Gears of War. Resistance: Fall of Man. Two great next-gen shooters, but which one to buy? Here's the point-by-point breakdown.
GEARS FOR THE WIN!!! Lets start a list of games that run smoother and look better on the 360, if you don't believe my list go to the reviews on ign, then you will see the light. Call of Duty 3 Tony Hawk Project 8 Marvel Ultimate Alliance Need for Speed: Carbon So far the Ps3 is getting PWNED on exclusive and multiformat games. All more reasons not to buy a ps3.
YOU DO KNOW 360 CAME OUT 1S SO THE DEVELOPERS HAVE MOR TIME OF THE DEV KIT . PS3 CAME OUT LATE DEV. HAS LESS TIME TO DEVELOPE.
much the exact same time. So it doesn't matter since it's been equal time worked on both. So it's only an ok result from sony and to be honest I think IGN was being rather nice on ranking resistance. I mean play them both and you'll see there's only 1 true winner here. Gears of War !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
That is just plain silly... Devs have had final dev kits for X360 for almost 15 months now, while some devs have complained they haven't gotten final dev kits for PS3 before august this year. Secondly it has been reported for all of the games you've mentioned, that lead development has been on X360 (obviously because they didn't have final dev kits for PS3). Thirdly, don't start with the delay thing, since, as just mentioned, final dev kits weren't being shipped to the majority of developers before august this year.
The dev.s can, are, and have been working on titles LONG before dev. kits came out, they do this on a PC by using system specs and the game engine, It's easy and has been and is being done for a long time, how else do you think almost 2 years ago you saw MGS4 footage, of course which looks like crap today compared to the CGi they mostly showed back then. So no, your wrong, developers have been working on titles for same time frames basically, especially sony duh and the R-FOM title. Sorry, no excuses this time.
So are you saying that Resistance was developed with beta dev kits. Remember, sony pushed the release of the PS3 back at least twice. I'm thinking that the PS3 dev kits were probably out months before that. The only reason the dev kits were not called final kits is because the machine hadn't been released yet. I mean, it's not like much has changed as for as the hardware is concerned since the first promised release date of the PS3 which was spring of 06. All I'm saying is this, don't blame the dev kits, I'm thinking that gears and resistance were both being worked on long before the x360 was released.
both games is awsome 1ST GEN GAME OF PS3 GOING HEAD TO HEAD AGAINTS 360 2ND GEN GAME WOW RESISTANCE U THE MAN. GOW 2 YEARS OF DEVELOPMENT USES UNREAL ENGINE 3.0 RESISTANCE 1 YEAR OF DEVELPMENT BUILT ON PS3 HARDWARE WHICH ITS HARD TO DEVELOP CELL IS MONSTER
IBLOWPS3ALLTHEWAY, considering all of the delays and such, most of the PS3 games have been in development for the same time, making your 1st vs. 2nd gen argument a moot point. Yeah with Resistance's beefed up PS2 graphics LOL and Gears of Wars mindblowing visuals that set the bar for any game visually. Mass Effect will take the crown from gears. The graphics chipset in the 360 is superior, that is why there is such a tight NDA grip o the specs for the RSX, the cell processor is an AMAZING piece of technology, but not for real-time gaming. PS3 is nice, but if you want games and better looking games get the 360. Developers will develop for the 360 more, since it can easily be ported to the PC, they can use a large majority of the 360 code on a PC, especially next-gen gpu's. TECHNICALLY THE GPU IN THE 360 IS A GENERATION AHEAD OF THE PS3 GPU, GET OVER IT, NOTHING YOU SAY WILL CHANGE THAT. IT HAS DOUBLE THE POLY PERFORMANCE, TRIPLE THE VERTICES PERFORMANCE. 360 GAMERS HAVE NEXT GEN HARDWARE PS3 GAMERS HAVE NEXT GEN MOVIE PLAYER NUFF SAID
That's what I'm sayin! Since the PS3 was delayed from spring 06, that gave developers an extra 8 months to "polish" these games, since Sony said the only thing holding the PS3 back was the poo-ray diode, right? So this 1st gen PS3 vs 2nd gen 360 arguement has no truth.
will u shut the hell up. The first gen PS3 game is being compared to 2nd 360 game. What do u have to say to that. RFOM is getting just as good reviews as GOW. So please, shut up. Go play your GOW.
The reviews for RFOM (89%) are not as good as the reviews for GOW (95%), check it out. Actually here, I'll help you. ;) RFOM: http://www.gamerankings.com... http://www.metacritic.com/g... GOW: http://www.gamerankings.com... http://www.metacritic.com/g...
Insomaniac has been working on this title for a while. They are a premiere developer for Sony and are get special treatment from Sony. How long has Sony displayed RFOM? "But the relatively plain-Jane special effects and textures just don't match up with Xbox 360 shooters such as F.E.A.R. or Call of Duty 3, let alone Gears. " Even newer titles that have been in development in a shorter amount of time beats RFOM in graphics.
Sorry.. double post.
Where did you go? ;)
Welcom3 chang3, still dont know how a Duke-Nukem-like game even came close.
The recent post about consumers thinking the PS3 is under $300 shows the lack of information in the general population. Everyone tries to make the argument that "you can't compare two games because one is first gen and the other is second gen." Unfortunately, that is EXACTLY what most consumers walking into a store are going to do. They are going to look at GOW and look at Resistence and assume the 360 has better graphics. THe average consumer isn't going to say "but the 360 devs had more time with the final hardware." They are going to compare the games available and thats it. Period.
RFOM is old school rubbish with dude hopping on wind to get across empty levels while using goop guns that shoot bubbles. It keeps getting high score's because it reminds Sony fans of Ratchet and Clanks wacky BS. 40 players online that offers Unreal style chaos is wack. I agree nobodies going to give a sh*t about 1st vs 2nd gneration tittles. I think RFOM has to get the score's it did out of respect for Sony "sympathy points".
Gears kicks everything in the ass thats come out for the year of 2006. I mean look at these scores, brought to you by Gamespot. Xbox 360 Gears: 9.6 Xbox 360 COD3: 8.8 PS3 COD3: 8.2 PS3 RFOM: 8.6 So judging by this, your precise RFOM for your PS3's is not even better than COD3 or COD2. LMAO. Thats just hilarious. So in no way is it even close to Gears. Its not even close to COD3. Thats how sad PS3 and its games are. 8.6 for RFOM, seems to be its highest rated game right now. LOL
all the same just focus on your onw system not bashing . its all good 360 is just second rate trying hard pu55i c4t lollololololol even 360 wins this war maybe (not) so. P1 PS2 stil selling yah its stil selling over 200 million sold wow 360 5-6 million? lol sory long way to go . PLZ 360 fans just stf^ stop finding excuse the king is coming 1 day left you 360 fans agen wil bow to the king SONY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!4 life . 1-800 4 MY XBOX
Jump IN! welcom3 to the futur3 of gaming, Play B3yond.
So you'd rather have sh!tty graphics and buy the most bought machine because 50% off them stopped working so people had to buy them twice or... You buy the machine that has Gears of War On top of that: COD3 with 60 fps compared to PS3 30 fps (and no, it's not out later, developed on the same timepath and even worse: like RR7 on PS3 a year after RR6 on 360, the 360 version looks better???) Rainbox Six with vison cam face mapping which the PS3 doesn't have? The 360 is just the new king. Be ready to have your beloved PS uncrowned
"The build we saw was the very first attempt to convert the game to PS3, since the team got the final development kit from Sony only a week before the event, which was held in Paris last month" http://ps3.gamespy.com/play... Date of this arcticle is Sep 20, 2006 So COD 3 was developed mainly for 360 and ported to ps3, starting in August 2006.
GO Resistance !!!
Shooting goop bubbles riding on wind, with PS2 graphics with less jaggies.
DON'T make me fukin laugh!!! thats not even an equation!!! gears of war would seriously kerb-stomp ALL OVER IT!!!! resistance is mearly a system filler title! i've seen the hd videos (streamed through my 360) and to tell you the truth, the ps3 is a joke!! it's just NOT delivering the 5x power of 360 talk. ridge racer looks like a coder with cerebal paulsy programmed it!!! DMC4........MEH afrika.......WTF only GREAT game will be vf5!!!
I would agree with you on vf5 but if a fighter doesn't support online then im going to just pass it up! As far as rfom vs gow is pretty much a wash because I know I will never play rfom so I can't judge it!
Who really cares what the best system is? Each are powerful in its own right. But for me it comes down to online play and media center functions. MS wins hands down on that.
What's with the excuses? Why are we compairing development time? Bottom line, right now, you pay $200 more to play games and you get less performance and lower quality. I'd be pissed.
Poop! Do-do Fecal matter Sh*t. LOL. #15 Sony's still lieing about the PS3 i seen Kaz H. and another Sony guy on Fox News durring my lunch Hour lieing about the PS3 being the only console to do 1080p and playing HD movies they worded it as the PS3 was only console instead of out of the box. ect..
If you guys keep using this excuse that 360 is on the 2nd gen and ps3 is on 1st gen, when will ps3 games be better? When 3rd gen 360 games come out, ps3 will be on 2nd gen, when 360 4th gen ps3 will be on the 3rd gen. And so on...
It's nice to see Sony humbly taking the #2 spot this generation. At least they're good sports about it. I wish them luck with the PS4.
The PS3 hasn't even been released in the U.S which is the Country with the Biggest Gaming Market, and yet you think the PS3 has already taken 2nd Place? You are one sad little MS fanboy.