Ubisoft has kept the resolution and framerate combination of Watch_Dogs a secret until now, but on the pre-order page for the game on PlayStation's official site something quite interesting has appeared.
What? We don't need 60fps on a game like this, as long as it is solid 30fps I'm okay. Maybe just upgrade the visuals rather than more frames.
Yea, true but if the system can do a lock 60 fps ,,i am not complaining :-p bring it on sony..
Could still be a mistake, even if it'd be funny if they built a whole description boasting "the true watch_dogs experience" around a mistake.
I doubt about the 60 fps, but I believe in the 1080p.
Didn't we get confirmation that the X1 version will be running sub-1080p already?? I made my friend pay for my Nandos meal because of it.
@Abriael yea lol but i am sure true native 1080p on ps4 is 95% possible..we shall see :)
I have almost no doubts about resolution, but framerate is iffy, especially considering how dense the world is. Hell, I doubt my gaming PC can hold 60 steady in all situations.
It's a mistake. It will almost certainly be 1080p and 30fps.
Truefan...why are you still trolling in PS articles, i thought you said you were "done with that"? You act like Sony have done it on purpose, it's probably just a mistake is all....or it could be true, but i doubt that. I doubt there's any misleading being done on purpose here, take your tin-foil hat off. Just stay out of PS articles man, your bitterness shines through when you comment in them.
No mention of the XB1 version's resolution on a Sony site? shocked LOL Funny how people in here are saying "mistake" vs lie?
@MPOG "Funny how people in here are saying "mistake" vs lie?" We don't know what it is...either way, why do you care? You will be getting in on the X1, right? So why exactly are you in here? I think people like you need to sit down and ask yourselves why you frequent PS articles so often. All you are doing is showing how much PS4/Sony's success upsets you. You and Truefan, two of the biggest Xbox fanboys/trolls on this site, commenting on this article...about a game on a platform that isn't your platform of choice, about an aspect that doesn't even affect your platforms version of said game. WHY?
I knew it, I read in a previous article where Ubisoft said it is clearly possible to hit 60 FPS on PS4.
Ha. I remember you mentioning that Septic. You don't want to have to pay that chicken back. Trufan, what does it matter if Sony "lies" to you? You don't believe anything they say anyway.
@gamerxd I'm impressed on how you can complain about 1080/60pfs(which is awesome if true) on a game like this?! LOL!
LOL our multi caoount troll MPOG is back, whinging after his ban 8)
They did it with Assassin's Creed IV, so I wouldn't be surprised if they achieved 60fps too.
I will actually complain, as for this kind of game I would rather have better graphics and 30fps than a downgraded graphics and 60fps. At this point I'll be waiting for the official specs for both PS4 and Bone to pass judgement.
The article never said it was a locked 60fps.
60 FPS? Now watch people complaining about the Graphics.
Hmmm .. Killzone SF " mistake " !!
Mistakes.... Let me call out a huge one "Kinects"
There's a MASSIVE difference between 60fps and 30fps.
it's controller lag... 90 ms vs 300 ms
If it's 1080p 60 fps I'm starting to become really interested in getting a ps4. Last gen performance really bothered me on consoles, this gen it looks like having a ps4 will solve that issue for me.
Devs will make a game and the ps4 version will be inherently better...(or should be given the same amount of time) fewer obstacles in their path...it may just be that 2 frame difference the 360 got all last generation or the higher rez/ better Antialiasing it got for most of the gen...but that is enough for me considering I bought a 360 just to play Red Dead Redemption with the best experience possible. Don't worry i filled out my collection with halo, gears, and crackdown. I tend to think though, with 720-1080 being the difference in a few games thus far, that the ps4 and xbox one will have a relatively wider gap. Ps3 never saw this big a resolution difference and it was a much harder platform to work with than either of these. The frame rate in early games on the ps3 was hilariously bad as well. Not happening to ps4 this time around. making a game 720p really should be giving the xbox one more of a frame-rate advantage in those game, but only a few actually do, and not even constantly.
Build a pc if your worried about consistent frame rate. I'm not sure if either of these consoles have a game that hold a solid 60fps. Some go that high, but every one I've seen has some serious dips down into the 30's sometimes. That's noticeable to most people, and if performance bothered you last gen, it just might this gen. The difference being a higher resolution on average so far. The ps4 is a great console, I don't want to knock it too hard. I have a lot of fun on mine. But they are very limited, but that's obvious, being a console and all. I won't sugar coat it like a lot of people will for you. Tell you it's perfect and you should buy one right away. IMO the pc option is the best option, but if you don't want to or know how to build a pc, a PS4 is a great gaming option.
This game will not be native 1080p and a solid 60fps on the PS4. It will be locked 30fps or fluctuating 30-60fps. Unless they gimp it to look like last gen graphics.
60fps is really huge for open world game with so great visuals. instead of buying better gpu, I might even buy PS4.
Won't regret it. Better multiplatformes in pc will take at least one year. You can buy ps4 right now and hide money for next year. This way , you get the ps4 exclusives and next year you will get a noticeable upgrade for multiplatforms in pc. That's wiser in my point of view ^^ .
I would recommend to buy a better graphics card. 2k/4k and 60/120fps with better visuals on Watch Dogs and other games is simply much better experience.
i really hope the fps is around 30-60 and great Graphics so they dont just Think of the PC Graphics. Then im pissed.
I kind of doubt it will be 60fps. But it would amazing if it was. 60fps IS what makes current gen special.
I thought it was already confirmed to be 1080p 30fps..
Yeah. I think I read that somewhere too.
I'd prefer 60fps as top priority on next gen systems. Once you play any game from 30fps to 60fps there's no going back.
I would prefer that as well, then 1080. Even if the added effects like weather and lighting would suffer.
i did play games from 60 to 30fps.. i dont care if 30 is done correctly, its a smooth experience too
lol yet u bash anything related to sony running 30fps..
I don't know if this is true. But if it is that's a great thing. Open World games in 60fps is a great experience, very smooth. That alone would give Watch Dogs a very different feel from other Open World games on consoles.
i agree, but at the same time, if it can do it without sacrifice, why not? it would be nice if they could also do motion blur at 60 fps but i've never seen that on a console.
How come if a game can't do 60fps ppl are so so mad. But when a game does, you complain about it? You sure are a weird one.....
@mpog It clearly says, "no mention on x1's PAGE." Make sure you actually read what your commenting on before making yourself look ignorant.
If it can make it look smooth without big dips I'm all for it
Few things are more infuriating in the modern world than hearing what Gamer XD said. *Counts to 10, Goes for a walk*
Christ people, 111 disagrees?
I don't care if it's at 60 or 30, but it better not have screen tearing. If they're sacrificing Vsync just so they can brag about high Framerate, I'll flip out.
30 fps is waaaayyy too low. 60fps would be a minimum for a game like this. Higher framerates don't just give you smoother gameplay, it also acts as a buffer for high action areas. For instance, if a game is running at 30fps and you enter a huge shootout with hundreds of AI at the same time, your frame rate will start to get very very choppy as it drops below 15fps, while with 60fps if you enter the same scenario, your frames drop to 45fps, you won't see the choppiness that you would with 30fps to begin with.
Few problems with what you're saying. Firstly, it could be easier to keep 30fps steady than 60fps steady. A scenario that might drop 60fps won't necessarily drop 30fps. Another issue is that hopefully watchdogs is vsynced. If it is, then the next drop from 30fps is to 20fps, whereas the next drop from 60fps is all the way down to 30fps. Going from 30 to 20 is less jarring than going from 60 to 30.
Yea, we don't need games to be optimized to run at their full potential, way to keep gaming down. What's next ? we don't need HDTVs ? we should all go back to 24 inch color CRTs ?
THE PS4 IS A SUPERCHARGED PC YOU WILL BOW DOWN TO RESOLUTION AND FPS THAT HAS BEEN STANDARD ON PC 9 YEAR AGO!!!
I completely agree! Upgrade the visuals and don't worry so much about a game running at 60 frames! 30 seconds is just fine, I want crazy graphics man!
Depends on how the combat is implemented. A locked 60fps could be a real blessing if the game is combat-heavy.
doubt it. Supercharged PC my ass.
Trust me 60 Frames makes things feel more fluid. Like running around shooting when lots going on having a stable frame rate really helps.
especially when things explode.... I love explosions
Don't we all.
for sure. i think its a little more important on fps games, and games like this I'm ok at 30 fps especially if they run motion blur because it makes it feel just a little bit less video game-ish.
Yes. Not only does 60fps make the game much more fluid and smooth, it also adds a buffer zone for high action areas.
The director of Watch Dogs said the game was 30 FPS just a few months ago: http://www.destructoid.com/...
yeah i think this is a mistake
It could be a mistake, we will just have to wait and see.
he also said recently that they were still working on optimizing. Not that I don't lean towards a mistake myself, but that statement is outdated.
Wow! That conversation was before the delay! Few months to you is over half a year?
Would you like a more recent update? http://www.gamepur.com/news...
Ya that would have been better to post don't you think? Still...the wording on the sony site is oddly specific. Wonder how it got there. You don't like using outdated sources do you?
yeah then. Then when people complained about graphic downgrade they meaby did higher the Graphics and down was the FPS...
He did not says it was at 30 FPS. He said, "RIGHT NOW the frame rate we're focusing on [is] a steady 30[FPS]." Maybe something changeD or maybe they didn't want backlash from XB1. The Sony/Watch Dogs pre-order site is overtly explicit in it's description of the PS4 version of Watch Dogs: "Experience Watch Dogs in a way that only the PS4 can provide, at 60 Frames Per Second in 1080P." I hope the website is right!
I will be very happy if that's true.But even on the demo you can see is 30fps.
That's because you're watching a video on youtube and youtube's videos don't go beyond 30fps.