Try our new beta!Click here
Submitted by Ezz2013 566d ago | news

Eurogamer: Uncharted 4 is pushing for 1080p60 on PlayStation 4

Eurogamer: "Uncharted 4: A Thief's End will be aiming for 1080p60 in-game, with Naughty Dog saying it's become an objective for all of its PlayStation 4 titles.

The Last of Us: Remastered, a retooling of last year's post-apocalyptic PlayStation 3 game, is Naughty Dog's first game on the current generation, and it maintains a steady 60fps while outputting at 1080p - what's set to be the benchmark for the developer in the future." (PS4, Uncharted 4: A Thief's End)

Alternative Sources
« 1 2 »
allformats  +   566d ago | Well said
And that, my friends, should be the standard for all next-gen games... And another reason why PS4 should be the console of choice for every gamer, because it's the only console that can consistently push 1080p/60fps and beyond.
#1 (Edited 566d ago ) | Agree(90) | Disagree(61) | Report | Reply
JBSleek  +   566d ago
And beyond?


Also 1080p/60fps has been a standard for "next gen" games for years now. Over five years. Now it's a standard because consoles finally decided to join the club in 2013?
#1.1 (Edited 566d ago ) | Agree(47) | Disagree(116) | Report | Reply
bicfitness  +   566d ago
lol I see that some folks still believe that 4K games are possible on these machines. I doubt next-gen (PS5/ X2) will even hit that. "Sub-4K" will be the new buzz word.
Ballsack  +   566d ago
Agreed should be standard

Not random 900p etc of certain other games
blitz0623  +   566d ago
If ND is able to achieve 1080/60 with Uncharted 4, there's almost no excuse to not be able to do this with every game (except maybe if it's open world like inFamous/Watch Dogs). Granted ND is one of the best devs out there, I don't see them sacrificing graphical fidelity just so they can push 1080/60. The Uncharted series has always been IMO the best looking series on the PS3 and if it can hit 1080/60 on the PS4 then I expect most future games to be able to do so too. Would also be nice to have a lock 30fps option like TLoU for those who prefer it though.
TomShoe  +   566d ago
Everyone's face when they see the graphics:
Why o why  +   566d ago
I wish I could play uncharted and tlou on my pc . . . . . . .

That's right. Let's compare consoles to consoles. PC's are in their own league and that league doesn't have the games consoles do
Ezz2013  +   566d ago | Well said

why did you bring PC into a Consoles article ..Again ?!

ND is Console Developers only
and 1080p/60FPS is not standard for consoles
and this article is onlt talking about ps4
no one is talking about PC here
JBSleek   565d ago | Trolling | show
johndoe11211  +   565d ago | Well said

He can't help it. He constantly brings up PC arguments in console topics. That's what I was trying to explain to you yesterday.

The term next gen does not belong in a pc conversation. Pc's do not have "generations" because of their up-gradable architecture. When ever we speak of next-gen it is understood we are talking about consoles. He is fully aware of this. He does not care.


" PC gaming is a gaming platform thus can be compared to consoles."
and this here people is the definition of "ignorance". An airplane is a means of transport therefore it can be compared to a motorbike.
#1.1.8 (Edited 565d ago ) | Agree(51) | Disagree(10) | Report
Detoxx  +   565d ago
And that's why the PS4 is my last console ever, I want 120FPS 4K gaming!
disKinected  +   565d ago | Well said

Well said mate. Since his preferred console is weaker to ps4, he constantly feels this urge to downplay ps4 somehow, and he does that by bringing PC into the conversation. Always present in ps4 articles spewing rubbish about how pc does this, does that etc. I mean, even a blind person will be aware that PC will always be superior to consoles because its upgradeable. Why repeat the same thing over and over and over?
Next time he brings PC into a console article, just mark his comment off topic and bubble him down. That'll teach him a lesson.
#1.1.10 (Edited 565d ago ) | Agree(38) | Disagree(10) | Report
make72  +   565d ago
2 days ago i bought wolfenstein neworder from steam because it was 50% off.I have 2 gaming pc:s.First one with i5 4670k gtx780 game was fine stable 60 fps but the second one with i5 4570 2x760 sli it was fucking lag shit.The second pc i use to play games in tv.I quess gpu:s under 3gb gddr5 running out vram against next generation time i pay more and get ps4 version,i dont wanna waste time for finding playeble pc graphic settings.
rawz  +   565d ago
Someone is desperate to play TLOU: Remastered and Uncharted 4 on their PC.

Swallow your pride and go buy a PS4 if you want to play those games so badly JB. Then there is no need to justify the superiority of PC.
MasterCornholio  +   565d ago | Well said

Wow your so right about that. And since he can't make the PS4 look bad by claiming that's its weaker than the Xbox One he compares it to PC. No one in N4G disputes the fact that PCs are more powerful which is why its easy to identify him as a fraud with his comment.

We all know that PC is more powerful we have all accepted that. But what we won't accept is people choosing to compare the PS4 with a gaming PC since they are not even similar on price point or functionality. It's much better to compare it to other consoles like Xbox One and the Wii U.


"Then there is no need to justify the superiority of PC."

Exactly. This is something that everyone knows and accepts. JBsleek assumes that N4G is filled with a bunch of morons that dont know that and he feels its his duty to educate the posters here. But what he really doesn't want to do is educate people on the hardware differences between the three consoles because his preferred system is weaker than the most powerful one. So instead in order to get over his frustration he compares the most powerful console to a PC in order to bash it.

He just has to accept that the PS4 is the most powerful next gen console and that there are many reasons why people choose to game on consoles instead of PCs. He also has to learn to respect other peoples preferences as well. If he did that then his comments wouldn't be so problematic in N4G.

JBsleek it really isn't difficult to respect other peoples preferences in gaming. Its OK if you dont agree with them but its not OK to constantly bash their favorite system. I own a PS4 and I really dont game on PC but I respect people who game on PC, Xbox and Nintendo systems.
#1.1.13 (Edited 565d ago ) | Agree(28) | Disagree(10) | Report
XB1_PS4  +   565d ago
4k is not going to happen for a long time. 2k is the next step. 2560x1440p
user7402931  +   565d ago
i think jbsleek is a xbox one fanboy in disguise as a pc fanboy. he always downplays ps4n any way he can poisoning the thread...yet doesn't do anything or call out the xbox one eve he knows he cant troll ps4 with xbox one so he uses pc. rag on ps4, praise xbox one.

:p "!!!

#1.1.15 (Edited 565d ago ) | Agree(28) | Disagree(9) | Report
dcj0524  +   565d ago
Well, yeah pretty much. 1080p 60FPS has been available for at least a decade but most games didn't advantage of that because most gamers rigs/consoles weren't capable of that until 2007-8.
Rob_Ko  +   565d ago
your pc fanboism got really boring a while ago.
XB1_PS4  +   565d ago
@ Rob, this site is stuffed full of fanboys. His comment is slightly fanboyish. It's nothing compared to what PS4 fanboys come up with.
Xsilver  +   565d ago
I see (highEND) PC gamers as the minority of people who own sport cars while the majority of the world drives standard cars and what do People with sports cars do all the time?..........BRAG same way Highend PC gamers brag about 4k, now tell me if i payed a allot of money for something that i wanted that suited me should tell everyone else to do the same when they found something that suited them who am i to tell everyone to do the same now some might find this hard to believe but people have different preferences i know mind blowing right? :/ But once again that's not my business and for the love of GOD some of the best games are on console accept it.
#1.1.19 (Edited 565d ago ) | Agree(3) | Disagree(8) | Report
Hellsvacancy  +   565d ago
DirtyPimp has got it right, it's funny how he constantly downplays Sony and any console related to Sony yet he's got a XB1

He's just a sad Sony hater
NewMonday  +   565d ago

many PC games run like crap no matter the how much power the GPU has, paying $1000 just to have a handful of games optimally is not worth it.
DevilOgreFish  +   565d ago

many PC games run like crap no matter the how much power the GPU has, paying $1000 just to have a handful of games optimally is not worth it."

Lies, I have 200 games on my PC, and all of them run can at 1080p+ 60 fps+.

from the mass effect trilogy to the dead space trilogy, to the Bioshock trilogy, to the lost planet trilogy, to the Crysis trilogy to the Battlefield collection (including Bf4), to the Splinter Cell collection, to the assassin's creed collection, castlevania lords of shadow 1 and 2, to the wolfenstein collection and even watch goes on.

my rig will sustain 1080p 60 fps long when the true next generation of consoles comes out.
#1.1.22 (Edited 565d ago ) | Agree(9) | Disagree(13) | Report
AndrewLB  +   565d ago
Blitz- For the 100th time, the trailer you saw was pre-rendered cutscene played on a PS4 and recorded in-engine.

The game will look nothing like the trailer. Sorry bud.
LocutusEstBorg  +   565d ago
Sorry but 1080p/120fps has benn the standard since nVidia 3D Vision came out in 2008.
AndrewLB  +   565d ago
XB1-PS4: Just to let you know, 2k is not 2560x1440. It's 2048x1080.

2560x1440 (Quad HD) has 3,680,000 pixels, almost double what 1080p can display.

And good luck with running 2560x1440 with the PS4's HD7850 equivalent graphics power. Anything over 1080p will be a serious struggle even on medium-high settings.
thehitman  +   565d ago
1080p/60fps was not the standard and is still not even the standard even for PC games. The PC equivalents to console games like bf4 and cod dont even run at 60 fps on highest settings on an average PC gamers rig. Only people with like 300-400 gfx cards can push those settings and thats almost the cost of the consoles themselves. Then to add not even all games push settings that far because the big budget games are mostly on consoles so most of Sony games still out perform PCs.
starchild  +   565d ago

Let's see. I spent $400 for my PS4, whereas I only spent $300 this generation on my PC to upgrade to a GTX 770.

So I spent less on my gaming PC than I did on my PS4. However, even if you build a PC from scratch it's not nearly as expensive as many of you make it out to be. $600 today could build you a very capable gaming PC.

I can say for a fact that 1080p+ and 60fps+ is definitely the "standard" for the majority of PC gamers that actually care enough about games to talk about them on game sites.

I love my PS4, but there is no doubt that my PC beats my PS4 in every multiplat, including Battlefield 4, AC4, Watch Dogs, Thief, and Bound by Flame.
gobluesamg  +   565d ago
@JB. You know there is a PC tab at the top of this site right? Just click on that and it will take you to articles about PC gaming. I know, I know, it's a hard concept to grasp. Do us all a favor and go battle it out with the rest of the PC master race and leave all of us console peasants here.
#1.1.28 (Edited 565d ago ) | Agree(5) | Disagree(1) | Report
chrisarsenalsavart  +   565d ago
Jbsneek(see what I did there)
Everybody knows your just another fantroll.

Don't believe me?
Jbsleek started
To appear on pretty much every single ps4 articles dissing the machine by comparing it to pc gaming rig.
But if you go on an xbox1 article like"Xbox1 from zero to must have console", you ll see his true colors.
I don't mind which machine you prefer, but at least be straight with people.
chrisarsenalsavart  +   565d ago
I just read an x1 article with a jbsneek comment on it praising xbox1 and the great games on it.
So which one is it???
r2oB  +   565d ago
@ JBSleek

So you want to call out PS4 gamers? How about you get called out, on your BS drivel. First off, there is nothing standard about PC gaming, the very concept of having different levels of GPU performance goes against the definition of standard. Do you even know the definition of standard? Just because a small percentage of PC gamers were able to run demanding games at 1080p/60fps in 2008 doesn't make it a standard. So no, 1080p/60fps was not "standard" in 2008. It still isn't standard to this day on a $400 PC. So until you can show me a $400 PC that can output better graphics than a PS4, how about you STFU with your poor attempt to downplay consoles. Because guess what, graphics matter, but so does value. The PS4 is great value for its technical fidelity.

PS4 gamers compare their console to another similarly priced console, and the you have ignorant PC elilist that want to compare the PS4 to a PC that costs twice (possibly more) as much. How about you not be a simpleton and make fair comparisons. Show me some comparisons with that $400 PC.

Welcome to common sense and logic.
TheDevKit  +   565d ago

I payed $600 for my PC, have over a hundred games in my library, and many of them play at both 1080p and 60 fps. I'm fine with preference, but don't spread misinformation.
#1.1.32 (Edited 565d ago ) | Agree(4) | Disagree(0) | Report
its_JEFF  +   565d ago

He brought up Consoles Vs. PC, because us "Console Peasants" should know our place and should NEVER praise any console game for it's "graphics" because we all know that said game would look better if it were on PC. We should also never bring up 1080/60 cause that is "so last-gen".

Some of you guys are just too much. Does it really matter if you can run DOTA, League, The Stanley Parable, Gone Home, Don't Starve, Proteus, Antichamber, Steamworld Dig, Rogue Legacy, Papers Please, Stick it to the Man... the great games of 2013 @ 4K?
ShinMaster  +   565d ago
@ JBSleek

Just because you could run older games in 1080p and 60fps, doesn't mean they were next gen games, ya PC supremacist troll.

PC fanboys are the worst. You only say PS4 fans are because PS4 is the more powerful console and it bugs you when people praise how good a game looks. Stop being so insecure.

Here's the problem with you people.
If a console game is not 1080p and 60fps, you people make fun of it and talk about how underpowered consoles are.
And if a console game IS 1080p and 60fps, you still make fun of console gamers because games should've been like that years ago according to you.

Give me a break, you graphics Nazi. You're acting like no one should be allowed to be excited about a game and praise they way it looks because it's not a PC game running at higher frame rate and resolution. That's not all it takes for a game to look good, believe it or not.
#1.1.34 (Edited 565d ago ) | Agree(2) | Disagree(2) | Report
Sarcasm  +   565d ago

You guys argue all you want.

Even if Uncharted 4 was 720p/30fps and looked the way it did. I'm buying that ish day one.
Buzz7S  +   566d ago
How about that Destiny game? 30fps was it?

Another "gamer", deciding what game to play based on visuals and not gameplay.
bicfitness  +   566d ago
He's obviously being hyperbolic, and I don't agree with him at all. However, video-games are a visual medium, and it is not unreasonable to expect 1080p/ 60FPS gaming--a PC standard for YEARS now--out of this generation's Playstations and Xboxes. Especially after a 7 year hardware cycle.

What's astonishing, is that people are shouting 1080p/ 60 as if its some sort of gold-standard for gaming. Really, its the minimum we should expect in 2013/ 2014.
I_am_Batman  +   565d ago
@bicfitness: "However, video-games are a visual medium, and it is not unreasonable to expect 1080p/ 60FPS gaming a PC standard for YEARS now"

Wrong. There is no standard for PC gaming. You'd be surprised how many people are playing beneath what you call the standard.

And it's also not wise to demand a 60fps standard for consoles. The devs should choose for themselves how they are managing the console's recources.
joab777  +   566d ago
To be honest, if they couldn't hit 60 fps for single player due to the graphical push, I would be fine.

It will be interesting though to see how much better it is than TLoU remastered. And how much better will games get than next yr b/c they r not gonna b pushing anything beyond 1080/60.
ThePope  +   565d ago
@all formats

No the console choice for every gamer should be the one that has the games they want to play. I promise you I have enjoyed the multi plat games I've played on my X1 as much as the ones you've played on your PS4 1080 or not. So if Uncharted is 900p will you not play it? Because from the sounds of your comment you make it seem as if that’s all that matters.

OT: This article is stupid. Does any developer start development saying "guys, lets aim for 720p, come on guys we can do it". NO, of course not, hence why this is a stupid article.
mediate-this  +   565d ago
Look you moving the goal posts, p.c standardized 1080p/60fps like eight years ago, now you carefully place console in their. Get off your self dude.

Tlou, is pushing max settings on a old game, uc4 may not get max settings. Nd is pushing for it, didnt say the accomplished it yet. I have both systems snd as of now ps4 is not doing anything crazy, so i meed uc4 to see the powa of tha GDDR5.

Xb1, has not done anything crazy yet either, im starting to get buyers remorse with these systems. And what do you mean by push beyond?
kenshiro100  +   565d ago
You sound very insecure JB that you keep bringing up PC in a console article.
user5669510  +   565d ago
1080P @ 60fps sounds great I wonder how the gfx are going to look too. It no reason why all devs shouldn't be doing this . This will give gamers smoother gameplay
aquamala  +   565d ago
How's 1080p/60fps standard at all? Look at games in 2015, Bloodborne,the order, witcher 3, the crew,the division, pretty much all the demanding games are not 1080p/60fps on consoles 2 years in "next gen"
#1.8 (Edited 565d ago ) | Agree(11) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
famoussasjohn  +   565d ago
Why limit myself to one console when I got both and I can now enjoy all of the games? Stop acting like all games are 1080P and 60FPS on the PS4 also.
Azzanation  +   565d ago
1080p is years old. Standard next gen games should be 4k. Sorry to say PS4 and XB1 1080p / 60 frame games is something iv been doing for years. Consoles are way behind the 8 ball.
#1.10 (Edited 565d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
ifistbrowni  +   566d ago
"Naughty Dog said it's become an objective for all of its PlayStation 4 titles."

Hopefully other developers make it their objective, too.
Raf1k1  +   566d ago
Objective is fine. I don't see the need to focus on it so much though.

I feel that it should be required for some genres that need it (i.e. twitch shooters and racing games) but for games like Uncharted 30FPS is perfectly fine.

Dropping the frame-rate allows for better graphics, AI, physics etc. so as long as devs are making valid choices with good reason I'm happy with both 30FPS and 60FPS.

What I don't want is to have games running at sub-1080p resolution.
joab777  +   566d ago
This statement makes me wonder if this is it for this gen. Yes, optimization and tricks will be used but is U4 and 92015x the pinnacle for some time to come?
johndoe11211  +   566d ago
I highly doubt it. The xbox one would be a nightmare to work with (maybe even impossible) if they wanted to do that because of its hardware architecture. No way will the devs make every game on the ps4 1080/60 and lower on the xbox. Apart from the fact that they will loose sales on the xbox, that will also confirm in peoples minds that the xbox is a weaker system and that would be literally screwing microsoft right out of this console gen.
BigBosss  +   566d ago
It's Naughty Dog, I don't see why it wouldn't ;)
XiSasukeUchiha  +   566d ago
Confirmed 1080p@60fps!
BigBosss  +   566d ago
CaptainSellers  +   565d ago
Haha no first comment for you this time :P
masterfox  +   566d ago
Is Naughty Dog the masters of code optimization or what ?, I pretty much think so :P
#5 (Edited 566d ago ) | Agree(11) | Disagree(11) | Report | Reply
Clunkyd  +   565d ago
Im pretty sure.
Just look how they optimized TLOU on ps3, not even a PC could run that with ps3 specs.

Optimization is key.
Clown_Syndr0me  +   566d ago
I hate how this gen so far has all been about resolutions and frame rates.

What makes it worse is that 1080p 60fps has been PC standard for years, so its not even that big of an achievement.

Thank god I play for fun not for visuals or Id find myself in these discussions too often.
masterfox  +   566d ago
yeah an standard in PC, but with visuals like Uncharted 4 teaser is using ?, hell absolutely not.
WeAreLegion  +   565d ago
That's how things always are. Back on the SNES, Rare released Donkey Kong Country and it drove SEGA fans crazy! Of course, the Genesis had the better version of Mortal Kombat. The point is...people will argue about this stuff no matter what and they always have.
Clown_Syndr0me  +   565d ago
I guess. I've only just started using sites like this over the last couple of months and before that the only people I really discussed gaming with were a few friends.
Never realised how worked up people get over things that I never realised were that important.
WeAreLegion  +   565d ago
Oh, trust me. They're definitely not important. Haha. It's just that people are argumentative. If they aren't arguing over graphics, they're arguing over controllers. Or customer service. Or features. Or backwards compatibility.
skydragoonity  +   566d ago
Ps4 is really the future
Artista  +   566d ago
Just give me a release date... I don't care what else you do.
Digimortal  +   565d ago
Congrats to Naughty Dog. Now if I only actually cared for 1080p visuals. 60fps is fine cause that's more important then resolution is in my opinion. 30 or 60 I'm okay with that. As for resolution NOPE.
Masterman280  +   565d ago
Hmm i'll be surprised if they pull it off, because right now this generation, the choices are...

- Nice graphics
- 1080p
- 60FPS

Pick 2.
Moncole  +   565d ago
I pick all three because I use PC.
akaFullMetal  +   565d ago
That's cool, how much did it all cost?
#10.1.1 (Edited 565d ago ) | Agree(7) | Disagree(8) | Report
EvilWay  +   565d ago

Probably $1800+. We get arguably a better experience on a $400 console
funkybudda  +   565d ago
nice, please tell me how Uncharted and TLOU play on max settings on your PC beast of a gaming machine... OH WAIT.
Moncole  +   565d ago
Why does it matter how much it cost, if I enjoy it than it doesnt really matter? Are you enjoying Star Citizen and Just Cause 2 MP on consoles?
#10.1.4 (Edited 565d ago ) | Agree(6) | Disagree(10) | Report
Dynasty2021  +   565d ago

Statistically over 6 years, PC is far cheaper.

From scratch you can build a far better PC capable of more than 60 FPS @ 1080p, monitor, case, mouse etc included, for around the £800-900 mark.

It's been done by Eurogamer.

Games are £20 on PC. £50 on consoles (well, £45).

At 10 games a year, that's £200 on PC, £450 on PS4.

6 year cycle? £1200 on PC. £2700 on consoles.

In 6 years, add on the initial PC cost, it's almost £1000 more expensive on consoles. And I haven't even taken the £350 and £300+ on a TV start-up for consoles.

That's not even including the £40 a year for PSN.

Yeah, we miss out on TLOU Remastered, Uncharted 4 and MGS and....and....hmmm.

Instead, we get the biggest games in the world. Fact.

Look it up. PC gaming is now officially growing faster than console gaming. And its' games are bigger, watched by millions, we have tournaments that are sponsored etc.

PC gaming is bigger these days.

We completely dominate hardware sales:

So the inconvenient truth is that PC gaming is FAR bigger and worth more than console gaming.

Steam alone has more users than Xbox Live and PSN combined.

And the argument of "how many are active" applies to PSN and Xbox too.

These days, PC gamers are on the defence, as console gamers are the ones making the insane "trolling" statements.

N4G is the worst site around for consoles vs PC.

It's so console-pro here, it's pathetic.
#10.1.5 (Edited 565d ago ) | Agree(8) | Disagree(5) | Report
uth11  +   565d ago
So if PC gaming is self-evidently so much better. Why do you guys feel the need to keep shoving it in our faces? We would be there. Yet we don't want to?
TheDevKit  +   565d ago

It cost me $600.
nycgamer4ever  +   565d ago
You guys just either don't get it or refuse to admit it. I have a gaming pc that I paid four times the amount of my Ps4 for. However I couldn't care less if it could play games at 4k and 120fps if a lot games I want to play are on consoles only! I will still need consoles if there are games I want to play. Gaming isn't about power. It's about the games. You go where the games are.

And you guys act like games on pc now are light years ahead of the new consoles that the same game would look like a totally different game or something, which is BS. Unless you are forking out more money for a stronger gpu AND a monitor capable of over 1080p a Ps4 will hold it's own. I highly doubt many Ps4 players are crying over their console's performance compared to the PC.

I've venture to say that the first party games on Ps4 will look better for the first couple of years. Look at Infamous SS, Uncharted 4, The Order and Drive Club.
WrecklessFlamingo  +   565d ago
Well it is ND.. You have to remember they're all wizards!
#11 (Edited 565d ago ) | Agree(5) | Disagree(5) | Report | Reply
Predaking77  +   565d ago
Anything that comes from ND will be amazing and will raise the bar. ND managed to impress us with the PS3 and TLOU at the end of the PS3 life cycle. Imagine what ND will do with the PS4. Is going to be jaw dropping.
OtakuDJK1NG-Rory  +   565d ago
will it be fun and evolve in gameplay though?
Bobby Kotex  +   565d ago
I like how your legit question gets downvotes.
OtakuDJK1NG-Rory  +   565d ago
a lot of you know .... ....... here hates me
Legacy212  +   565d ago
They better not pull an infamous and take away gameplay in order to make the game prefty. Sorry but infamous 2 was better then SS. Also im going to wait till I have uncharted 4 in my ps4 before I go all goo goo ga ga. People can claim anything with a short teaser. Anyways I am putting my expectations at 1080p 30fps for uncharted 4 and not going to jizz my pants over this until the final build is out amd I see gameplay. This gen so far as had alot of flip flopping and amazing reveals that aren't a true reflection of the game
sAVAge_bEaST  +   565d ago
Any thing less, than the best.- would be a felony.
Glock  +   565d ago
Whether or not it achieves 1080p/60fps at the end, that effort will make it polished.
jp_footy2  +   565d ago
I still have some hope for Driveclub...
EvilWay  +   565d ago
I did as well until they released all the details, than it was a definite pass
uth11  +   565d ago
Isn't this old news?
Bobby Kotex  +   565d ago
Any story that mentions TLOU or Uncharted people go nuts.
EvilWay  +   565d ago
I think ND should be aiming for 1440p 120fps s/, because people make it seem like the PS4 is all powerful.

If this game doesn't reach 1080p 60fps with the hardware provided that is sad
d3nworth1  +   565d ago
Even is the ps4 could do 1440p 120fps most people don't have 4k T.V.s so it would be a waste. This isn't some wannabe dev hyping a game. This is Naughty Dog when they say the going to do something they do it.
TheEternalGamer  +   565d ago
And Halo will be 144p at 12 Frames Per Second xD #dealwithit

Sony is Better. Sony is Life. Sony is Love. #Dealwithit
MicroShaft is a piece of garbage so go crawl back in your garbage can with your garbage games and exclusives and #dealwithit
MegaRay  +   565d ago
3 Bubbles feel good, eh?
R0n0rve  +   565d ago
He'll be down to one soon.
TheEternalGamer  +   565d ago
the only reason why i am down to only 3 is because of Xbox Fanboys getting butthurt over my comments. lol. Don't worry though i have been doing this for a while here and i have yet to lose one bubble from commenting. lol. but its whatever i don't take this sh*t seriously like you guys do. lmao.
IAM  +   565d ago
1080p, 60fps ought to have been minimal this generation. 900p to my surprise isn't that bad. I refuse to play anything less then that. Its insulting after 7 years of current gen. 30fps in any game is bare minimal. I expect better but not even the PS4 is that much more capable.

1080p, 30fps is the standard this gen. Love it or hate it. SONY like most of their products end up coming up a bit short. Xb1 & Wii u won't even get a second glance. They are a disgrace of consoles technical for me.

At the end of the day. I can keep all my money in my pocket. Makes no difference to me. Im not going to worship some plastic box. I sold my PS4. Ill buy another when I feel like it. But it will have to be more then for recycle remaster games, no replay value Infamous, overhype only single player The Order, 30fps rails riding Driveclub & etc.

Im learning to keep my expectations low after Watchdogs. Hype for nothing, skeptical of everything.
aks6351  +   565d ago
Please Please,

Tell me there's an option for 720/30fps for those who prefer it
LightDiego  +   565d ago
Great news, can't wait for another masterpiece from Naughty Dog.
And petition race trying to ruining another article, pc fanboys are the worst, just annoying attention whores, soon they will beg for Uncharted on pc.
zod  +   565d ago
This gen it's much easier to achieve 1080p60fps in linear and heavily scripted games.

In a linear game you will only see those things which devs want you to see...You have no freedom or control over the world or player actions...

And ND is known for making great heavily scripted linear games..
#24 (Edited 565d ago ) | Agree(4) | Disagree(3) | Report | Reply
zod  +   565d ago
It's pathetic that game like Order 1886, which is a heavily scripted linear corridor shooter, only runs at 30fps and that also with letter box resolution with black bars...

Native resolution of Order 1886 is 1920 x 800p..It's not full 1080p


I don't buy their filmic style BS.. It's a clear compromise to achieve desired image quality with 4xMSAA
Clunkyd   565d ago | Trolling | show
illminded32  +   565d ago
Wouldn't expect any less from naughty gods.
mysteryraz11  +   565d ago
1080p 60fps isnt the standard in the pc, pc gamers are delusional, most ppl have weak ass pcs that struggle to hit 720p, stop saying its the standard, when it has no standard
funkybudda   565d ago | Trolling | show
starchild  +   565d ago
Nonsense. The vast majority of people that would call themselves PC gamers (the kind of people that visit game sites and the like) have PCs that do 60fps and 1080p in most games. It's irrelevant what casual PC users have, even if they occasionally play games.
mysteryraz11  +   565d ago
no they dont lol, most pcs are horribly weak and outdated anyone who has a pc can be considered a pc gamer, go look at steams most played games, its stuff like dota2 and counterstrike, you dont even need mid range pc to play those games, lol most pcs arent hitting 1080p 60fps, stop lying, aaa sell best on consoles thats more proof cause noone has this shit you pc guys brag about, accept the minority, someone playing farmville or world of warcraft can be considered a pc gamer lol there is your logic right there
starchild  +   565d ago
PC gamers, as in the guys you are actually talking to on this site and others like it, generally have decent to very high end gaming PCs. Those kinds of PCs can easily do 1080p and 60fps in the vast majority of games.

I don't care what kind of hardware casual PC users (or console gamers that have a PC on the side) are using. That's completely irrelevant. It doesn't change what I or any other enthusiast PC gamers are experiencing.

The PC has a much wider variety of games and the sales tend to be much more spread out among many games, instead of being centered on a couple of the biggest AAA games as is often the case on consoles. The FACT is, PC games as a whole are generating more revenue than any single console by far.

I'm not saying that consoles suck and PC is the only good platform, I'm simply correcting the falsehoods that you are presenting.
TheDevKit  +   565d ago
No, go look up the Steam statistics, most users have switched over to 1080p.
#27.3 (Edited 565d ago ) | Agree(2) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
d3nworth1  +   565d ago
The article is about Uncharted and PS4 not PC. No reason to bring it up.
Drasill  +   565d ago
They do have an advantage in that their games are extremely linear and scripted with corridor environments.
GeraltofRivia  +   565d ago
2007 gaming pc status has been achieved!!! finally
fullmetal297  +   565d ago
That would be quite amazing if Naughty Dog can achieve that feat while looks that good. It is quite apparent that ND took what learned while optimizing their engine for their PS4's version of Last of Us, and applying that to Uncharted 4.
« 1 2 »

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
New stories

Swords and Sorcery: Underworld Review | Game Industry News

1m ago - GiN: Swords and Sorcery: Underworld is an interesting gaming experience. It’s a new game that ap... | PC

N4G Game of the Year Awards Nomination Contest

Now - Help us create our Game of the Year nominee list and you could win one of five $100 Amazon Gift Cards. | Promoted post

Review: The Legend of Legacy (DarkZero)

2m ago - Samuel Howitt: "It might not look like it at first glance, but The Legend of Legacy is basically... | 3DS

Red Dead Redemption is coming to Xbox One. Here's how to get it right now.

3m ago - You will need a friend. And a digital copy of the game. | Red Dead Redemption

10 Games That Need A Sequel

3m ago - Ranting About Games: "Sometimes games aren't that successful and other times developers just move... | PS2