
TransientDreamer3537d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(0)
+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community3537d ago
TimeSkipLuffy3537d ago

simple:

It is ok/great/awesome for those who get the exclusivity
It is not ok/tragic/hard for those who don't get it

Of course it is different from person to person because everyone has a different taste and might not be interested in some of the games that the competitor got as an exclusive game.

MightyNoX3537d ago (Edited 3537d ago )

Wrong. Tomb Raider was COMING to the Xbox One regardless. All this does is rob PC, PS4 and PS3 owners for no reason. Besides, the article wasn't asking how YOU feel, it's asking when is the practice okay.

As for the article:

GOOD:

- When franchise is dead and Console manufacturer revives it (Bayonetta 2)

- When both console manufacturer and Dev are co-developing it (Bloodbourne)

- When it's created by 1st party studios (Sony, Nintendo etc)

BAD:

- When the game's coming to other consoles, already announced for other consoles and then you come along and block it (Rise of the Tomb Raider)

Lightning Mr Bubbles3537d ago (Edited 3537d ago )

Damn, I still can't figure out when Tomb Raider became relevant again.

That franchise was so crash bandicoot times.

Suddenly it's the hottest thing on the web.

I still want to make sure? This is Tomb Raider we're talking about right? Tomb Raider? That Tomb Raider? That same cheesy platformer with that girl? That Tomb Raider?? Tomb Raider??

Here are a few other names. Crash Bandicoot, Gex,Jersey Devil, Medieval, Spyro the dragon...

Seriously... Tomb Raider?

Tomb Raider?

HanzoHattori3537d ago

I completely agree with your statement. Instead of buying developers and ruining the industry, Microsoft should take some of that money and invest in first party development, but they won't simply because it's easier to bribe developers.

Gatsu3537d ago (Edited 3537d ago )

I agree it was totally pointless at this point, as it's been known to come other console for a long time. So they decided to bribe the developers and block those many fans of other consoles a chance to play it at release. Some of them were actually looking forward to play it a lot. Forcing others to buy XBox or wait... what a nice move MS. It just shows that they lack in the area of exclusivity and spend money by robbing, just to boost sales.

I was looking forward to play this after the TR1 reboot, as always on PS ever since the 90's. But thanks to MS now I can focus on those 10 other amazing games coming to PS4.

Big_Game_Hunters3537d ago

Learn business. Exclusivity is always okay.

Legion213537d ago

When was it announced for other consoles?

ThePope3537d ago

I don't remember Rise of the Tomb Raider ever being announced for other platforms. It was unveiled at the MS E3 conference and that was all. If news outlets were announcing it as a multi platform title that's on them not MS.

I love all the hate MS is getting. The phenomenon of buying IP for one console or another isn't new. Does it hurt the industry, well only of you are the one not getting the game. Otherwise its just business.

Either get both consoles, or don't play the game. BOTH are YOUR loss, as you will miss out on great exclusives on both sides if you only own one.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3537d ago
cfc783537d ago (Edited 3537d ago )

I see it only being ok when you help develop the game other than that leave it on neutral ground let everyone which ever platform they game on enjoy the title though in the case of Tomb Raider I can see what they were thinking in terms of a timed exclusive deal if it's going directly up against Uncharted 4.

MasterCornholio3537d ago (Edited 3537d ago )

Depends on the situation but the Tomb Raider announcement made me angry because they already confirmed the sequel for the PS4 before. Thank god its only a timed exclusive.

P.S I enjoyed the definitive edition on my PS4 so I was looking forward to the sequel.

pornflakes3537d ago

Its ok when its PS exclusive

Its not ok when its xbox exclusive

/s

Insomnia_843537d ago Show
trouble_bubble3537d ago (Edited 3537d ago )

PS doesn't intentionally cock block sequels to franchises already on xbox though, does it?

PS had Splinter Cell Double Agent, MS took away Splinter Cell Conviction. PS had Dead Rising 2, MS took away Dead Rising 3. PS had Ace Combat 5, MS took away Ace Combat 6. That's greasy.

Look how long MS held on to Mass Effect1 even after the trilogy ended? MGS Peacewalker and AC Liberation meanwhile both went from psp exclusive to ps3/360 at the same time. No pettiness. No stupid parity clauses.

3537d ago
Show all comments (34)
70°

It’ll Be Fine, Right? Five Games With Unfortunate Release Strategies

Mark from WellPlayed writes about five game launches that were impacted by unfortunate scheduling.

Read Full Story >>
well-played.com.au
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community354d ago
jznrpg353d ago (Edited 353d ago )

Zero Dawn sold really well so I’m not sure this belongs. The second game released next to a big game again and it hurt it some I forget what it was though, oh yeah Elden Ring .
But a good game is a good game to me I don’t care when they release personally but they do have to think about it when you want to get more people to buy it.

250°

The Tomb Raider Survivor Trilogy's Take on Lara Croft Deserved More Recognition

The Survivor Trilogy was a drastic reimagining of Lara Croft and Tomb Raider, and it provokes changes for the character that are truly fantastic.

Read Full Story >>
gamerant.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community465d ago
isarai466d ago (Edited 466d ago )

Deserves less IMO, i think the 1st in the new trilogy was a perfect 1st step for the new direction. The next 2 games were half steps at best. Not only that, every character in the series including Lara is just annoying and doesn't make sense in terms of motive, like yes they have a motive, but none of it seems proportional to the lengths they are willing to go through for it. The most annoying thing is every one of the games say "become the Tomb Raider" yet 3 games later and we're still not there? No thanks. Then there's the mess of the 3rd game, massive skill tree that serves almost no purpose as there's literally only like 3-4 short encounters in the whole game, and they took till the 3rd game to finally manage some decent puzzles even remotely close to previous games in the series. Nah, the trilogy infuriated me to no end as a long time fan of the series, i hope we get better going forward cause that crap sucked.

Army_of_Darkness464d ago

The first in the trilogy was my favorite. I thought they were going into the right direction with that one until the second one came out and seemed like a graphical downgrade but the gameplay was okay. As for the Third, Graphics were really nice but it was kinda boring me to death with its non-stop platforming and exploring with not enough action! Well, for me anyway...

DeathTouch464d ago

Graphics on the 3rd one were abysmal. It’s more colorful and has more variety, but everything else was a noticeable downgrade.

The more open world with NPC quests was also handled very poorly, to the point I missed Angel of Darkness.

thesoftware730464d ago

I know it is your opinion, but she did progress as a character in each game, she even got more muscular and seasoned.

That is the thing, people first complained that there was not enough platforming and actual tomb raiding in the first and second games. Shadow remedied that and kept the combat elements.

3-4 encounters? huh? did we play the same game? there was plenty of combat and, the skill tree did matter, like being able to hang enemies from trees, set explosives traps on bodies, being able to counter, and that are just a few of the combat skills. The skill tree also had things like being able to hold your breath underwater longer, crafting upgrades, zipline upgrade, and climbing upgrades that all changed how you can approach situations.

Not knocking your opinion, but we definitely had different experiences. I had 98% completion on the shadow.

SoulWarrior464d ago (Edited 464d ago )

Sorry but i'm with him about the low number of encounters, the game throws loads of weapons and skills you're way with a comparatively low amount of places to actually use them, so they felt under utilised.

-Foxtrot466d ago

Yeah...no

It was awful, for THREE GAMES it was "become the Tomb Raider" where she went back to square one after each game. Not to mention after a huge reaction of killing someone for the first time she then becomes Rambo straight after and goes on a slaughter spree without a single other reaction. Her development was all over the place.

She was whiney, weak and in later game a little arrogant and selfish

Oh and the voice actress compared to the previous ones was not as good

Lara Croft deserved better and while they are decent games as they are, we deserved actual Tomb Raider games, we could have had better survival games if they just stuck with the original Lara Crofts origin about her plane going down. Surviving 2 weeks in the Himalayas...I'd have liked to seen that, who knows what mystical threat she could have faced in the mountains or underground some secret concealed cave.

Tacoboto464d ago

I thought Shadow of the Tomb Raider had better gameplay than Rise, but it annoyed me the most of the trilogy when I stopped to think about the story.

It's like they deliberately decided to make her unlikeable and did nothing to make the character you're playing as likeable or have even one sign of humility.

SoulWarrior466d ago

2013 I thought was a fine entry, but Rise and especially Shadow were painfully mediocre follow ups imo, I really didn't like how selfish and angry her character was in those two.

Terry_B465d ago

No. Please forget the crap completely.

northpaws465d ago

First one was decent, played through it twice.
Second one was okay, played through it once.
Third one was really bad, tried twice a year apart, still can't get through the first two hours, it is just really bad.

thesoftware730464d ago

Honest question, what did you find bad about it? the opening 2 hrs of Shadow were fantastic imo.

The opening was very similar to the first 2, what did you find really bad?

Not looking for an argument, just an honest question.

Starman69464d ago

3rd one just didn't feel like a tomb raider game. Possibly because the development was passed to another development team. Big mistake! Microsoft killed tomb raider making the first game a timed exclusive. Never recovered after that.

Show all comments (45)
200°

Get three Tomb Raider games free at Epic Games Store

Starting today, Tomb Raider, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, and Rise of the Tomb Raider are free at Epic Games Store. The free game offers run until January 6 at 11 AM Eastern. Once you claim them, they’re yours to keep.

Read Full Story >>
gamefreaks365.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community845d ago
CrimsonWing69845d ago (Edited 845d ago )

They're all solid games, but nothing quite matched the epicness of the first one for me. I think the 3rd one started off strong but once you got to that Peruvian area it took a massive nose dive for me.

lelo2play845d ago (Edited 845d ago )

You got to be kidding!
The first one was great at the time... but this latest trilogy of Tomb Raider games are also great.

LiViNgLeGaCY845d ago

I think he means the first one in the new trilogy.

CrimsonWing69845d ago

I meant the first of the new trilogy.

Furesis845d ago

yeah i remember liking the first one when it came out, so i tried the second one sometime after release and i just could not get into it, i couldn't finish it. So i might try the 3rd now that i got it for free but ehh. But i do remember enjoying the first one, i wonder if i'd feel the same way if i played it today? Better not taint those memories lol

ANIALATOR136845d ago

I was the same for some reason. Never finished the second one. I got like half way through maybe.

ActualWhiteMan844d ago (Edited 844d ago )

The first one of the latest trilogy is a masterpiece

Fishy Fingers845d ago

I'll take a copy of Shadow... Cheers.

Profchaos845d ago

Great games I've played them all on ps4 but it'll be good to finally try shadow on my rtx card.

Double_O_Revan845d ago

Trying to claim them and the store keeps crashing. lol.

gamefreaks365845d ago

EGS has been having issues all day.

RedDevils845d ago

Weird I don't has that issue.

Double_O_Revan845d ago

I finally got it after a while. But it was real bad for a while.

PeeShuter845d ago (Edited 845d ago )

Claim games by going to the website and login using ur credentials. I did the same as i couldnt use epic launcher. Also try reinstalling Epic Launcher I did it and it worked.

Double_O_Revan845d ago

I always go through the website. It was all just down for a while yesterday it seems.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 845d ago
Show all comments (19)