Watch a new video showing a graphics comparison between the PS4 and Xbox One versions of Wolfenstein: The New Order.
Wow the game looks great. The differences on either system is EXTREMELY EXTREMELY minor, however the XB1 version actually looks sharper in most cases that there is a difference...like the nurses' face in the beginning, the skin on his hand holding the knife, the details on some of the guns. Again IT'S SUPER SUPER SUPER minor, and really doesn't mean anything, it's ONLY noteworthy because it appears to be the first multi-plat where the XB1 version actually has the edge. I know many are going to pretend they don't see it, or blame the video (it's the same video), or say that I'm simply being a fanboy troll...not the case, I still think resolution arguments as a whole are overrated and there is nothing here to change your mind about whichever console you get it on...it looks GREAT on both...again it's only noteworthy because it's the first multi-plat to go the other way. It could just be something to do with the video capture, and this isn't set in stone, and it's only based on this one video... Please watch the video before you just hit disagree...
Did you really stated that ? Have you seen the video quality ? Dude. 0:49 - Xbox has more aliasing than Ps4, that is clear.
Idk Guys..They look same to me..if there are some differences. I cannot really tell.. :-/ Both looks great.
PS4 has shown better anti-aliasing in most cases. And @ 2:14 muzzle flash lighting reflecting off surfaces on PS4. That said. They look the same. And not all that impressive overall.
You gotta be sh!ttin me. Take off your fanboy glasses. They look identical except XO has better contrast in few scenes, nothing major. ALIASING IS EXACTLY THE SAME, pretty easy to count aliased lines on same elements as edge of a gun or a crack in the wall that light goes through. No difference there. Great job devteam!
I agree with you. Almost 100 % identical. But in addition to the thing you mentioned, If you look at the last shot where it shows the close-up on the crosshair dot, the ps4 one is more aliased, and less sharp. Most of the pictures and items in the world also had a 1-2% sharper portrayal on the xb1 version. I sometimes wonder if it's been harder to get games to run 1080p on XB1 because it ACTUALLY does a more true representation of 1080p, and maybe the PS4 blurs or artificially sharpens with a filter to attain 1080p. I'm probably wrong, but it seems like 1080p is the pixel count but the techniques used to get that many pixels on screen/at a certain framerate require a different amount of actual power to get there. Like I said I'm probably wrong, but it would be interesting to see if there's any merit to that idea. And there was also more pixel crawl around objects when standing still on PS4. But I don't even really care, I think with the game looking so identical that there is no reason to even give a shit about the 1-2 % difference. Or the 5% difference on most multiplats where PS4 looks better.
not at all surprised by this post.
I did notice that in the planes machine gun turret scene that the muzzle flash was realistically reflecting off of objects in the PS4 version but not at all in the X1 version. It's easily noticeable.
i saw that at about 2.14 mins
they sharpen the xbox to hide some of the flaws look at call of duty same thing
wrong on all accounts,,,and the only reason its as close as it is,is because of parity and parity only
The game looks identical, and I will give the edge to the Xbox as it is sharper overall. Which begs the question how on earth we have such a result when one system has nearly 50% more GPU power? This is when I say I agree with you.
If you want to see how this game REALLY looks in HD, instead of these stupid GIF and half ass pics, just go watch the full review of W:NO game on IGN, it's the PS4 version they are showing, make sure you blow up the screen to full, this is how the PS4 version really looks.
Very hard to tell with the compression on this video but they look identical. Not that it matters much. This game is so much fun!
Looks the same as expected. Might get this for the XB1 when it is on sale in the near future.
I don't see any difference, but I do not care about games for all consoles. I need next gen and this game has not delivered the graphical fidelity I was looking for, because it's not for next gen only.
Do they have confirmed resolution? All I want is for the developer to take advantage of both consoles strengths.
1080p/60fps on PS4/Xbone. Anyway, game has great reviews. Can't wait to play this game.
Just bought it myself... bit bummed cos i have a hospital appointment before I can get home to play it :/ This game looks like it knows what it is; no pretence of GOTY storytelling, no shoehorning in of multiplayer. Exactly what this industry needs IMHO. Can't wait to get home and fire up the PS4.
Just does not excite me at all, looks unspectacular and average.
Both games look the same you can't tell any differences between the 2. Glad to see that both version are native 1080p 60 FPS. Hopefully later down the line xbox one will have more native 1080p games consistently.
Holy christ just stop with these comparisons. People get angry over tiny details you'd never notice in a million years if you didn't have them side by side. And no matter how the games look, Ps4 fanboys will say theirs is better, and vice versa. This is just a means to get hits and stir up bullshit. With that said, I honestly think the Xbone version is better. Better contrast. K bye!
Stronger contrast does not equal "better" contrast. The PS4 version will look better on your TV since it preserves more details in shaded areas and your TV will already add contrast. Also @2:12 PS4 also has better lighting from the muzzle flash bouncing off surfaces. But don't take my word for it. Look for yourself and tell me if I'm wrong.
They look the same. These .000001 differences people like to jump on are ridiculous. No one in a million years would ever see a difference if they weren't trying as hard as they can with a magnifying glass and bias to pick a better version.
Graphically it's meh. Obviously if it's good to play that doesn't matter as much. But they have coded to xboxone power and just ported it over knowing PS4 will run it with ease.
No multi means I will check this out on $10 steam sale at some point.
Yay for parity... wait, that's right we can't have that. Yo, they look the same. You can't be serious with this "they're extremely close", yet you're some how able to dissern the most minor minor details to actually see a difference... I can see any difference, and I have 4 eyes! lol They're basically the same, if you're the nit picky type... each console tends to have their own "characteristics", at least when it comes to multi-plats, The blacks are blacker and the whites are whiter on Xbox, PS4's are not. blah blah blah... same as BF4 basically. Here's the truth... Xbox guys will think the xbox version looks slightly better & PS guys will think the PS version looks slightly better. There you go, enjoy the game.
Really who cares both consols have been a disappointment from the start missing basic features software crashes lack of games. Who s botherd if one is slightly better.
I think I'll wait for Digital Foundry to pick through the bones and find the differences of which there's bound to be a few. PS4 version for me though.
Basically not a game that can represent the full power of both consoles, I don't believe in identical result... Both consoles are different in specs, when the result is identical, one of the consoles isn't maximized... The new order's graphic looks very average btw...
This just shows that there is no 50% difference, if they wouldn't have labeled one screen from the other you wouldn't know which was which.
This only shows what the developer wants to show.. Some devs show that if you actually put some effort on it, you can have a big difference, others try to be the nice guy and make both look the same without much effort.. Here it seems we got the second type of developer.. Graphics are not impressive at all, thats why u get 1080p 60fps, and thats why both look the same. Its a good game? I cant tell, i havent played it yet, but its clear that wasnt pushed to the limits on graphics deparment, thats why both look the same.
excuses excuses, you Sony fans need to get over this whole power thing. if what you said is the case why wasn't the last call of duty or trials game 1080p on both? This game looks better then both of those games. A dev finally uses both console penitential and you try to down play it.
@gameon1985 Have Xbox fans gotten over the "power thing" yet? Cause they seem to bring that up as often as the PS fanboys. Especially when any mention of Cloud & DX12 are brought up. I can't wait for this "power" issue to just drop, you Xbox/PS4 fanboys need to drop it. You guys are too much.
Excuses? Im not the one who tries to bring excuses to make my console of choise more powerfull or at least on par.. theres is one console more powerfull than the other.. sadly for you is not the one you decided to back.. Its clear that there is a power difference, if you want to be blind and make excuses to make yourself feel better with you choise, im fine with that, but dun try to fool anyone, im a very well informed costumer.. maybe you are not, then again, isnt my fault that you get fool by MS speachs..
@gameon AHH yes the old Hasty Generalization fallacy..... Because a few games do not have a disparity we get to generalize that a factual numerical difference on paper for the specs of these machines are invalid. Lets ignore watch dogs which looks twice as good as this....is running better on ps4 and not to mention the other plentiful examples of other disparity cases. Developers on consoles are NOT going to go over 1080p 60fps because its not practical...Even if the ps4 could manage to do more (which it most likely can (examples being COD ghosts getting stuttering from the frame rate EXCEEDING 60 fps) the developers wouldn't because it would cause issues with people who do not have over a 1080p screen...it would have aspect ratio issues and stuttering. Face it. This gen 1080p 60 fps is a MAXED game. When the game is to graphically intensive...youll see the disparity. When its a bit lower end (like this game) we'll see some parity. Until then here are some examples of games running better vs games running worse Theif (graphically intensive runs better on ps4 1080p vs 900p) battlefield 4 (900p vs 720p also graphically intensive) Assassins creed 4 (1080p vs 720p graphically intensive) Watch dogs (900p vs 792p graphically intensive) Call of duty Ghosts (1080p vs 720p average intensity) games with parity (NOTICE THEY ARENT GRAPHICALLY INTENSIVE) Lego Marvel (lego...) Fifa (a sports game) Madden (sports) NBA 2k (sports injustice (a last gen fighter) this game (a halfway decent looking next gen game....nowhere in the realm of other next gen games) Even xbox on games dead rising 3 sub hd and fps drops that have been proven by digital foundry RYSE....dont get me started Forza 5 (the only real 1080p 60 fps game that looks good one xbox one nearly no excuses on this on except that it was downgraded (also proven) PS4 Killzone shadowfall 1080p 30 fps locked infamous second son 1080p 30 fps locked knack 1080p 30 fps locked
again,its called parity,,,they choose not to take full advantage of the ps4 to be even with the xone. not to get worse sales on xone and have them not care about it gameon1985 + 2h ago excuses excuses, you Sony fans need to get over this whole power thing. if what you said is the case why wasn't the last call of duty or trials game 1080p on both? This game looks better then both of those games. A dev finally uses both console penitential and you try to down play it. I think cod looks better and has more physics involved, that's why the xone couldn't handle it as well,,,but this is a dif game, theres not much going on in graphics/physics in wolf,it was easier to make,and the devs chose parity. easy to see other games that take more horse power really show the difference, look at watch dogs,theres a big difference in res/sharpness thats in favor of the ps4 because the xone didn't have the horse power to make that type of game and bring up the res to 900p wolf is a simple game that the devs chose to make the same/parity... theres a number of multiplat games that are in favor of the ps4,why wouldn't this one be any dif unless the devs choose to,and they did here,that happens
@Angels3785 You just completely destroyed these fanboys. They always try to prove that one isn't more powerful when it's impossible. They are being delusional.
does anybody know if the engine is the same one from the other Wolfenstein game that came out last gen? It looks like it to me wonder if that's why this game looks like this and not truly next gen, but but also to run at 1080/60 got to make sacrifices on the graphics department also.
There appears to be a better illusion of depth on the PS4 version, maybe the contrast is better with more natural shading/color so scenes look less flat or fake.
guys, I agree there is a very slight variation in the graphics of this game in each console. although slight, its apparent in several things from sharpness to better color contrast. the xbox one has the clear advantage. i think the sony fanboys are just caught up on the fact that ps4 has 50% more gpu cores and so it must always be superior. lol. this one time xbox did a tiny bit better graphically. but ya fanboys, xb1 can do things ps4 only dreams about (DeadRising3,Forza,Titanfall,t urtlebeach HD audio from controller). you guys only have the better graphics (some of the time now, not always).
PS4 wins this out. If I wasn't a new user I'd have posted links to back my claims.
I'm a ps4 user, it must look better on ps4 because Sony said it has 50% more power. Just like I was playing toy story like graphics on my ps2 because Sony said it could do toy story graphics. The videos they showed of ps3 games which ended up being pre rendered and actually ended up looking better on xbox 360 when the ps3 was apparently 100% more capable. You'd think people would have learned to take Sony's comments with a pinch of salt by now. Has anyone heard of diminishing returns I.e. There is a huge difference in looks between 6000 polygon character models and 60,000 but hardly a difference between 60,000 and 120,000. That's what you get with xbone and ps4. This game looks identical on both and any slight differences I'm sure your not going to see when running and gunning. Be happy with your platform choice and enjoy whatever games you decided to buy that platform for. Just don't be an idiot and say you bought it because a company said it was more powerful, cos' games can look mighty pretty but be abso crap I.e knack
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.