An original interview with Microsoft's Yusuf Mehdi explains why you'll need to keep your Xbox Live Gold subscription to keep playing Xbox One Games with Gold.
"Because the old model was stupid." End of story. ;)
Those April Xbox One sales numbers must really be bad.
i wonder what xboners will say now ,im sure the fact they got to keep a crap game from years ago and didnt need a sub was why GWG was better than ps+. on another note what an awesome game there getting for the first month on xbone. i hope the new boss sorts alot of the issues out,might tempt me to move my ps4 from centre of tv nit and give a litte bit of room to buy a xbone in a few motnhs if something decent(in my eyes) comes out for it.
Because this way they can offer newer, more relevant games.
newer, more relevant games = 2 year old indie steam crap, and old games that are being sold in stuff like humble publisher bundles.
@palaeomerus - While the PS4 PS+ titles haven't been anything to write home about, give it time. The PS3 selections have been amazing. Imagine getting AAA games like Bioshock Infinite for free when the game released like 9 months prior.
Indeed, called this change ages ago. The moment they said Games with Gold would eventually come to Xbox One they said "in some form", and it was a pretty safe bet this was it.
Thank you for the listening to your fans!
Didn't the fans attempt to brag about how they got to keep their "free" game forever? I wonder how they feel? I bet they feel some type of way.
I think he means newer games with gold.
I guess the same way Sony fans feel about having to pay for online play. You just have to deal with it.
ahh yes the usual ... The free game are not free comments.
Is Dark Souls relevant enough?
Is free good enough? But i wil say that im truly pissed about not being able to keep the dl'd title. Thanks sony fans!
Yeah. They should just keep the old model and offer Dark Souls for keep 3 years later! /s
How can you blame Sony when MS is saying it listened to their fans.. seems the fans wanted it this way, so go blame them.
I'm not pissed at all.. Both systems had something to offer.. Gwg gave you older games you can keep, PS+ leased you newer games that you don't own. Personally.. I've never found keeping my xbl gold an issue in the least.. So I'd rather the PS+ model.. You can blame sony for giving us free games to play, I guess.. Lol.. I think I'll be thanking them
"But i wil say that im truly pissed about not being able to keep the dl'd title. Thanks sony fans!" What the hell man, you are seriously blaming Sony fans? grow up. The PS+ model is just way better, for the company and the majority of consumers. That is why MS has basically changed theirs to be the exact same!
Exactly, we have Sony's dick punch at e3 to thank for no online checks and not needing the kinect to be plugged in
That's the funny thing about this change Ghost_Nappa. You now subscribe to access your leased games. It is clearly a move towards online checks. All the people that raised pitchforks at MS and accused them of attacking their rights as a consumer are quite willing to wave those rights if they see good value. MS failed to convince anyone that good value was on offer, if they had succeeded then the One would be the online-only box they tried to sell in the first place.
They're basically copying PSN and PSplus for better or worse with this change and no paywall change. MS doesn't have their own direction for gaming at the moment. And they're basically trying to imitate Sony's direction for gaming.
True, but who cares.
Yup. I'll take better things wherever it is and I don't care if it's been "copied". PSN wouldn't be what it was if it didn't copy XBL.
They lost their direction last year with their first 180. They had to do the 180 because the DRM and online check in was horrible. Problem is their system was built on many bad ideas that got all reversed in the last 12 months. All of that makes the console better, but they should have been thinking about it before revealing the console. Now it looks like they have no idea what they wanted their console to be and that they don't stand behind their product. What we have now is a console that tries to be a PS4 but with weaker hardware, a HDMI in to watch tv and an OS that is bad to navigate with a controller because it was designed for a peripheral that just sent to die. I have never seen so many u-turns in gaming in my life. With all the changes since the reveal you don't even know what to expect from the future. Will they keep the HDMI in or drop that? Will they do the Xbox TV stuff for longer or just a short time before they axe that if it doesn't sell units? A year ago before the reveal nobody would have expected that MS needs to copy Sony.
That's a pretty ridiculous comment.. Someone has to be first.. In everything. If its a success, it gets implemented by all.. Ms doesn't have a vision for matching a popular feature? Guess Sony doesn't understand communication since they copied cross game party chat? Gimme a break man.. Ms has a clear vision, give its fans what they want and what they ask for.. Seriously.. Wasn't all these changes the main 3 complaints everyone had?
You know PC and steam had this, So called "revolutionary party chat" Seriously dude.
...So, it is a "subscription model" but Microsoft will only offer the games for a limited two week period much like they do now, whereas PS+ a new subscriber could still pick up Resogun for free. Am I correct in how I am reading this?
LOL... I am getting disagrees on a question being asked.
Games rotate on plus, too. Some games stay for a long time, some go more quickly
Most go quickly, but Sony keeps a few on there almost indefinitely. It's good for new users to try the standouts and it doesn't really impact new games coming to the service so long-time PS+ users won't get pissy.
Wait so the xbox360 free games can only be free if you're a XBL member and xbox one is like the old GWO were u keep it no matter what?
It's the other way around, I believe.
360 model stay the same.xbox1 u lose access when ur account lapses.
I'm glad they changed it. Prepare for the comparison articles about their lineups EVERY. SINGLE. FREAKING. MONTH!
@WeAreLegion lol This is gonna get ugly:D
Good. I want PS+ to have some decent competition. I'm not saying "it needs competition because competition keeps things from stagnating", which has some truth and some falsity to it, I'm just saying GWG was a joke in comparison and I didn't even bother downloading anything. Now I will.
Max, the curse of the brotherhood. Lot of people say this a good game, so i am very happy i will be playing come June.
I have thought about buying it, and the Halo title also... glad I have not yet.
Spartan assault is meh, it's insane that it was 15$ to start with
but.. but.. but.. rentals.. Going to be fun to watch the Xboners change their tune on this.
It will be PRICELESS!!
Rentals with DRM, gotta make sure the user still has Xbox Live afterall.
I'm not changing any tune. It's a rental service, same as PS+. Either way it is mostly irrelevant to me as I buy games long before they "give" them away. Unless it is something I don't want, but I still don't want it even if it is "free", so it makes no difference to me.
Right on bro!
You never even thought about wanting to try out a game but end up not buying it? I'm pretty sure everyone's done that. It's like a hot girl at some place, you want to go talk to her but you end up chickening out. A few weeks later you guys see each other again and she's practically begging for... It. So are you in or are you crazy?
lol, very rarely. If I do hold off on one at launch, I usually watch for it and grab it on a sale or when it starts dropping in price. So I still usually have it before it goes "free". The only game I've ever gotten off of PS+ that falls into that category was Spec Ops: The Line, and I obviously didn't want it too bad because I still haven't made any attempt to play it. lol
Gamers liked better what PSPLUS was offering, and xbox one mimicked that, which isn't a bad thing.
Damn I really wished they changed the X360 model as well but at least the june lineup is pretty good :)
But i thought ps+ was bad because when your subscription ran out you lose access to the games lol even though it offered more relevant games that aren't old as shit
You thought right.
........... Um that is kind of what people are arguing. We now cannot keep the games which sucks!!!
Oh cry a little more. It's better to get newer games most people pay for live or psn anyway. What was so great about 3 plus year old games for free if you want to keep them that bad I'm sure you can find them for a few bucks.
I've never understood how popular this argument has been.
In what imaginary universe do Xbox Live Gold subscribers just decide they'll continue using their Xbox without a Gold subscription? It's as if noone realizes how useless an Xbox is without a Gold subscription.
Both systems will adopt and adapt from eachother nothing is wrong with that.
Its that not bad really, I have plus and don't plan on nit having it. Same thing with gold now.
Well i dont own a x1 yet but its nice to see some competition for sony. Hope the games for x1 wont be bad, i am currently happy with PS+ discounts and games available.
Ugh, they adopted the rental policy. I'll speak against it here, because I spoke against in in PS Plus. It's silly. I understand why both companies do it, but it's silly and I want no part of it. I'll take the discounts gladly, but I don't want your "free games". I'm gaming on PC, XONE, and PS4 within the next year. I cannot afford/doubt I'll be able to have 2 subs running year round, meaning those free games will be useless to me.
would be really cool if they offer free multiplayer for xb360 owners!
Well this is crap but unfortunely rent to play is the future model in all likelyhood for almost every game Basically stuffed if you want to play a game down the line but no longer can
So pretty much MS is doing what PS+ been doing, that's good to hear. Xbl has been pointless the last couple years since PS+ has become a better deal. With all these announcement MS announce today there actually be competition this gen.
"That’s because Microsoft could potentially offer better deals to third-party publishers because customers are more likely to keep subscribing to Xbox Live Gold. That means Microsoft gets more people subscribing for a longer amount of time; publishers potentially get more money from Microsoft; and gamers might get a better selection of software." Pros and cons....I supported.
Awesome they finally did this. It's quite late though.
Xbox fans are running out of reasons to say how Xbox Live anything is better than PSN or PS Plus. Now XB1 Games with Gold is the SAME as Plus except for games.
well now that theres no paywall and games with gold is like psn+ model. we yet to see the game selections. are we only left to compare infrastructure of live vs psn? if so xbox live is looking better than it already was.
xbox will eventually become playstation. heck, might as well rename their brand to playstation.
if you think about it sony copy most of xbox live at first then they added extras. now ms borrows from it, you got to adapt man
Xbox live has always been the better and more reliable service. Now it even does the only thing that PSN had over it, PS+. In this case, Games with Gold. All this talk about "copy", You wouldn't have a comparable service like PSN without Xbox Live ^_^.
the xboxstation, hey you cant beat them,join em. now the xbox just gotta get games