Check out just how much Ryse on PC looks better than the Xbox One version, even in these early screenshots.
i might try it...maybe
LEGALLY buy it. You know you want to.
Don't pay for it. It's shit.
Just like I said, LEGALLY *WINK WINK NUDGE NUDGE* buy it.
Or you can try Skyrim who can look the same but has way more content
I can't see man PC gamers giving much of a shit about this. Just one less exclusive for the xbone and just one more C grade 5 buck sale item for Steam this summer.
I hope every single person who torrents this game gets a bios virus that ruins your computer. This company is in bad enough shape as it is. You're the reason.
^How the hell do you have 5 bubbles?
Are they going to release new DLC soon after?
Dlc is included. I find the claim that it is an "early build" a bit odd when the game is due out this fall. I am not totally familiar with American seasons, but isn't fall only a very small number of months away?
Well, Fall technically starts in a month and a half. They're probably forcing the game out as fast as possible to help alleviate their financial woes, so it's probably only an "early build" because the "early" work will only last a few weeks.
I don't think so, unless Ryse is a smashing success on PC, which seems far fetched at this point.
I might try it out. If not I'll wait for the definitive console version on PS4 at 1080p and stable fps.
@Alexious by smashing you mean button smashing right? That's all the game really was when I tried it
But people said Crytek is dead.
Because it is, when it has to close studios,when it doesent pay salaries for months and sells IPS (homefront) it means that the company is pretty much dead at this moment
It is, this is just them scrambling for that burial/coffin funeral money..
deep silver took over hunt. cryteks other game.
xbox version still looks pretty good even in the comparison. I may just hold off with what i got already, till the steam version is dirt cheap.
ha. pretty much. i liked this game. i would think they could have maybe pushed for 1080p if it came out later, judging by the slight jump in available power, but i dont think it would have made much of a diff. looks pretty sweet on pc. crytek deff just back-handed the xb1 and consoles in general..."with out compromising quality". lol, its true though. at any rate, i am excited to see what it looks like in action. i dont have a gaming rig, but may actually look into one at some point in the not to distant future. depends where my wallet is at. As it is, i already own all current gen consoles and with all the games coming, idk about dropping a grand or so on a pc.
This game should be called Ryse: Rymatsered
now ppl can see what the ps4 version would have looked like
That's...not great news for the Xbox One. Not exactly showing off the hardware
This was a launch title for the Xbox One. A re-release of a year old title looking better is hardly surprising, regardless of what system it was on. I'm more curious as to why they're bothering.. Ryse wasn't a terrible game but it certainly isn't worth a year of wait for a slight graphical boost.
its for people who haven't played it and dont have an xbox one. Plus the graphical boost helps make this already beautiful game 100 percent crisp
Well Cyrtek is in a Crysis :p It isn't about boosting graphical fidelity but it is more to do with making more money back off their investment.
@superman: you're gonna get every mileage you can out of the Crysis pun, aren't you. Seriously though, I like this development. I want see if Crytek managed to eek out a profit or not.
my thinking is this project is likely relatively low cost and they can at least bank on some decent sales. not a terrible way to gain a bit of cash
That too, but I mean the Xbone is really struggling at the minute, and saying "just wait long enough and you'll get better looking versions of our 'exclusives' on PC" isn't a great selling point...
Ummm, a launch title for XB1 vs a PC port a year later. What do you expect? They have readily available GPU's that are almost 6x more powerful. It has nothing to do with xb1 being weak it has everything to do with much better hardware being available on PC. The real surprise is just how minimal the differences are with that in mind.
Only jump from 900p to 4k is huuuuge difference.
It's cute you think there's only a 6x jump in performance between the GPU in the Xbone and a 780ti.
Apart from the res bump and 4k textures, looks the same as xbox one. What kind of beast will you need to run it like that though?
4k Textures + "Looks the same as xbox One" = WTF
Only 4k textures and 60fps.. Umm what more of a night and day difference could one hope for?
A beast? No no no. A midrange PC will easily beat Xbox One on this game. Indeed, it does comfortably on most games. The game only ran 1600 x 900 with a fairly variable often sub 30FPS framerate on the console with a pretty slow GPU. Considering even an R9 270 is twice as fast as Xbox One you'll probably get at least 1920 x 1080 with much better framerates and AA. Anything faster like an R9 280X or GTX760 you'll be cruising this.
As main PC user, zero interest in this quick time events festival of a game...
Completely agree, I will not buy this game (unless its 75% off in a steam sale in a year or so, but the game looks gorgeous on PC.
The game will be used as a benchmark. Same thing happened with the first Crysis.
or every Crytek game ever xD
There's no question that it will look better for PC. Not a major difference just the images look sharper.
It's good news for everyone that it's coming to PC. How ever it seems like one of those games you buy mostly to look at. I'll probably buy it when it eventually goes on sale.
If they remade it now on xb1 it would look better it's how thing work
Duh? Seriously?? Every game Will look much better on pc.
Not much of a difference here, but I'm sure it will look much better on PC in actual gameplay .. Besides, don't you think it's to early for a comparison?
Bit unsurprising considering the same result would befall any console game (on any console) if it were on (an enthusiast) PC.
This is cool for anyone with a really good PC to play @4k, but sucks for Xbox One fanboys. Seriously, MS doesn't know the meaning of the word 'EXCLUSIVE'.
How is it bad for X1 fanboys? If they wanted the game they'd already have it and played it through. Why not MS make a few more $ selling it on their other platform?
MS isn't going to make a few more bucks. Seeing as how they don't own the IP and they're not publishing the PC port.
@tee_bag242 Read 'John Kratos' Reply to You....Carefully 'MS isn't going to make a few more bucks. Seeing as how they don't own the IP and they're not publishing the PC port'....Exactly! Call Out a Fanboy and they answer, Glad you admit to being one!
Heard of royalties? I'm pretty sure that its running on Direct X 11. Nice try. I don't even have a X1. Its fine if you don't like MS but me telling you how it is doesn't make me a MS fanboy. Fact is fact. Typical butthurt PS4 fanboy.
I think that the most important improvement for PC owners will be the framerate.
Yeh I can imagine the game will play better with higher than 17 fps like the xbone but in the end it's still a very very very average game when you take game play into it.
hmm... never noticed that the X1 version looked "blurry" or had some kind of blur thing on it. That PC version looks so sharp.
I'll pick it up on steam or origin sale for $5 next year.
It's a Crytek game it's gonna run like crap =(
Or maybe one just needs better hardware
I have the Hardware! I7 4770k + GTX780
I have that rig and Crysis 3 runs around 70fps on high
@vandal Are you high? Crysis 3 ran smoother than butter on my PC. It was one of the most optimized PC games in recent memory.
I play on high for 60fps + and on v.high with an fps cap of 35fps for a solid frame-rate. I have a Corsair 250d build http://tinypic.com/r/wsqnpi...
Wonderful! Now bring to us Quantum Break, please! lol
QB is 50/50 because it's published by MS. However, so was Alan Wake and that came over to the PC as well. Sunset Overdrive has a higher chance.
Pretty sure Quantum break has much higher chance. In fact, looking at Remedy's track record, I can assure you QB is coming to PC.
Now with less Xbox One. PC owners get to wash rinse repeat too.
If only it was a vastly different game with that level of graphics . A real shame
1. it's a launch title. 2. Made on PC developer hardware. 3. In Crytek's PDF they say that we did not use XB1's hardware scaler. Crytek used some of XB1's GPU ALUs for Scaling. "Target hardware less powerful than high-end PCs at launch" page 3 "Efficient: just a single bilinear sample and a few ALUs on the texture coordinates Did not yet evaluate the Xbox hardware upscale" page 13 http://www.crytek.com/downl... With the new sdk the game will be 1080p.
What are you on about? The fact that Crytek used their own scaling implementation for the Xbox One bares no relevance to this on the PC. I don't know why you brought it up?! :/ Also, on a slightly different topic, I recall trying to explain to you the other day why SSS and translucency don't necessarily play a role in PBR as used in games. Seeing as you do already have that Crytek presentation at hand, surely you could gather that for yourself? Do you know what a BSDF is, or a BRDF, or a gaussian blur, or inverted-normals means in the context of translucency? The point is if you don't quite understand the stuff, don't just name random graphics techniques and keywords to back-up your points.
Again someone just talking and not POSTING LINKS.... I post links most of the time but most don't. One time i did a step by step of how to do this in 3DSM. PS4 fanboys use to say that this game didn't look better than SSS,KZSF, or 1886 but i point out that why it's a winner. You are just like them "FORZA 5 uses 2d backgrounds" wrong!!!