790°
Submitted by Abriael 480d ago | rumor

Watch_Dogs on PS4 Runs at 1080p, 60 FPS According to Sony's Pre-Order Page; No Mention on X1's Page

Ubisoft has kept the resolution and framerate combination of Watch_Dogs a secret until now, but on the pre-order page for the game on PlayStation's official site something quite interesting has appeared. (PS4, Watch Dogs)

Alternative Sources
Hopefully
Is this rumor true? Rumor votes 148
« 1 2 3 »
GamerXD  +   480d ago
What? We don't need 60fps on a game like this, as long as it is solid 30fps I'm okay. Maybe just upgrade the visuals rather than more frames.
Webbyy  +   480d ago | Well said
Yea, true but if the system can do a lock 60 fps ,,i am not complaining :-p

bring it on sony..
Abriael  +   480d ago
Could still be a mistake, even if it'd be funny if they built a whole description boasting "the true watch_dogs experience" around a mistake.
pedrof93  +   480d ago
I doubt about the 60 fps, but I believe in the 1080p.
Septic  +   480d ago
Didn't we get confirmation that the X1 version will be running sub-1080p already?? I made my friend pay for my Nandos meal because of it.
Webbyy  +   480d ago
@Abriael yea lol but i am sure true native 1080p on ps4 is 95% possible..we shall see :)
Abriael  +   480d ago
I have almost no doubts about resolution, but framerate is iffy, especially considering how dense the world is.

Hell, I doubt my gaming PC can hold 60 steady in all situations.
#1.1.5 (Edited 480d ago ) | Agree(28) | Disagree(3) | Report
starchild  +   480d ago
It's a mistake. It will almost certainly be 1080p and 30fps.
#1.1.6 (Edited 480d ago ) | Agree(35) | Disagree(14) | Report
truefan1   480d ago | Trolling | show
Lukas_Japonicus  +   480d ago | Well said
Truefan...why are you still trolling in PS articles, i thought you said you were "done with that"?

You act like Sony have done it on purpose, it's probably just a mistake is all....or it could be true, but i doubt that. I doubt there's any misleading being done on purpose here, take your tin-foil hat off.

Just stay out of PS articles man, your bitterness shines through when you comment in them.
#1.1.8 (Edited 480d ago ) | Agree(38) | Disagree(18) | Report
MorePowerOfGreen  +   479d ago
No mention of the XB1 version's resolution on a Sony site? shocked LOL

Funny how people in here are saying "mistake" vs lie?
#1.1.9 (Edited 479d ago ) | Agree(10) | Disagree(59) | Report
Lukas_Japonicus  +   479d ago | Well said
@MPOG

"Funny how people in here are saying "mistake" vs lie?"

We don't know what it is...either way, why do you care? You will be getting in on the X1, right? So why exactly are you in here? I think people like you need to sit down and ask yourselves why you frequent PS articles so often. All you are doing is showing how much PS4/Sony's success upsets you.

You and Truefan, two of the biggest Xbox fanboys/trolls on this site, commenting on this article...about a game on a platform that isn't your platform of choice, about an aspect that doesn't even affect your platforms version of said game. WHY?
#1.1.10 (Edited 479d ago ) | Agree(38) | Disagree(12) | Report
PLASTICA-MAN  +   479d ago
I knew it, I read in a previous article where Ubisoft said it is clearly possible to hit 60 FPS on PS4.
Bathyj  +   479d ago
Ha. I remember you mentioning that Septic. You don't want to have to pay that chicken back.

Trufan, what does it matter if Sony "lies" to you? You don't believe anything they say anyway.
Army_of_Darkness  +   479d ago
@gamerxd

I'm impressed on how you can complain about 1080/60pfs(which is awesome if true) on a game like this?! LOL!
DoesUs  +   479d ago
LOL our multi caoount troll MPOG is back, whinging after his ban 8)
LordMaim  +   479d ago
They did it with Assassin's Creed IV, so I wouldn't be surprised if they achieved 60fps too.
BG11579  +   479d ago
I will actually complain, as for this kind of game I would rather have better graphics and 30fps than a downgraded graphics and 60fps.

At this point I'll be waiting for the official specs for both PS4 and Bone to pass judgement.
Give_me_head_strong  +   479d ago
The article never said it was a locked 60fps.
AliTheSnake1  +   479d ago
60 FPS?
Now watch people complaining about the Graphics.
Am-No-Hero  +   480d ago
Hmmm ..

Killzone SF " mistake " !!
onyoursistersback  +   479d ago | Funny
Mistakes.... Let me call out a huge one

"Kinects"
Septic  +   480d ago
There's a MASSIVE difference between 60fps and 30fps.
mafiahajeri  +   480d ago
Hmmmm nandos...
kohlgamer  +   479d ago
Yeah... 30fps
Cueil  +   479d ago
it's controller lag... 90 ms vs 300 ms
kevnb  +   480d ago
If it's 1080p 60 fps I'm starting to become really interested in getting a ps4. Last gen performance really bothered me on consoles, this gen it looks like having a ps4 will solve that issue for me.
mkis007  +   480d ago
Devs will make a game and the ps4 version will be inherently better...(or should be given the same amount of time) fewer obstacles in their path...it may just be that 2 frame difference the 360 got all last generation or the higher rez/ better Antialiasing it got for most of the gen...but that is enough for me considering I bought a 360 just to play Red Dead Redemption with the best experience possible. Don't worry i filled out my collection with halo, gears, and crackdown.

I tend to think though, with 720-1080 being the difference in a few games thus far, that the ps4 and xbox one will have a relatively wider gap. Ps3 never saw this big a resolution difference and it was a much harder platform to work with than either of these. The frame rate in early games on the ps3 was hilariously bad as well. Not happening to ps4 this time around.

making a game 720p really should be giving the xbox one more of a frame-rate advantage in those game, but only a few actually do, and not even constantly.
Stapleface  +   480d ago
Build a pc if your worried about consistent frame rate. I'm not sure if either of these consoles have a game that hold a solid 60fps. Some go that high, but every one I've seen has some serious dips down into the 30's sometimes. That's noticeable to most people, and if performance bothered you last gen, it just might this gen. The difference being a higher resolution on average so far. The ps4 is a great console, I don't want to knock it too hard. I have a lot of fun on mine. But they are very limited, but that's obvious, being a console and all. I won't sugar coat it like a lot of people will for you. Tell you it's perfect and you should buy one right away. IMO the pc option is the best option, but if you don't want to or know how to build a pc, a PS4 is a great gaming option.
#1.4.2 (Edited 480d ago ) | Agree(13) | Disagree(23) | Report
esemce  +   479d ago
This game will not be native 1080p and a solid 60fps on the PS4. It will be locked 30fps or fluctuating 30-60fps. Unless they gimp it to look like last gen graphics.
Magicite  +   480d ago
60fps is really huge for open world game with so great visuals.
instead of buying better gpu, I might even buy PS4.
Salooh  +   479d ago
Won't regret it. Better multiplatformes in pc will take at least one year. You can buy ps4 right now and hide money for next year. This way , you get the ps4 exclusives and next year you will get a noticeable upgrade for multiplatforms in pc. That's wiser in my point of view ^^ .
edqe  +   479d ago
I would recommend to buy a better graphics card. 2k/4k and 60/120fps with better visuals on Watch Dogs and other games is simply much better experience.
Meltic  +   480d ago
i really hope the fps is around 30-60 and great Graphics so they dont just Think of the PC Graphics. Then im pissed.
Dustinf11  +   480d ago
I kind of doubt it will be 60fps. But it would amazing if it was. 60fps IS what makes current gen special.
#1.7 (Edited 480d ago ) | Agree(9) | Disagree(3) | Report | Reply
RedDeadLB  +   480d ago
I thought it was already confirmed to be 1080p 30fps..
boing1  +   479d ago
Yeah. I think I read that somewhere too.
MEsoJD  +   479d ago
I'd prefer 60fps as top priority on next gen systems. Once you play any game from 30fps to 60fps there's no going back.
KrisButtar  +   479d ago
I would prefer that as well, then 1080. Even if the added effects like weather and lighting would suffer.
#1.9.1 (Edited 479d ago ) | Agree(3) | Disagree(2) | Report
Golden30  +   479d ago
i did play games from 60 to 30fps.. i dont care if 30 is done correctly, its a smooth experience too
dale_denton  +   479d ago
lol yet u bash anything related to sony running 30fps..
porkChop  +   479d ago
I don't know if this is true. But if it is that's a great thing. Open World games in 60fps is a great experience, very smooth. That alone would give Watch Dogs a very different feel from other Open World games on consoles.
system22  +   479d ago
i agree, but at the same time, if it can do it without sacrifice, why not? it would be nice if they could also do motion blur at 60 fps but i've never seen that on a console.
thehitman1398  +   479d ago
How come if a game can't do 60fps ppl are so so mad. But when a game does, you complain about it? You sure are a weird one.....
dwezel  +   479d ago
@mpog

It clearly says, "no mention on x1's PAGE." Make sure you actually read what your commenting on before making yourself look ignorant.
MYDEATH21  +   479d ago
If it can make it look smooth without big dips I'm all for it
Eyesoftheraven  +   479d ago
Few things are more infuriating in the modern world than hearing what Gamer XD said. *Counts to 10, Goes for a walk*
Ghost_Nappa  +   479d ago
Christ people, 111 disagrees?
xander70769  +   479d ago
I don't care if it's at 60 or 30, but it better not have screen tearing. If they're sacrificing Vsync just so they can brag about high Framerate, I'll flip out.
AuToFiRE  +   479d ago
30 fps is waaaayyy too low. 60fps would be a minimum for a game like this. Higher framerates don't just give you smoother gameplay, it also acts as a buffer for high action areas. For instance, if a game is running at 30fps and you enter a huge shootout with hundreds of AI at the same time, your frame rate will start to get very very choppy as it drops below 15fps, while with 60fps if you enter the same scenario, your frames drop to 45fps, you won't see the choppiness that you would with 30fps to begin with.
#1.19 (Edited 479d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(4) | Report | Reply
xander70769  +   479d ago
Few problems with what you're saying. Firstly, it could be easier to keep 30fps steady than 60fps steady. A scenario that might drop 60fps won't necessarily drop 30fps.

Another issue is that hopefully watchdogs is vsynced. If it is, then the next drop from 30fps is to 20fps, whereas the next drop from 60fps is all the way down to 30fps. Going from 30 to 20 is less jarring than going from 60 to 30.
quenomamen  +   479d ago
Yea, we don't need games to be optimized to run at their full potential, way to keep gaming down. What's next ? we don't need HDTVs ? we should all go back to 24 inch color CRTs ?
solar  +   479d ago
THE PS4 IS A SUPERCHARGED PC YOU WILL BOW DOWN TO RESOLUTION AND FPS THAT HAS BEEN STANDARD ON PC 9 YEAR AGO!!!
reko   479d ago | Trolling | show | Replies(2)
MadMax  +   479d ago
I completely agree! Upgrade the visuals and don't worry so much about a game running at 60 frames! 30 seconds is just fine, I want crazy graphics man!
Locknuts  +   479d ago
Depends on how the combat is implemented. A locked 60fps could be a real blessing if the game is combat-heavy.
solar  +   479d ago
doubt it. Supercharged PC my ass.
hiredhelp  +   480d ago
Trust me 60 Frames makes things feel more fluid.
Like running around shooting when lots going on having a stable frame rate really helps.
#2 (Edited 480d ago ) | Agree(35) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
superbhoy  +   480d ago
especially when things explode.... I love explosions
Geoff900  +   479d ago
Don't we all.
system22  +   479d ago
for sure. i think its a little more important on fps games, and games like this I'm ok at 30 fps especially if they run motion blur because it makes it feel just a little bit less video game-ish.
AuToFiRE  +   479d ago
Yes. Not only does 60fps make the game much more fluid and smooth, it also adds a buffer zone for high action areas.
ArbitorChief  +   480d ago
The director of Watch Dogs said the game was 30 FPS just a few months ago:
http://www.destructoid.com/...
superbhoy  +   480d ago
yeah i think this is a mistake
Geoff900  +   479d ago
It could be a mistake, we will just have to wait and see.
Abriael  +   480d ago
he also said recently that they were still working on optimizing. Not that I don't lean towards a mistake myself, but that statement is outdated.
mkis007  +   480d ago
Wow! That conversation was before the delay!

Few months to you is over half a year?
ArbitorChief  +   480d ago
Would you like a more recent update?
http://www.gamepur.com/news...
mkis007  +   480d ago
Ya that would have been better to post don't you think? Still...the wording on the sony site is oddly specific. Wonder how it got there.

You don't like using outdated sources do you?
#3.3.2 (Edited 480d ago ) | Agree(3) | Disagree(1) | Report
Meltic  +   480d ago
yeah then. Then when people complained about graphic downgrade they meaby did higher the Graphics and down was the FPS...
amnalehu  +   479d ago
He did not says it was at 30 FPS. He said, "RIGHT NOW the frame rate we're focusing on [is] a steady 30[FPS]."

Maybe something changeD or maybe they didn't want backlash from XB1. The Sony/Watch Dogs pre-order site is overtly explicit in it's description of the PS4 version of Watch Dogs: "Experience Watch Dogs in a way that only the PS4 can provide, at 60 Frames Per Second in 1080P." I hope the website is right!
angelsx  +   480d ago
I will be very happy if that's true.But even on the demo you can see is 30fps.
#4 (Edited 480d ago ) | Agree(3) | Disagree(7) | Report | Reply
Overwhelming  +   479d ago
That's because you're watching a video on youtube and youtube's videos don't go beyond 30fps.
jay2  +   480d ago
PS4. 60 mins extra, 60FPS, Full HD, £50 cheaper hardware, love it.
Stapleface  +   480d ago
Then you woke up?
mkis007  +   480d ago
...to PS4. 60 mins extra, 60FPS, Full HD, £50 cheaper hardware, love it.
CernaML  +   479d ago
Yes. He woke up and experienced dejavu.
MasterCornholio  +   479d ago
That's what you call a dream come true. Although I dont think the game will be 60FPS.
#5.1.3 (Edited 479d ago ) | Agree(3) | Disagree(0) | Report
MysticStrummer  +   479d ago
He woke up, remembered he bought an XB1, burst into tears, got control of his emotions, and traded his XB1 in on superior yet cheaper hardware.
jay2  +   479d ago
I'm not convinced, they've always said 30FPS. I'd be so happy if it's 60, so much smoother.
farhad2k8  +   479d ago
The page has been up on Playstations official site for over 14 hours, you'd think with all the popularity the page has been getting, they'd reach out to Ubisoft and double check, and they would have fixed the error by now IF it was a mistake.

I'm starting to think it actually is 60fps.
Ps4marksthespotnotX  +   480d ago
More proof that Sony Ps4 is the the best most powerful console on the planet.
Niv  +   480d ago
Doubt any xbox1 game did a locked 60
Tedakin  +   480d ago
Forza 5.
Vitalogy  +   480d ago
Forza 5 sacrificed way too much to get 60fps. But you do have a point there.
BakPAin  +   479d ago
Its 1080p/60fps, but most people only think about the sacrifices made to get to run that way. Regardless still 60fps and having played, looks really nice. Tho I tend to believe that Turn10 rushed it. Im expecting F6 to be much much better.
imt558  +   479d ago
You went full retard never go full retard

http://images.bidnessetc.co...
Tito08  +   479d ago
Actually, Forza has always being 60fps with the exception of Horizon, and isn't graphically a big of a leap from F4. The real test will be with the new Halo, which according to MS at last year's E3, will run at 60fps, it remains to be seen, one month away.
LightDiego  +   480d ago
The Sony fans always said that Xbox One players just care for fps, looks like PS4 will receives more fps on this generation.
Infamous298  +   480d ago
WTF are you talking about??
Kosmacz  +   479d ago
This is something called irony. I wouldn't bother if i was you, anyway.
TFJWM  +   480d ago
Just a heads up 60 fps doesn't mean 60 first person shooters
porkChop  +   479d ago
LMFAO I hope that's not what he meant
amnalehu  +   479d ago
60 First Person Shooters! That's classic. Wait till everyone starts talking about Planet Side 2. The Playstation 2 is making a massive comeback!
Tito08  +   479d ago
When people talk about 30-60fps, they're talking about frames per second aka performance, not first person shooters fool, go play some Pokemon, lol.
#8.3 (Edited 479d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
MadMax  +   479d ago
Lol, you Xbots really have far too much air between the ears!
MrSwankSinatra  +   480d ago
i doubt it, i mean didn't ubisoft clearly state it was 30FPS? I mean if they did get to 60FPS then hell of great job on ubisoft.
Tedakin  +   480d ago
I believe 1080. I don't believe 60fps. If it's 60 it'll be that 60 that goes all over the map and isn't locked.
deadfrag  +   479d ago
I hope they lock the framerate to 30fps than having horrible flutuations between 30 to 60fps that will cause judder and bad input lag on controler!
#10.1 (Edited 479d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
Master-H  +   480d ago
I don't believe the 60 FPS part, doesn't make much sense in this kind of game, i'm sure Ubi would rather upgrade the visual fidelity than try to get 60 FPS .
MasterCornholio  +   480d ago
1080P almost certain.

60FPS I dont think so.

I think they made a mistake.

Dont get me wrong u would love 60FPS but I dont think its realistic to expect that from a game like this on the PS4.

They dont say anything about the Xbox One version but I wouldn't be surprised if its below 1080P.
mark3214uk  +   480d ago
maybe the 6 months delay they managed to achive the solid 60fps, will be great if they have it will set the bar for future AAA games (on ps4 anyway)
mkis007  +   480d ago
I could have sworn that before the delay they had already achieved it locked on ps4 and with dips on xbox1, what if they solved the dips!
johny5  +   480d ago
Funny thing is Infamous second son and Killzone SF felt much smoother when played with the 30FPS lock setting off!

Both games where advertised as 60fps capable "which technically they where" but even when the average frames where under 40 it still felt more responsive then when locked at 30FPS. Don't believe me try it yourself!

Even if Watch Dogs hits 50FPS average I would choose that over 30 FPS anyday!
#13 (Edited 480d ago ) | Agree(17) | Disagree(6) | Report | Reply
starchild  +   480d ago
I STRONGLY disagree. A capped 30fps feels a lot smoother and more consistent than a variable framerate that swings up and down resulting in judder.
#13.1 (Edited 480d ago ) | Agree(8) | Disagree(14) | Report | Reply
WickedLester  +   479d ago
I played Killzone Shadowfall using the capped 30fps feature and I didn't like it as much as the default variable frame rate. 30fps capped felt LESS smooth to me.
candy_mafia  +   480d ago
1080/60fps would be silky, silky, milky, milky smooth!

..but I won't get my hopes up, since I'm sure Ubi already confirmed 1080/30fps on PS4.

But I'm hoping it's me that's made the mistake, not Sony ;/
#14 (Edited 480d ago ) | Agree(7) | Disagree(2) | Report | Reply
esemce  +   479d ago
I thought they did also and If Ubi could not get AC4 the run at 60fps then how will the more advanced Watch-dogs manage it? It may hit 60fps now and again but a solid locked 60fps I can't see it happening.
HaveAsandwich  +   480d ago
lol no way. just no way.
cruzngta  +   480d ago
If its 60 fps it will look unfreaking believable. Tomb Raider on PS4 is so fluid and crisp with the 1080/60fps graphics. This game will kill it if it is indeed at 60 fps. You have to love Sony for getting us a console that gives us all of these amazing games in 1080p.
jazmac  +   480d ago
No way this game is 60fps I can guarantee that, a very decent pc is going to struggle getting 60fps especially with ubisoft's track history nvm the ps4.

Assassin's creed 4 is a perfect representation of what you're likely to get. It has much less density and events going on than watch dogs with a similar level of graphics and you're getting 30.
Haki1112  +   480d ago
I agree with you man Ubisoft PC games are horrible with optimization I cried when playing AC4 on PC.
TheDevKit  +   479d ago
AC4 on PC was absolutely pathetic.
Qrphe  +   479d ago
Yeah, at best, it'll run unlocked and would hit 60hz in small rooms but no way is it locked
MYDEATH21  +   480d ago
Hello my pretty!
Tedakin  +   480d ago
Either a typo or something has massively changed in a short period of time. http://www.gamepur.com/news...

'Ubisoft has officially revealed details regarding resolution at which their upcoming open world title "Watch Dogs" will run on PS4 and Xbox One. Watch Dogs on PS4 will run at glorious 1080p/30 FPS, whereas on Xbox One it will run at 960p/30 FPS.'
#19 (Edited 480d ago ) | Agree(4) | Disagree(3) | Report | Reply
nerdman67  +   479d ago
I think it is unlocked so it fluctuates at random times. I hate that, if so. There better be just 30 fps cap, i prefer consistency
esemce  +   479d ago
Yeahs it's BS to label a game with 60fps it it's not steady and only does it 5% of the time when there is nothing on screen.

If you want 1080/60 in all your games then PC is the only option. My PS4 and Xbox are for exclusives, PC for multis.
JakeTyler93  +   480d ago
I have a ps4, but I don't see the big deal between 30 FPS and 60 fps. That doesn't equate to a better game. Neither does resolution. As long as it runs great and plays well, why does it matter? It's not going to ruin my experience any and it shouldn't ruin the experience of someone who has an Xbox One and enjoys it.
Idba  +   480d ago
well if its 60 fps it'll play and run better, and if it also has a high resolution it will well look better. Graphics, gameplay and fps all factor into how good a game can be. Sometimes some factors are more important that others.
jazmac  +   480d ago
resolution I can agree isn't such a noticeable difference as some people seem to think it is but the difference between 30 fps and 60 fps is massive.

At some point you should try a game like devil may cry or an assassin's creed game or most games really with a pc and then play it at a stable 60 then lock it down to 30 and then tell me you don't notice the huge difference.
TomRL  +   480d ago
Uhh, framerate IS how well is runs...
JakeTyler93  +   479d ago
But it isn't so black and white. I'd rather have a game run at a stable 30 FPS than struggle to do 60.
jazmac  +   479d ago
right but that's not what you're arguing for. You're saying 60 fps doesn't matter but it definitely does and in several games it can be a serious game changer. Yes a variable framerate between 30-60 isn't a great experience but a solid 60 is a big deal and is what games companies should really be aiming for over the cost of graphics because unlike shiny new graphics (which is all well and fine ofc) framerate does impact gameplay.
johny5  +   480d ago
you know what's funny is that some people say 960p with AA will look the same as 1080p but it doesn't!

AA doesn't miraculously add 1920 by 1080 lines of digital information that wasn't there to begin with!

AA is a digital enhancement to get rid of jagged edges from a byproduct of lower resolutions.

Simple as that! No magic sauce!
#21 (Edited 480d ago ) | Agree(6) | Disagree(2) | Report | Reply
TomRL  +   480d ago
WOW YOU'RE A GENIUS!
mhunterjr  +   480d ago
A console open world game at 1080p 60fps... Impressive if true... But I wonder if the game wouldn't be better served at 30fps with the savings going to improved pixel quality.
#22 (Edited 480d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(2) | Report | Reply
AussieBadger  +   480d ago
I heard it was 1440p @120fps.oh sorry that was on my gaming pc. Just kidding I love stirring you guys. No I hope its right otherwise it turn it a sony lies bonanza.hopefully good news for Ps4.
Stapleface  +   480d ago
Get your popcorn ready for a bunch of butt hurt excuses from PS4 fanboys. I'm ready for the backlash if I'm wrong, but I'm willing to bet a $20 PSN card that this is wrong. But the outcome and butt hurt will be oh so right. Out of bubz now I think..I miss that 4th one, I'll never talk about plants again N4G I PROMISE!! LOL
#23.1 (Edited 480d ago ) | Agree(6) | Disagree(10) | Report | Reply
AussieBadger  +   480d ago
I'm sure it will be 1080p just don't like sony's claim of 60fps. But hey they might know something we don't.
modesign  +   480d ago
i doubt you spent $399 for 1440p @120fps. if my mommy bought me everything i would be a greasy computer nerd too.
AussieBadger  +   480d ago
@ modesign I work and buy games for every machine. Sorry go out and work if you want a computer because i'm not buying you one.
cyclindk  +   480d ago
Don't listen to him, I'll buy you one for Christmas.
Qrphe  +   479d ago
I highly doubt your Intel 4000 laptop will run the gane at that performance. Actually, I expect a whole bunch of people coming out and blaming Ubisoft for "bad optimization" because they can't run thr game very well.
G1L  +   480d ago
Thats obviously a mistake. With the amount of effects we've seen in the promotional videos and walktroughs there's no way that is achievable at 60 fps. Only possibility is they include the PS3 version in the ps4 game and let us choose (play the ps4 version at 1080p 30 fps os the PS3 version at 1080p 60 fps) and thats highly unlikely ;)
Melankolis  +   479d ago
I don't think it's a mistake. It could be TRUE or a MISLEAD instead. See, Sony emphasize the sentence...

"The True Watch_dogs Experience ONLY ON PS4".

It's clearly trying to distinguish from the X1 version.
XiSasukeUchiha  +   480d ago
1080p60fps. Damn that would be awesome.
Speak_da_Truth  +   480d ago
That would be awesome if its not a mistakes but the way its worded it doesn't look like a mistake to me. only PC Elitist/Xb1 fanboys want it to be a mistake LOL
cyclindk  +   480d ago
We will all see in 17 days!!! YAY!
cruzngta  +   480d ago
PS4 1080/60 and XB1 900/30 or 960/30. PS4 will look better and is the lead platform just like Destiny. XB1 owners will still enjoy a great game and it will look great on XB1 as well. Everyone wins in the end guys.
heisenberguk  +   480d ago
What did they sacrifice to get 60fps if true! 30fps locked would be better than 40/60fps!
#29 (Edited 480d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(6) | Report | Reply
Android  +   479d ago
They sacrificed that e3 presentation lol
iistuii  +   480d ago
I will be playing it 1080/60 for sure.
MUGEN81  +   479d ago
No,you will be playing 1080p 30/60 for sure!
iistuii  +   479d ago
No, again I will be playing it at 1080/60. We don't all just have consoles. I'm sure a GTX780 will manage 60fps.
AuToFiRE  +   479d ago
I know I'll be playing it at 200+fps at 4K resolution..
« 1 2 3 »

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
Remember
New stories
30°

GTA V Might Meet Its Match In The Face Of Crackdown 3

10m ago - GTA 5 Cheats considers whether Crackdown 3 might be able to match the success of Grand Theft Auto V. | PC
20°

It's time to enter the Wasteland with Mad Max

10m ago - MWEB GameZone writes: "Mad Max is either a Completionist heaven or hell. We take a look at the ma... | PC
Ad

Check What PC Games are Coming Out in August

Now - At Releases.com you can check release dates for PC games. Visit now and start tracking the games you plan to buy. | Promoted post
30°

Gears of War: Ultimate Edition Review | NZGamer

29m ago - NZG: Since the launch of the eighth-generation consoles in 2013, there have been a handful of ga... | Xbox One
40°

New NieR by PlatinumGames Gets Lovely Concept Artwork

39m ago - PlatinumGames released a new piece of concept artwork of the upcoming NieR project in development... | PS4
30°

Best of PAX Prime 2015 – Top 5 Video Games

42m ago - Ashton Macauley, GIZORAMA - "I spent the past four days waking up at 6AM so that I could get to t... | Culture
Related content from friends