Top
470°

Why Microsoft changed the 360 subscription model for Xbox One’s free-games program

An original interview with Microsoft's Yusuf Mehdi explains why you'll need to keep your Xbox Live Gold subscription to keep playing Xbox One Games with Gold.

Read Full Story >>
venturebeat.com
The story is too old to be commented.
barefootgamer807d ago

"Because the old model was stupid." End of story. ;)

Cobra951807d ago (Edited 807d ago )

No. "Because the old model doesn't force you to keep paying for Gold. The new model makes you pay for Gold forever, if you want to keep playing the 'free' games." Much more accurate pretend quote.

Think for a moment about what this means. It means the "free" games are locked to your account, and you must sign into it to play them. We're back to verification DRM, at least to some degree.

from the beach807d ago

Bingo. Old model was too good to last, unfortunately.

konnerbllb807d ago

fromthebeach,

The old model was too costly and if they are to compete with the kind of new AAA titles that PSN offers they can't allow you to keep the game. If you've kept up with Phil Spencer interviews he's hinted at this the past year.

This is actually a good thing! Before we were getting free games that were 3-5 years old while PSN was getting free games from last year or as early as 6 months old. It's much nicer to have the latter.

Docknoss807d ago

Wait isn't this exactly what PSN dies with "free" games. Am I not correct!? The double standards from people who come to this site. Is mind numbingly ignorant.

Sayburr807d ago

"We're back to verification DRM, at least to some degree."

That is correct, the same as Sony.

Both systems will check to see if you are up to date on your subscription before allowing the game to start up... I guess. I don't have PS4 so I am not sure what happens if you don't have internet connection.

from the beach807d ago

It's a good thing for Microsoft, primarily because you have to keep paying to keep playing the 'free' games now, as has always been the case with PS+.

That was the point I was agreeing with..

Ghost_Nappa807d ago

Only on xbox one is that a requirement and besides, have you ever even seen ps plus lineups?

Mr Pumblechook807d ago

The Sony Instant Games Collection model works really well and when people who had upgraded from a 360 to PS4 dropped their Live subscriptions Microsoft had to react.

DragonKnight807d ago

HA! So now Live "rents" free games to you, just in a different way than PS+ does. I can't wait to see the backpeddling from the Xbox fanboys on this.

Man, today is Xbox Fanboys Eat Crow Day.

alexkoepp807d ago

Sucks they downgraded to PS+ levels, so much for free games, guess we unfortunately now have free game leases that can be revoked at any time.

DonMingos807d ago (Edited 807d ago )

@saybur,
No, in the ps3 you don't have to login and connect to the internet to play a game from Instant game collection. You just have to connect once your ps+ subscription expires to check if you have renewed it. Wich means i only have to connect once a year if i want to

kreate807d ago

I really liked the old model better.

UltimateMaster806d ago

@konnerbllb
"while PSN was getting free games from last year or as early as 6 months old. It's much nicer to have the latter."

Correction, as old as 0 days old.
Some games came out on the store free from day 1!

zeuanimals806d ago (Edited 806d ago )

@Alex:

Aren't you used to renting half of the system's functions with Gold restrictions by now? And it's about time they got rid of those, and by the way, I'm not applauding MS for undoing something they shouldn't have done in the first place. It's like thanking someone for pulling the knife out of your gut after they stabbed you with it.

That said, I don't see what your problem with "rentals" is...

If they give you better games, they have to give it to you as a "rental", but here's the thing, if they give you better games constantly then you won't want to stop subscribing because you'll keep getting newer and better games. Get mad if they stop giving new and good games.

mikeslemonade806d ago (Edited 806d ago )

I think the majority of people rather have a continuous subscritpion for the sake of better games than ownership of games that would lead to more crappy and old games.

That's if XBL gold gets better games. So far the last two months they have improved. But PS plus is still about 3 times better in that department.

Charybdis806d ago

So the xb360 gold program will stay the same, while the xb1 will finally get gold but with restricted drm same as sony, even if they previously stated they don't have drm they do have drm for their digital games.

Can't see why people think this is bad news for Microsoft fans because they finally get the opportunity to get free games on xb1. Meanwhile xb360 at the moment still has the benefits of the old program.

mike_honcho806d ago

only difference between g4g and ps+ is g4g are a year behind ps+ with what they're giving out.. #leftovers #4th&longM$fumbles

Kidmyst806d ago

E3 we should get a nice list of free games coming, I'm sure they'll throw a long list on the screen to jump start things.

+ Show (15) more repliesLast reply 806d ago
Darrius Cole807d ago

Those April Xbox One sales numbers must really be bad.

ramiuk1806d ago

i wonder what xboners will say now ,im sure the fact they got to keep a crap game from years ago and didnt need a sub was why GWG was better than ps+.

on another note what an awesome game there getting for the first month on xbone.
i hope the new boss sorts alot of the issues out,might tempt me to move my ps4 from centre of tv nit and give a litte bit of room to buy a xbone in a few motnhs if something decent(in my eyes) comes out for it.

Neonridr807d ago

Because this way they can offer newer, more relevant games.

palaeomerus806d ago

newer, more relevant games = 2 year old indie steam crap, and old games that are being sold in stuff like humble publisher bundles.

Neonridr806d ago

@palaeomerus - While the PS4 PS+ titles haven't been anything to write home about, give it time. The PS3 selections have been amazing. Imagine getting AAA games like Bioshock Infinite for free when the game released like 9 months prior.

Volkama806d ago

Indeed, called this change ages ago. The moment they said Games with Gold would eventually come to Xbox One they said "in some form", and it was a pretty safe bet this was it.

XiSasukeUchiha807d ago

Thank you for the listening to your fans!

ErcsYou807d ago (Edited 807d ago )

Didn't the fans attempt to brag about how they got to keep their "free" game forever? I wonder how they feel? I bet they feel some type of way.

Hyper_Tension140807d ago

I think he means newer games with gold.

testerg35807d ago

I guess the same way Sony fans feel about having to pay for online play. You just have to deal with it.

memots806d ago

ahh yes the usual ... The free game are not free comments.

ColManischewitz807d ago

Is Dark Souls relevant enough?

shinrock807d ago (Edited 807d ago )

Is free good enough?
But i wil say that im truly pissed about not being able to keep the dl'd title. Thanks sony fans!

badz149807d ago

Yeah. They should just keep the old model and offer Dark Souls for keep 3 years later! /s

barb_wire807d ago

How can you blame Sony when MS is saying it listened to their fans.. seems the fans wanted it this way, so go blame them.

n4rc806d ago

I'm not pissed at all..

Both systems had something to offer.. Gwg gave you older games you can keep, PS+ leased you newer games that you don't own.

Personally.. I've never found keeping my xbl gold an issue in the least.. So I'd rather the PS+ model..

You can blame sony for giving us free games to play, I guess.. Lol.. I think I'll be thanking them

Parapraxis807d ago (Edited 807d ago )

"But i wil say that im truly pissed about not being able to keep the dl'd title. Thanks sony fans!"
What the hell man, you are seriously blaming Sony fans?
grow up.

The PS+ model is just way better, for the company and the majority of consumers.
That is why MS has basically changed theirs to be the exact same!

Ghost_Nappa807d ago

Exactly, we have Sony's dick punch at e3 to thank for no online checks and not needing the kinect to be plugged in

Volkama806d ago

That's the funny thing about this change Ghost_Nappa. You now subscribe to access your leased games. It is clearly a move towards online checks.

All the people that raised pitchforks at MS and accused them of attacking their rights as a consumer are quite willing to wave those rights if they see good value.

MS failed to convince anyone that good value was on offer, if they had succeeded then the One would be the online-only box they tried to sell in the first place.

NatureOfLogic_807d ago

They're basically copying PSN and PSplus for better or worse with this change and no paywall change. MS doesn't have their own direction for gaming at the moment. And they're basically trying to imitate Sony's direction for gaming.

zeuanimals806d ago (Edited 806d ago )

Yup. I'll take better things wherever it is and I don't care if it's been "copied". PSN wouldn't be what it was if it didn't copy XBL.

OrangePowerz806d ago (Edited 806d ago )

They lost their direction last year with their first 180.

They had to do the 180 because the DRM and online check in was horrible. Problem is their system was built on many bad ideas that got all reversed in the last 12 months. All of that makes the console better, but they should have been thinking about it before revealing the console. Now it looks like they have no idea what they wanted their console to be and that they don't stand behind their product. What we have now is a console that tries to be a PS4 but with weaker hardware, a HDMI in to watch tv and an OS that is bad to navigate with a controller because it was designed for a peripheral that just sent to die. I have never seen so many u-turns in gaming in my life.

With all the changes since the reveal you don't even know what to expect from the future. Will they keep the HDMI in or drop that? Will they do the Xbox TV stuff for longer or just a short time before they axe that if it doesn't sell units?

A year ago before the reveal nobody would have expected that MS needs to copy Sony.

n4rc806d ago

That's a pretty ridiculous comment..

Someone has to be first.. In everything.

If its a success, it gets implemented by all..

Ms doesn't have a vision for matching a popular feature? Guess Sony doesn't understand communication since they copied cross game party chat?

Gimme a break man.. Ms has a clear vision, give its fans what they want and what they ask for.. Seriously.. Wasn't all these changes the main 3 complaints everyone had?

memots806d ago

You know PC and steam had this, So called "revolutionary party chat"

Seriously dude.