Nvidia and Ubisoft are working together to bring realism in the world of virtual games.
Again choices are being taken away from gamers, you either have to go with Nvidia or have a bad gaming experience
Absolutely no choices are being taken away from AMD users. AMD optimizes games the same way Nvidia does and AMD has partnerships with developers as well. It's just Nvidia is better at their job than AMD. They optimize drivers faster, more regularly and offer additional solutions such as Physx. You can't really blame Nvidia for anything because they are giving MORE to games, not taking away from them. I recently switched from a HD7850 to a GTX 760 and the 760 is a much better product both in the software and hardware department, hands down.
I agree, but Ubisoft and AMD shouldn't just ignore their relationship if they aren't partners. After this, the gamers get crushed.
My GTX 460 died so I got a MSI GTX 760 ( wanted the 770 but that was practically 100 bucks more T_T). It's so deliciously quiet. And yes Nvidia does a good job with drivers. @Themadcow I don't think AMD users will have a worse experience compared to Nvidia users. There are just some tweaks here and there that make better use of Nvidia cards. This doesn't mean AMD users will suffer. In fact they probably wouldn't even notice anything.
Yes I blame Nvidia - they were the first to start these partnerships. TWIMTBP project...
If Nvidia was pushing OpenCL or other hardware agnostic standards I'd agree with you, but they're not.
here's another take on this: I will ignore Ubi's games vote with your wallets people, and stop pre-ordering wait for the game to get released and see the the benchmarks before buying the game I do not know the exact numbers, but AMD and nVidia GPU market share is quite close UBi is fucking with a lot of people
Nvidia have around 65% of the pc market share. A bit more than half.
even so, 45% is not something to ignore take for example Skyrim - it sold globally aprox 1.8mil units 45% of that is ~800k units; at 60$ (original) price, that's 48mil USD
35% zme-ul, although yes it's not something to ignore. But to say the market share is close is far from true. http://jonpeddie.com/press-...
@zme-ul That's 35%, but I still agree.
*35%, sorry, my mistake was doing some other shit on my laptop at the same time
PS to my original comment: one of most staggering facts that is ignored - both consoles run on ATi GPUs, but somehow UBi partners with nVidia for PC!? how? why? the only reason is money, nVidia payed them; not performance, not graphical fidelity .. nothing of that - pure simple greed
This just means lower sales of the games. Why would AMD users buy it if they know it'll not work well?
You are under the assumption that it won't work well. No one claimed it won't work well.
@ chickey - History has proven itself in the past. MadCow is correct.
Uhg, Im starting to hate Ubisoft for this. I was really excited for the Division
Yeah well, on the shitpile with it. I'm not going to follow Ubi into stupidity.
Ubisoft and Nvidia partnering up is a good sign for PC gamers. I hope the upcoming Assassin's Creed title brings more optimizations for PC users rocking Nvidia cards.
What about AMD card? :o
Well AMD needs to straighten up somethings that it messed up pretty bad! Its Nvidia and Ubisoft so of course Gameworks will only favour those who rock N cards. For AMD users; I feel the pain bros.
That's why I use a Nvidia card myself! IT GIVES YOU THE BEST EXPERIENCE!!!!!!!
@ CODF - I've been an AMD supporter since their Thunderbird CPUs when you used a lead pencil to overclock them. I recently changed to the Nvidia camp because of these partnerships and programs. AMD/ATi offered the best bang for the buck and sometimes still do. But it means nothing if the games you play aren't optimized to run on your system. I got tired of seeing lesser nvidia systems crushing mine...
Good. Wouldn't get a crappy AMD card in the first place.
Unless, you're mining :3 Why can't we do both ?
Pick one :3 Either Mine and poor games Or Great games, no mining :) Anyway sane person would pick Gaming, or both. Never just AMD.
I have a feeling games won't look bad on decent AMD cards. Until we see the results and comparisons it seems like not so big of a deal. Usually when one party adds new bits then they rapidly get standardised and wrapped up into the standards.
Well, U-play, late ports to PC, and favoring Nividia all add up. It might be time to "EA" your ass Ubi. Which is to say not buy much of your stuff because thy hassle and the disrespect to your customers makes your products unattractive and less desirable.
Don't you see my fellow PC gamer brothers evil Ubisoft is trying to divide us in 2 camps and create a civil war between AMD and Nvidia users. We must not let this evil triumph.
Lol, I totally agree. Add in the Illuminati. And NSA. This is gonna be a great conspiracy.
The only reason I dont have an AMD GPU is because they run too hot and they use a lot more electricity to run slower than an Nvidia GPU.
Agree totally. I listened to the hype & purchased an R9 290. It ran so hot my tower felt it was on fire, even the desk it sits in got hot & my games just didn't see to be as smooth as the GTX680 I had in there before. I ended up swapping it in the store for a GTX780 paying the extra after complaining of driver issues. So glad I did.
@iistuii - top of the cards from both camps run hot as hell under load. My 580 SLi run hot as hell but that's to be expected under a load. One camp might run slightly cooler from time to time but it ain't enough to swap over...
@Guwapo77 Honestly, I've had Nvidia for years & switched to AMD like I said. Now my 780 is no way in the same heat/noise level as that R290 was. I may have had a dodgy card, but I'm telling you it was as hot as hell. My 780 is nothing like that. But I'm happy I had a go, but even more satisfied I returned pretty quick to Nvidia.