"Crytek is a company that has built itself up as a gaming powerhouse over the years, so spending the past couple of months watching it seemingly implode from the inside-out have been a bit of a shock." - Joe Garcia, Stealthy Box
Seems about right, often times CEO's lose touch with the worker bees. Also when problems start and it becomes public knowledge then the CEO acts all high and mighty or doesn't come clean it tends to look bad. Seems this is happening at Crytek as I type this.
totally agree as Sergi Gregoravich the CEO of GSC Game World totally lost touch with the workers the gamers and REALITY as a whole and thus went Bankrupt and killed off GSC Game World and STALKER. but then again Crytek started making crappy console products instead of sticking with what made them successful......looks at FarCy and Crysis.
"but then again Crytek started making crappy console products instead of sticking with what made them successful......looks at FarCy and Crysis." I disagree, Crytek went for graphics over gameplay, pretty games lacking any substance, that's what is wrong IMO.
Farcry is made by ubisoft... It just uses the crytect engine. Plus farcry 3 surpassed ever console fps in the entire generation besides the fallout series.
FarCry was made by Crytek but the sequels were Ubi Montreal
What this dumbass CEO said was disgusting. I hope he goes. Shows he's out of touch and has no respect for his employees. I'd boycott Crytek games but that only hurts the people who make the games. I'm sure Yerli gets his cut no matter what happens.
let them die ..they didnt offer anything special except first crysis and first far cry maybe...all the other games from crytek were mid failures ...they had such a powerful engine in their hands and they preffered to develope COd futuristic clones ...we will not miss anything if they close
The thing is they own a lot of cool IPs like timesplitters and still shocked they let the battlefront IP lapse (Free Radical had it who they took over) so EA could buy it.
I wouldn't worry about the IP's too much. Those will be the first things sold. Just look at THQ for reference. Once they're sold, and depending on who they're sold to, then it may be time to start worrying about them. For the most part, Crytek has sat on a lot of their cool IP's, and if any company buys them, they are likely doing so to capitalize on it, which means we may see something from it sooner, rather than later.
I enjoyed the Crysis games quite a lot. They are good games. They received generally good reviews and have good to great metacritic averages. I don't give a sh*t that it became popular among internet fanboys to hate on the games or the company. Console fanboys hate Crytek because they were always jealous of how good their games looked on PC, and some PC fanboys hate them because they didn't remain exclusive to the PC and are butthurt that they started making games for the consoles too. But I don't care, the hate is ridiculous and completely out of proportion. Are their games my favorite games ever? No. But they are a lot more enjoyable to me than the vast majority of shooters out there. The fact you call it a futuristic COD clone tells me that you are ignorant as hell and really haven't even played the games. They literally play nothing alike, aside from the fact that they are both FPS games.
And to be clear, I'm not defending the CEO. He definitely has showed a smug attitude that I don't like. I think they could benefit from some better leadership. I just think that the hate towards the games is unrealistic and out of proportion. Crysis --> 91 Crysis Warhead --> 84 Crysis 2 --> 86 Crysis 3 -->76 Those are the metacric scores. Those scores represent "good" to "outstanding" games. Even the lowest rated game out of the group, Crysis 3, would still be considered a good game. Now, I'm not saying every individual has to agree with the metacritic average. Individuals are free to have their own opinions about each of those games, whether it would be a higher or lower score than the metacritic average. My problem is when people act like it is just a fact that all Crytek games are complete "shit". That's where it gets ridiculous. Game reviewers in general disagree and by and large gave the games positive reviews. And many other gamers, myself included, disagree with that attitude as well, and enjoyed the Crysis games. The user reviews for these games on places like amazon are generally quite positive. Those of us that frequent game sites nearly every day are a very small percentage of the people that buy and enjoy games. A bandwagon starting up among that very small percentage of people isn't nearly as relevant as those on the bandwagon might believe.
they are on the wrong road with all their free to play stuff. they should improve the gameplay and story immersion in their games and go back to were they started with crisis 1 and the add on. i can't remember the name :/
Amazon will swoop them over.
what exactly do you mean? :/
Nope Amazon concentrating on there amazon machine now.. They were gonna get into proper gaming when MS were selling Xbox brand but MS wanted too much so they went the other way instead and now not even competing.
He was thinking about his next Ferrari instead of the long term investment of his company and employee's! Too bad no one will miss you!
They were just out touch with what kind of games people want to play. They kept making generic COD/Halo clones and thought people would buy it just because they looked pretty. Then they decided to release a costly new IP as a launch title on a fail console. Why did they even have 950 people employed. All they did was make Crysis 2, Crysis 3, Warface and Ryse which were all failures commercially.
Crytek is in Crysis
CEO and management are probably using the salaries of their employees to line their own pockets.
Cevat is going down. Thanks God. My prayers were listened.
Crytek has built games with all flash and no substance. Their games have some amazing graphics but the game-play has been bland/boring recently. I did play Crysis and Crysis 2. Crysis (original) was amazing open world type of game with good AI responses. Crysis 2 was none of those things. I didn't play Ryse but I have read quite a few reviews about beautiful environments but boring and repetitive game-play. Crytek needs to build a game with game-play first, amazing graphics second.
Typical idiocy from hierarchy that shouldn't be in their position. Not a clue, completely out of his debt & ridiculous attitude & decision making towards the industry he's in. One of these people that listen to analysts & decide their whole work schedule around it... Analysts like Pachter for example, these people who are world renowned by anyone with common sense for being wrong, always wrong, but yet will take his word as gospel. They must put stuff in the water because society as we know it is getting stupider & stupider by the day!
This is how they roll, stupid turks. Don't mind if they die.
The guy's a complete A-noos. Arrogance and greed have obviously poisoned that man's soul.
I loved all the Crysis games, especially three. Even the first Far Cry was 10x more superior than any sequel.
Well I'm defending farcry 3 as it was better then any fps I've played for a very long time. Probably sense fallout. And again why does everyone think crytec makes this still? This game is made by ubisoft.
I really liked Far Cry 3 a lot. One of my favorite games from 2012. But I like the Crisis games quite a lot as well, just not as much as Far Cry 3. @OpieWinston below I agree that betting on F2P is a very bad idea. I hope they wake up and correct their course. I wouldn't want to see Crytek go down (or any studio for that matter).
I enjoyed Farcry/Crysis/Ryse...But the Yerli brothers are running Crytek into the ground. Bankruptcy is inevitable...they think F2P will save them? Yeah bet on a Casual market, see where that gets you.
The best thing about Crytek is there gaming engine. Of course Farcry and Ryse, I would say they did a pretty solid job with, most of the other titles, I could really care less.
Great engine. With a great engine you can make a great game if you have a quality team for story, gameplay, characters. MP. Graphics were nailed down, Some gameplay elements were good. Animation could be better. But stories sucked, i'm looking at crysis, Characters did not pull you in.
Folks, come down, the Yerlis took the risk and built a company that is a leader in technical achievement, out of a bunch of nvidia fanboys. They are not much different from iD or similiar companies. There are highs and there are lows, successes and mistakes, no need to kick them while they are down.
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.