"Playstation owners seem to be getting a plum deal with Destiny."
You do understand those are not nearly the same thing right? That page was a mistake by sony that bragged about the game being 1080p/60 fps. In fact they afterwards silently removed it. This is simply a listing of the video output. ALL PS4 games have a video output in 1080p, because the console upscales every game to 1080p regardless of the native resolution. Exactly the same wording can be found on the listings for Battlefield 4 or Watch_Dogs, that have 900p native rez. That was news. This isn't.
Destiny will be amazing on the PS4. I hope the player count is increased though.
Really? i thought BF4 was 1080? Edit: sorry just googled it. you're right
The videos I've seen of Destiny made it look so much like Halo. It just makes you wonder why they insisted on moving on from developing Halo games, only to develop a halo game with a different name. The stuff I watched looked a bit more dreary than Master Chief's world, until they got oustide to see the skyline. Then it screamed "BUNGIE!" at my eyes.
Well the good news is that we have already seen this game running on console, and no matter what the final resolution is, it looks great, and it's another one of my "must haves" this year. It is funny the way they are wording it though "output", most likely seems that it will be 900 upscaled, but time will tell...either way like I said it looks awesome. The part I found MOST strange however is saying "1080p 'Native' display" I have never heard anyone use that phrase before, it's almost like they are purposely playing with the "key words" for marketing purposes. Again, I'm so ready for this game...it's gonna be awesome. Now let's see if all the same people that ripped TF for being 6 vs 6 will stick to their guns and rip this game a new one for being capped at 12? In my personal opinion for TF 6v6 is the perfect number and based on what I've seen of this game it looks like it'll be the same. It's probably a choice more than a limitation.
http://www.eurogamer.net/ar... Watch Dogs PS4 = 900p 30fps Watch Dogs XB1 = 792p 30fps Watch Dogs PC = 1080p, 1200p 1440p 1600p and 4K @ 60+fps And why so much watch Dogs on a Destiny article? lol
I read it but I hope it's more players. Only 12 players would be disheartening to me if Destiny has competitive multiplayer. More than 12 would be appealing. At least 16.
12 pvp, haha so much for MMO.
IT WAS NEVER AN MMO why don't people realise this? Bungie are always really reluctant to call it an MMO. it has MMO like features but is not an MMO!
Ohhh, I get it. Just like it's not a FPS. It has FPS like features but is not an FPS. lol.
@AKiss Did you realized that you make yourself look really stupid with that comparison? It only show a few things. First you dont know enough about Destiny. Secondly you dont even know the correct definition of MMO. Destiny is definitely not a MMO althou they have certain features in place that makes it looks as if it is one. But the actual fact it is clearly not one. It is like Diablo 3 plays like MMO too. But the fact is it is not either. I have seen and heard so much people trying to call that game a MMO when clearly it is not. And you are just like those "people".
Agreed, I am one of those "people" lol A massively multiplayer online game (also called MMO and MMOG) is a multiplayer video game which is capable of supporting large numbers of players simultaneously. By necessity, they are played on the Internet. MMOs usually have at least one persistent world, however some games differ. These games can be found for most network-capable platforms, including the personal computer, video game console, or smartphones and other mobile devices. Is this right? Are these MMO "features"? Does Destiny work like this or not? ^_^
I bet we won't see people complaining about this, yet they complained about the player count in Titanfall... Destiny looks amazing anyway. Definitely getting it day 1. Might get the CE if it gets announced.
Titanfall is all action no need go any higher than 8vs8, Respawn preferred 6vs6 and there small maps mostly. If they player count was any higher in Titanfall it would not play well at all. The problem this generation Sony is holding back the x box 1 Every third party game developer, either has to provide their own dedicated servers, for games, or don't use them at all. X box fans will have to deal with player hosting because Sony can't provide them.
So is the why Battlefield on PS4 has 64 players, or Killzone Shadow Fall supports 24 players, or why Ghost supports 18 players on PS4 because Sony's network is holding back XBO? Lmao GTFOH with that ridiculous fanboy claim. It is Simply a design choice from the developer, not something mandated by Sony's netcode... Last I remember, the PS3 had games with 32, 40, 60, 128, and a whopping 250 players online simultaneously! They aren't holding anyone back, Developers choose what's the best for their games. You are just a crazy fanboy grasping at straws trying to perpetuate your delusionist conspiracy theories.
with your dumb logic planetSide 2 shouldn't be able to be on PS4 since Sony is holding us back but oh wait it is coming to PSN so go somewhere with your BS.
You really sound stupid, really! what r u, 12? that sounded so dumb. I never heard such idiomatical things before. Sony is holding back the X1? gimme a break! there's no way sony is holding back the X1, you sound ridiculous, and that's impossible that they're holding them back, X1 is holding the PS4 back due to weak hardware in it, so you can kill that noise. On topic, if it's 12v12, then i'm fine with it. If not, IMO it might be like BF4 or something, idk!
If I want to play with games with player counts of over 1000 players I have PlanetSide 2 for that which is coming out for PS4. Tell me knws why doesn't the Xbox One have any multiplayer games with such massive player counts? This is why I fail to see why PSN is holding XBL back.
The thing is Destiny can have up to 50+ people in the world in public events ( as said by deej) without any technical problems, this is most likely just for balancing purposes that limit is their for our enjoyment. Same for Titanfall
12 V 12 is the best!
I doubt people would complain about that, but that's not the discussion. They are talking about 12 people in all in the same match. Though I believe 12 vs 12 would still be too low. At least aim for 32 vs 32. Even that number is low if this is supposed to be an MMO.
Does this mean that there will be a competitive PvP mode (in a limited area, just like any other MP FPS) with 12 players max....or is it saying each free-roam server will be 12 players max? I'm confused. But i really hope it's not the latter.
IDK Lukas. But I'm right there with you, I really hope it's not the later in your statement. If it's just limited areas for a competitive PVP mode it would be fine. But if it's the free-roam servers that would be terrible.
It's more of an Always online shooter than an MMO, It takes things from MMO's like raids and stuff but its not one. I mean by your logic watch dogs could in a since be an MMO or dark souls. Besides they said they could have up to 50+ people in public events but then that would 9/10 just retract from your experience of feeling important and challenged.
@Shadonic Hey I'm not the one who generalized it as an MMO, that was Bungie. I don't really see it as that either, but if what they are going for is in fact an MMO like experience, they are going to need more than 12 players on screen. I didn't put any of "my logic" into that statement, just going by what the game has been stated to be. None of that was me coming to my own conclusions.
OMG, how can the PS4 have 12vs12 without the help of the cloud?
ps3 had M.A.G, 256 VS 256.
MAG's 256 was 128 vs 128 Not 512 in a room...
imagine 512 players per map... that would be the most insane game ever
[email protected] Planetside 2 has like 2000 per map I think.
Hell if battlefield can do 32v32 im sure destiny can do the same with ps4 @corrios that's stated for ps3 ps4 might have 26 online
Lol, dude i was just joking around. I played MAG.
How are people getting a cap of 12 to be 12 per team? It's 6 vs. 6, this is nothing new.