240°

Sony agrees to $15M settlement in 2011 data breach class action

Sony today agreed to a $15 million preliminary settlement in a class action lawsuit over its 2011 data breach, which led to the theft of names, addresses and possibly credit card data belonging to 77 million user accounts.

Lightning Mr Bubbles3562d ago (Edited 3562d ago )

Ouch!! Those are $15M that could of been spent on making games dammit...

FarEastOrient3562d ago

The only people making money off of the settlement is the lawyers.

Kevlar0093562d ago

Sony losses hundreds of millions of dollars a year, just another bad day for Sony

Dirtnapstor3562d ago

@FarEast
You're absolutely right. It's pretty pathetic that the system works like that, where as the real beneficiaries are the lawyers.

Tctczach3562d ago (Edited 3562d ago )

Lol. Millions of cards breached and $15,000,000. That's a wag of the finger.

DragonKnight3562d ago

No cards were breached. All cards were encrypted.

fenome3562d ago

Not one single person I've heard of ever had anything bad happen because of this, myself included. It was all encrypted data, it never got used. Someone on the inside thought they were cool and took a backdoor key, nobody actually had any $$$ stolen or fraudulent activity. This is all a bunch of bullsh** that people like to troll on.

pop_tarts3562d ago

"led to the theft of names, addresses and possibly credit card data belonging to 77 million user accounts in what is one of the largest-ever Internet security break-ins."

I do believe theft means stolen not breached. Their "network" was breached. Peoples "information" was stolen.

Seems like you should heed your own advice.

Tctczach3562d ago

Breach and "break in" are practically the same thing! Of course they had access to all that info. That's a breach. If you breach a countries defense in war it means you crossed their line and possibly saw their equipment, not obliterated them. So what I was saying since I have my crayons out was they saw your info but did nothing with it. That's a breach.

king_ps43562d ago Show
+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3562d ago
Death3562d ago

It's not a cash settlement. It's free services, themes, game downloads, etc.

Darkstares3562d ago

I'm not sure what people want for compensation. We have no idea what impact if any this actually had. So how do you put a value to each person who was a member at the time if nothing really happened? What we do know is what we knew all along and that is Sony did not have sufficient security measures in place. Most things can be hacked but they did not do a good enough job at preventing it until after it occurred. In hindsight it was actually a good thing because now we are all more aware of our personal information, Sony beefed up its security and the news spread the word to other companies to improve their own security measures.

OrangePowerz3562d ago (Edited 3562d ago )

They did offer free fraud protection afterwards to people who had their cards stored on PSN.

Also that is more than what as example banks get as fines. Banks in Germany lost my data more than once because they sent account data to other branches on discs via mail and the discs never arrived and I got zero compensation for that.

Lets not forget most services got hacked in the last few years amd account data got stolen and Ebay was one of the recent examples this year and last year pretty much every ges publisher website got hacked and data stolen. If someone really wants to hack into a site or service and steal data they will get in.

DragonKnight3562d ago

They shouldn't have even agreed to this.

"If you are responsible for so many payment card details and log-in details, then keeping that personal data secure has to be your priority," the Information Commissioner's Office's deputy commissioner David Smith said. "In this case that just didn't happen, and when the database was targeted — albeit in a determined criminal attack — the security measures in place were simply not good enough."

So they agree that it was a determined criminal attack, which means it was planned and studied before hand so as to ensure positive results, yet Sony's at fault because... they didn't predict the future?

Names and Addresses are a matter of public record and shouldn't even be considered in any lawsuit. Hell, google, phone books, the frickin' Freedom of Information act can likely get you anyone's name and address that you want. Where's the government settlement for the millions of people that that affects?

As for credit cards, it's already been stated at length that the credit cards were encrypted. NO ONE's was breached. In the "so slim it's nearly non-existent" chance that someone's card was breached, Sony offered a $1 million dollar fraud protection service to the affected person or persons. Guess how many claimed it.

It's so unbelievably insane that a company can be attacked and end up being punished for that attack.

chaosx3562d ago

Attacked? no! targeted yes , and the servers were not up to date with the latest patches. If their servers were vulnerable, they were not protecting the clients data to the best of their ability, so then blame should fall totally on there shoulders.

In my opinion .

DragonKnight3562d ago

Attacked YES! It says it right in the article.

"albeit in a determined criminal attack."

That's the government's official stance on what occurred. They were attacked, they are a victim, and they are essentially being punished for not being clairvoyant. No service in the world, I repeat and emphasize, NO SERVICE IN THE WORLD IS HACKER PROOF!

JD_Shadow3562d ago

Probably should've tried to do more instead of pretending that it could never happen to them, then suddenly say "oh, poor us". They should've been more upfront with consumers about what was exactly going on (I can understand not giving TOO much info away, but it was trying to infiltrate the CIA the way they were sparse in giving out any info as to WTF was going on).

I like Sony as much as the next guy, but that doesn't mean I'll let them off the hook when they do stupid shit. Nothing is hacker proof, of course, but they obviously didn't think things through enough. Hopefully, lesson learned on both ends.

Darkstares3562d ago (Edited 3562d ago )

They were fined for not have proper security measures in place. Why is this so hard for you to understand? You go on and on about how it's Xbox fans making a big deal out of it when in fact it was PSN users who were most upset. Sony even admitted their security measures could have been better and guess what? They did indeed make it better because of it. Why do you think Target customers were upset? Would you not get upset if your bank called and said your information was compromised only to find out every other bank but yours was offering much more advanced security measures or would you blame Xbox fans for that too?

So take your issues with Xbox, Xbox fans, Microsoft and everything else you have all bottled up inside for years and start acting like a consumer for once. Honest;y, is Sony paying you because you sure act like it's your job doing damage control for them all while attacking the Xbox, Xbox fans and Microsoft any chance you get.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3562d ago
+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3562d ago
Yahdaree3562d ago

I can't believe the world we live in.

mrpsychoticstalker3562d ago

Damn Sony, there goes the Money I spent buying games twice regular edition and ps4 edition. :(

Dudebro903562d ago (Edited 3562d ago )

That's it? What a joke.

They lost 77 million peoples private data, and then are given a punishment that will not teach them or any other company the importance of private data security and protection.

TheWackyMan3562d ago (Edited 3562d ago )

They got your name, and where you live. At this point, that really isn't all that private, since millions of people could just find that out with a simple google search.

@gamerfan0909 with a simple google search, you could also find out that they never actually stole any credit card information. The internet is a truly wonderful place.

gamerfan09093562d ago (Edited 3562d ago )

Name, address, CREDIT CARD INFO. That's enough to mess over a ton of people.

Death3562d ago

Sony didn't encrypt any of our data including the credit cards we used on PSN. So the hackers have your name, address, phone number and credit card numbers. You can't make it much easier for identity theft.

rainslacker3562d ago

The credit info was stolen, but it was encrypted so it couldn't be read. The rest of the information was just name and address info, likely phone number or something. Everything that would be easy to find on public record unless you go through extremes to keep it private, which most people don't. Most of the information that was stolen is likely already sold many times over by any number of companies that keep track of that information anyhow.

SilentNegotiator3562d ago

There was never any evidence of useable CC data being stolen, just the basic info. But shocker, that won't stop Gamerfan####/Gamefan####/ Gameon####/etc#### and Death from claiming that it TOTALLY DID GUIS.

trouble_bubble3562d ago (Edited 3562d ago )

@death
My name address and phone number are already public. It's called a phone book. Paranoia much?

I wonder what my yellow pages could go for on the black market? Bidding starts at half a million..

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3562d ago
DragoonsScaleLegends3562d ago

Taking money that could be used to help fund better security will make it worse.

FarEastOrient3562d ago

The company lost money and the hackers didn't lose anything.

emad-E-three3562d ago

Speaking like they hacked there own network -_-
They are the Victims!! You know what just GTFO!

DafunkyRebel3562d ago

The NSA already knows your Social Security, Credit card, address, likes and dislikes and your habits. So yeah Sony is only small time compare to your government.

hiredhelp3562d ago

That's it? What a joke.

They lost 77 million peoples private data, and then are given a punishment that will not teach them

Eerrrr. They learnt Alot from this they also spent out millions more investing in better security. Inc better servers and free games to gamers and public appology And cost of trying track down the hackers.

DragonKnight3562d ago (Edited 3562d ago )

They actually completely moved the location of their servers and hired completely new people after the PSN hack. That's why it took a month for it to come back up.

hiredhelp3562d ago

Sorry yes they moved servers late night. Eaither way cost them millions thoes disagreed do your research.

incredibleMULK3562d ago

Thats what they get for doing their business with sony. If it was microsoft they couldve sued them and won in american courts. You can sue government agencies in America and WIN. Japanese courts ain't gonna clobber their own company...sony and nintendo are their work horses.

You were lucky to get dead nation and infamous for your personal data breach. "Heres twelve dollars in old games now be gone."

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3562d ago
sungam3d3562d ago

That's like 20 cents per person...

SCORE!

Sitdown3562d ago

Haha...only if rounding up, which I'm sure they won't.

Show all comments (90)
280°

Sony Taps Bungie's Head of Revenue to Lead Live-Service Games

Sony has recruited Bungie's head of revenue Jaremy Rich to head up its live-service gaming division, Rich has announced on social media.

Read Full Story >>
techraptor.net
ChasterMies20d ago

Please do not put Destiny’s monetization into Sony’s first party games. The monetization is what’s driving players away from Destiny.

just_looken19d ago

The new temp boss is the sony cfo bean counter so i can see this being a thing get every penny.

Cacabunga19d ago

PlayStation officially losing it.. fans will never support gaas games

just_looken19d ago

@car

The new boss did a interview in japan he wants to tap into the mobile market like nintendio so he give 0 fucks about gamers/fans

https://www.pushsquare.com/...

Redemption-6419d ago

@Cacabunga
You only speak for you and those who think like you, but most fans will support what they want. Playstation and PC fans are literally supporting Helldivers 2 and that is a gaas. Maybe you wouldn't, but many more would if they like it.

Huey_My_D_Long19d ago

@Redemption-64
Look, Im not making any judgement calls about this guy, but I will say that Helldivers 2 GaaS model is unique to Helldivers, and legit the only other game I can think of thats similiar was the Avengers game except HD2 pass is still better.
The fact that you can earn in game currency in a way that doesnt make you feel like you have to grind forever, as well you being able work on that pass that you bought...on your own time without a time limit...that right there is fucking huge to me, and I can't name any game other than avengers that avoided trapping players with FOMO logic...I think GaaS on HD2 shouldn't be compared to the rest of the industry...it should be copied.

Einhander197219d ago

Cacabunga

Helldivers 2...

Redemption-64

In Europe it's a 60 40 split favoring PC.
In the US its a 60 40 split favoring PS5.

So PlayStation owners supported the game just fine, it's not getting carried by PC or anything like that.

FinalFantasyFanatic19d ago

@just_looken,
I'm perfectly fine with the way Nintendo entered the mobile market, I never touched their mobile games, meanwhile, the console/handheld stayed the way it is. As for being a bean counter, he's probably going to reel in these massive budgets that Sony's studios have had lately, I haven't played Spiderman 2, but I cannot see how they almost tripled the budget for that game.

@Redemption-64,
That's an exception to the rule, I'm expecting a lot of these GAAS games from Sony to fail, to be fair, they only need a few to succeed, but I would have preferred that they put more of their resources into other types of games.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 19d ago
DivineHand12519d ago

True their monetization is driving players away and at the same time, their decision to chop out content and convoluted systems is keeping new players away from the game.

Joe91319d ago

I don't think that will happen based on how things worked out at Naughty Dog now that we know what we do, seems they had the option to fully commit to live service games or stay making single player experences so they gave up on their live service game. We are not sure how things came about with Bend making a live service game but I hope that was not a forced situation. Sony doesnt seem like they are forcing studios to switch up but we will see, Sony's bread and butter is single player games it is how they dominated the console market.

Obscure_Observer19d ago

Yeah, I though Sony learned something from all their failures in the LS segment under Bungie´s disastrous leadership and supervision which led to games been cancelled, studios closed and all the people laid off.

Looks like Bungie still plays a major role in Sony´s LS initiative and Sony is not backtracking on their GaaS plans.

S2Killinit19d ago (Edited 19d ago )

Are we forgetting that Destiny is also a highly successful franchise? I feel like that definitely deserves mention here.

Besides, there is no reason why a person cant learn from past experiences.

Joe91319d ago

I agree, people act as if Destiny flopped when it came out lol it took 9 to 10 years for the numbers to fall yet people are still playing it add the success of Helldivers 2 no wonder Sony is going forward down this path.

S2Killinit19d ago

Personally, I see no problem with Sony also having service games as long as they make good ones, and more importantly they deliver the AAA story driven games that they are known for. So yeah, I agree 100% with you.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 19d ago
Christopher19d ago

I mean, this person made some pretty bad decisions at Bungie. I hope they've learned from them because I definitely don't see those type of ideas as good for PlaySation in general.

CrimsonWing6919d ago (Edited 19d ago )

Honestly, what’s to learn from? How to make people happily continuously dump money into a single game over its life-time? Buy season passes continuously for several years with a smile on our faces?

GaaS is a design decision that is everything wrong with this industry. The fact that Helldivers 2 did so well and people defend the monetization because it was $40 and is a fun game, scares the sh*t out of me to see that the door is open and all shift will probably be to replicate that in future games. We already know the ROI for traditional game dev cost isn’t doing it for them.

I thought with Jimbo leaving we’d see a change for the better… I’m not so sure now.

S2Killinit19d ago

Service games are being offered by everyone. Sony cannot afford to only create single player AAA games. No one can. They already said they will be doing both.

Abnor_Mal19d ago (Edited 19d ago )

Ps5 gamers in 2023 seemed to play more live service types of games, so regardless to how people feel about them, numbers don’t lie and Sony is going where the money is. I mean look at the excitement around Helldivers2, people are showing that they want live service games.

Christopher19d ago

They play long-time existing live service games like CoD, Fortnite, Apex Legends, Destiny 2, and the like. Mass majority of new live service games are considered failures and aren't moving gamers away from older games.

just_looken19d ago

Yep the huge issue with live service is they need paid players along with a reason to play them.

You forgot mobile market that also taps into that player base as well as the eve online style games there is only a certain amount of krakens/whales blind supporters compared to the amount of live service games we have its not sustainable math wise.

700 restaurants making food for every seat for 1000-3000 eaters just does not work out

Einhander197219d ago (Edited 19d ago )

Christopher

I am not a big live service fan and literally own zero of the games you listed, but that is not true, unless you call games that aren't the top games to be failures.

There are tons of live service games that are profitable.

Games don't have to be the biggest game ever they just need to make more than they cost.

I challenge you to show professionally prepared data that shows that more live service games fail than make enough to keep going.

Because all the data that I have seen shows that live service is less of a gamble than making a big AAA budget game which needs to survive off retail sales.

FinalFantasyFanatic19d ago

I sometimes wonder if we're at saturation point, where it's hard for a new game to join those ranks unless it's particularly exceptional, people only have so much time and money to devote to these types of games.

romulus2319d ago

Correction, they have no issue playing good live service games

shinoff218319d ago

Lol it's not even a quarter of the ps5s sold. Helldivers may have been a hit but let's not say most are enjoying it because truth is most(the real most ) don't care about it.

S2Killinit19d ago (Edited 19d ago )

I play what is fun. If a live service game is good I’ll play it as long as its not a money scheme which Helldivers is not.

And Im a single player gamer.

mastershredder19d ago

How do you kill a franchise that already been killed?
Destiny’s grind, cash-in-on-playbass-cha-Ching, and pop-culture-insertion mainstream-me-too bs totally killed any rep Bungie had. Sony/Bungie, if you are doing this to ward-off players, it’s already working.

crazyCoconuts19d ago

Headline truncated:
"... off a cliff"

Show all comments (43)
80°

Sony May Soon Let You Decide How Much NPCs Talk In Games

Sony has patented to add multiple dialogue modes to let players switch between how many conversations with NPCs they want in the game.

blackblades25d ago

Sony is like the only ones outta the 3 that has atuff like like this pop up changing thing in ways.

just_looken25d ago

Sony in the past has always been first at bat with new ideas/tech but in the end never fully use it or just toss it away.

blackblades25d ago

I think they did use some but yeah most usually never happened but at least they thought about it. Sony seeks things like this and other, Nintendo seek different ways of playing going by there different controler designs and console designs.

just_looken25d ago (Edited 25d ago )

some of the other stuff sony want's/owns never used
https://gamerant.com/sony-p...
https://gamerant.com/sony-p...
https://www.eurogamer.net/s...
https://metro.co.uk/2023/03...
https://decrypt.co/114754/s...

monitor/adjust game difficultly as you play
https://www.techradar.com/g...

Sony nfts
https://www.theblock.co/pos...

Pay ai to play the game for you
https://thebusinessofesport...

Oh all the above last 12 months

I just imagine a evil scientist with test subjects when it comes down to sony recent patent reports.

Kaii25d ago

Will we get dialogue options that won't spoil puzzles in a matter of seconds? :p

280°

Judge rules in PlayStation's favour in $500m patent infringement lawsuit

Genuine Enabling Technology was seeking damages, claiming the tech allowing PlayStation consoles and controllers to communicate infringes its rights.

Read Full Story >>
gamesindustry.biz
S2Killinit27d ago

Big victory for Sony. And a long time coming.

DarXyde27d ago (Edited 27d ago )

Crazy to think the savings from this lawsuit allows them to develop one AAA game.

Make it Bloodborne 2, please and thank you.

27d ago
Profchaos27d ago

Sounds like patent trolling they tried the same thing against Nintendo with the same pattern.

Motion and control input traversing over higher and lower frequencies seperate from each other allowing the controller to do both

Pyrofire9527d ago

Patents suck. Most of them are complete garbage.

Knightofelemia27d ago

So to recoup the money Genuine is going to take on Nintendo or Microsoft next. I hate patent lawyers they are some of the worst bottom feeders out there.

Show all comments (13)