SkunkMe: PC is the most powerful hardware to play video games, not any console beats PC yet. As the PC gaming offers limitless possibilities with a variety of benefits. There is a list, contain 12 video games that deserve a PC release.
Your talking exclusives your out your mind... Im pc gamer owner of ps4 PC being my primary but even i know some them games never hit pc. Now when you talk likes of Bayonetta Then sure its multi platform why not.
Writing an article asking for a Sony's first party games (owned by sony!!) on a none sony platform to release on is plain stupid and pathetic, All I can say to him KEEP dreaming. PC gamers with all do respect are ok on spending a fortune on a new hardware parts but "some" of them aren't ok with putting a 400$ on console for 6 years life time to play the exclusive games on that platform, @G3NZ yeah writing an article is cheaper than playing the games on there platforms /s
People still think building a good rig cost a fortune?
No one with a PC cares about Killzone .A mediocre shooter .On the other hand i personally think whole Zelda franchise needs to make its way to PC .I'll go even further Nintendo needs to give up the console business and make all their games multiplatform.they'll make more money than they are making now
Though you liked it or not that "mediocre" game I prefer it on other FPS, and its not just about Killzone!
Won't spend $400 on a console, but will buy a new $300 graphics card every year to "keep up"
Why would i pay 400$ for a system that has no games?I'm sorry but i haven't seen a single title that will make me buy a console anytime soon. GTX 750 Ti(150$) > PS4 GPU... o7
Well, with PS Now, there is the possibility to play PlayStation exclusives on PC. It's still in its infancy, but 10 years from now most of the world should have fast enough internet to support it all. The gaming landscape is changing with technology, and while I prefer playing on dedicated hardware, I do realize that things are changing. And Sony, MS and Nintendo will need to change with the tech.
Here's the problem with how Sony and Microsoft work. Sony Computer Entertainment does not normally co-operate with Sony Online Entertainment because SOE's primary job is publishing/developing PC titles like Payday 1, DC Universe, and Planetside. If they make a Playstation port, so be it. More money made from them. SCE, historically, has and NEVER will make a PC port so they can keep their AAA GOTY-worthy titles on their own platform to make more money. Microsoft, however, has been different. Throughout the Xbox and early 360-era, they HAVE had their award-winning titles ported to PC. Gears 1, Halo's 1 and 2 have all been ported to PC because they own Windows and wanted to expand both their Xbox and PC gaming. However, they begin giving the PC-gaming community a big ol' f*ck off since forcing Halo 2 to be a Vista exclusive then eventually stopping their PC publishing altogether (f*ck Don Mattrick, f*ck Steve Ballmer). Phil Spencer promises that in expanding the Xbox Division's set focus to games, it included rekindling their PC fanbase (on Steam, may I add since GfWL is shutting down). The Halo Collection has better odds of being ported to PC than the Killzone or Uncharted collections because of how Sony and Microsoft work. This article is 90% filled with Sony titles that will never be ported and is just trying to create a far-cry from a PC elitist who's head is too far up their ass to expand themselves to a console to enjoy the best that has historically been on a Playstation. Before the PC Master Race drags me down thinking I'm targeting them as a whole, I am only targeting the author for not dishing out the $250-$400 for a PS3/PS4 if they are listing a bunch of Playstation titles that they oh-so desire for PC. If that's not enough, I am a PC gamer and PS4 owner.
This list is mostly Sony exclusives but Sony has a console they they want us to buy, a few consoles actually so chances are none of these will release on PC. Even the few titles that Sony does release on PC are likely to slow down as the PS4 becomes a priority.
BMF7364- Sony has brought many games to PC. http://www.ign.com/companie... http://www.ign.com/companie...
it's no different then the many time I've seen Playstation owners wish that Half Life 3 would be Sony exclusive.
@Andrew those are Sony Online Entertainment titles, like I just explained... Tell me one title from Sony COMPUTER Entertainment, then we can talk.
This seems like flame bait written by a fanboy. Badly... badly? Seriously. Zelda ? Why wouldn't I just buy a wiiU because they have everything else worth playing. The others are overrated . Infamous I like the first but asking for a port if it could happen why bother. Most of the games on the list is good games but incredibly over hyped . Platforms need exclusives if not whats the point. If you want to play a game that's not on the platform you have, then buy the platform its on. Its that simple. PC gamers know this more than anyone that's why most of us have a console along with our amazing PC . We badly need exclusives that's made by the console maker huh? Dumbest thing ever. Sound like somebody is trying to make us look petty.
Twelve reasons why pc elitists hate console gamers..... that would have suited the title for this flamebait article to actually gain some grounds. But no.... they want ports... ports and more ports. Nice way to pick on pc fanboys.
@stenmark Yeah because "no games" and "no games I want to play" are the same thing. #embarrassing
Playstation first party exclusives will NEVER be on PC, at least not officially. Probably the same can be said about Nintendo. Microsoft on other hand could bring their exclusives, especially Halo 3 to PC and thats understandable, same goes for 3rd parties.
Only Red Red Redemption is badly needed on PC. I would not mind an Xbox One, PS4 & PC release of it like what they are doing with GTA V. Come on Rockstar give us a remastered version on RDR.
Or give us a sequel? I'd much prefer that.
And Dragon's Dogma. It runs horribly on last-gen consoles and the resolution is pretty funky too.
Never got the big hoopla for Red Dead Redemption. Tried it, didn't like the gameplay or game mechanics and wasn't all that impressed with the story. So don't see why pc gamers would want it on pc and stuff. Besides since it is an older game doubt that it will come to pc if RockStar hasn't already done a port to it.
If u like the game want to play a game it doesnt matter which system ur gonna ply it.i play in all sysytem so if im going to play only in pc i will miss tons of very good games even though i know pc is better but doesnt have the game that i want to play.
You will never see playstation or nintendo exclusives on PC unless it's through emulators. Red Dead Redemption will come eventually just like all rockstar games have, Halo 3 is probable since MS has said they wanted to have more focus on PC, Dragons Dogma might come as well at this point capcom needs all the money they can get, Metal Gear i don't see happening since PC already missed out on 7 different games in the series, bayonetta financially doesn't make sense since it didn't even sell well on the PS3/360 and with bayonetta 2 coming out only on wii u you would be missing the second part of the series on PC.
I wouldn't bet on Red Dead Redemption ever coming to PC, bit late don't you think?
Honestly i think it'll come out eventually. i might be wrong, but i just don't see rockstar not releasing their second most popular game of last generation next to GTA V on PC. Then again they didn't release red dead revolver on PC either so maybe you're right.
@mrswank The reason RDR hasn't been ported to PC is because the coding is a mess, to put the game on PC means they have to rewrite the entire game and that would take years and lots of money. Next Red Dead will probably come on PC
Red Dead and Metal Gear Solid are the ones that are missed the most on PC. I have my fingers crossed for MGS5PC, but I gave up on RDR for PC. Which is such a big shame. All hope is on you, Kojima. Give us a MGS game on PC again.
I have never understood why MGS never comes out on PC? Metal Gear Solid 1 and Metal Gear Solid 2 Substance did. Why not MGS3? I can sort of see why MGS4 didn't as it was a PS3 exclusive. The one with raiden in (the shit one) was released on PC. Very weird indeed. Also another game series that does not get released on PC is the WWE game? Am sure there PC gamers that are wrestling fans right? I can only ever remember WWF/WWE Raw coming to PC and that was 14 years ago.
Does this guy understand what a first party game is? You will never see a good portion of those games on PC. Back on topic: I was actually quite surprised when Dragon's Dogma was not released for PC. It was marketed towards a western audience and it would have had a good chance of doing well on the platform.
Dragons Dogma. It was an amazing game, but the frame rate was horrible. They need to launch it with Steam Workshop!
excactly my thoughts, DD, RDR and MGS are the only games that would be the best to release on PC
That is one horrible list. Why the hell would we want Killzone, Halo, Gran Turismo, the countless simple third person action games, etc on PC when we already have better alternatives in those genres. Keep em and let the console crowd think they have something to brag about. PC gamers tend to like deeper more innovative titles. I wouldn't waste more than $5 on a Steam sale for most those games that could be beaten and forgotten in a day.
Because The Last Of Us isn't deep enough! Ohh right its the most over rated game /s
I guess our definitions of "deep" are different, because I don't think TLOU is deep at all. The gameplay was average at best and if I want to watch a "cinematic story" I'll go watch Gomorrah. As I saw someone post once "it has more in common with Michael Bay than Citizen Kane."
What exactly do you consider "deeper"? I am a PC gamer and I have to say that the simpler a game is, the more I like it. Actually, the biggest gripe I have with today's games, right alongside too many cutscenes and not enough gameplay/interaction, is the fact that devs cram way too many things into a game which don't exactly fit, while the budget spent towards building that nonsense could have been utilized in perfecting and refining gameplay elements that actually DO fit. So it's pretty obvious I don't like RPGs or any RPG elements in games where there shouldn't be any. If that's what you call "deep" - games being bloated with elements just for the sake of it - then you should speak of yourself instead of the entire PC community. And I don't know of any alternatives to many of the games on the list. RDR, Killzone, Halo, MGS, Infamous are all quite unique and that's what makes them successful. That's why you'd want them on PC.
You almost had me convinced that this was a serious post until I saw: "And I don't know of any alternatives to many of the games on the list. RDR, Killzone, Halo, MGS, Infamous are all quite unique and that's what makes them successful." That gave it away that you must be joking. I had a good laugh though so it worked. Thanks for that.
RDR, Killzone, Halo, MGS, Infamous are all quite unique ... No they're not. Killzone is probably the most generic fps of last gen. It brought nothing to the fps genre. Infamous and prototype were basically the same. Why play Halo when PC gamers can play CS or TF2? Read Dead REdemption is probably the only unique one listed but even then it's not a must play. I'd like to see what it would have looked like if it wasn't jagged mess. I never really cared for the story.
When I said unique, I meant it. What PC game is near the atmosphere, polish, multiplayer and world Killzone offers? Prototype is nowhere near as polished and fun as Infamous - guess that's what big budgets do. Oh, and which sci-fi FPS is like Halo? I honestly don't know a single PC game similar to Halo other than Halo 1 and 2 themselves. And you're comparing CS and TF2 to Halo? Only in success maybe, nothing about these games have a single thing in common with Halo other than the first person perspective. And you seriously don't think MGS is unique? Please tell me which game is even similar to MGS? If you say Splinter Cell.. I don't know what to say to you. Please, for the sake of argument, tell me an alternative game to each of the console games I mentioned. Just try, if you're even reading this post.
MGS is only unique in that I can play the game on youtube. I had a ps3 I had MGS. I stopped playing 30 minutes into a cutscene. Never finished it
Poor PC guys. In order to cover up the disappointment of not getting these games, you have to put em down. What a shame.
There r ways to get games on PC
No, they don't need PC releases. They're exclusive for a reason. And asking for 1st party games, particularly from Sony or Nintendo, to make their way to PC is pretty comical. I'm not sure where this belief that everything should be on everything came from, but thank goodness many don't agree (in the industry) and these things will remain exclusive.
Yea I don't get the point of this list overrated games plus exclusives that gives value to a console. This seem like the writer is trolling. Asking for something that will never happen. Most of us don't care if exclusives get ported if we want them we would buy the console its for. Most pc gamers don't beg for ports. Others do Gotta love articles that tries to discredit PC to make themselves look good. They the writer doesn't even try to give a reason why and list a ton of average PS exclusives. I already see the purpose of this article . @tigertron No you have no point.
Most of those games will never see a pc release. Or at least are very unlikely, as long as a few of those companies are in the console business and stuff.
None of those are ever going to have an official PC release.
Would you like fries with that?
How is Gran Turismo needed? PC has Assetto Corsa. MGS is possible and I believe Kojima said he was interested because of the success of Rising so I hope its true.
"PC is the most powerful hardware to play video games" Yeah, if you have a good enough system. My Sony Vaio all-in-one can only dream of playing games like Uncharted. It's barely able to run the first Mass Effect on average settings...
My pc is good enough. Shame about yours, but it's obviously not a gaming pc. Not sure what your point is, there are loads of people with decent gaming pcs, just because you don't have one doesn't mean a lot really. The hardware is out there in plenty of peoples hands, it's not a myth. Not that it really matters as this article is pretty ludicrous. Exclusives are there for a reason, to sell consoles, and with the exception of a few in this article I doubt they will see the light of day on pc. And that's fine with me, there's tons of games to play on pc so they're not needed anyway. For anything else I'll just buy it for my consoles and play the games as they are. And years from now I'll play them on pc when the consoles get emulated. I'm in no rush.
My point is not everyone has a computer that can play games like Uncharted or whatever. Some computers like mine aren't meant for gaming and have a crappy ATI laptop GPU and other people have old PCs. Sure, a decent and modern PC can probably play last-gen and indeed current-gen games easily, but the fact is that a sweeping statement like the one in the article isn't really true, though he does make the point that good PCs are better than consoles - we all know that.
I'm sorry but whoever thinks people prefer consoles over PC just because they're cheaper is a shortsighted moron.
Red Dead Redemption and MGS5 thos is what I want 😉come on RockStar & Kojima!!;)
Zelda, Killzone? Hahaha. Nope.
TLOU ? sure ..... over Yoshida's dead body
I don't see it happening, this is the reason why for the last twenty years I always had a console paired with my PC and s handhelds. It's the way it's always been and what separates the business models and makes sales. You won't see Mario or Uncharted on the PC. And there is nothing wrong with that. :)
This egotistical, self entitlement is hilarious. More than half of these games are outright owned by platform creators, it's never going to happen legally, unless something happens to any of these companies. These games don't need to be anywhere besides where the publishers want them to be. Consoles are around for good reasons, the 1st being that there's a huge market for them, they're easier to use for the majority of people & they have exclusive games on them. People like the person who wrote this article should realize that just because you own a platform that doesn't make you entitled to games that aren't
Most of the games on this list will never get a PC release. 1st party games? Are you serious? If you want the game, get the platform. Can't deal with that? See ya.
PC gamers port-begging again?! Such a master race!
The guy who wrote the article must be 12 years and don't know how exclusives work. Just because you have only one platform, don't bother gamers who appreciate the best games from consoles. Pathetic article.
Ignoring how bad the list is, given it's full of platform exclusives, no just console, it dosen't even explain why it should be on PC. I mean how mean people thought Nintendo missed a big opportunity by not releasing Ocarina of Time on PC? Yet the author just says ' This game also should be released for PC.' without any further explaination. Most of these are Sony exclusives yet it's Halo 3 being one of the few I'd agree with. Given Halo:CE was on PC, releasing Halo 3 rather than Halo 2 might have shown more serious commitment to PC gaming by MS. RDR not getting a PC release was also a bit odd given that GTA always ends up on PC. It would have been nice to se a spruced up version of that.
Graphics aside, what is Killzone offering the world? I got it bundled with my ps4, and played the PS3 ones too and there is just nothing in the slightest bit exciting, interesting or innovative about it. It might be one of the dullest franchises I have ever played.
Apart from Killzone 2 they've all been pretty mediocre.
KZ3, lol. As a PC gamer that owns a PS3 I want to see these Valkyrie Chronicles, Tales of PS3 games, Ni No Kuni, 3D Dot Hero, MGS4, and Disgaea games. I am not going to ever expect or dream of SCE IPs on PC, so I will dream for the unlikely gems exclusive to the system. Some multiplats I would love to see are FFXIII, RDR, Dragons Dogma, there are probably many more but cant think of any right now
I think MAG would do great on the PC.
would fail horribly considering planetside 2 has been out for awhile.
PS2 and MAG are not the same kind of FPS. One is an open world. The other is map based without any significant open field, providing lots of cover. They would cater to different player bases.
As an owner of a PC lol this is just funny i love these kinds of articles just keep proving how stupid it is to call PC the "master race" its not master race if it misses out on huge awesome exclusives that PC owners will say suck anyway just cuz they cant play them LOL now now PC fanboys dont get all sensitive and insecure on me,dont try to prove to me that just cuz you can play at so and so resolution and framerate does not mean its a "Master Race" i know after saying that its kinda hard for you to believe i have a PC but i dont care, your just going to have to take my word for it, i have a gtx 570 sli combo. i just hate all the master race douchebags
actually even though the pc hardware is 'more powerful' i still aint seeing nothing yet that lets me think pc is capable of exclusive game graphics and im not stupid enough to think multiplat pc superior versions means that is going to happen
Nice to see Dragon's Dogma get some love as it's one of my favorite games from last gen. If Capcom focused more on games like this they would be in a much better position right now.