Top
340°

Nintendo Promises To Push Gay Agenda On Children

Earlier this month, the Japanese company Nintendo declined to introduce same-sex marriage in “Tomodachi Life,” a life simulation handheld video game marketed to children over the age of eight. Following the #Miiquality push (Mii is a digital avatar used in the game), Nintendo said it “never intended to make any form of social commentary with the launch of” the game.

The company, however, later stated in future releases of the popular game they will “strive to design a gameplay experience from the ground up that is more inclusive, and better represents all players.”

Read Full Story >>
infowars.com
The story is too old to be commented.
nope111766d ago

LOL somebody is having too much fun with the photo mode.

ps4rulez766d ago SpamShowReplies(5)
thehobbyist766d ago

Social justice is ruining video games.
Firstly, Tomadachi Life never had homosexuality in it to begin with. That was a lie that spread like wildfire because of SJW's.
Secondly, Sexuality is a Mature (Wink wink nudge nudge) topic and shouldn't be put into a game designed for kids and is rated 'E for Everyone'. If this was rated T or higher I'd think it's acceptable but this game is designed for an audience that thinks romance in general is gross. Come on, guys.

marloc_x766d ago OffTopicShow
sjaakiejj766d ago

Acceptance is a topic that applies to everyone, not just adults. The ability to have a homosexual relationship is just as relevant to children as the ability to have a hetero sexual relationship. Either have both or neither, anything else and you're essentially telling children that not everyone is equal because their preferences don't match that which the materials they are exposed to reflect is "correct".

If "romance is gross" is the group of people this game was aimed at, then why have a relationship option in the first place?

ChickeyCantor766d ago

@Sjaakiejj

I'm 100% with you, but you shouldn't bother here. Loads of ignorance that runs here.

kreate765d ago (Edited 765d ago )

@sjaak

I see plenty of movies and other games that only represent hetero sexual relationships.

what about those?

are they telling children something?

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 765d ago
bullymangLer766d ago

Dear nintendo,

please just cancel this game

thehobbyist766d ago

Dear Nintendo,
Please just cancel a game that's probably already gone gold and is the game that allowed Sakamoto to stop butchering Metroid. Just because of a little controversy that you've already addressed and will make changes for in the future.

jc48573766d ago

why does it have to be an agenda?

Sly-Lupin766d ago InappropriateShowReplies(4)
mpnothanks766d ago SpamShowReplies(2)
trywizardo766d ago

i think the world don't need an 8 years old gay kids , when they grow up they will choose their sexual desires ...

kingdom18766d ago

Emmm... I don't know, its not like it has sexual scenes, I'm assuming, its just conditioning to children to the fact that its okay to be different, that its okay for a man to love another man and woman another woman. I don't think this is a big deal either way, not having it or having it in the game that is, as you said they'll develop their sexuality when they get older.

Loadedklip766d ago OffTopicShow
saviin766d ago OffTopicShow
Loadedklip766d ago

Does the game have sexual straight scenes inappropriate for kids? No it doesn't ... so what gay stuff could possible be added that would be anymore inappropriate?

ps4rulez766d ago SpamShow
Berezau766d ago

ps4rulez, you are a homophobe; just admit it and be done with semantics.

Meanwhile, good on Nintendo for at least acknowledging the issue; it wasn't necessary, but positive nonetheless.

Dehnus766d ago OffTopicShow
deafdani766d ago

Homosexuality and heterosexuality aren't choices, buddy.

A gay man doesn't choose to like men. He just does.

A straight man doesn't choose to like women. He just does.

Same goes for women, obviously.

schlanz766d ago

its a choice to act on it however.

pedos don't choose to be attracted to children, either. but they certainly choose whether or not to act upon it. the same could be said for people with all kinds of involuntary propensities for vices such as alcoholism, gambling, violence, ect. just because you can't help feeling a certain way does not give that feeling a free pass.

that's exactly why the "I was just born this way" argument has absolutely zero leverage in the conversation. pedos can make the exact same claim, but naturally we wouldn't excuse it in their case. if it doesn't work there, it doesn't work anywhere else.

aLucidMind766d ago PersonalAttacksShow
Nevers0ft766d ago

@schlanz
That's a silly comparison to make. Why should any of us care what two *consenting adults* get up to?

DarkHeroZX766d ago

@schlanz

GG my friend. You just said what I've been saying for the longest.

ChickeyCantor766d ago

"that's exactly why the "I was just born this way" argument has absolutely zero leverage in the conversation. pedos can make the exact same claim, but naturally we wouldn't excuse it in their case. if it doesn't work there, it doesn't work anywhere else."

A pedophile might be born that way but the subjects are CHILDREN. Who can not act on their own behalf or take responsibility when it comes to the act of sex.

The context here is consent. That's why it does make a difference when a homosexual says it. By only preferring one combination between the sexes ( between 2 consenting adults) you are annihilating the other. It does not reflect reality.

"its a choice to act on it however. "

So this means absolutely nothing. Because straight people choose to act on it as well, so what exactly is your point?

deno765d ago (Edited 765d ago )

Homosexuality is a mistake in nature. History will look on you and your ilk as perverted and confusing people with upside down values. How can a man sleep with another man, that is an atrocity.

schlanz765d ago

@Neversoft

I'm not comparing the acts at all, nor am I saying it's right or wrong to be a homosexual.

I'm simply illustrating the fallacy of using the argument of "born this way" as a justification of behavioral proclivities. And having feelings and acting on them are two completely different things.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 765d ago
-Foxtrot766d ago ImmatureShowReplies(3)
miyamoto766d ago OffTopicShow