Submitted by Rashid Sayed 432d ago | image

Project CARS In-Game PS4 Vs. PC Comparison Shows Hardly Any Difference

Slightly Mad Studios' racer gets the visual comparison treatment - and it looks like everyone will win come this November. (PC, Project CARS, PS4)

« 1 2 »
Lior  +   432d ago
lol i have project cars on PC which is pre alpha currently, I play at max settings at 1440p and i see a difference lol
Muerte2494  +   432d ago
But for everyone else playing on their 1080p TV. Nope no difference.
Letros  +   432d ago
eww 1080p
Muerte2494  +   432d ago
Yeah I'll take a 1080p display with low input lag over UHD TV that's either $3.5k or has extremely high input lag.
Dark_Vendetta  +   432d ago
Don't mean to be sniffy, but there are really cheap 1440p "gaming" monitors available if you consider importing them from South Korea. Got my 27" with almost none input lag for 215€ (although this model is sold at about 230-250€). UHD displays on the other hand, I have no idea. But I would say go with 1440p first as UHD is still too demanding even for good graphic cards. You would have to go with real enthusiast cards to get 30 fps @ ultra @ 4k.

On topic: I don't see a difference, and I don't think there will be a huge one. Can't wait for the game. November is still a long time to wait. (I need my racing fix but I guess I'll have to at least wait until october for DriveClub)
Army_of_Darkness  +   432d ago

Not sure if your being sarcastic..... But if your not, I really feel sorry for you dude cause 1080p is everywhere! so that ugly, grossed out, screw face look must be a natural look on you by now ;-)
M-M  +   432d ago | Well said

Eww PC nerdists.
user5669510  +   432d ago
wasnt people saying that last gen when pc gamers was saying how great 1080p was. are console gamers this dumb ignoring whats out their because your precious console cant hang.

you only make your self look stupid, than hop on the bandwagon when they announce it as a console feature only to struggle to achieve it.
DevilOgreFish  +   432d ago
XHD texture packs and MODs, that is where you'll see the difference. 60 fps too if the consoles don't secure that.
bmx_bandit  +   432d ago
Its 2014 and they still use Bullshots/replay-scenes for comparisons?
Come on….
scott182  +   432d ago
Dang, that looks great! Can't wait to play it.
elhebbo16  +   432d ago
except higher MSAA and anisotropic filtering, and if your rig can handle it a higher framerate. saying theres no difference between the console version and PC is naive and ignorant. there is always going to be a way to make the game look better on PC.

@M-M its 2014 are you really still calling PC gamers nerds because the guy has higher standards than you? really? grow up dude.
#1.1.10 (Edited 432d ago ) | Agree(14) | Disagree(17) | Report
minimur12  +   431d ago
heh, the new adverts that are showing up at the bottom of the link, there was on comparing the graphics of Mass Effect. Some of the comments are funny but relatable:

LOL and people say they dont care about graphics.... N4G sure its bipolar.

Graphics is something but comparing is so 2007.

Also, I wonder if this trend will repeat itself
These comparisons were more relevant when gamemakers were actually trying to highlight the strengths of different systems.

now they aim for parity. which doesn't really suggest anything in terms of superiority.

Muerte2494  +   431d ago
@ Dark_Vendetta

I hope to god you're joking. The fastest monitor out there is the ASUS monitor which has an IPS panel if i'm not mistaken. The lowest input lag recorded for it is 7ms. I have a BenQ MLG edition that is 9ms. I was also referring to TVs. Notice how I said UHD(4k televisions). Its just funny to watch PC gamers talk like console owners don't have PC gaming rigs either.

Why come visit a PS4 article anyway if PC gaming is so superior? Are you guys mad that Slightly Mad Studios got Project Cars looking this good @ a fraction of what your gaming rig cost? Everyone knows unlocked hardware trumps locked-in hardware.
#1.1.12 (Edited 431d ago ) | Agree(8) | Disagree(5) | Report
starchild  +   431d ago
Even then you would see a difference if you are downsampling from 2556 x 1440 or using any kind of decent anti-aliasing. The way aliasing affects overall image quality is seen mostly in motion not in static screenshots.

The other big difference will be the framerate. 60fps has much greater temporal resolution than 30fps and games are almost always in motion so this means that the visuals will be much clearer at 60fps than 30fps. A solid 60fps also reduces latency and provides for better controller response.
blackmagic  +   431d ago
"Why come visit a PS4 article anyway if PC gaming is so superior?"

Ummm... this article specifically compares the PC and PS4.

The PS4/XBOne are releasing at the beginning of the UHD revolution but they are having trouble hitting 1080p @60fps. The PS3/360 released at the begining of the HD revolution but they didn't have any problems outputting greater than SD resolutions and framerates.

UHD Timetable
Gamer1982  +   431d ago
Erm look at the reflections on the side of the car here
http://gamingbolt.com/wp-co... - PS4
http://gamingbolt.com/wp-co... - PC
Much more than just resolution..
Chrischi1988  +   431d ago

You say everyone knows that, we know that for sure, but then there are these articles, which by all means, is not only a PS article, it is a PS4 and PC article, written by some PS4 fanboy journalist, who really tries to make the PS4 better than a PC, even though everyone with common knowledge knows, that this is not possible, only if the Devs decided to "not" use the hardware capabilities of a good gaming PC.

You say, everyone knows that, but acutally all the PS4 fanboys dont and really try to tell themselves, that a PS4 is better from a visual perspective, but it is not, but the PS4 community really tries hard to make it seem that way.

Dont get me wrong here, all console and PCs have their pros and cons, but that PS4 fans actually try to take the visuals away from PC, is hilarious and impossible at the same time.
#1.1.16 (Edited 431d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report
Muerte2494  +   431d ago
@ Gamer1982

Really, you're going to compare a scene where the reflections are based off a vast, cloudy sky to a sunny area near trees. If you seen the new Driveclub trailer you'd know PS4 has no problem handling reflections. Like I said, achieving this on a $400 system. PC elitist claim that consoles are so inferior but these pics suggest otherwise. Now is the part where you start saying "well I can run it @ 2k" or " I'm getting well over 60 fps".
blackmagic  +   431d ago
You want to talk about what is fair?! How about this:

The first comparison features a PS4 shot from yesterday vs a PC shot from February 4, 2012 (2 year, 3 month old build)


The two BAC Mono comparisons contrast 1920x1080 resolution PS4 shots released yesterday to 1600x1000 resolution PC shots posted June 22, 2012 (2 year old build)


I couldn't find the RUF shots but I am sure they are sufficiently ancient. The second RUF shot in particular is a 1920x1080 PS4 shot vs a 701x309 PC shot!!

I'm willing to bet the PC version has come a long way in the last two years!
#1.1.18 (Edited 431d ago ) | Agree(2) | Disagree(0) | Report
UltimateMaster  +   431d ago
The vast majority of TVs display in 1080p.
Very few have 4k or 1440p.
But if you do have that TV, then take advantage of it.
UltimateMaster  +   431d ago
4k TVs currently have very low sub 30fps frame rate.
And to anyone saying "this looks terrible"
No, you're right, this sh*t looks as bad as an old NES game, there's such a HUGE difference.../s Not

It's still the same game. The same amount of detail. The same thing, but with some perks of higher resolution at a frame rate cost (From the TV, not the machine).
#1.1.20 (Edited 431d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report
blackmagic  +   431d ago

When the ps3/360 was released, the vast majority of TVs were SD but half way into the generation 1080p sets were common and now 1080p is expected and the PS4/XBOne can barely hit 60fps let alone higher resolutions. You are looking back in time not forward.

ALL 4k TVs ever manufactured are capable of displaying 30fps, not "sub 30fps" as you allude to. Any TV that displays the UHD logo is required to accept and display 3840x2160 @ 60fps as a minimum. The Toshiba 9300 series is an example of a UHD set that displays 60fps and you can get a 65" set off of Amazon for $2900, which is actually not much more than a similarly featured 1080p set of the same size and significantly less than I paid for my 58" plasma only a couple of years ago.


As far as comparisons go, here is a much fairer comparison using a more up to date PC screenshot. Note that even though the PC shot is only 1600x900 it has less jaggies due to superior AA. Also note that the wheel wells, lights etc actually look round instead of polygons (especially look at the lights). Notice the better shading and shadows on the tires, on the underbody and under the car and how it lets you see subtle shapes and contours on the car (look where it says sparco by the right front tire for example). Notice the carbon fiber on the mirrors and air intake. Notice how the writing is sharp and crisp.

Same types of details here

Now start layering on the resolution and no contest.
#1.1.21 (Edited 431d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report
MazzingerZ  +   431d ago
I really never care how PC( PC should, in the paper, be always superior) or X1 version performs, the only thing I always care is that my main gaming platform is used right an delivers a experience according to my expectations, I never invest in something to get something else, do I get a Wii U then I don't expect less of what I know it can deliver, on the other side I'm not happy with less.
#1.1.22 (Edited 431d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report
gameDevWannaBe  +   431d ago
People tend to worry to much about visuals...

If drive club devs can only hit 30fps you better bet your ass there is a difference between the pc vs and ps4 version. Frame rate is a big thing and this new gen consoles keep failing at this 60fps thing.. Tell me I am lying lol

ps4 is a super tablet pc. IS a beast when you cut the frame rate in half.
#1.1.23 (Edited 431d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report
AgentSmithPS4  +   431d ago
This is what happens when there aren't enough good new games to play, instead of fighting digital enemies the humans turn on themselves.
AnteCash  +   432d ago
Lol no you dont Liar..i mean Lior....
JP1369  +   432d ago
Learn how to construct a proper sentence before you brag.
Father__Merrin  +   432d ago
ha ha project cars will look ace on ps4 also, driveclub will also look ace ha ha
WeAreLegion  +   432d ago
I have a 1080p monitor and a 1440p monitor. The resolution is important, but what really matters is overall quality of the monitor/TV. The 1080p looks better because it's a top of the line Samsung. The 1440p is a cheap HP.
ATi_Elite  +   432d ago
I currently play Project Cars PC build 680 on a 4k Sony TV

Blows all those pictures right off the track.

These PS4 vs. PC version comparisons are STUPID! WHY?

Majority of the time they gimp the PC version to match the specs of the PS4.

also Once the Gold version is release ProjectCars PC will quickly get a High Texture pak and a Graphics mod that will take things to the next level.

So if you wanna compare PS4 vs. PC, tell me the SPECS and SETTINGS of the PC version.
thereapersson  +   432d ago
Wake me up when 4k actually grabs more than .005 of the market and developers actually make games with 4k optimized textures and other assets. Otherwise you're simply upscaling something that isn't native 4k. Might look sharper but that's all 4k offers, and in most cases you only have a refresh overhead of 30hz.
kung-fu-grip  +   431d ago
#1.6.2 (Edited 431d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(4) | Report
Chrischi1988  +   431d ago
Funny, that you say resolution doesnt matter, but then all the other PS4 fans bash the Xbox One, for a game having only 900p resolution, but not 1080p like on PS4. Double standart pretty much?
Tsar4ever  +   432d ago
Damn, right. Im not interested in screen shots, they could be rendered, dressed up. I wanna see gameplay, but I don't need to, I already know Pc will be superior, but I'm just intrested on HOW close or how far its visuals when compared to the PC alfa.
johndoe11211  +   432d ago
Your name suits your comment.
kayoss  +   431d ago
"liar" there I fixed your name.
Meatyboy  +   431d ago
You sound like a cunt. I bet you're fun to be with at parties
#1.10 (Edited 431d ago ) | Agree(4) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
Chrischi1988  +   431d ago
This article is BS, but I do not wonder to read something like this on here. Everyone with common sense and not hype thinking, knows, that this cannot be, only if the Devs themselves decided to do so.
HammerKong  +   431d ago
mna,pc virsion is ahead,there is no doubt but ps4 version looks amazing also,but fanboys are saying there is no difference,they must got their eyes checked.
thezeldadoth  +   432d ago
here we go again. tell us about how your 400 dollar machine matches a 3000 dollar pc and all that.

then continue on to say how 4k resolution and 1440p are pointless right now

and to end it in fashion, lets hear about how much better driveclub will be anyways
#2 (Edited 432d ago ) | Agree(21) | Disagree(51) | Report | Reply
Applejack  +   432d ago
A $3000 pc will always preform better than a $400 console. Both 2160p and 1440p resolutions will always be better than 1080p. Saying one game is better than the other is pointless since it's all just opinion. Is that what you wanted to hear? Well there you go, so quit with your constant whining.
GameDev1  +   432d ago

Correction, smooth stable framerate of 30fps with gorgeous graphics

Am not sure if the frame rate of Project cars will be jumpy
gameDevWannaBe  +   431d ago
A $800 pc > a $400 console to! lol

Every console will play this at 30fps.
You asked for it...

apart from resolution (which only matters to pc gamers because you have to sit so close to your monitors and can see all the jaggies) a 400 dollar machine was able run the same game as your 3000 dollar machine.

And yes Driveclub will be better. Why? Because it appeals to a broader fanbase, It's friggin free. The graphics are on par, the vistas are better, and so far Driveclub has an actual theme to it other than "look how pretty i am". How was that?

In all honesty both games will be great....
TXIDarkAvenger  +   432d ago
Except Driveclub isn't a racing simulator and Project CARS has PROVED that it is a racing simulator. Obviously you never played Project CARS to say its just pretty visuals.

"And yes Driveclub will be better. Why? Because it appeals to a broader fanbase, It's friggin free."

So you think Driveclub will be better than Project CARS because its free? LOL...
zeuanimals  +   432d ago
Moved the goalposts I see. I'm a big PS guy, just look at my post history, but "resolution only matters to PC gamers"? Really? Didn't PS fanboys and PS fans in general all go crazy about resolution? Don't lie to yourself man, you know you care about resolution.

PC will always win with power, but PC will also always have issues that consoles don't go through, the biggest one being price for parts.
RATEDAFORADULT   432d ago | Spam
Sorry guys. I was just giving the guy what he asked for.

Project cars will be fantastic I'm sure.

Yeah I care about resolution. What I meant by that comment was super high resolutions like 1440p only has significance to pc gamers because of how close they are to the screen.


It being a simulator is why it won't appeal to more gamers than Driveclub. No I haven't played project cars but I have seen gameplay of it. And yest cost does affect how people perceive the quality of a product.
elhebbo16  +   432d ago
Its not free, since when paying yearly for a SERVICE is considered free? free is free.
imt558  +   431d ago

Except drive club runs at a shity 30fps..

Driveclub looks waaaay better than this. PCARS isn't confirmed that will be 60fps on PS4. Devs said they only targeting 60 fps.
chinlu  +   431d ago
"Driveclub will be better because it appeals to a broader fanbase"

Whoops, quit reading right there lol.
user5669510  +   432d ago
you should know by now most of the people saying something are the ps fanboys. when ever the see they are loosing an arguement they go in denial mode. we start to see every excuse in the book.

But for everyone else playing on their 1080p TV. Nope no difference. "

but let a xbone gamer say "But for everyone else playing on their 720p TV. Nope no difference." or" the famous its getting converted to 1080p from 920 so its no big difference", it would be the death of them.

ps fanboys do a lot of back tracking. on every article they seem to lie, contradict themselves, and make up bs excuses.

and now suddenly, if you cant afford or have a highend rig, that mean the technology doesn't exist. and pc actually does the gfx at a better Fidelity so screen shots dont capture how it looks in games.
nosferatuzodd  +   432d ago
Dude I can tell youre a xbox fanboy disguising has a pc fan, stop it dude whos more delusional than Xbox fanboys
Who do more back pedal ps or ms you guys makes me really laugh
#2.3.1 (Edited 432d ago ) | Agree(3) | Disagree(13) | Report
Azfargh  +   431d ago
So, lets change the point:
Anything higher than 1080p WITHOUT DISASTROUS IMAGE DELAY RESPONSE must be a pc monitor of at least 27 inches and requires a table for it and you must sit close.

If we take the already refined FullHD technology with a very low rate of image delay, the game will work on most of the televisions and projectors... which means bigger screen and playing on the couch.

I want my couch, my gamepad, my 55TV/100Projector and a very acceptable visual quality for an afordable price. You pc guys, stay on your desks.
dcj0524  +   431d ago
Forget that! 4K Sony TV, PC and Driving wheel please.
Azfargh  +   431d ago
People are weird... most of then work on pc and desks... after a tough day, I rather lie down on a couch and relax while playing until sleep or wait for something better to happen...

...and these pc nuts, rather sit more in front of a desk and press their eyes against a 27 inch screen just to feel some extra visual satisfaction. Learn that, boys and girls: games are for free-time fun and relaxation... if you are willing to spend more time unconfortable at your own home just to play games, it is a sign of addiction. And this is coming from an ex-game-addicted... and also an pc/console gamer.
#2.4.2 (Edited 431d ago ) | Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report
kung-fu-grip  +   430d ago
-"and these pc nuts, rather sit more in front of a desk and press their eyes against a 27 inch screen just to feel some extra visual satisfaction."

-"And this is coming from an ex-game-addicted... and also an pc/console gamer."

So that how you play on your rig, Mr "pc/console gamer"?

If so Maybe you're doing it wrong. lol

Believe it or not but many PC gamers actually set their rigs to their HDTVs or projectors and play from their sofas, or in my case from my lazy boy chair. You could try that...Just a thought.
#2.4.3 (Edited 430d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report
Azfargh  +   428d ago
Yep... because for me, nowdays pc are for RTS and some multiplayer FPS... MOUSE AND KEYBOARD are a must.
I can play on a gamepad sit or lay on my bed/couch. Mouse and keyboard are precise because it relays on a adequate position.

If you didn´t thought on that part of my argument, you must be quite young. Mouse+Keyboard rules... on a desk.

Not only that, what is the advantage of having a gargantuan gfx card-cpu combo enabling maxed out settings and 4k res on a fullHD projector/Tv? Is an overkill. Besides, too expensive to buy and pay for the electric bill, so the future-proof thing does not make a reasonable cost-benefit for a monstrous hardware if you actually pay your own bills and care for your money.
#2.4.4 (Edited 428d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report
Gore-Content  +   432d ago
And again, no words on the x1 version, lol!
JoGam  +   432d ago
Is it coming out for X1?

Edit: Why didn't they add Xbox One in the game description is beyond me.
#3.1 (Edited 432d ago ) | Agree(7) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
imt558  +   432d ago
Corpser  +   432d ago
If they look the same pc is just getting a ps4 port that's not using the power of more powerful pc's.
AnteCash  +   432d ago
PC elite around the world
RATEDAFORADULT   432d ago | Spam
minimur12  +   431d ago
Funny, listening to the radio and 'around the world' by daft punk is playing 0.o
EXVirtual  +   432d ago
Oh, here we go again.
You really can't suggest that a weak PC could run a game like this while maintaining the same quality. And did you ever figure that maybe, just maybe it'd be too expensive to create games on the highest levels that PCs can reach? Probably that you don't even have?
Qrphe  +   432d ago
"If they look the same pc is just getting a ps4 port that's not using the power of more powerful pc's"

Reread this to yourself 5 times before you go to bed, and in the morning try to decide on how you could've made it sound better.
porkChop  +   432d ago
The game was built for PC from the start, so no. They've just clearly taken advantage of the immense optimization that's possible on consoles and not possible on PCs. Regardless, the game looks great on both platforms. I'll be playing this with my Driving Force GT when it finally comes out.
#4.4 (Edited 432d ago ) | Agree(5) | Disagree(2) | Report | Reply
GDDR6_2014  +   432d ago
Imagine if they said xb1 and ps4 versions hardly show any difference , everyone wins! Lol
minimur12  +   431d ago
I think the esRAM is the 'cell' of this generation, its like a hidden power that not many devs truely know how to take advantage of yet, and won't until a few years maybe. And when they finally do, all the idiot will say 'ermahgerd optimise for ps4 stupid developers'
maelstromb  +   431d ago
Forget arguing about resolutions and fps, there is one word that sets the two apart by a long shot: Modding. Something that still cannot yet be achieved on the PS4 or Xbone - so there's a HUGE difference between the two, as it stands right now. And that one aspect is reason enough to own a PC version of any almost any game, if you have the rig and capability to run said game(s).
#4.6 (Edited 431d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report | Reply
PrinceOfAllSaiyans  +   432d ago
Lmao PC fanboys are quick to defend themselves. When none of them really have that 14400p and 100fps shit they be talking about.
porkChop  +   432d ago
The vast majority of us PC gamers play on displays with resolutions at or below 1920x1200. Yet here on N4G every PC gamer seems to have the latest 4K monitors and talk about gaming at 120fps as if they actually have the hardware to run modern games that fast at that resolution. It's all BS. Clearly they're feeling insecure about what their actual rigs are capable of.

I might not have the fastest rig (560 Ti, i5 2500k @ 5GHz, 8GB DDR3) but I have no problem saying that I game in 1080p and no I cannot max recent games. Not a big deal.
Qrphe  +   431d ago
It's like back when Crysis came out and everyone claimed to be maxing it out at 1080p60fps in 2007. Goalposts always change.
Stapleface  +   432d ago
You don't think that's because the people who keep up on gaming news are pretty serious gamers? Meaning (if they build their own pc) that they likely do have some pretty high end hardware. 1080p usually shoots over 100fps on Ultra on most games, there are very few I can't get over 100fps with everything maxed out. Now 1440p, I doubt it, I would need a second 780ti. But just because you, and the other guy who replied don't have the hardware, doesn't mean other people don't. You saying stuff like that just makes you sound like a moron.
Qrphe  +   431d ago
Not everyone builds their PCs. Most of the people buy pre-built systems or just play low-end, popular games on their laptops. You don't need a gaming rig to play Dota, Minecraft or LoL.
minimur12  +   431d ago
I wish o had a 14,400p screen 0.o
EXVirtual  +   432d ago
Here we go.
Before you guys make assumptions, no. No ones saying that the PS4 is on par with a 3000 dollar PC, which some of you claim to have/mention for the sake of it. That'd be insane. Sony and MS would be losing some serious money if they were trying to produce machines that powerful while keeping the current prices. And we all know how that $600 fiasco turned out.
It's just a good thing to see on a console so early in it's life cycle.
#6 (Edited 432d ago ) | Agree(6) | Disagree(4) | Report | Reply
Kennytaur  +   432d ago
"a deeper chrome red in the PC version and a patterned design for the PS4 version"

That "patterned design" is called fiberglass...
porkChop  +   432d ago
You mean carbon fiber :P
Kennytaur  +   432d ago
Yes, I do. Wow, that's a brainfart.
gamingisnotacrime  +   432d ago
Its obvious that a high end pc will look better. This just shows how mch bang for the buck we get from ps4, a $399 ready to go box. PC gaming is not for everyone (not for me anyway), console gaming is easier to access and no need to upgrade any card
Shabutie13  +   431d ago
You can build a PC of equivalent performance for roughly $500-600 dollars. Yes, that is more expensive, but you also get far more capability with a PC than a PS4. Everyday computing to artistic design and business applications. While the PS4 is fine for what it is, I really suggest you not use the "upgrade my card" argument. It doesn't actually hold any water. If the console is a standard set of components, why can't your PC stay a standard set of components through the same time frame of the console? The reason we upgrade is that in 1-2 years time PC games will be very far ahead of consoles and we want to see them in all their glory. Needing to buy a card to keep up with a console that has no upgrades just doesn't make sense.
d3nworth1  +   431d ago
I don't think he/she used their console to come to this site so odds are they probably already have a PC. Console are designed for entertainment purposes. Play games, listen to music and watch movies. They don't need to do everyday computing artistic and business applications have no purpose on something made for entertainment. Just because someone doesn't game on PC doesn't mean they don't have one. You can have your PC for everyday computing and your console for gaming.
BLow  +   432d ago
Why can't we all just get along. Yes, if you have a nice PC with all the bells and whistles then it will look better than the PS4 version. We get it. But we have been seeing screenshots of this game FOR YEARS. Now, we have seen some PS4 screenshots. If you were to tell me those were PC shots I would have believed it. I don't understand why some of you PC gamers have to get so defensive all the time. If your version of the game will look better then so be it. I game on a 60in 1080p TV and I'm fine with these visuals. More than fine actually.

How hard is it to say that the PS4 version looks stunning as well? Would it hurt your feelings or make your experience any less enjoyable. You guys play your version and console players will play theirs. Simple as that. We get the point so can we finally move on now!
#9 (Edited 432d ago ) | Agree(10) | Disagree(4) | Report | Reply
GDDR6_2014  +   432d ago
Do you want ps4 games to look just like xb1 or heck wii u games? Why wouldn't you want developers to use the power of more powerful platforms?
BLow  +   432d ago
Wow, you completely missed the point of what I wrote. I have no clue of what your talking about said because no where in my comment did I mention that developers shouldn't take advantage of each platform. Thanks for the reply though. O_o
#9.1.1 (Edited 432d ago ) | Agree(2) | Disagree(1) | Report
D3ATH_DRIV3R_777  +   432d ago
Well said man! you earned a bubble.
d3nworth1  +   431d ago
Dlacy13g  +   432d ago
I want to see a comparison with the WiiU version in the mix.
ironmonkey  +   432d ago
Pc children will cry if its not better than ps4. You better get your mods ready.
Tundra  +   432d ago
You probably won't see a major graphical difference in games regarding PS4/PC for quite some time. It'll mostly come down to performance and resolution and maybe some missing effects that aren't all too important. We're still in DX11 and despite what people say, PS4s graphics card isn't actually all that old nor is it weak.
kevnb  +   432d ago
7850 is still a great midrange card.
starchild  +   431d ago
I like my PS4 for exclusives like Infamous Second Son, but being completely honest I am already seeing pretty big differences between multiplats on my PC and PS4. Thief, AC4 and Battlefield 4 all look and run noticeably better on PC than on PS4.

Still, the PS4 does give some nice performance for the price.
ocelot07  +   432d ago
Waits for all PC snobs to come in and compain about how the devs are lazy and crap.
AceBlazer13  +   432d ago
Meh i never really expect PlayStation to win against Pc but it's nice to see how close it can come.
aliengmr  +   432d ago
Good for the PS4 gamers. There really isn't any reason they shouldn't look the same. That is why they chose to make it for the PS4 and XOne instead of the PS3 and 360.
F4sterTh4nFTL  +   432d ago
Let the damn game get completed first before making comparisons.
Stapleface  +   432d ago
I do wish they would use some detail in their use of the term "PC". What kind of pc are we talking about? Something running a 3 year old i5 and a 580? Or are they comparing to something similar in price to the consoles? What is in that pc? What settings are being used in the photo of the pc version? Was everything turned up? The ps4 version is maxed out so the pc version should be maxed out, that's for sure. As well as having hardware from at least the same production year. They both look great though. I'll likely rent it for the ps4, as I don't ever buy racing games.
Hk85karlsson  +   432d ago
Isn´t amazing how many people there are who claims they have a superduper gaming rig? When steam shows numbers around 5%...
Most of you have a gaming rig equvivalent to a 4-500$ PC.
kevnb  +   432d ago
That's all people need
Qrphe  +   431d ago
Exactly this. What's worse is that Steam surveys shows only a third of its users own 1080p monitors with another third being freaking WXGA.
starchild  +   431d ago
I have a GTX 770 and I've never done a Steam survey. I wouldn't put too much stock in that survey. Steam doesn't encompass all of PC gaming anyway.
Qrphe  +   431d ago
They're statistically accurate. It makes sense most Steam users are using laptops if you go by the survey's results month after month.
kevnb  +   432d ago
Looks good on both, car games can't really get that much better looking anymore.
iareber95  +   432d ago
Indeed it does look amazing on both. I don't see why people need to brag about PC's and talk shit about PS4. Obviously on a PC that cost 3 times more than a PS4 with a 4K monitor it's going to look better. Some of us gamers can't afford those luxuries and buying a PS4 was hard enough. The games the game. We should all just appreciate it for that, not say which system is better. Seems like you're one of the few who understand that.
elhebbo16  +   432d ago
This could mean one of two things, they optimized the game so good that it looks great on a PS4 (this in terms will also benefit 6-8 core PC's if the coding translates well) or two, they optimized the game poorly for PC and put more attention to the PS4 version. hopefully its the former.
mysteryraz11  +   432d ago
im more interested in driveclub truthfully
kingPoS  +   432d ago
Until 4K becomes as ubiquitous and as affordable as 1080p, open comparisons between the two resolutions will remain skewed.

Remember VHS vs DVD in 2000, TV's capable of displaying 480p cost a mint back then. All 4K needs is for something to drive it down to a competitive price. PC's can't do it alone, Having a gamut of UHD movie & TV show content would help, but where is it? It needs to be easily consumable like Bluray.

As galling as it is to those with high end PC's, 1080p is the perfect middle ground for movie studios, just as 16:9 over 16:10 was for them. Go ahead! tell me what you're screen's ratio is, I bet it's 16:9, unless of course it's
2560x1600. Black bars anyone?

Gateway MT6706 2008
#22 (Edited 432d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(1) | Report | Reply
sourav93  +   432d ago
This is awesome. So it doesn't matter which platform you get it on, it'll look amazing nonetheless. The only question now is the framerate for the PS4 version. Since it's a driving simulator, I'm hoping it'll be running at 60fps.
aliengmr  +   431d ago
Well if it supports Morpheus it will have to run at a high/stable frame rate. 30fps won't cut it for VR.
eraisu  +   431d ago
but i though this game "would" be PC exclusive lol
fredy  +   431d ago
What is holding the PC back, unleash the powah
LightDiego  +   431d ago
The pc beggars will be so pissed about that article, lol.
WickedLester  +   431d ago
Question to those who've been playing the beta/alpha whatever it is on PC. Does the game have options for driving assists like what GT and Forza has for guys like me who aren't complete gearheads?
mysteryraz11  +   431d ago
Noonr has high end pcs, alot pc gamers lie about there rigs, most ppl have low end pcs that are weaker then the wii u, they thumb you down if you tell the truth cause they cant handle it.
#28 (Edited 431d ago ) | Agree(0) | Disagree(2) | Report | Reply
kingduqc  +   431d ago
people seem to forget that in 5-7 years they'll have 4k monitors and when they come back playing their older games there will be a ton of nice mods, 4k res and better choice of peripheral.
Si-Fly  +   431d ago
Like Driveclub, pCARS on PS4 will be 30fps, I'd bet my house on it.
dja1nhb  +   431d ago
and 60 fps on xbox one lol the only console so far with a 60fps racing game
« 1 2 »

Add comment

You need to be registered to add comments. Register here or login
New stories

Capcom Details San Diego Comic-Con 2015 Activities

28m ago - Capcom outlines what's in store for fans at SDCC 2015. | PC

Shantae: Risky’s Revenge: Director’s Cut PS4 Review | Hardcore Gamer

1h ago - Shantae: Risky's Revenge: Director's Cut could have used some help with its map system, but liter... | PS4

At a Glance: Psyonix

Now - Psyonix is an independent developer that has also worked closely with some of the biggest publishers and developers on a wide array of titles. Toda... | Promoted post

The Long List Of Names Xseed Rejected For Earth Defense Force 2

1h ago - “Earth Defense Force 2: Too Big to Fail,” “Earth Defense Force 2: Defense on Titan,” and a bunch... | PS Vita

Dr. Mario: Miracle Cure Review - Gaming Nexus

1h ago - From the review: "Dr. Mario: Miracle Cure doesn’t offer too many improvements outside of the Mira... | 3DS

Hands-on Preview: Afro Samurai 2 | Entertainment Buddha

1h ago - EB:The fact that RZA will be providing music for Afro Samurai 2: Revenge of Kuma is going to make... | PC