Try our new beta!Click here
Submitted by Abriael 555d ago | opinion piece

Xbox’s Games With Gold Finally Competing on Even Ground with PlayStation Plus, and That’s Awesome

When Microsoft announced the Games With Gold program for Xbox 360 at E3 2013, it was just little short of ridiculous. Lately the offering has finally been evolving into something that can compete on a fairly even ground with PlayStation Plus, and that's awesome for everyone involved. (PS Vita, PS3, PS4, Xbox 360, Xbox One)

« 1 2 »
lelo  +   555d ago | Well said
Lately I found Gold's X1's games offerings more interesting then PS+ PS4 games offerings.

Competition is good.
#1 (Edited 555d ago ) | Agree(132) | Disagree(159) | Report | Reply
LOGICWINS  +   555d ago
And PS Plus had a head start. That makes this even more impressive.
iamnsuperman  +   555d ago
That is irrelevant really. It isn't like Microsoft had no power amongst publishers before they introduced Games with Gold. Plus laid a groundwork which Microsoft soon released they had to follow since it worked so well (remember Microsoft originally tried to give away games for free for ever which they realised quickly that it doesn't win them favours amongst publishers). Time is irrelevant in this case

Lets just congratulate the service as it is without having to say it is more impressive because of X or Y (when X and Y has no logical place). It is good Microsoft has stepped their game up
#1.1.1 (Edited 555d ago ) | Agree(49) | Disagree(30) | Report
dcbronco  +   555d ago | Well said

How can you say Sony laid the groundwork if you also say Microsoft tried giving away free games first. But, correct me if I'm wrong, isn't Microsoft the only one actually giving games away. Sony's games disappear when your account expires don't they?
TFJWM  +   555d ago | Well said
@dcbronco The Xbox1 games also go poof if you do not keep the sub up
iamnsuperman  +   555d ago | Well said
"How can you say Sony laid the groundwork if you also say Microsoft tried giving away free games first. But, correct me if I'm wrong, isn't Microsoft the only one actually giving games away. Sony's games disappear when your account expires don't they?"

Because not only did Sony have sort out their side of the whole process but they had to coerce and convince publishers and developers to believe in this type of service since it was a brand new idea for consoles. This is a lot of work that can't be understated. It is a lot easier to convince publishers to get on board when someone else is doing the same thing already (especially for the last threeish years). This isn't mean devaluing what Microsoft has done but more about what LOGICWINS is talking about

To your other point. Only 360 games are kept for ever (unless they stopped that I am not sure). Exactly like how Plus works, on the Xbox One ones your subscription runs out you can't play the games (the ones you have actively purchase for no money). You just need to renew it to get back that access. The services are identical
#1.1.4 (Edited 555d ago ) | Agree(36) | Disagree(12) | Report
Utalkin2me  +   555d ago | Well said
PS+ gives games away on 3 different platforms, end of story. And btw if you do not keep your Xboxlive you loose those games.
dcbronco  +   555d ago
Utalkin you're wrong. As long as the games are played on the console the license is on they work. And the license can be transferred if you buy a new machine. Go ahead fanboys insert RRoD joke there.

I checked and you are right about Xbox One games. But 360 games are the only ones with either program that actually gives you anything. Xbox One and PlayStation plus are just rentals.
#1.1.6 (Edited 555d ago ) | Agree(13) | Disagree(75) | Report
FACTUAL evidence  +   555d ago | Well said
I'm sorry but i get free ps3, ps4, and vita games. Ps+ is defo where it's at.
Giul_Xainx  +   555d ago
Hopefully they have the stamina to keep everything in check.

But with ps+ having an extra years head start to pioneer this type of service, it makes you wonder what Sony's next move is going to be. While games with gold is just starting to build up a library, ps+ already has a big one.

The length of time that a game is available for free matters not. It is wether or not the player is interested in playing the game.
guitarded77  +   555d ago
Oh yeah... well my wiener is bigger than your wiener... blah, blah, blah.

I'm about sick of these stupid ass articles and this same old conversation.

Both Plus and GWG are the best part of those stupid fees we pay for other services too.
Spotie  +   555d ago | Well said
Dcbronco makes a statement that's wrong and gets a well said.

N4G is obviously run by Sony fanboys. /s

Gwg has gotten better, that's for sure. But on par with Plus? That's debatable.
Biggest  +   555d ago
"And PS Plus had a head start. That makes this even more impressive."

What's more impressive is your ability to use this statement with your history of discounting these types of statements.

Games with Gold is not impressive. Having a month or two of solid games does not put it on even ground with PS Plus. It means that it has had a few months of solid games. Comparing Games with Gold to PS Plus only shows that PS Plus is the better service by a long shot.
sonarus  +   555d ago
Glad to see improvement but if we want to judge ps plus vs games with gold over the past few months then cool. If you are judging with the head start, its not even close because it is a large head start
fr0sty  +   555d ago
Having a head start doesn't matter as much when dealing with a new console, all you have to choose from is the software that has been released for it, and who among those developers is willing to cut a deal with you to let you give their game away.
#1.1.13 (Edited 555d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report
shaenoide  +   555d ago
Years of gold sub are not enough to be called a headstart?

But you're right about competition.
xHeavYx  +   555d ago
Funny, one month of good offerings and all of the sudden GWG are the best thing ever, I'd say let's wait a couple more months before making this comparison
Boody-Bandit  +   555d ago
All those articles debating XBL vs PS+ over the years were always so heated. I've been saying for years and especially during this generation that hands down PS+ is the overall better value.

This article proves that was the right assessment since it is now being debating GWG is "trying" to level the playing field. For now though, this is way too early to be debated. MS has to do this for more than a month or 2 before we start discussing this. MS also has to expand their offerings with additional content, discounts, early beta access, and so many other categories PS+ off their subscribers.

So for now PS+ is still the better value. Less expensive and offer their subscribers a lot more than just some free games and discounts. So no, GWG is still not even close to PS+ and wont be until MS does this month after month and expands their offerings with more content than just a couple decent games.
#1.1.16 (Edited 555d ago ) | Agree(3) | Disagree(2) | Report
ashcroft  +   554d ago

You only get to keep them as long as your are susbscribed to gold, similar to ps+

Of course you can use it on another console, since the subscription ties to your account not console.

When your gold sub expires, your games won't work or go to a trial mode.
incredibleMULK  +   555d ago
yep, indies blow. bunch of nes games in 2014. Limbo was good. but thats it.
Skizelli  +   555d ago
You sound like you're not even old enough to remember the arcades, with the bubble count to match.
Clown_Syndr0me  +   555d ago
I like to see Outlast running on NES...
ashcroft  +   554d ago
As if you knew anything about the nes! Zelda,metroid,SMB3, TMNT2, Double Dragon.

Indies are the majority that still care about putting out something that's fun and not something stupid that try to cover it up with stunning visuals.

No wonder you have one bubble, just like major publishers, all talk and no substance. :P
ashcroft  +   554d ago

Forget Outlast, Monster Party scared the crap out of me when I was little. That and Maniac Mansion.
SpeedDemon  +   555d ago
One difference, Sony will only give games that have a 70 or higher Metacritic score. Microsoft doesn't really have standards as to what they give out and sometimes give some not so great games(like Crimson Dragon this month, which has gotten some pretty bad reviews).
mixolydian_id  +   555d ago
Metacritic scores?

Just who trolls the web to even leave reviews on there? Disappointed customers or happy customers?

It's about as useful as Rotten Tomatoes is for movies.

The critics slam a movie... but then the average joe enjoys it. But just who is right?

If there are a potential 200,000 gamers.... and 200 of them go online and post how they feel on N4G. Does that mean that the N4g opinions are the word of god?

I can't be bothered to get the calculator out, but we're looking at something like 0.001% of the gaming population.

Surely, you can't believe everything you see on the internet. There are more articles with fallacious information then there are gamers in the world.
admiralvic  +   555d ago
"Sony will only give games that have a 70 or higher Metacritic score. "

Like I keep pointing out, that remark was mostly in reference to what "great" and "high scoring" meant in SCEE advertisements. If you actually take the time to look into the games, you'll see that Sony has given away several <70 games over the years (some being REALLY low if you include day 1 titles like Chronovolt - 44 or Contrast - 59). To further prove this point, here are some <70 titles that were free with Plus:

Modnation Roadtrip - 62
Dynasty Warriors Next - 67
Malicious - 67
Doki Doki Universe - 66 (technically this score), 62 , 71
Poker Night 2 - 63
Germinator - 67
Zombie Tycoon 2 - 63
Labyrinth Legends - 68

I mean, I found 10 in the past year (Doki Doki is a current offering no less) by just looking at a list and going "I doubt that scored high."
Mr_Writer85  +   555d ago

The metacritic score applies to the PS3 games only.

And that was for the first year only.
SpeedDemon  +   555d ago
@mixolydian I was going by the critic scores not the user scores. Sure I've enjoyed a few games that have gotten some bad reviews, but most of the games that I have played with bad scores deserve the bad critics rating.

@admiralvix at the time those games were given out they did have a 70 or higher score, apart from Doki-Doki which was given away along with the other 2 monthly games last month.
admiralvic  +   555d ago
@ Mr_Writer85

Now I know for a fact thats just not true. I know the SCEE site still mentioned the Metacritic stuff until the redesign (so around when the PS4 launched it changed or 6 months ago~). There is also the article below that also makes a strong case the other way.

@ SpeedDemon

"At the time those games were given out they did have a 70 or higher score"

Thats not actually true. Malicious actually got an article pointing out it didn't meet the Metacritic requirement when it was offered. You're also free to verify if anyone refuted the claim (I mean, it would be easy to disprove), yet people just talked about how stupid it's to go off Metacritic ratings (something I 100% agree with and thought about including in my original post). You can also see interesting things like...

"Blastoise + 473d ago
Lord of the rings war in the north was on 60 something and they put it on. Glad they did to be honest, I enjoyed it
#4Agree(21) | Disagree(1) "

You're also welcome to actually look at the Metacritic pages for these games and you'll see things like ModNation Racers (given away on 2/24/2014) has yet to get a review on Metacritic since 2012 or that Poker Night 2 was also not updated since it released for Plus. But choose to believe what you want to believe.
SpeedDemon  +   554d ago
@admiralvic After looking further into it, I guess you're right, tho they do seem to at least attempt to stand by it, having given 210(only counting NA) games away, I imagine it would be hard to find something that qualifies that they haven't already given away before.
PurpleDragon96  +   555d ago
The thing is, a lot of these "impressive" games have already appeared on PS+...

I don't mean to say that Games with Gold isn't improving, I'm just saying we need to compare objectively, and not just on a month for month basis!
ARESWARLORD  +   555d ago
Free games are great on both ps plus and live.
Sevir  +   555d ago
A few months from now PS+ offering for PS4 will be better, there isn't much in the way of AAA releases on either platform. Both GWG and PS+ on next gen platforms have large been subjected to paltry indie releases, some impressive and addictive like Resogun and Strider, while others not so great. The program is in its infancy on PS4 and XBO the platform currently doesn't have large libraries of AAA games to do this with and right now, developers and publishers are having to recoup dev cost for what they released on PS4/XBO...

This year, in the fall I think we'll see AC4 Thief and TR:DF on PS+ along with Driveclub.
TheSaint  +   555d ago
Only the current one IMO, the last two were pretty uninspired.
liquidhalos  +   555d ago
I personally have found the last 2 months of ps+ (for ps4) to be pure drivel. I keep saying thus but here's hoping next month is better
C-H-E-F  +   554d ago
3 platforms to 1 yet that is on par? Lol cute
Bonkerz  +   555d ago
I have to agree, we have been getting some solid titles free, as well as great discounts. Newer games like wolfenstein have been price cut it was i believe 40 bucks. Great work so far, seems like they are really listening to us.
GusBricker  +   555d ago
Crimson Dragon is pretty awesome once you get a dragon that doesn't suck.
KillerByte23  +   555d ago
Or add stallion83 to your friends list and use is hire his dragon as a wingman and you will do beast from the moment you start the game
GusBricker  +   555d ago
Yeah, wingmen make the game way too easy.
700p  +   555d ago
Which is definitely great news. I've been downloading quite a lot of great free games as of late.
tee_bag242  +   555d ago
Not sure how you can call them 'free' if you loose them when you stop subscribing. It's more akin to leasing.
700p  +   554d ago
they're free if i dont need to purchase them. Also you dont lose the games....what?
greenyboi  +   555d ago
Enjoying crimson dragon more than i thought i would . I have enjoyed all the games we have got with gwg so far keep up the good work ms.( although we all know that lococycle is coming next month heard some bad things about that game)
GusBricker  +   555d ago
How do you know LocoCycle is coming next month?

I'm actually shocked it wasn't the first game MS gave away with GWG.
iamnsuperman  +   555d ago
I hope they never give it away. Microsoft needs to set a baseline for titles like Sony does with Plus (a game has to be over a certain score to be considered for the service). It is good to take risks with new titles (being unknown) but the stuff that has already proven to be bad needs to stay away from Games with Gold
shinrock  +   555d ago
True, i was hoping they would have gotten that one out of the way 1st!

Lococycle.... lol!
FanboyKilla  +   555d ago
lococycle nooooooooooooooooo!!!! please nooooooooooooooooo. the only thing more stupid than that is octodad. noooooooooooo!!!

i have been enjoying the games as of late. dont know what sony is doing with plus. give us something interesting. you know its bad when you cant enjoy a free game. im not talking to a person with every sony device lol. hell they should give you something for that. i speak for ps4 only. give us killzone or knack, i promise we wont be buying them. go sony.

hey, do any of you know how to tell if you have a playstation, or a gaystation? i kid i kid he he heee
#5.1.3 (Edited 555d ago ) | Agree(2) | Disagree(8) | Report
greenyboi  +   555d ago
I don't know its going to be lococycle just a guess i hope i am wrong but i am guns call strider and lococycle next month .just a guess if i wanted to hope i hope for child of light and valiant hearts
cfc78  +   555d ago
How bad can it be when it's for free.


I never said I wanted it on there but if it's on there anyway then why not.
#5.2 (Edited 555d ago ) | Agree(2) | Disagree(4) | Report | Reply
iamnsuperman  +   555d ago
Because reputation is important. Bad titles need to stay off these kind of services. It doesn't matter if they are free you want the free offerings to be at least well regarded
dcbronco  +   555d ago
The problem is bad can sometimes be subjective. There are games that get panned by the general public based on group think. I judge everything for myself. The public can often be feeble minded.
#5.2.2 (Edited 555d ago ) | Agree(9) | Disagree(3) | Report
memots  +   555d ago
i bough lococycle on steam sale this summer at 1.99$ its a terrible game, i wish i would have kept my $2, i played for about 30 minutes and was done with it.
reko  +   554d ago

Go play gaybox idiot lol
SlavisH2  +   555d ago
M$ was making so much money off Xbox live its about damn time.
OpieWinston  +   555d ago
What are you 12?
"M$", people still make that BS statement...especially with your profile pic.

All multi-billion dollar corporations care about is money...Don't pretend one doesn't and others do.
voodoochild346  +   555d ago
There is a difference between running a business and being money driven. The way Microsoft nickel and dimes it's consumers is sad. The fact that they still have people defending them is even worse.
condemmedman  +   555d ago
@ Voodoochild

No one is forcing you to buy it if you don't like it just stay away but I'm sure you have another reason to hate ms just grow a set of balls and stop blaming companies you don't like.
JonnyBigBoss  +   555d ago
They invest in updates and R&D.
TRD4L1fe  +   555d ago
this is very awesome for us gamers
towelie1288  +   555d ago
agreed i have been liking GWG way more than PS+ lately
Strider was cool
and Strike suit zero is great
we will see for PS+ for august .....
irokster  +   555d ago
IMO Strider sucked badly. I played it for 15-20 minutes and I knew then I didn't want to play it ever again.
sho0ok  +   555d ago
Come on man give the game a chance. I said the same thing at the beginning, however after the first hour the game gets interesting. Especially when you get all the weapons unlocked. Also play the game on the hardest difficulty, this is how it is supposed to be played.
swice  +   555d ago
You only gave it 15 minutes?
Do you know how to give things a chance?
blakstarz  +   555d ago
I'm sorry but Games for Gold has a long way to go in order to get with PS+...the games they are offering now are not all that great and bit scarce....I have over 25+ games from PS+ PS3 and PS4 combined...way more than I can ever finish, they are just getting started so to say they are on even ground is far from it, at least to me.
DOSman   555d ago | Spam
DualWielding  +   555d ago
they won a month for the first time ever.... whether they'll maintain the pace it remains to be seen (I hope Sony ups their game and beats Microsoft again as I only own playstation devices) but there's no denying Microsoft game selection for August is better than Sony's
XtraTrstrL  +   555d ago
Yeah, I'm a PS4 owner, but I'm no idiot. A big part of Sony's M-O with snatching up all these indies is to have some PS+ monthly partners for cheap.
PrinceOfAllSaiyans  +   555d ago
Well said I totally agree . They think they're slick.
YodaCracker  +   555d ago
Now that they've switched the GWG model to be more like PS+ (you lose the free games when your subscription runs out as opposed to keeping them forever), Microsoft has been able to offer much better titles.
#11 (Edited 555d ago ) | Agree(3) | Disagree(3) | Report | Reply
mrpsychoticstalker  +   555d ago
Competition is good, but I think Microsoft is definitely better than PS+. Being able to keep the games after ur subscription runs put is awesome . Plus the games are mainly good titles, not as many indies. (nothing against indies, is just I like block buster titles better)
BiggerBoss  +   555d ago
You can't keep them on Xbox one, it's just like PS+ now
IcicleTrepan  +   555d ago
Yes and no. On the 360 you get to keep the games, on the XB1 it works the same as PS+
BiggerBoss  +   555d ago
@icecicle that's why I said "on Xbox one" :p
WeAreLegion  +   555d ago
Microsoft could feed you your own feces and you would say their offering was better than Sony's. You're insane.
TheRealHeisenberg  +   555d ago
And if Sony were to feed you yours I bet you would do exactly the same.
#12.2.1 (Edited 555d ago ) | Agree(12) | Disagree(12) | Report
WeAreLegion  +   555d ago
What makes you feel that way? Prove to me that I'm a fanboy. Go ahead. Find my past comments and prove that to me.

mrpsychoticstalker is constantly saying Microsoft is better than Sony. I am just some dude who likes video games. Where does your comment come from?
#12.2.2 (Edited 555d ago ) | Agree(7) | Disagree(5) | Report
TheRealHeisenberg  +   555d ago
I rarely look at past comment history. I only read your comment which looks likes an attack against mrpsychoticstalker's opinion. My apologies for assuming the worst of you.
ziggurcat  +   555d ago

mrpsychoticstalker's opinion is wrong because it's factually incorrect. You don't get to keep the games anymore.
WeAreLegion  +   555d ago
Hey, TheRealHeisenberg. That's pretty cool of you to admit that. Have a bubble!
LogicStomper  +   554d ago

"mrpsychoticstalker' s opinion is wrong because it's factually incorrect. You don't get to keep the games anymore."

So much irony here. You accuse someone of being 'factually incorrect' yet, you make the same logical failure.

Here are the FACTS:

1) Xbox 360 GWG games are playable whether you are still subscribed or not.

2) Xbox One GWG games are ONLY playable IF you are still subscribed.

Now let's look at the arguments in turn.


"Being able to keep the games after ur subscription runs put is awesome"

This is factually correct if you are referring to Xbox 360, as you still KEEP your games upon expiry of your subscription. This is NOT correct for the Xbox One though.


"'s factually incorrect. You don't get to keep the games anymore."

This statement now is the opposite of the first. It is now factually correct for the Xbox One, but incorrect for the Xbox 360. If I may say so myself, they are BOTH incorrect. You both attempt to push your agenda's through manipulation of the 'facts'. One of you try to manipulate the situation to sound as if ALL GWG games are kept upon expiry of subscription. The other tries to manipulate the situation to sound as if NO GWG games are kept upon expiry.
#12.2.6 (Edited 554d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(1) | Report
ziggurcat  +   555d ago

They changed the policy. You can longer keep the game if your XBL subscription runs out.
aragon  +   555d ago
thats on xbox one u keep xbox 360 games forever as per the link u provided
LogicStomper  +   554d ago
Thank you for linking the article however, this does not support you argument, it undermines it. You argue that you do not keep your GWG games anymore, but using the very source you linked, it states:

"On Xbox 360, the Games with Gold program will work the same as it did before. Games you downloaded for free will remain on your account."

Now if you knew how Games With Gold worked before, you'd realise that Xbox 360 games are kept even upon expiry of your subscription.

Also, you probably want to read comment #12.2.6
xJumpManx  +   555d ago
Bout time Xbox Live gets to take some of the ideas from PSN like PSN has taken ideas from Xbox live.
JonnyBigBoss  +   555d ago
Definitely agree. Xbox Games with Gold has been killing it for a couple month snow
arbitor365  +   555d ago
most of the games that are any good on games with gold have already been for free on PS plus. like last month they had qucamelee and gotham city imposters. and before that they had sleeping dogs.

games with gold has a long way to catch up with PS plus.
DOSman   555d ago | Spam
memots  +   555d ago
Anything is better than nothing right?
Sm00thNinja  +   555d ago
Lets not jump for joy til Microsoft shows its more than just a trend. This months offerings were weak on both fronts. Like when's Outlast going GWG? Ryse would be a great addition
RSR314  +   555d ago
Would of been better of they didn't give us two flying games.
system22  +   555d ago
i've been pretty impressed with games with gold so far. probably more so than ps+' offerings, but its not like the ps+ offerings suck by comparison.... they do have Strider for free right now and thats one of my classic fav's.
Rimeskeem  +   555d ago
If you have a Vita, PS3 and PS3 then the PS+ is by far better IMO
xDHAV0K24x  +   555d ago
according to vita sales, NOBODY owns one. Also, MSFT doesn't even have a portable on the market!
BattleN  +   555d ago
Nintendo needs to follow suit!
DOSman   555d ago | Spam
Lou Ferrigno  +   555d ago
i think PS+ is the better service, but idk about on PS4 , i love indies but that's all we've been getting with PS+ on PS4.. buckets of indie titles that i'm afraid to buy an indie title when it releases now, knowing it will most likely be free in a month or two on PS+..
I'm not against free games by any means, but we pay $50 or more a year, I would totally be ok with a big title once in a while like the PS3 used to (and still) gets..
other than that both services are great and worth it still imo
sanosukegtr123  +   555d ago
PS+ is better for $50 for a whole year I get discounts free games every months. What's not to like plus I play online for free.
XBisLIKEdeadANDstuff   555d ago | Spam
tee_bag242  +   555d ago
You're playing online for 'free'? How did you come to that. Hey I've got some snake oil I'd like to sell you. It's free for $50 a year .
Saleem101  +   555d ago
I'm sorry playstation plus is way better than games with gold, playstation plus is like steam with discounts and betas on a regular...
XBisLIKEdeadANDstuff   555d ago | Spam
LogicStomper  +   554d ago
Steam > All.
PudgeyBurrito  +   555d ago
I have both and this article is stretching the truth. It is getting better which is nice but I haven't found it to be better than Plus as every month feels like Christmas on PlayStation when you have all 3 platforms and with PlayStation now offering rentals.. It's a no brainier. I wish my Xbox 1 actually had more stuff to offer as it doesn't get much play time these days.
Giantbomb82  +   555d ago
Rentals, PS Plus, PS Now. Xbox 1 tries to be the all digital console of the future. And everyone hates it. Make up your fucking minds people. PS Plus was born out of the fact that Sony just wanted to charge to play online. PS plus was the BRIDGE that made it possible. A nice smooth transition. Plus only became good after the Hack in 2011, before that it was garbage and no one talked about it. I know, I was a early adopter in 2010. "infamous" was the first good solid full retail game they gave away. But it all led up to E3 2013; where it was announced that PS plus was required to play online, that was the ultimate goal of the service. I have a PS3, 360 and Xbox One. I think I've only bought 2 games from a store in the past year. So eventually it will all come back to the original Xbox one reveal. ALL Digital. Hilarious. Too ahead of the curve, I guess
PudgeyBurrito  +   554d ago
The 2 things you are forgetting is how closed that system was with DRM and checkin's and no ability to trade disc based games.. in other words having the best of all worlds and not being forced into 1 system.

Also, We are living in 2014 not 2011 in which PlayStation plus has proven it self over Xbox live in so many way's and is worth the 49.99 price tag with all the games you get on 3 platforms each month. No one cares if it was talked about it in 2011.. when psn was a free service anymore cause people much prefer if they don't have the money to buy a game that month, they can download one out of the plus library. It's like listening to a child, " PlayStation plus is now a better service then xblive so I must take to N4G and cry my opinions all over " It's that simple.. or rent a game from now for a week for 5 bucks. Sorry you don't approve but there is about 9 million people on PS4, 81 million on PS3 and whatever vit's numbers are that do. Sad how mad you get when a service on another console is better.
#25.1.1 (Edited 554d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report
kewlkat007  +   555d ago
I don't even have time to play all these free games...I wish there was other perks for those that don't always download the free games. Like an extra 10% off a digital game.
Feldman9000  +   555d ago
Uh no, it's not.
tommygunzII  +   555d ago
They only have about 200 games to go. Keep it up MS, you're getting closer.
ARESWARLORD  +   555d ago
They are both good. Play games live life have fun. Console bashing is stupid
SynestheticRoar  +   555d ago
Microsoft loves to play, follow the leader.
« 1 2 »

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
New stories

UFC Champ Wants To Become A Full-Time Video Game Streamer

4m ago - Kotaku: "Demetrious “Mighty Mouse” Johnson is the UFC’s flyweight champion and arguably one of th... | PC

XCOM 2 (2016) Review | FilmGamesEtc

7m ago - FGE - XCOM 2 is the direct sequel to the 2012 reboot of the XCOM franchise, XCOM: Enemy Unknown.... | PC

Gran Turismo SPORT Beta Testing Begins early 2016

Now - Start tracking GTS with's release date alert service and be notified when the GTS beta launches. | Promoted post

Persona Q: Shadow of the Labyrinth Review

1h ago - Persona Q: Shadow of the Labyrinth is simply fun. The challenge keeps it interesting, adding to t... | 3DS

That Time Xbox 360's Uno Game Was Flooded With Dick Pics

2h ago - Uno was one of Xbox Live Arcade’s best games in the early years, a fact that’s been somewhat forg... | Xbox 360

Onki Studios ARPG “Unnamed” is now live on Steam Greenlight

2h ago - Unnamed lands on GREENLIGHT on Tuesday 9th February of 2016. Unnamed is a third person action an... | PC