140°
Submitted by ValKilmer 364d ago | opinion piece

With Assassin's Creed Rogue, Ubisoft Continues to Waste the Animus

Hardcore Gamer: The Animus is being wasted and it’s taking the entire Assassin’s Creed series down with it. (Assassin's Creed Unity, Assassin's Creed: Rogue, PC, PS3, PS4, Xbox 360, Xbox One)

ValKilmer  +   364d ago
Seriously, this series doesn't even make sense anymore.
-Foxtrot  +   364d ago
We got fed this whole thing about the first people and the 2012 thing however <SPOILERS> when that story came to a close at the end of AC3 they decided to add a new plot they could continue from...Juno. She became free and made it clear she was going to try and take control of the world. At this point it was obvious the next games would focus on the present day team to stop Juno from taking over the world. Maybe Desmonds father or mother would take over so their sons sacrifice wouldn't go to waste but no...they didn't do that.

With AC4 it's like they didn't even bother, we had a small glimpse of her "trying" to return to full power but hardly anything was said about her. People moaned on that Desmond sections were boring and dull yet what we got in AC4 was even worse...an unnamed character working for a GAMES STUDIO who is making a Pirate game, basically a game within a game replicating Ubisoft and AC4: Black Flag AND the worse part was the whole thing was in first person.

I did think the first people plot was getting a little silly by Assassins Creed Revelations but it was still interesting however what bugs me is that they had their chance to end it in AC3 yet they adding an even bigger plot they are just wasting now.

The best thing they could of done before AC4 was to "reboot" the franchise by ending the present day story in AC3 and everything past "Desmonds trilogy" would focus on just the different time eras. Next gen...new focus, it would of been better but it's only now, at AC5 (odd choice) that they are dropping the numbers and going on a new path.

It's like they don't know what they are doing. In my opinion I feel like they messed stuff up in AC3, things past codex pages told us, about George Washington for example they changed in AC3.
#1.1 (Edited 364d ago ) | Agree(5) | Disagree(8) | Report | Reply
aLucidMind  +   364d ago
It is possible that the PS4/XB1 exclusive, Unity, will focus on continuing the Juno storyline. A separate but related story arch to the previous one with Desmond. After all, I feel it is kind of a dick move to go "want to find out the ending of this arch? Spend $460" rather than just starting a new arch in a relatively self-contained way on the new consoles. Though, it still could have been done on AC4.
iamnsuperman  +   364d ago
I have mixed feelings about the modern element in AC IV. It was really bad for them to use a silent protagonist (old game design here) and that June part was more confusing and anti climatic than anything else. But everything else about it worked quite well. The biggest issue isn't going to be Templar against Assassin but Templar working with the Assassin's (hence Unity) to take on those people who believe they are the true Templar. I think that could work.
spartanlemur  +   364d ago
I actually agree with this article. I'm playing Liberation HD now, and it's so incredibly boring; far too similar to AC3.

Unity might change things a fair amount, but Rogue just looks dull.

Why not take us to Ancient Athens? The Roman Empire? Alexander the Great could even be a significant Templar/Assassin. East Asia of course is a natural choice, be it Sengoku Japan, Han Dynasty or Warring States China. Medieval India was also quite impressive.

Not to mention that we never had pre-Renaissance Medieval Europe (10th-14th centuries).

I've resisted in the past, but now I agree with the view of the author. Ubisoft need to do something new.
#2 (Edited 364d ago ) | Agree(6) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
iamnsuperman  +   364d ago
The idea of revisiting similar locations is so they can use similar assets. Plain and simple, Rouge is a money grab. Same with AC IV. The problem is Ubisoft wants to stretch out the assets they make for as long as possible
mike32UK  +   364d ago
This is exactly right, I don't even know how people can't see this. Copy and paying buildings and such is the reason why they can release 3 assassins creed games on one year. It's a cheap practise, but unfortunately a very real one
Cobra951  +   363d ago
There's nothing cut-and-paste about AC4. That's a unique entry in the series, with its balance of naval and land-based gameplay. AC3 just introduced the concept in scripted linear diversions. AC4 integrates the seafaring into the core of the game, and makes it one of the best sandboxes of the generation.

You may be right about Rogue, though. Let's wait for release to be sure, before damning it. I'm hoping it's at least worthwhile.
#2.1.2 (Edited 363d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(3) | Report
Sketchy_Galore  +   364d ago
I couldn't agree more with this article. I'm so tired of sneaking around brick houses killing men in tricorner hats carrying flintlock pistols. I brought this up fairly recently and was reminded that the French Revolution was a very exciting time in history. This is true but then so was the American Civil war and we all know how that worked out as a game,

Black Flag's differing locales were nice but it still amounted to sneaking around fairly similar areas killing the exact same town cryer looking fellows we killed in the game before it. It has to be remembered that a difference of fifty years or so in that period was equivalent to a difference of three to five years today.

It really is silly that the strength of the series was based around the ability to experience any point in human history and the creators are so reluctant to try new eras. To think of the things they could have us experience if we weren't stuck playing the pirate/highwayman/scarlet pimpernel. It's like creating a game about a person who has the ability to teleport to any single point in the Universe and uses it to travel exclusively between Boston and Chicago.
#3 (Edited 364d ago ) | Agree(7) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
iamnsuperman  +   364d ago
I think what killed the war of independence era was the nonsensical plot and boring characters. It could have been an interesting time period but Ubisoft destroyed that themselves. Also another issue is pre population boom America isn't densely compact enough. We saw it in AC 3 where free running made things slower because the buildings were so far apart.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
40°

The Five Most Memorable Moments in the Metal Gear Solid Franchise

49m ago - After multiple screenshots, trailers and not to mention the Konami-Kojima debacle, Metal Gear Sol... | PS2
40°

Dungeon Souls - SteamFirst Review

50m ago - SteamFirst: I got to check out a very cool game I never would have looked at twice. Dungeon Souls... | PC
Ad

Warhammer: Arcane Magic Comes to iOS

Now - Test your tactics against legendary foes! | Promoted post
40°

New Pollen Screenshots Revealed

50m ago - VRFocus reports on indie developer Mindfield Games releasing new screenshots of virtual reality (... | PC
40°

5 New Things Xbox One Owners Should Be Excited About

50m ago - Microsoft just made a bunch of announcements The annual Gamescom 2015 conference in Cologne fe... | Xbox One
40°

The Summer “Lull” is the Best Time of Year in Gaming

51m ago - The so-called summer lull sometimes appears to be the dark-ages of gaming releases. In my mind, I... | PC