Try our new beta! Click here
Submitted by jeffpenner 508d ago | opinion piece

Where Did Batman: Arkham Origins Go Wrong?

With Arkham Knight on the way, will it improve upon Arkham Origins? (Batman: Arkham Origins, PS3, Xbox 360)

Palitera  +   508d ago
After Watch Dogs, Batman Arkham City is the next on my list. Then I plan to buy Arkham Origins.

Do you like the game?
Deividas  +   508d ago
Its an okay game. But it will be a HUGE letdown if you play it right after Arkham City...
Ezz2013  +   508d ago
i don't agree
it have better story and longer, acting is great, the atmosphere and the armor and boss fights and the side quest is far better than B:AC
also Bane was really the true Bane i wanted all along in Batman game
no the stupid version of Batman and Robin Crappy movie where Batman have Credit Card

the real problem that this game have is that it didn't look that much different than AC and lots of Glitchs .

i know that i'm the only on the internet who think that though
anyway Arkham Kight look and feel far better than both in pretty much every possible way


the gameplay is pretty much the same with few minor tweaks here and there

Yeah, i know ...i shall forever stand in the dark cornor alone with my opinion :(

But Arkham knight amazed me to no end
can't wait to get my hand on this very epic game
#1.1.1 (Edited 508d ago ) | Agree(8) | Disagree(6) | Report
Palitera  +   508d ago
Is it more of the same or actually worse?

Also, gameplay-wise, how does it fare against the two precedent masterpieces?
camel_toad  +   508d ago
Yeh I thought just okay at best too. It sucked compared to what Rocksteady did but that's what happens sometimes when you hand off a franchise.
Deividas  +   508d ago
@ Palitera

Its more of the same. And thats the issue, Arkham City improved on almost every part from Akrham Asylum while origins, just does exactly what the others have done. It doesnt try much of anything new really and there are no really "memorable parts" of that game. You will still enjoy it but its just not on the same level as Rocksteady level design, characters, or story telling.

Yea you might be one of the few that enjoyed it over AC but if you like it then fair enough :) its all a matter of opinion anyways, but yea I do agree Arkham Knight looks like a vast improvement, but again...Rocksteady knows you cant just do the same thing in a franchise and keep it relevant.
#1.1.4 (Edited 508d ago ) | Agree(3) | Disagree(1) | Report
Palitera  +   508d ago

Lots of +helpfuls to you.
OpieWinston  +   508d ago
They've fixed a lot of the bugs.
It's a solid game now.

Great evidence scanning system
Better Boss Fights than Arkham City
Strong cast of characters/actors
Does a great job telling the Origin stories of characters, surprisingly well.

You'll enjoy it. People build up Arkham City to stupid expectations...Arkham City is an epic game and an awesome batman game if you play all of it, but bare in mind Origins was WB Montreals first game taking the mantle of Rocksteadys legacy. They've learned a lot from launch.
Christopher  +   508d ago
Well, they could improve by supporting their game rather than promoting DLC and saying that they won't fix game-breaking issues in it.
wannabe gamer  +   508d ago
so which subject is this article about
THIS- Where Did Batman: Arkham Origins Go Wrong?
OR THIS - With Arkham Knight on the way, will it improve upon Arkham Origins?

seems like 2 different subjects
#2 (Edited 508d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
Outside_ofthe_Box  +   508d ago
It wasn't developed by Rocksteady.
Vandamme21  +   508d ago
My only problem with origins was the fact that the kombat system didn't feel as good as city and asylum..but overall it was a solid game.
Sclavius  +   508d ago
I liked the game, but it was just less interesting than arkham city. Also Gotham was just a Christmas reskin. But at the end of the day it was more of the Arkham gameplay I like, and Troy baker did a good job.
OhReginald  +   508d ago
Problem was the multiplayer. And that the single player felt like a DLC. There wasn't much added from arkham city to arkham origins.
KwietStorm  +   508d ago
I thought the story was actually very well done. It's just that the gameplay didn't add anything, coming from Arkham City. There were some annoying glitched too. The combat also wasn't as responsive as AC. I could regularly pull off 70+ hit combos before, but they seemed to always get broken up around 50 in Arkham Origins.
InTheLab  +   508d ago
The counter was off and that dumb a** mini game ninja guy always ruined my combos...
Ezz2013  +   508d ago
i always thought the combat was really easy on ps3 and yet makes you counter faster than before

but i felt even more easy on Hard on my pc since batman games work the best for me with K/M
and those Ninja Guys were tough but i still was able to make 200+ combos when i fight lots of thugs/Ninja in challenges and SP (Including the DLC with Bruce Wayne)
#7.1.1 (Edited 508d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report
Ghost_Nappa  +   508d ago
When the dev gave up fixing glitches, also, not made by rocksteady
#8 (Edited 508d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
InTheLab  +   508d ago
Combat- was broken in this game. There's always been the feeling of phantom punches from dudes who would glide across the screen but they were a rare occurrence in the previous to games, but happened every fight in Origins. The counter timer was also broken as the animations never lined up with when and where you'd be hit. And then there's that ninja guy that has that wierd mini game for countering. It completely through you off when you had 2 or 3 guys attacking and suddenly this dude shows up and screws up your free flow.

Boss- The Deathstroke fight was repetitive and dull and the Shiva fight was unforgivable. For those that don't know, the greatest fighters in the DCU are Batman, Lady Shiva, Deathstroke, Black Canary. The fact that they reduced Shiva to one of Talia's Arkham City guards was embarrassing. She's one of, if not the best martial artists in all of DC and she fights exactly like the generic female ninjas.

Story- was pointless. I don't understand why they feel the need to drag the Joker out for this game. ANY of Batman's early bads would have been nice. That's 3 straight games with Joker as the main boss and that was overkill. This was supposed to be an origin story so they should have went with Red Hood, Falcone, Penguin, Riddler,Black Mask...for more than a few chapters, or other villains of that era.

I also thought it was BS that Batman was meeting all these dudes on the same night and he quickly develops a relationship with the Joker instead of a back and forth thing over the course of years. It just felt shoehorned in like everything else in the game.

I did love the voice acting despite no Conroy or Hamill. Troy Baker proves once again why he's the best, and the rest of the cast was pretty good as well.
nope111  +   508d ago
It did everything right, especially the writing.
overrated44  +   508d ago
By not being made by Rocksteady.

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
New stories

Just Cause 3 Review – Open World Blandbox | Thejimquisition

10m ago - Jim: Just Cause 3 is okay. It’s far from great, but it’s not bad either. It’s just a decent wast... | PC

Fallout 4 Locations Compared With Real Life Boston

12m ago - SegmentNext - Fallout 4 is set in Boston and although the city has been nuked (in the game) for... | PS4

See what games are coming out in 2016

Now - Visit our release calendar to see what games are coming out in 2016. | Promoted post

Xenoblade Chronicles X Review | TSA

28m ago - TSA: Having long been in development for Wii U under its understated codename, X, Xenoblade Chro... | Wii U

Xenoblade Chronicles X review | GamesRadar

28m ago - Xenoblade Chronicles X offers a resplendent world, fantastic combat, and transforming mechs, but... | Wii U

Just Cause 3 Review - Viva La Revolution | Game Informer

29m ago - GI: Rico Rodriguez comes home in Just Cause 3, bringing revolution and his arsenal of devastatin... | PC